I'm with the prior person, very well played and I would be shocked if you are only rated at 3.0s and 3.5s. Good pace, placement and control. I mean there were errors and all, but the overall game felt more like a 3.5 vs 4.0 game. Though it wasn't completely obvious the differences, anytime there is a half a point difference on both sides of the court you'd expect this type of outcome. Thanks for sharing!
I typically title them based on how bad the quality of games are and this one definitely wasn’t great. No extended dink rallies, a lot of impatience at the kitchen and bad speed ups that don’t get punished. We can play from anywhere between 3.5 to 5.0 depending on the game lol.
@@CarolinaPickleball That's interesting. I took those at face value and assumed that was the actual ratings. I'd believe the group is a much higher rating than the title and even with some mistakes the play ability was pretty obvious. Again, thanks a ton for sharing!
@@michaelnoe1195 absolutely! I have played against varying levels of players and I’m currently close 3.5 myself. This game was definitely in the ~4.0-4.5 range. At least from the better team.
Agree with the last post, this definitely looks like 4.0-4.5 from the stronger side. Atp on about the third point was super clean, not seeing that from a 3.5 very often. Inaccurate though DUPR can be, estimated ratings are absolutely all over the place. I played a round with a guy in a 3.5+ tourney and he literally couldn't get a serve in, some of them were landing on the next court over.
