4 Things EVERY Commander Deck Needs! 

5. Deck Box

@@croustibast29 you spelled rubber band wrong

Best way to wipe!

VINDICATION

​@@NitpickingNerdsrip Andre Braugher

👶🍼👶🍼

Pod, Meet Judith! 😂

Caeser, legion’s emperor is my favorite

Try this Token Deck: Commander 1 Anim Pakal, Thousandth Moon (LCI) 223 Deck 1 Rosie Cotton of South Lane (LTR) 27 1 Esper Sentinel (MH2) 12 1 Siege Veteran (BRO) 25 17 Plains (KTK) 250 16 Mountain (LTR) 268 1 Battlefield Forge (BRO) 257 1 Command Tower (ANB) 118 1 Mountain (KTK) 256 1 Arcane Signet (ANB) 117 1 Enduring Bondwarden (MOM) 14 1 Anointed Procession (AKR) 2 1 Inspiring Commander (ANB) 11 1 Smothering Tithe (WOT) 13 1 Grateful Apparition (WAR) 17 1 Luminarch Aspirant (ZNR) 24 1 Abzan Battle Priest (J21) 1 1 Daxos, Blessed by the Sun (MUL) 67 1 Mondrak, Glory Dominus (ONE) 23 1 Angelfire Ignition (MID) 209 1 Mountain (MOM) 280 1 Cathars' Crusade (JMP) 95 1 Impact Tremors (WOT) 44 1 Reckless Fireweaver (KLR) 141 1 The Ozolith (IKO) 237 1 Stalwart Realmwarden (Y24) 5 1 Dusk Legion Duelist (MOM) 11 1 Brave the Sands (KTK) 5 1 Ajani's Welcome (M19) 6 1 Lunarch Veteran (MID) 27 1 Soul Warden (M10) 34 1 Anointer Priest (AKR) 3 1 Ashnod's Altar (BRR) 4 1 Urabrask's Forge (ONE) 153 1 Ojer Taq, Deepest Foundation (LCI) 26 1 Boros Locket (GRN) 231 1 Abzan Falconer (J21) 2 1 Authority of the Consuls (KLR) 9 1 Teferi's Protection (STA) 11 1 Roaming Throne (LCI) 258 1 Warleader's Call (MKM) 242 1 A-Winota, Joiner of Forces (IKO) 216 1 Brave the Elements (M14) 10 1 Steel Overseer (M20) 239 1 Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx (THS) 223 1 Gleeful Demolition (ONE) 134 1 Inventors' Fair (KLR) 284 1 Adeline, Resplendent Cathar (MID) 1 1 Veil of Assimilation (ONE) 37 1 Shared Animosity (WOT) 49 1 Oketra's Monument (AKR) 277 1 Path to Exile (OTP) 6 1 Divine Visitation (GRN) 10 1 Swords to Plowshares (STA) 10 1 Giver of Runes (MH1) 13 1 Heliod, Sun-Crowned (THB) 18 1 Impassioned Orator (ANB) 10 1 Take Up the Shield (OTJ) 34 1 Big Spender (Y22) 10 1 Great Train Heist (OTJ) 125 1 Gingerbrute (WOE) 246 1 Professional Face-Breaker (SNC) 116 1 Selfless Spirit (SIR) 42 1 Helm of the Host (BRR) 19 1 Light of Promise (M21) 25 1 Odric's Outrider (MID) 29 1 Terror of the Peaks (OTJ) 149 1 All That Glitters (ELD) 2 1 Intangible Virtue (ISD) 19

It's extra funny cause Beezy never lies

That made me have to pause it to laugh. 😂

why use two cards when you can use one?

Oh that's funny. Never even thought about using it that way.

@@coryledwitch6492 You know can have just have an opinion and argue that in a friendly manner? You don't have to go full snarky/arrgoance with that "ummmm.... firstly", then not even have a "secondly" and then really your argument basically boils down to "it's a 3-colored spell" and "the effect "isn't worth it". 1. If one mode is very playable, then it doesn't matter how bad the other modes on the card are. Just treat it as the card that you'll only ever cast at that one mode. Or are you dismissing every single card with kicker because the non-kicker mode is boring? 2. being 3-color specific doesn't make a card "bad" in exactly those decks that CAN play it. What would be the argument here? That the 3-colored Ultimatums are all bad because they're restricted to 3-colors? WWBR is not a dificult mana cost to pay at the time that spell is relevant unless you have super budget mana bases and even then you're not casting Mythos of Snapdax turn 3 after your turn 2 arcane signet because it's a mid to late game card. 3. It's basically the card Tragic Arrogance (which was featured in this very video) for one mana less, if you're in WRB. It's certainly not a "smelly dumbster fire.

​@@coryledwitch6492Hey, couple of things. Whilst I'm sure people appreciate your opinions and advice as an experienced player, it's important to remember that they're still your opinions and are not objectively correct. Also, the way you portrayed your points came across as a little arrogant and rude towards the, presumably, less experienced people in this thread. On the "Mythos of" cycle, I've played a couple of them and have found them to be both fun and effective. Objectively speaking, they're more mana-efficient, but colour-intensive equivalents to similar effects (e.g. Mythos of Snapdax vs. Tragic Arrogance), with less powerful modes that can be used in cases where you can't meet the colour requirements properly. They're definitely playable in decks that can support the colour requirements (which is becoming increasingly easy with increased fixings options), and outshine their counterparts by being more mana-efficient. Seeing as they're cheap to pick up, they're worth giving a go if you think they'll fit your deck, or just like the art/flavour etc.

​@@coryledwitch6492 You seriously need to find out about paragraphs. Also you're acting like I felt stepped on. I'm not the original poster here, you were simply being a bit of a dick to that guy comming in with that "ummmm, actually"-attitude. Nothing about your opinion was "humble" so maybe reconsider using that word. Also, I didn't say that you didn't have an opinion, you obviously do. You were missing convincing ARGUMENTS to support that opinion. Again: It makes zero sense say that mythos at 4 mana is somehow complete trash vs a card that does the exact same thing but at 5 mana and comes recommended, for the sole reason that it can only be played in Mardu. Paying 4 mana instead of 5 to get the same effect as a card that is considered playable is not "jumping through hoops" maybe it is, if Mr. "33 Years of Magic" is still playing with 30 basic lands in his EDH-Decks? What hoops are you jumping through besides trying to not having a terrible manabase after "33 Years" of magic? And somehow "goes into any deck" always beats "restricted by color identity" in your head. By that same logic, Noble Hierarch is worse than Llanorwar Elves because Hierarch can only be played in Bant. And because of that I shouldn't play hierarch in... Bant? I guess "Terminate" is also worse than "Murder", because you can only play it in Rakdos and Murder costs a Mana more but can be played in every black deck. Why jump through hoops and play Terminate when you can just play murder! 🤡 Also Alpha came out in 1993. If you have played this game for 33 years (checks calendar), it's either the year 2026 or you were designing this game together with Richard Garfield, or you're really bad at math. I'm guessing it's the last option, since you seem to think "4-mana card trash, 5 mana card okay." The other option is of course that you're simply lying and that "having experience" somehow counts as an argument. (It actually doesn. 😱) Also I didn't even discuss the other Mythos cards (and at no point claimed all of them were great. Why are you making things up in your head?) because your arguments were irrelevant in the first place. All the other mythos cards might as well be terrible, but not for ANY of the reasons you mentioned. "Regeneration still exists". -> Okay boomer. Great job at now moving goal posts. Besides Wrath of God not even being a relevant comparision when, in this very video, they were talking about -> asymetrical boardwipes

​ @coryledwitch6492 You seriously need to find out about paragraphs. Also you're acting like I felt stepped on. My man, I'm not the original poster here, you were simply being turbo-snarky to that first guy comming in with that "ummmm, actually"-attitude. Nothing about your opinion was "humble" so maybe reconsider using that word. Also, I didn't say that you didn't have an opinion, you obviously do. The issue is that you failed to produce convincing ARGUMENTS to support that opinion. Again: It makes zero sense to say that mythos at 4 mana is somehow complete trash vs a card that does the exact same thing at 5 mana and is deemed playable, for the sole reason that mythos can only be played in Mardu. Paying 4 mana instead of 5 to get the same effect as a card that is considered playable is not "jumping through hoops" maybe it is, if Mr. "33 Years of Magic" is still playing with 30+ basic lands in his 3-color EDH-Decks? What hoops are you jumping through besides trying to not have a terrible manabase after "33 Years" of magic? And somehow "goes into any deck" always beats "restricted by color identity" in your head. By that same logic, Noble Hierarch is worse than Llanorwar Elves because Hierarch can only be played in Bant. And because of that I shouldn't play hierarch in... Bant? I guess "Terminate" is also worse than "Murder", because you can only play it in Rakdos and Murder costs a Mana more but can be played in every black deck. Why jump through hoops and play Terminate when you can just play murder! 🤡

@@coryledwitch6492 Also Alpha came out in 1993. If you have played this game for 33 years (checks calendar), it's either the year 2026 or you were designing this game together with Richard Garfield, or you're really bad at math. I'm guessing it's the last option, since you seem to think "4-mana card trash, 5 mana card okay." The other option is of course that you're simply lying and that "having experience" somehow counts as an argument. (It actually doesn't. 😱) And.... I didn't even discuss the other Mythos cards (and at no point claimed all of them were great. Why are you making things up in your head?) because your arguments were irrelevant in the first place. All the other mythos cards might as well be terrible, but not for ANY of the reasons you mentioned. So you said that you "could go on" with more arguments, dear Mr. 33-Years, but I'm actually still waiting for you to ... start.

I run that card too I think it could be a Include in 85% of decks because also Replaces itself

I didnt even know this card somehow. Thank you so much, this is perfect for my meta

Highly underrated card. Great grave hate

So what do you have in your deck except creatures, protection and multiple wraths!?

Play from the ashes, cause it’s there fault if they’re not playing basics

@@hanschristopherson8056 Why not both?

We actually do mean that

@@NitpickingNerds 😂

No, it isn't better than straight up fizzling their cultivate, or cracked fetch

@@yavivanov6650 knowing what is in someone's hand for free is in fact better, yes. I don't see how you don't see where this conversation is going but you gotta start

@@yavivanov6650 I clearly wasn't saying it's better than wasting the search.

Bamboozled as always!

she absolutely did lol

I love when people play 1 sided wipes. Especially when they don’t mention them during the Rule 0 discussion. It makes it so easy to get the Rule 0 restrictions thrown out the window to a significant extent for Game 2 & onward, without coming across like the bad guy. A lot of people I’ve run into take having your deck set up to either protect all your stuff through a bunch of symmetrical wipes, or playing asymmetrical ones like the control version of playing Infect, for lack of a better comparison. It’s not pseudo-cEDH’ing like Thoracle’ing, but it definitely sends the message “This isn’t a janky friendly game.”

@@shawnpanzegraf5642 idk what you're talking about, sorry.

@@TiltedSquare You know how a lot of pods get a bit overly picky on what they’re willing to play against, and that all gets folded into the Rule 0 conversation? It’s been my experience that people loosen up about what “Isn’t fun to play against” when certain strategies get employed. For example, an Urabrask deck popping off turn 5 and carrying out a successful pod-kill. If the other couple people playing are willing to play against Mr. Machinegun again, they generally won’t fuss about the game shifting to more cutthroat stuff being permissible.

also with wrathful red raptor in dino decks. i love the wrathful things

Nah. Just direct table threat assessment towards the person who sticks it. That's usually sufficient.

Graveyard hate is just another form of interaction like removal. Obviously it gets better against certain decks, but you'd be hard pressed to find a deck that doesn't do at least something with its graveyard.

@@samogburn2662 I disagree and think only bout 10% of decks are interacting with their graveyard in a capacity that would win the game for them or stop you. Catering to a 10% chance isn't smart imo

We think they came out great!

Those may be coming soon 👀😯

Sorry we're gonna!

It changes the cost not CMC. If the card cares about how much it cost works not if it cares about mana value

@Tyler-bw3fd so if I gave cyc rift cascade it'd cascade off the 2 CMC regardless of overload yeah? Wanna make sure I understand correctly I appreciate your help friend 🧡

@@prestonmitchell9135 yes. Put Oracle on the stack then cascade the rift to win

@@prestonmitchell9135 assuming that you didn't put anything in your deck that cost 1 or less

Or will the Oracle trigger after the cascade resolves putting the cards on the bottom then Oracle trigger?

We'll post an update on the channel community page if they don't sell out!

No way he doesn't cheat dude. Impossible to have the same card in multiple games AND the resource to cast it WAY ahead of curve

@@yavivanov6650 eh well when you have multiple tutors in the deck and dihada makes 4 treasures on turn 3. its kinda hard to avoid lol

That’s actually false because he fell hard out of CEDH meta Actually

too predictable!

Certainly not

We are definitely not advocating 30, more like 35

@@NitpickingNerds even at 35 lands i feel like i get unplayable opening hands or miss at least one land drop in those first few crucial opening turns way too often. i've had so many games where i think to myself 'darn if i hadn't missed that land drop earlier' when i'm just short of making what i think will be a game-ending play.

​@@themoops4006If you feel that on 35, add more card advantage before upping the land count.

​@@Bstone410 card advantage doesn't make up for missed land drops and you kind of need those lands before you can use your card advantage. IIRC you have an ~87% chance of drawing into at least three lands in your first nine cards with 37 lands and it goes down from there. unless im popping a preordain or a faithless looting turn one every game i don't see how more card advantage helps me consistently make my first 4-5 land drops. later in the game sure but nothing sets you up for a loss faster than missing land drops on those opening turns. i've had so many games immediately upended because i miss an early land drop while my opponents don't and ramp on top of that which just compounds their advantage going into the later stages of the game. if i'm at 5-6 mana and they're making 8-9 going into turn 6 or so that's a huge problem that card advantage in and of itself also isn't going to solve.