30 mm APDS-T MK320 VS Armor Steel

Подписаться 13 тыс.

Просмотров 40 тыс.

50% 1

This video presents the penetration capability of 30mm APDS-T, NM245/MK320 against 60 mm thick armor. It is observed is successfully penetrates the rolled homogeneous armor.
The 30 mm x 173 TP-T round is developed to be a ballistic match to the MP-T/SD NM222/MK264. It is qualified for use in the Bushmaster II MK44 and DLS CAMGUN 30 GI-30.
Please subscribe to our channel: / @extremeengineeringsim...
Music Credits: www.bensound.com/
Other Similar Videos:
1. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
• 125mm BM15 APFSDS Proj...
2. Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Failed Armor Penetration
• Bullet Penetration Vs ...
3.120 mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate
• 120 mm KE M829 APFSDS ...
4. 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2
• 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bulle...
5.7.62 NATO X 50 mm Bullet Vs Armor Steel Plate # Armor Penetration Simulation
• 7.62 X 51mm NATO Bulle...
6. BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
• BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN...
7.Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing Ammunition
• Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 m...
8.7_62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest #Armor Piercing Simulation
• 7.62X51 mm NATO Vs Bul...
9.120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation.
• 120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs ...
10.Low Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation
• Bomb (Kinetic Energy P...
11. Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulation
• 90 mm t33 Vs German Pz...
12.125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation
• 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T V...
13. 3VBM3/3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS #APFSDS Collision
• 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS Vs ...
14. APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor
• APFSDS Vs NERA #Non En...
15. 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation
• 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T V...
16. 105 mm APFSDS-T M900 Vs Leopard 2 # Ballistic Simulation
• 105 mm APFSDS-T M900 ...

Опубликовано:

6 июл 2021

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 49

@DaReaperZ 2 года назад

It is said that the Strv 103 could put two 105mm APFSDS shots in the same hole within the span it took it to reload (3s). It'd be interesting to see this effect against some type of composite frontal armor.

@Dramigbaklanges 3 года назад

It would be interesting to see the penetration of the bofors 40mm apdsfs-t, the available data claims 170mm @2000m. I believe it is well over 200mm

@NotVanesssHousekeeper 3 года назад

The 50mm ETC Cannon on the US next gen IFV is going to very interesting.

@jackmclane1826 3 года назад

Usually the available claims are the absolute maximum that CAN be achieved when everything is perfect. Including the alignment of planets! ;)

@NotVanesssHousekeeper 3 года назад

@@jackmclane1826 The true underlying reason for the auxiliary power supply on the M1A2Sep3. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-u0gneYoV2PQ.html

@CZ350tuner 2 года назад

@@jackmclane1826 That's why actual range test results, taken with a few hundred shots, quote "Up to X mm. of RHA @ 0, 30 or 60 degrees @ range R metres or yards'. There's too many chaotic variables involved Projectile muzzle exit velocity is affected by: Propellant chemical consistency. Propellant combustion velocity. Propellant contamination. Gun barrel residue (from previous shots). Gun barrel wear. Projectile drive band sealing quality. The projectile itself, also has chaotic variables, created during manufacture & assembly, such as structural integrity flaws.

@jackmclane1826 2 года назад

@@CZ350tuner I think you overcomplicate things here a bit, while proper maintenance and production quality control should suppress it as much as possible. There is a reason why one of these rounds costs upper 3 digits in bulk. The whole list has an impact, but they will only vary the velocity in the order of some 10 m/s. That is the difference of 50 m more or less distance. It matters to monitor quality. But on the battle field... that does not make the difference.

@jari2018 2 года назад

the bofors 40mm tungsteen arrow can do 140mm at 30 degress -i guess bofors could do a budget bullet like this doing 90mm but all 4 at once instead of single shots

@paveldv1 3 года назад

Very good simulation. What kind of software has been used? Some kind of Ansys?

@maioralofknowledge2658 2 года назад

I would like to see this 30mm (or 35mm), 200 to 500m distance vs 2x plates (30mm outer, 35mm hull side wall) of armox 600t uhhs steel (or maraging steel 350), in 90° separated 60cm from each other (air gap), then we would know if this kind of caliber would pierce side skirt + side hull.

@fissis1955 3 года назад

that wouldnt be very pleasant for the crew inside.

@lukeclarin8244 2 года назад

You don’t say

@user-so2xd7pw9l 2 года назад

could you do this with a 3,7-cm-FlaK 18 of Ju87?

@SeniorTaco174 3 года назад

Best simulation of an a10 death haha

@jackbiliny2435 3 года назад

Cool

@extremeengineeringsimulati5627 3 года назад

Thank you !

@thepreserver83 3 года назад

@@extremeengineeringsimulati5627 i have watched some your videos, you are stopping the vid too early ,without simulation is complete. I think is better to extend at least 1 second after the penetrator disappears completely if fail to penetrate, or 1 second after complete penetration, especially for APFSDS-T. Im not speaking about this video.

@user-cz4jg2rq4x 2 года назад

Плотность вольфрама выще чем плотность брони Поэтому брони сердечник не может 1 к одному испаряться затачиваясь вместе с бронь!

@paullakowski2509 2 года назад

THE Leopard 1 turret had 60mm cast armor all round at "compounded angle" of 30o horizontal and 35o vertical [~ 45o] LOS of 59mm . The principle threat would be the Russian 30mm BT API . But this round could only penetrate 60mm cast armor @ 0o ~ 50m range . Clearly and APDS would be needed. The Russians did develop a 30mm APDS [BPS] that could penetrate 6cm @ 45o at 100m range , while follow up 30mm APFSDS should penetrate 6cm @ 45o at about @ 500m range.So this tank would be vulnerable to the BMP 2 at the end of 1980s. Back in 1979 Germany installed perforated plate armor [23mm RUBBER -steel perforated plate -RUBBER ] that were mounted on shock absorber about 4" from the leopard cast turret. I have found ballistics research papers featuring perforated plate, that suggest me of 1.7 to 3.5 ...with research showing that brittle projectiles would crack under strain of perforation. More importantly the projectiles would yaw and hit follow on plate at sharp angle while breaking up leading to their defeat. Even more surprising; it is reported that such perforated plate armor is also featured in Israeli Merkava tank turret armor and leopard II wedge turret armor in the turret. Any help in this area would be appreciated .