4 Best CANON Lenses 

Canon tf 85mm f/2 price

I was wondering if anybody else had noticed that :)

Thanks!

same bro

Is the Canon lens suitable or it fits to another unit.?

I want to have indoor/ outdoor photo shoots what lens do you recommend

please sell your 7d mark 2 to me or else purchase 50 mm 1.8 from me

@@SandeepKumar-uh8fo 🤨🤔🧐😏

I love it when the yt channel makes fake accounts to put up comments

Yah, the ocst of it is also your favourite, yeah?

I love them too, and their price too 😭

Ashish : U- Tube Ah ja, you get what you pay for in this case. See it from this perspective, if the image is rubbish then it’s because of you and not the lens because there is nothin better available on the market 😂

Bruh, f3.5 to f4.0 isn't a big difference. Unless you're planning to change into fast glass lense such as f2.8 or faster aperture. Just invest in cheapo 50mm stm 1.8 you'll absolutely fall in love with it...

@J S Canon 24-70mm F2.8L II USM

Canon 135mm F/2.0L

Canon 100mm F/2.8L

Congratulations! I just got my first DSLR as a gift. The rebel t7. What lens did you decide on?

@@izzyh.3581 Sigma 17-50 f2.8! Best all-around....

@@lcdy1280 nice! I just watched josh winiarski's review on it so I can have a better idea of what it is. That 2.8 is definitely better than the kit lens lol. It's contrast was better too. What category(ies) of photography do you?

@@izzyh.3581 Event's and portrait photography!

@@lcdy1280 oooh so fun! How long have you been doing photography on a professional level? I'd love to see your shots 🦭

Get a telephoto for the moon, the longest the best, the more expensive the best, believe me, is not the same a Canon 50mm f/1.8 for $150.00 if you compare with 50mm 1.2 L that cost $1500.00

J C, can you show me a picture of what that lens would like? I have the t7 canon.

Not if you are buying them already used, than you can swap them freely, without any loss.

what would you suggest for sports photography, Im sitting in the bleachers?

For APS-C cameras EF-S lenses are generally the better choice. Not all EF lenses perform well on APS-C, and when it comes to general purpose zooms the focal range of EF lenses suck on APS-C. Besides they are often quite unnecessarily expensive. Lenses are longer term investments than cameras, yes. But certainly not lifetime investments. I own (and loved) several EF lenses from the film age whose sharpness just aren't good enough for modern cameras. So much for "lifetime". If you KNOW you're going to "upgrade" to full frame very SOON and KNOW where the money's going to come from, then I agree: buy EF. But if you only THINK that some day you'll go full frame and you also hope to marry and have kids - which is going to suck up a lot of cash for much more important purposes than photography, then do not buy EF (unless there are no EF-S options). Those who invested in EF a few years ago and now realise that if they ever move to full frame it's going to be mirrorless, and that the new RF lenses are better than their EF lenses, well they might realise that their EF glass wasn't really much of a lifetime investment. And very importantly: most APS-C users never buy full frame. Personally I don't even want full frame. If someone offered to give me an R5 for free, I'd say no thank you, because it would create a need for lenses that I could never afford.

It is what it is. Don't spend for a cheaper lens not giving your needs. In order for you to gain more features, you need to spend more.

Please get the prime lens 55mm f 1.8 it's a low budget and has outstanding results

24-70 mk 3

@@johnbisp prove it, I have this 2 lens, and 24-70 is sharpest

The 1.4 is 3-4x the price, and isn't as sharp as the 1.8 until you stop down, which negates the extra 2/3 stop

85mm 1.8 still available, made in Taiwan. I purchased one new today for street & discreet. Will be just fine.

keep the mark IV and use prime L lenses or the 24-70 2.8L II

No, adapting a lens onto a mirrorless body does not change the image quality at all - you'll get the exact same result. Just bear in mind that the 45 mp sensor of the R5 is going to put higher demands on the sharpness of lenses than the 30 mp sensor of the 5d4. But any lens that's sharp enough on your 70D should be sharp enough on any full frame camera up to at least 50 mp. What you do is your choice, but I'd just stick to the wonderful 70D. Or maybe upgrade to the even better 90D (as I did). But that sensor puts much higher demands on lens sharpness. No lens will perform any worse on it, but some might not be able to make full use of the high resolution sensor, so if you pixel peep the images may look soft. Your 70-200 should be alright, though.

No, quite the opposite!

Yes

his is a 1.2.. more expensive with wider aperture and more blurry backgrounds

You legs is the zoom in and out for this particular lens

Not great for landscape?

@@Northern_Rockhopper Not traditional landscapes.... the kit 18-55 is not bad for the wide angle... I use a super wide angle Tamron for big vistas..

@@Syncroschannel nice. Which lens please?

no EF mount is different from EFS

Yes

Yes, with an EF-M adapter.

longer focal range.. one of the zooms.. probably the 70-200

None is good. You need a macro lens. EF-S 35mm (only crop camera) or the EF 100 f/2.8 L and some others 3rd party

It's almost as good as the Sigma 135 F1.8

@@golferpro1241 RF 28-70 L USM F2 is better

@@golferpro1241 I guess you are a former DSLR user shifting to mirrorless now lol

@@golferpro1241 gosh I'm kinda jealous XD

srkwedding moments do not take it serious , depends on what to shoot e.g 600 f4 ıs mark3🤣😂

@@golferpro1241 They have reopened?

The 50mm 1.4 is 4x the price

@@resiyun can be had for 160 used. This isn't the kind of lens you need the warranty for. Take a shot at a gently use one for 30 to 50 more than the 1.8. I did.

Lol

these are made for mostly crop frame cameras. not fullframe

research before buying

hi P R... ' i have one canon A-1 digital videocamera with Hi8mm videotape... oh it is not working

Aperture is the most important thing for lens. It is not depend on mm. I looked at your lenses on the market, aperture is f3.5-6.5. It is not good enough. The more expensive lenses, the less F number is.

Dual pixel AF is your camera focusing censor, not the lens. The lens AF only interact with what's in your camera censor

ha forget that its not that good i had one its very soft wide open the F4 is shaRP ALL THROUGH THE APERTURE RANGE ITS LIGHTER AND SHARPER AND CHEAPER HERE IN THE uk AT mpb I CAN GET A 70/200l f4 NON is FOR UNDER £300

@@michaelreynolds6543 you suggest that canon 70-200 f4 is sharper than f2.8?