Good video presentation! I've been an A & P mech. for 51 years & frequently work on / Annual Cirrus Acft. I was impressed how you managed the engine, wish everyone would do it as you did in video. Our shop has pulled cylinders @ 300 hrs. TT due to improper leaning. One Cirrus SR22T (1100 TT ) had been topped twice before we worked on it (excessive oil consumption) so we pulled all cyls. again for third time & sent to well respected engine O/H shop we deal with. They informed us the cyls. were finished & to order 6 new TCM Cyls. & pull the connecting rods for inspection. 2 of the six rods flunked magnaflux & when we pulled the rods the upper bearing (toward piston) looked like it suffered a shotgun blast. Makes me wonder what else in the engine might be wounded & might fail or not make TBO. I've gone out to run-up SR 22's for Annual & found 3 to 31/2 qts. on the dipstick. Once again, nice video & a pleasure to one flown competently!
Thank you - that really means something coming from you and your experience. I see a lot of abusive ops on the 6 cylinder engines - makes me cringe! Thanks for watching!
Competently? 418 CHT is not the way to fly a Cirrus unless you want to replace cylinders early. Did you spend any time at all going through the engine management course from Cirrus? And your TITs, holy cow!!
I envy, I envy, I envy! First, you’re spending your time on something amazing. Second, you’re on the perfect plane. And third, you’re creating incredible content. Triple thumbs up!
A few things (speaking as a five year SR22T owner). The M350 is substantially more expensive (about 20%)...so the similar performance numbers don't really matter. I never run my Cirrus over 75% power (180kt true in still air), above is just not needed (waste of fuel and engine), esp at cruise and that will keep the engine cooler and lasting longer. I often fly at 15 to 17k with a canulla and so do other owner friends that also own the plane. Fuel burn is a little better and the oxygen is cheaper than fuel. Never lean in climb, or descent. The best way to lean the SR22T is not to use the carat or MP. Instead use TIT temps. Keep them just under 1600 and you will see CHTs stay below 380f and the fuel burn will be under 17gph. The engine likes to be a little leaner than the carat gives you.
This was a great demo flight. I love the SR22T. It was nice to see a video with no background music, and just the sights and sounds of the aircraft with your explanations and comments. Very nicely done. New subscriber!
Very pretty Cirrus you were flying here! It's remarkable how far the SR series have come in twenty years. As you mentioned, they are one of the most refined general aviation aircraft in this class. I've flown many of the legacy production planes but Cirrus is a step above. By the way, love the video. Most enjoyable to watch!
Hi Rich! Thanks for letting me park the Cirrus SR22T-G5 at your hangar in Long Beach on Saturday, while we went in search of a nearby Cessna Citation Mustang.
Almost bought a cirrus but then I flew the Cessna TTX. Bought one of those instead. Want to take it for a flight? Love to get your feedback on flight recording.
Running 82% power, TIT 1710 ROP and CHT at 418 - typical SR22 Turbo numbers. And it's typical for SR22 owners to replace all cylinders at least once before TBO. My Cessna Turbo 182T will do 150 knots at 11,500 burning 14 gallons/hr. My CHT's cruise at 370 and the TIT is about 1585 and all my cylinders WILL make it to TBO. I don't understand why Cirrus drivers push their engines so hard. Great demo video as usual, I appreciate the work it takes to produce such quality.
You are a laugh. My SR22T at 75% power flew at 180kts cruise, CHTs never above 360f. And after six years the cylinder compression and turbos are still at the same level as the day I flew the plane out of the factory. There is nothing typical about anyone replacing cylinders in a Continental before TBO. Have fun in your clunky chunk of Cessna junk.
This is totally perfect way for joyriding especially if you didn’t feel safe riding a motorcycle. This plane has the feel of a motorcycle except much safer!😎💖💖🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸✝️
I love this plane... I wished cirrus would make a 6 seater !!! I fly the 172 or the archer and with my wife parents and mine getting older I have had to look for the Cherokee 6 for more room..... thanks for sharing
Thanks for this overview of such an enjoyable single engine aircraft well equiped, and this interesting video full of useful details !! As always a very professional presentation !!
love the vid. . I really appreciate the way how GA aircrafts have evolved. The SR22 is like "on the top of all" those kind of aircraft. Really enjoyed it.
@@FlyingwithRich Cirrus puts the same focus on all their product lines. The SF50 was a decade or more in development all while evolving the SR line. The SR20 is their trainer and it just got the most radical upgrades of all of them.
Rick, you mentioned a Columbia…what is your thoughts with a TTx? May I ask why the parachute? Certification? Even if they sell better. The TTx ..is it a safer flying airplane? Your thoughts.
Almost all of the airplanes I fly (all of the higher performance aircraft) I do formal training on. I also fly a lot of different aircraft as part of business and normal operations. Weather is always a big consideration for me. Knowing history/maintenance history on the aircraft, focus on the fundamentals. I have been fortunate to fly a lot of different aircraft over my career - but I guard against complacency/over confidence based on experience. Thanks for watching!
flew one of these, comfortable aircraft, just dont like the side yoke, especially when compared to the superior feeling sidestick of the cessna 240ttx.
You can’t go wrong either way - both great airplanes. SR22 probably will satisfy more missions over time. Insurance higher/other costs higher on the SR22. Thanks for watching.
I agree with Rich and I fly a 182, I know several folks that got their PPL in a SR 22. If that’s what you want to end up with, might as well start with it….
You should fly what you want to fly. I bought a new plane before I had a single lesson. A light sport.. Then after getting certified, I bought a NEW SR22T with ony 100 hours in the log book. Now I have 1000 hours and am looking forward to my next aircraft.
@@Matt.Jernigan Yes. My next and last plane will be a turbo-prop. I am seriously looking at a Prat PT6B-9 equipped LX7 right now. Making a decision soon.
It really is a nice airplane. I’ve always been a fan of the company. I became a CSIP a couple of years back and was very impressed with the training program/people/company. Looking forward to your upcoming video!
Tough call. I think for me really depends on what your plan is. If you are buying a later model airplane and plan to transition to something in the future, probably a turbo. If you are buying your last airplane and flying around FL, NA.
I noticed you used flaps on TO, and the front of the wing seems to have 2 shapes, I assume the outside is to give better aileron authority, Does the leading edge extend/retract, or is it fixed? I never got very close to one. 8) thanks --gary
People and businesses have been leaving California in droves mostly because of incredibly high taxes and excessive regulation, but your business seems to be doing just fine. Is your segment within the industry insulated against these things or have you considered leaving too?...
You better be glad not staying in Germany Europe, here taxes are well done by the government. You mostly work for them taking your money. 42% to 55% is normal plus plus plus plus…
@@FlyingwithRich you have your great business there, good clients, good Reputation. This is a good place to run this business. The tax is unfriendly in CA. Ok, but not really that high, compared to Germany in Europe, what we have to deal with here! We would be so happy with the CA tax rules.
Aviation is my new hobby and I'm pretty much a complete novice. If I were to buy a plane to learn to fly in would a SR22 be a good plane for that? Or should I get something like a Cessna 172? I'm planning on keeping the learning plane to fly occasionally to keep my skills sharp. Ultimately I'll be buying a single pilot jet like a CJ3 or a Phenom 300. Any advice is welcome.
It's a good airplane for training - insurance costs will be higher for training since it is a high performance airplane vs a 172. Can't go wrong either way, but the higher performance airplane, will cost more for training.
@@rogerbee697 hey! i am going to get me a f16 after i get my learners permit--been playing video games since i was 6 and now 15 so i can fly it i am sure like the dude who gamed the horizon air plane--i am ready
With all due respect, people that, like, and have SR's. I personally don't think, its worth the investment. I believe, it is a more of a status symbol, and trendy if anything. That's just my own personal, humble opinion. That being said, If you're going invest that kind of a money, in a plane, I believe, you get more bang for your buck with a Beech A36 turbonormalized. A G1000 NXI suite. A truely a 6 seat aircraft. With an useful load of around 1200 lbs, if not more, and travel in comfort. Cruise speed in mid teens, around 220 mph. Wish al a happy, and safe flying.
Good point - thanks. We will do a review on DA 42 soon. Would love to do the 50 and 62 as well. Diamond seems to be doing really well in the market now - thanks for watching!
Except for the "snitch" system on it. wait for an accident where somebody gets seriously hurt or killed, they'll subpoena all that aircraft data. Other than that it's a great aircraft.
@@FlyingwithRich yeah not saying I even have the resources like that just pointing out comparing new prices you could have a large number of high performance machines for the cost of one 300 horsepower one
@JM-bu7cf It’s unfortunate aircraft engines have had little development/technology and costs are so high. I figure a base Toyota Camry engine has about 200 HP (the entire new car likely costs less than a new 200 HP Lycoming engine). I also figure you could put a derivative of a Camry engine in an airplane and the engine would do quite well from a safety/reliability perspective as-is, but to do it per the FAA it would make the engine cost 10X what it does for a car. I believe Toyota certified an aircraft engine some time ago, but never did anything with it. I think people forget that the masses of people don’t want to fly airplanes so that limits the demand by huge numbers. Many people who might want to fly are turned off by what it takes to get a license and then to be able to use it efficiently is also expensive. The end result is very low demand for aircraft, and prices go up as demand decreases - the cycle repeats itself to where we are today. I don’t like it, but it’s reality. I don’t blame aircraft manufacturers for high costs of airplanes. I believe the market sets the price, and OEM’s have to figure out how to be profitable within the demand structure. Cessna tried to build a really low cost Skyhawks when people complained about the high costs of Skyhawks. Reality was - no one bought them. Turns out Skyhawks buyers wanted the fully loaded, expensive version. I’m not trying to give any kind of lecture - just my opinion, and maybe I’m a little defensive for general aviation, and testy from all the criticisms of airplanes costing so much, low technology, and comparing with cars! Thanks for your comments, and watching the videos!
Good point - GA engines could use some technology upgrades. The Diamond Twinstar Austro diesel engines are good example of some good tech on GA engine. I am impressed with those engines.
@@FlyingwithRich I look forward to your future videos flying the DA50 and 62. That said it would be great if you could get your hands on a DA40 with the Diesel.
The SR22 line is without competition...the sales numbers prove it. The FADEC, autothrottle are in the SF50 jet. They will NEVER be in the SR22 line...no need for them.
Cirrus's pressurized aircraft is the SF50 jet. The piston singles will NEVER be pressurized. They were designed from scratch to be what they are...the best piston single with oxygen available via built-in reservoir tanks and a mask or cannula..
@@Matt.Jernigan No one feels safer with a parachute. The chute is there as a safety device no different than ADS-B, TCAS, redundant electrical systems and crew alerts are safety devices.
Sorry, I can't agree with the statement at the end of this video that the SR22 is a safe plane. The SR22 has had a disturbing number of fatal accidents in the pattern due to stalls of all sorts. In 2011 Aviation Consumer Magazine reported the SR22 fatality rate per 100k hours as 1.6, compared to competitor Cessna 182 at 0.69. In response Cirrus has stressed training and use of the parachute to bring the fatality number down. But pattern crashes continue. Compared to a stable flying airplane like C182 the SR22 has sacrificed too much stability for speed. I'll pass for safety reasons alone. But also I don't like the glass cockpit. I want to fly an airplane, not program its computers.
Good points - everyone has their own assessment of value. I’ve got some good time in Cirrus aircraft and my opinion is that they are safe, certainly higher performance which has some negatives, but seems they appeal the largest light GA market.
Aircraft engines do not have the same technology as car engines largely due to requirement of FAA certification which gets expensive - still no electronic, ignition, electronic fuel injection or control - basically manual controls required due to very basic systems.
@@FlyingwithRich I understand that however I was told that Turbo aircraft engines use turbo positive pressure to compensate for thin atmosphere at higher altitudes.
Cirrus has consistently improved on their aircraft to make it the best in single engine piston planes, but it has come at a cost to GA. The plane you flew is now over $1Million, you can buy a used jet for that price. It had become a toy for the rich only now, average guy cannot afford the used 22T ‘s now. The TTx is a really great plane to buy now, if you can find one. It has the G2000 and it is fast.
I'm sure this is a very nice airplane. BUT! My question is; how long can we realistically expect a "Plastic" airframe to last? Just the UV rays from the Sun will likely make it UNSAFE TO FLY, in from 7 to 15 years ! If it's kept hanged and well protected, will it be SAFE to fly in 20 years? Or 30 years? I recently flew as a passenger on a DC-3 built in the late 30's. BUT, if that old plane had been made out of plastic instead of metal? I'd have never got aboard!
If only they could invent something that you could completely cover the aircraft in to protect it from UV rays. Something liquid which could be sprayed all over the plane and allowed to dry. If it came in different colors that would be even better.
Main thing not mentioned: Cirrus is Chinese-owned. I would never ever be a part of helping the chinese beat western companies in the aviation industry. Products from chinese companies are completely out of the question for me.
Respect your opinion but avoiding anything Chinese made is impossible. You wrote this on a computer or a phone thats probably 95% Chinese made. You should just accept the fact that every microchip comes from China. Also the ones in your Avionics. Would you also avoid Diamond, Embraer, Tecnam, Dassault etc. or are those "western" enough? I think the key would be to build something better and let the free market decide. I don't like Cirrus because I just don't like the way it handles and looks.
@@petsmith7772 Always, every single time someone writes that same illogical, nonsensical response. You don't even understand the distinction between chinese-made and chinese company. Nor do you understand the difference between a market where there is no choice but to buy chinese-made and a market where you have plenty of choice. Crazy that nowadays every single time people step up to defend things like this.
If you only knew how much shit you use on a daily basis that was NOT made, either entirely or partially, by western companies... you’d live under a rock. Step out of the 1940s and into the 2020s.
@@rogerbee697 Do you have a point you're trying to make? Interesting too how your name seems to be fake and your account was just recently made. I would very much be surprised if you are not a company hired by China or Cessna to shill for them here. Most planes in the world are not Chinese, so it's easy for me to fly around daily without any Chinese airplanes. Especially ones that are not Chines bought but everything about them invented, developed, all of it financed in the west.
