@@G_Demolished Expecting others to be rational is rational. It is discrimination in it's lowest form: Projection of the self upon others. Which is quite rational since it clearly serves a purpose, i.e.: being able to understand people without having to know everything they are, do and want. INFP btw, fellow rational 😉
yeah, as an intp, im disappointed by the society. i argue with my friends every time about religon, they just answer it simpily as "wHo CrEaTeD tHe UnIvErSe ThEn" which i feel is annoying. the only reason i dont like to even talk to people is that they always disappoint me.
right like misogynists! they are so delulu and pretend they don't know it? I believe they do except the narcissistic men and women who profit from abuses against women and children. Like trump and maga!
I think it's funny how this guy talks about rationality while most of his videos are him proffering emotional appeals to irrational value judgments about other types rather holding up "Ti" as some sort of deity-given "super power". He's not very logical himself while making heavy judgments that I think Ti-doms who actually maturely develop their functions wouldn't make.
I'm not familiar with this individual, so I won't judge, but I've seen what you're talking about too many times-- both with young/immature INTPs (especially males... sorry, guys) who haven't developed Fe or haven't had enough reality checks in life, and with INTJs who are actually using Fi reasons but think they're being logical. It's embarrassing and cringey to hear when you get older, partly because it reminds you of how you used to be. I think a lot of people don't realize how emotional and insecure they sound when they overuse the word "stupid" to criticize people and things they don't like.
Yeah assuming people are like that because they’re all “stupid” is irrational itself. A lot of people are well aware of what they’re doing when their socially expressed logics and ideologies are fairweathered, or even hypocritical. Some of those people are actually pretty intelligent, taking advantage of changing their outer “frameworks” to manipulate certain reactions they want to get from others. The only “stupid” people are the people who fall for those types of people.
@heatherbryant4197 totally agree about when younger how cringeier things get said but I think on the function part with guys ...I really question if they actually are that way or just want to identify as hyper rational... too many young dudes just think it's edgy and cool.. but good point all around
Oh, exactly, and the arrogance of assuming you will know when the rules don't work/ why the rules don't apply when they are out with your competency. Like, as you get older, you still question, but you appreciate the chances of this being much lower. It is just intellectual laziness to dismiss rules you dislike, i.e., emotion over logic
Good list. I can NOT help but (kneejerk reaction) assume people have reasons. 2 is an eternal battle for fitting in with work and society. Of course, mentioned framework, is subject to constant revision. But some truths "should just be assumed to be understood". At least in the moment, until we may or may not say something OR make the smarter choice of thinking it through in relation to who we are dealing with.
If rational means using reason and logic, I think Fi is better with the reasons side of rational and Ti with logic. Ti spots inconsistencies easily using true/false if this then that to check for consistency and to process the logistics with their framework of what they "know". Because the world and feelings are so messy Fi is not as straight forward and has to weigh out many reasons to determine which choice is most rational for their or others goals.
Unless you're an INTP yourself, it's practically impossible to become friends with an INTP. Mainly because they always isolate themselves and INTP's HATE people because people aren't as smart as them.
1. I really feel having common sense is a curse whenever I find stupid noisy people. 2. Whenever I break some stupid rules people are like "Aren’t you strict with rules?” " Yes, the necessary ones only btch." 3.Don't even get me started.
i think he meant reasons to do things that they do, sometimes people are just doing things just for the sake of it. without thinking the consequences and what will it do to many other people, by their choices, so he is referring to peope who have unreasonable reasons, ( me as an intp girl here)
The progress never ends. The problem with that is we become even more disjointed with others because our frameworks are sturdy from a lifetime of fortifications and modifications and they haven’t even begun to build theirs. Then I become skeptical of most people because they’re led by fairweathered logics, to a hypocritical level. And at that point, there’s no trust in anyone but yourself and that gets pretty lonely no matter how many people you have in your life
I take emotions in consideration, and pridicts what people will do based on their habits instead. Understanding their true nature is more practical compared to expecting them to be rational make you negotiate easier, rational enough to not be hurt and understanding emotions to be healthy which can be futher analyzed. Also mindfulness helps with emotional well being along with staying rational when dealing with different situations.
the rational thing is more so that if i see someone doing something that looks dumb my first assumption is always that they must have some good reason for it i just don't understand not that their stupid and didn't think enough.
I agree, I’m an intp and when making decisions I also consider how this will affect other people emotionally as a part of my rationality. In my eyes, the concept of being rational includes my personal ideas of ethics, reasonableness, quality, and reducing all harm to zero (or as close to it). that also includes not harming those I care about emotionally. I think it’s important that my framework for making decisions or carrying out decisions include emotional rationality as well. one of the only ways to do this is by observing, building a mental profile based in habits and patterns, and acting in response to that in the most rational way possible. it’s the only way that I can be a well rounded individual. I will say however, that emotional well being is one of the lower subsets of the “harm” category (with physical and mental being higher) but it’s still important nonetheless.
C'mon intp bro's y'all know how frustrating it is when someone has no rationality and seemingly shallow frameworks. Deep down you think they're stupid 😂 even though you immediately reason the complexities of humans to justify it so you dont feel just arrogant 😂
could be lazyness also. Or they are just so successful in other parts of their life that they don't need to be smart. The brain is gratification based after all.
@@Itsmesmileyface yeah but that's the idea. In many matters, there is no real truth. Everything has Madden hidden causes or effects, and all construst and research are made by humans. Its made within societal parameters, thing like psychology could change at any point. Even something like math, aliens could have a equivalent to math that's very different but still works for them. But the point is that alot of people don't even try to think, or come up with ideas or conclusions. This is frustrating because the social constructs humanity made helped us in endless decisions and will continue to for infinity and beyond. Our world would be a shithole if noone tried to think about any rationality. Its because we had people that did, that we are what we are today. Thus, it can feel pointless dealing withh people that don't use any sort of Ti,Te or atleast Ni,Ne
Well, people do have reasons for their ideas; they just don’t know what they are. They may not think they know about what triggered their thoughts because it could be subconsciously made up, but there’s always a reason:)
I used to constantly get into conflicts with my managers because I’d be 5-10mins late. My rationale was why do I need to be a couple minutes early when we’re just going to stand around and chat for a few minutes AND every day we end up staying late anyway?
I can't see any flaw in your view point. Logic is detected, but the problem is the other side isn't operating off logic, they are simpletons, they say you must do this because I say so. And despite there being no logic in it, you get punished for being logical lol.
It blew me away when I found out not everyone makes their own rules and frame to see and engage with the world in. I’d go crazy if I didn’t have standards or guidelines that I’d personally made for how I’m gonna act, I’ve gotta know my reasoning is sound. Consistency of thought is a big part of how I know I have identity instead of being a random collection of actions
I've learned to dumb things down. Especially since smart shaming is very common in our country, not that I mind, but it's inconvenient when everything you say, they'd think it's always something deep so they wouldn't even listen. Ugh, I want to have no social life sometimes, if only that's possible.
I don't have one but somehow my mom introduce me to neighbors girl who is my friend now. Cuz she thinks I need humans interactions cuz I am getting nuts 🙄😒
@@ItApproaches hmmm, that’s quite the radical, Freudian perspective you have I don’t think that’s true, necessarily. They maybe more adept to social norms but most certainly aren’t bound to them at least not in general Some are that must be statistically true but that’s not a rule. You could extent your argument to nearly everything since one has to adept eventually to something new or else which should equal conditioning on some level for example boxing or maths You get conditioned to respond quickly to attacks and attack yourself in boxing and get acquainted with vigorous logic in maths to construct arguments My point is: everything is conditioning to something if one has to adept to something but how you phrased it puts that in an unnecessary negative context. Social skills aren’t equal to the degree to which a person is bound or does adhere to societal norms. Social skills are maybe somewhat correlated to that in the sense that one must be able to follow the norms for the period of time they’re interacting with people but the type of conditioning you are talking about would be a type of conditioning that’s akin to a dog being trained to behave properly and do some tricks. That’s permanent and not true as a general argument
@@sonicmaths8285 Truth will always seem radical to untruth, they are polar opposites after all lol. Extend my argument? I didn't argue? Did you mean adapt? Not Adept? You can't condition "yourself" that would be self delusion. When I say condition, that is referring to everything external to the illusion of self, the supposed "you." Ironically there is no logic in math, as math, like science and religion and politics and such are all made up concepts from human ego. They aren't real. You took what I said as a negative context. Nothing I said is positive or negative, it's just neutral. Our ego is what determines if something is positive or negative. As for the dog example, you say trained to behave properly which is in fact untrue, the human trains them to be proper IN THEIR way, not in a proper way for the dog, cause making a dog obedient and docile is breaking it's nature and molding it to fit your own egoic view of it. You changed it from it's natural state to a conditioned pet, sit, roll over, beg.....that's not "proper" in the dogs mind.
I would also say being logical first about a situation then emotional. Of course if its losing a close loved one then I feel sad but if there is a problem I often find myself discussing solutions or reasons why this happens rather than comforting others. It can come off as cold or that I don't care as much. It's just processing situations differently.
@@MP-ut6eb Best is really going to be individual. Like I'm an introvert, but I'd actually prefer an extrovert partner because I'm actually fairly social, and would like someone who would get me out a little bit more. I couldn't deal with an extreme extrovert, but I think someone with that characteristic would be good for me personally. If I were an extreme introvert, I'd probably want a partner who was also an introvert and wouldn't be creating social situations because my personal battery couldn't take it. I like to watch Frank James, and he brought up that he thought the biggest MBTI divide was S vs. N. And after watching his reasoning for that, a lot of conflicts in my life popped into perspective and I agree with him completely on that. So for a fellow intuitive, especially an introverted intuitive, I'd suggest that looking for an intuitive partner will generally lead to less marital conflict. Though ISTPs are at least noted for seeing patterns in things and might be highly suitable , especially to an INTP. There's not going to be a hard and fast rule, though. Sometimes opposing strengths really works for a couple. I'd stay away from ESFPs as an INTP just because you have no compatible functions in your stacks so that's just going to be the hardest relationship to make work. You just have 0 objective points of compatibility and ability to understand each other.
@@MP-ut6eb There's no such thing as an INTP-T or INTP-A. It's just INTP which stands for Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, and Perceiving. INTP's are one of the rarest personality types in the world as literally 7% of the world are INTP, it would be nearly impossible to find another INTP. Additionally, INTP's possess the potential to become famous scientists, even Albert Einstein is an INTP. And as an INTP myself, (Logician) I personally relate to why INTP's struggle with finding someone they can relate with or debate with. (It's no wonder my conversations are always awkward. This is due to the fact that non-INTP's don't think on the same level as we do. To give you an insite on how we think; INTP's possess the ability to think even when they're not aware of it. The majority of INTP's love solitude and they hate interacting with other people, they think emotions make them weak and they's always trying to be perfect.)
Went from INFP to INTP after getting stabilized by medication and now i just expect to be disappointed by everyone around me when before I just had the hope that people would be nice and things wouldn't repeat themselves. 😭
Hmm, find enjoyment and happiness in entertainment/media then. That'd be my suggestion and what I do myself. It helps that you already expect disappointment, so then the entertainment can exceed those expectations.
Then you build your entire framework so that you can still act normal with everyone because you fundamentally still think there has to be an underlying logical reason for everything. Or maybe this is just me
Lets be real, you only keep it to yourself cause you know exactly how it would play out if you opened your mouth and it's just not worth the headache lol.
As an INTP, I especially felt the rules being broken and half ass book part. This one time in High School, we had this English teacher that told us to go to the library to issue ourselves some books for the class. Well. I had already gotten some books before hand and already had them on me, yet my teacher told me that if I didn’t go down to the Library to grab ANOTHER book, she’d call the dean on me 💀 Well, I told her over and over again that I had books and legit had to shove it in her face to make her process that I HAD A BOOK. After that, she then told me that since I already have a book, She told me to go to the library and listen to the speech the librarian had prepared for my class (for the ones that needed books), and she said if I didn’t, I would be sent to the deans office for disobedience 💀 I said to her “Look, sending me to the library to get books that I DONT NEED is completely pointless and a waste of my energy, and class is already draining enough. And after realising that I already have a book, you *STILL* want to send me there? For what reason? The people that went down there is already coming back up meaning I’ve missed the thing entirely. Say if I did go down there, I’m wasting my energy just walking to the library for something I ALREADY have. And you are telling me to go to the library for a speech that wasn’t even meant for me in the first place? You are just wasting my time and the librarian’s time because she’s gotta recite a whole speech for 1 person who wasn’t even meant to be there and I’m wasting my energy going there and back. And by the time I’d come back, I’d miss *YOUR* lesson as well, so I’m literally letting you do your job to teach me” And I said this in a logical, (mostly) well mannered way and she still got the dean on me 💀 After that, I just kept thinking she was stupid. And this happened the next year with my new English teacher. We had a class of 30+ and only 1 teacher and a lot of these guys fell behind in work and others were delinquents. Well, my friends sat behind me and they asked me for help, and realising the teacher was going around the class helping other people before my friends, I thought I’d be nice and set them on the right track to do the work. Well. As soon as I started helping them, the teachers says “Oi (my name) stop distracting the class okay? That’s disrespectful” and me just being me, I took that as an insult and having a shitty day, I said “Okay, look, you are a teacher in a class with 30 and more students. Like 80% of this class need your help, and you haven’t even made through all of them yet. My friends NEED help and they can’t get it from you since you are going to others, and there isn’t much time until the period ends. I’m just helping them because you’ve already told me what to do and they haven’t got any idea yet. I’m just trying to help them and technically I’m helping you as well, so what are talking about saying “I’m distracting the class” mate I’m just tryna help the people you haven’t gotten to yet and you probably wouldn’t have gotten to them in the first place knowing how long until class ends, so stop nagging on me” And I got sent to the dean….AGAIN. I didn’t see how she couldn’t process my logic at the time but I can see it now.
Wow I've been through almost the exact same experiences! You spoke the truth and people, especially authority figures, don't like it at all when we point out those things that seem incredibly obvious to us with air of incredulity at their lack of comprehension. Definitely worse as a young INTP, at least for mez because adults really feel their pride hurt when a child corrects them.
If you were logical, you would just say, “Yes ma’am.” No drama then. You haven’t figured out who the teacher in the class is yet. That’s kind of retarded when you think about it. You are on her time when you’re there, not yours. When you leave school, then you’re on your time. The world was here before you. You didn’t create yourself. You don’t comprehend the lives of others and the various agonies they endure in their life. You’re not at all smart - you’re a fool.
Female teachers aren't very bright. Just the facts. Even male teachers for the most part are very....well...by the book and don't have any bend in understanding a situation. They are paid to do things one way and only one way. It's odd a high school has a dean though? That's usually a position at a college or university.
Omg I feel this is so relatable it’s infuriating lmfao but I still don’t get why she couldn’t process your logic.. why? Is it just because of the authority rule they don’t care if the kid is saying the truth?
Cause and effect. And the cause and effect for that. And the cause and effect for that. And the cause and effect for that….. boiling everything down to its basic components. It’s the reason that we trust very little because very little proves trustworthy at its basic level.
@@plots4 I couldn't have put it better myself. Learn. Aquire information. Become better at learning. Become better at acquiring information. Repeat this cycle until you can understand the flaws of the world, then at some point you become enlightened enough to realize that you are a living contradiction. That is the life of an INTP
@@NoGoatsNoGlory. Funny. I’ve always thought of myself as a walking contradiction. I believe some of the highest forms of beauty exist within the concept of paradox, which drives sensors and feelers absolutely insane.
@@plots4 I agree, although I tend to find the beauty in everything by looking for connections that exist in nature and show up everywhere else. Like how math and functions connect to the way things react in nature, and if you consider every possible outcome, you can basically tell the way something moves "randomly" based on the way it is pushed. I've always been fascinated by things like that and I want to look further than what science already knows. Although I probably wouldn't be a well respected scientist because I never can seem to get anything done and in school I suck at doing homework, although I can ace tests pretty easily without studying. Maybe I should focus on becoming more balanced and better at increasing my productivity, because I know I am at least semi intelligent, and therefore if I increase productivity I could become a very successful person if I work hard. Man. Writing this comment has really helped me sort out my thoughts, and sorry if I went too far off into a side tangent, I guess I do have the attention span of a gnat, anyways, cheers, have a great day, and a wonderful life
Am I the only INTP who is like an INTP but also sometimes just likes to defy logic and physics Example, I was in science and we were talking about irreversible changes and my brain decided to say that aging was reversible because if you died and then got rebirthed technically you just went back to when you were younger
I’m an INTJ, and I personally strongly agree on all 3 points, but from my observations and characterizations of human and institutional behavior, it became obvious to me (from a young age) that this way of thinking is very rare.
The first one! I get so frustrated when people make stupid decisions. I get annoyed when people involve their emotions so much when they make decisions.
I hate when useless rules are enforced on people. Rules are rules for a reason, and when they can't serve their only purpose should be disregarded. So stupid!
I relate to this so much! Especially number one is always shocking to me, like, wdym you do things for no reason?? Why would you do something if you don't have a reason for it/if it doesn't serve a certain purpose? I always have such high expectations for the world and then remember "Oh yeah, people are stupid." ("Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein). 2. Authority and rules (and thus the system in general) should always be questioned. We can't just go around the world doing whatever other people/rules tell us to do without questioning whether these things are in alignment with what *we* want and/or should do. Always "have the courage to use your own reason" (- Immanuel Kant) and don't just mindlessly follow others - that's basically a one-way ticket into getting manipulated. 3. Yeah... this one is just... wow. I don't think I could even go about my life without an ideology/framework of how the world works. (infj here, though)
Perfectly bulit framework but constantly debating ? How about a framework that is always being remodeled, renovated and parts occasionally razed to the ground. And why half ass reading?! Real probing and questioning involves revising one's own worldview. INTP does not equal ego plus an assumption of being smarter than everyone else.... it means caring about things like truth or utility or what can be known even if one's self gets in the way. Anyone who claims they have a full understanding of the world isn't an INTP
When I figured out people dont have reasons I was astonished and learned to never take someone seriously until they prove their competence to me first. (Direct or indirect)
If you think other people are stupid, it is likely that you are stupid because you don't understand how humans work. After learning typology, every persons actions make perfect sense because they are doing what their type does
The full framework one is so real. Even tho I’ve lazily read books, I have settled on an overall framework of my mind and reality. I’m well aware how lazy my research has been but I do have a clear structure in my mind of myself, reality and how I should interact with reality.
Not looking up definitions of words. People just guessing at what words mean. Not looking up terms and ideas and concept in encyclopedia, wiki or in sources relevant to the topic. Just accepting not knowing what a word means.
Yeah, that's one that gets me all the time. I would even expand that to more broadly cover 'not feeling the need to obtain relevant data'. If I'm watching some video that makes some vaguely statistical claim, I almost invariably feel the need to go see if there are any actual statistics published on it.
Heres what I think, majority of the people around the world are capable of thinking, not sure if its delusion or arrogance that makes intps think they are the only ones capable of rational thinking. Many great minds around the world, scientists, engineers, inventors etc do not have Ti in their dominant functions but still perfectly capable of thinking, and building frameworks, its just that many of the time things are somewhat subjective, what you think is facts aren't actually facts. Just because you think the rules are stupid doesn't mean it does not serve a function, and if you do break them, be prepared to suffer the consequences. This whole clip comes off a little too, I'm (ie. INTP) is always right and you (all other types) are wrong.
First off, INTP's don't think humans aren't capable of thinking rationally, we just assume most people out there don't think or understand things the same level as we do. I mean, are you capable of forming nearly "infinite" ideas by simply looking at something once? Are you capable of thirsting for knowledge to the point where you're willing to sacrifice your life to get your hands on that knowledge? Are you capable of thinking to the point where you're no longer aware that you're still thinking? Are you capable of spending every single moment of your life learning new things to the point where your mental health is about to collapse? These are things INTP's like myself go through on a daily basis, have you ever wondered what goes through within Albert Einstein's brain? Well, Einstein is also an INTP which is why INTP's are considered to possess the potential to become famous scientists. Even Sir Isaac Newton is an INTP and he's considered cold-hearted.
The rule thing is so relatable. I’ve been categorized as a problem, I think, for doing things the rational way instead of the “right” way. But when the “right way” is stupid I don’t see why anyone would expect/want me to do that. It’s not a disrespect for rules. It’s an acceptance that guidelines can’t account for all situations & human judgement still needs to be a part of the equation. Thats why the concept of “general rule of thumb” is a thing. Generally - we would do x, but if x is not suitable we should choose the best option for the circumstance. Why can’t people understand that?!
Laughed so hard about the reasons thing. It’s just mind-boggling to me to accept that not everyone does what they do for any conscious reason (I refuse to accept there is no reason). Learning to stop expecting that was like unlocking a whole new level of predictability.
Pure art. Everything you said made sense. Had me loll! The problem with INTP's is they dont know they are genius. Dwelling on that truth seems self-aggrandizing, and useless. They just think that their thinking is thinking. The reality is their MBTI type is probably the closest you will find to a fully developed, fully sentient AI.
@@anubis-tp3js To be honest, I've never really thought about it that way, I always thought non-INTP's were completely stupid. Not knowing INTP's like myself were just smarter. (No wonder I always found it hard to start conversations with people, so I'd normally live in solitude and start thinking.)
A friend recently informed me that 98% of people lead with emotions regardless of whether those feelings are reasonable or not. It wa an A HaH!!! moment for me. Never underestimate solitude. The ability to be comfortable alone and by yourself is equally as rare as thinking. @@Golden-l4r
@@Golden-l4r I was talking with a friend and told him I just realized a large number of people lead with their emotions and maybe it would help me if I took that into consideration when I spoke with them. I said something like it must be over 50%. He said, "More like 98%.". Well, well, now I have the scary prospect of trying to remember in my conversations; before I communicate pure, rational, logical reasoning that, none of that matters to the person I'm talking too🤣🤣🤣
@@anubis-tp3js Being an INTP has its flaws you know. For instance, there are moments where I would want something but while I’m walking to that destination, I’d suddenly forget the main reason why I’m there and I’d turn back. Only to remember why I got there to begin with, this is a downside of consistently thinking to myself on a daily basis, NOT all INTP’s go through the same thing but I could relate to it when it was mentioned during the test. After analyzing my time management, I realized I’d spend atleast 3-5 hours of my leisure time thinking to myself. There are also moments where I’d ask myself too many questions and all of a sudden, I’d feel like ripping my head apart because my brain couldn’t handle too many information all at once, this is what most people call “analysis paralysis” which others won’t relate to. Some people out there usually fake being INTP’s because they aren’t sure whether they’re one or not or maybe just to gain attention.
I'd say they sound pretty normal. I feel ashamed of all the others who think it isn't. Being rational all the time?? What in the world? Why not? (also, I am a little confused about what you mean about the third one. Can somebody pleas explain? ;D) -ENTP
Leo 🦁: At first, he came across as strong and sure himself, has it put-together. At the end, he said, "Every day, I'm dying by 5%." He said I always made him feel safe. That I'm "everything."
Ok but if the rules do make sense, INTP will absolutely follow them. There’s a good chance that’s a rule because someone was stupid, and that rule is the only thing separating us from chaos, and we do not like chaos!
Rationality is a virtue. Most people aren’t virtuous, most people prefer leverage. The reasons INTP stay away from leverage is because they feel as if they already got it. They feel as if they understand the map and the game very intimately, so they’d rather operate within that framework.
People can be stupid but i am annoyed at those people who don't even accept they are wrong, even if someone give them facts amd truth... They just stuck with their stupid mindest...
Bruh in the #2 got me hahaha My leader said who got in late should do 3 laps in oval And I got late And I do walk to do it hahaha She got mad said I should run But I refuse because I just need to do 3 laps by walking I mean what kinda follows running those 800 meters per lap bruhh That is exhausting and stupid If we are run out of stamina how can we work well in the activities
Was anyone else thrown of by the fact that they said “3 things the INTP thinks is stupid (but isn’t),” when it should say “3 things INTPs think are stupid (but aren’t).”
Those things are not normal?! I have been known to say “everyone has their reasons“ lol. And why would you follow a stupid, illogical, or outdated rule or law?
Sans obviously emotional incidents, I almost never understand how people aren't rational. Have you all not gameplanned every possible scenario in your head a few times immediately before making the decision??? 😂
idk why someone talks about my psychology i feel like they are trying to type out a genius because theres no way im rational and i dont think like i am, and i dont think that anything is stupid maybe because im more open minded. maybe im not even intp but i really agree with the last one but just bcs i built a whole framework, i like, really try to expand it throughout the informations i gather, also i dont think theres stupid people. i dont like to call them stupid its just so brief and sounds like i feel superior when i do not
as an intp, the thing i hate the most are designs that dont serve purposes, for example, the garbage bags we buy supposed to be put inside out in the trash can, but it can used neither way which shows the uselessness of the design and it bothers me so much.
I always think this. But apparently people are too stupid to have the same mindset because apparently they can’t think about reality in an analytical manner which makes them extremely ignorant
I realized that people are different, so I got bit more laid back, and let them lead me a bit more, but in a sense that if they stop my invisible whip is going to slap them where it grants them the biggest reward. I guess I taught one dude that they can outsource some tasks which are not their ace even if they are ace at something else. Ego is a bitch for me too, but we can keep on learning I guess.
Nope wayy off as an intp I understand some people are stupid and reasonless and I also know stupid rules are broken often lots people do not understand common sense and do not have their life’s planned out
Maybe, people have reasons to be stupid ?! And even though, as an INTP, idc or correct them unless I value them or are close to them. I won't consider emotions at all unless they're that close to me. You could live stupid, and let me live by my delusions or realities, whatever it is, please.
Why do people listen to authority without thinking for themselves. For instance, my Chinese mom has a lot of traditional values and thinking stuff. And when I think her why she does things this way, she says it’s because it how she grew up, and her mom did it. ( I get if you were conditioned, but yk even simple things ) I genuinely believe that everyone should listen to common sense and logic, it’s makes me a little stressed when I think about the millions of people(almost billion), who do things without logical reason
@@markusaurelius83 they may seem unreasonable to you but it could be perfectly reasonable to the other person, unless we have a perfectly consistent and objective value to everything, its hard to determine if a person is rational or not based on your own subjective judgment
@@joesr31 That's true. However it is part of the Meyer Briggs theory that some people tend to lean more towards rational thinking (frontal cortex) for their decision-making, while others decide based on their feelings (or rather subcontious thoughts, which manifest themselves to us as feelings). Of course there is always a source and a process before decision-making, but this source might be something different than rational thought producing (reasoning) reasons.
@@markusaurelius83 true, i'm not denying that thinkers exist, its more like intps (at least those that identify as intps online) very often think they are the only thinkers, and they are superior to anyone else in regards to logic. mbti is just about preferences and it is totally possible that a type with Ti as their inferior function being more logically/rational than someone with Ti as their dominant function. Just because intp prefer to use logic to make decisions doesn't automatically makes them good at it
