3D THRUST VECTORED GIANT Rafale TURBINE RC JET 

Hearts their own comment? I was subscribed but I got no thanks let known a Heart

@@Ricksta66 Dont take it personally. I genuinely appreciate comments left on my vids. I get so many now I find it hard to get through them all. Have a good weekend Ricky. Cheers Dom (Essential RC)

Essential RC My sincere apologies, I was going to delete my comment but you had the decency to not only reply but you gave me a ❤️ Thank You. Subscribed & Left a Like.

Awesome piloting skills, prop hanging (hover) without the luxury of having a prop to force air over the control surfaces

@Essential RC Thanks for sharing, no clue how I got here but definitely appreciate it! Random story... 30 years ago as a kid I loved taking apart my battery powered RC car and heli! (which at the time were considered high quality as my dad had worked with Boeing and other aerospace engineering companies as a consultant 😉). Always tinkered with them but eventually lacked time because of other interests, ie education and sports. You have literally just reignited an old passion and will be looking into your links for information. Good stuff and thanks again!! 🤝👍

Same but I dont have that kind of pilot experience I do fly planes but not like this lol but I can tell from experience he was narrowly missing those trees

Aaah, Jonathan Boisson was the pilot. Yup, that explains it :)

Yes it was!

did you hang around for his landing

Russians.... :)

@@Sajuuk EF 2000 fans

@@kolerick This flying garbage no longer have fans since Rafale came in.

@@pierrevilley6675 I wouldn't say garbage... it's just made for a specific type of mission and isn't (according to many evaluation from third party examiners, aka, potential buyers) the best. The Rafale happen to be "bien né" and his evolution make a very good non 5th gen plane. Given how the radar-antiradar race goes, very expensive "stealthy" planes may not keep an advantage... of course, as I say every times I comment when "we" try to compare planes, until there is a real fight between different plane types, we won't know which is better... be it between western planes or in a east-west fight... also, let's not forget that the missiles have an even bigger impact than the planes themselves. And missiles are cheaper to change then the plane.

@@kolerick Of course, i was joking, but all simulations of combat, and combat exercises (both with canon or missile) have showed Rafale like a better fighter than the EF 2000. Even if the EF 2000 is designed for the only purpose of aerial fight, where Rafale is a multi-purpose aircraft. So even if EF 2000 is not a "flying garbage" Rafale is still better (and far much more esthetic), even if combat exercises are not real war, but EF 2000 has some good points : it's (i guess) cheaper, and it is the offspring of an international collaboration (which is a very good point to me), where Rafale is a 100% french aircraft, that cost about 60 millions each. As a non-objective-french-rafale-fan, you have my apologises for my bad english, and my regards.

Not unless the EDF jet is specifically designed for it and most are not. EDF systems don't produce enough thrust to overcome the weight of the jet normally. There are only 1 or 2 exceptions.

Bzw so ähnlich

Actually, is a reprodution of a Dassault Rafale.