Those beings are angels and demons. Not all angels are good either. Anyone who believes there are good demons, well I don't know how to help you. That's just asinine.
@@MrEnte3000 So those amigos that sacrificed that young boy to "the beast" didn't really happen? That's not how reality works. Those atheist fairy tales have your mind all twisted up. Even Darwin said his theory was highly implausible. He also talked about "favored races". Wonder what that was all about? He must have been into racing horses. Yeah that's it!
So is there a dimension where we are really, really Big? Or Tiny? Then, I suppose if everything around us got big or tiny (with us) how would we know? 🧐
@@tomherr5684 no dimensions beyond 3 + 1 are math concepts much like 'infinity' neither can physically exist ever; however, there is a possible 4th dimension existing in our world its called: time/motion otherwise just the 3d world.
@@tomherr5684 it's more like a theoretical 4th spacial dimension. Think of a line as one dimension. 4 lines can be made into a square, a 2D object. 6 squares into a cube, a 3D object. Theoretically, 8 cubes could be made into a tesseract, a 4D object. But if we were to view a tesseract passing through our space it would just look like a really screwed up cube.
@@amoureux6502Trippy stuff. Though I'm abit tipsy reading this, it wouldn't make much more sense if I were sober. Feels like we're getting to our teenage years as an intelligent lifeform and civilization. The medieval times, when guys thought urine was a great mouthwash and bloodletting was an effective means of treating an illness, that was our infancy days. Doing alot of sh!t we didn't know was wrong. I feel like we're in our preteen times now, when we think we're all that, but we really aren't. Just asking dumb questions that are obvious for the sake of rebellion. The fact that people have decided that having a d!ck or vajayjay at birth is no longer a clear indicator of ur gender, is a perfect example of this. We're still incredibly bad at using the energy around us and we're still fighting amongst each other, putting each other in categories and groups like in high school. Eventually we'll mature up, and that's when 4D will start making sense
The line refers to the passing of the sphere(baseball) through a gate. Think of the gate as a TV screen. So, starting from the tip of the baseball, as it passes through, the baseball would be making contact with the TV screen from the tip of the baseball through the center, and to the other tip. Check the bottom of the screen when he shows the green ball. The top half is what we see, the bottom is what a 2D being would see. This took a lot of time for me to figure out, I'm embarrassed to say lol
@@tobymcgroby8967 Well, I don't think you got it right. If a 4D hypersphere pass through our 3D world, we see a 3D sphere growing. If a 3D sphere pass through a 2D world, they see a 2D circle growing. If a 2D circle pass thought a 1D line, they see a 1D diameter growing. This is assuming that the 2D and 1D creatures have a perception of depth like us. Even if what we see is actually in 2D, the fact that we have 2 eyes let our brain simulate a 3D object. Let's use your example, but represent the screen as a square. A baseball would pass trough a 2D screen beginning at the tip, then pressing trough would form a circle, not a line.
It honestly doesn't matter and this i why pop-sci physics should be considered magical mumbo-jumbo pseudoscientific sophistry. 1D, 2D, 4D and so on are hypothetical - everything that exists is 3 dimensional. You can get things very very flat, but they'd still have tonnage a thickness. The fact that these concepts may have value in calculations while not actually existing puts them in the realm of mathematics, not science.
If you existed within a 2 dimensional space you would actually only be able to see a line, our ability to see a flat circle is because we're in a 3 dimensional world and can observe a 2 dimensional plane from the outside.
@@amoureux6502 Agreed. I mean, in a 2D space the only way it comes to a circle is if we're looking at it from the top, Z Axis aka, 3D. Others, a sphere WOULD look like a line
The dilemma of trying to fully imagine and visualize such an object is that we realistically have no real way of conceptualizing it-much like trying to imagine a new color.
Sure we'll never be able to fold into a fourth dimension, but we can come to a certain understanding of what it means. If you would like to I would jump into the idea of 2d beings and what it'd be like to be one, or to see one as a 3d being. That's a whole lot easier to understand, and by understanding it you will understand a bit more about 4d space.
Also, as a ball rusts, time is moving through the third dimension, we can only see this process by viewing the same object at several different points but viewing it from the 4th dimension would reveal every level of corrosion of the object in one instance.
Not sure thats what 4d really is, it's just an object in 3d moving straight towards you. The 4th dimension as i've learned is the dimension of time. Setting up a meeting in different dimensions: 1D = "Lets meet halfway (of this line)" 2D = "Lets meet at the mall." 3D = "Lets meet at the malls 2nd floor" 4D = "Lets meet at the malls 2nd floor at 3 o clock" And 5D is already meeting the person at the mall at 3 o clock even tho he is at home one year earlier. 5D is outside of time and space
Actually Disney has this sick 4D alien thing were he breaks out of a test tube and like is killing people in the room lands on back of your chair and breath on your neck and drool gets on you pretty cool
The only problem to this is that we are stuck in the world of 3D trying to understand 4D. Imagine stuck in a 2D world trying to understand a 3D ball, it's impossible to Perceive how it would look.
Well, the 4th dimension is time, so moving through the 4th dimension is living through time. (And there really isn't such a thing as a 4D sphere, like there is no such thing as a 3D circle.) Basically you assume that the property of the sphere in the 4th dimension is that it expands. It may not do that. The best way to represent this may be a change in color, indicating that a change in the age of the sphere has occurred. Another way to represent moving through the 4th dimension is a time-lapse of a child growing up-you'd see the child getting bigger but also older.
@@Koperlich. Well honestly it all depends on which theory you're using, I suppose by theory I mean proposed model of the universe. For example if we're looking at the ten dimension model by Rob Bryant, then the first through third dimensions account for space, fourth dimension is time, fifth is a probability later ect... But, I get your point.
Off topic but I must ask: is ageless immortality relevant to being removed from the 4th dimension? Another question: does this mean we are all moving through the 4th dimensional plane at a similar pace? Causing growth? Using 4th dimensional time theory and not 4th dimensional space theory.
I honestly believe we can't even comprehend 4D. This is a good example but at a level of understanding like a caveman trying to explain how wifi works.
Well people believe a lot of dumb shit so I guess we're just going to have to leave you with your incorrect belief just like we're trying to do with all the religious garbage that makes people think the earth is flat or that covid makes people magnetic. You have had things explained to you very poorly and then assume it is difficult to comprehend when it simply takes time to do so. No one is insisting that you grasp this immediately. It will take time and if you take a deeper look into recursion, an essential topic for understanding computing, you will be well on your way to understanding this topic and will be able to graduate to understanding further dimensions. So don't cut the tree down before you've let it grow into it's full size and you won't be left without any firewood. You are speaking too soon. Cavemen would likely be able to operate wifi given the opportunity, and since you didn't build any of the wifi devices that you use, you also don't know how wifi works, but you use it nonetheless, so you're essentially a caveman and lumping everyone else who would stand with you in your ignorance with yourself as being part of your cave family. I'm pretty sure I'm coming across as rude here, but you are plain wrong, and you will understand this if you take the time to examine it from all the sources available. Hilariously this includes watching doctor strange, so at least some of it will be pretty fun to do.
Even this explanation is kinda of a bullshit. He's basically "sectioning" a 4D object to get a 3D one, it's basically what we do with 3D objects, like mountains, to get a map of level curves (a topographic map, basically). Show a level curve map to your average Joe and it's pretty unlikely they'll understand it, even tho they know what a mountain is. Same for this, except you can't really see a 4D object, making things even harder.
Yes and no, we can understand them but we cannot visualize them. Our minds can't internally model objects with more than 3 dimensions. Cool stuff, tesseracts have always been fascinating to me.
To the guys that did the 3d Sphere model animation - The 3d metal ball model looks great with the spherical map texture on it. If the reflection didn't change from medium size to large size, we may never have noticed at all! Great work!!!
A ball passed through the 2D world wouldn't appear as a line, it would appear as a circle. Passing through a 1D world would cause it to appear as a line
‘Mmhmm. These calculations do seem to track, indeed. Yes, why, I say this science was done stupendously and is approved by my very scientifically competent brain. Very good Watson. I could’ve totally done it too...b-baka’
That headache is a sign of inability to understand and function under the criteria given. It's natural and it's actually the cause of most mental illness. Brains get broken from stress and worries in the same exact fashion.
What my brain? Every school boy thinks about this, when dimensions enter math. Then you're about eleven years young. What school did you all go to?! I can tell you, it was not good enough. High taxes do get our children better schools. Wake up dudes, change your politicians. Find good ones. Maybe business as usual sucks?
I read somewhere this is a great explanation for how The Almighty works: He is a dimensionally transcendental being interacting without non-transcendental universe.
Please search into orthodoxy. orthodoxy is the first church. The body of Christ. We need the Body of Christ and Eucharist.❤☦️ (John 6:53-58) Jesus is the only way to heaven, just being a good person won’t get you there, while yes doing what God said is requiered. Search into orthodoxy afterwards but first read this. Before you read these next things i want you to know that christianity isn’t about worshiping some deity in the sky because you dont want to go to hell, it’s about a loving and friendly relationship with God. God loves us soooo much no one can understand it. God wants you to tell Him everything, because He is soooo loving. Altough He knows it all He wants you to trust Him and be honest with Him and listen to Him. So now that i told you this read these Bible verses (the word of God) knowing that i’m telling you this out of love and i want you to know it’s not too late to turn and repent and follow Christ❤️❤️❤️ „Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” John 14:6 ESV Bible Repent from your sin (disobedience to God) and turn to God and follow Him so that you WILL be saved. „If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” 1 John 1:9 ESV „No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.” Luke 13:3 ESV „For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Romans 6:23 ESV ❤☦️
"Hi I'm just a little 4D ball, just passing through, don't mind me! I like to go slumming in the 3D world sometimes. Well see you later, gotta go!" lmao
@@ElijahBellomy-ti3rkWell they’d have four dimensional skin, if you think about it in 2-d, we would look like 3 disembodied circles of skin, the 2 arms and the torso. They’d probably be spheres of skin, if they have skin, because we can’t see inside the skin.
Don't forget that as long as the 4D ball was pushed through our 3D space with constant motion, the 3D cross sectional sphere would expand and then contract with Simple Harmonic Motion - starts expanding fast, slows as it gets bigger, and then reverses the process.
Sometimes, we actually really like science and always think that science is fun. But our brains said the otherwise and makes us don't want to learn about the science it self. Btw I actually not a scientist and just saying a random relatable thing
@@cmoore421no, you’re a 3D creature. The 4th dimension exists but we can’t detect it or comprehend it, we have 3 dimensions of space and 1 dimension of time, space time is 4 dimensional but we can’t see it.
@@cmoore421like gravity interacts with the 4th dimension, but it doesn’t just effect time because the 4th axis isn’t just time, it’s everything still. We say “1 dimension of time” to describe space time and why we only see 3 dimension but that 4th axis is just time, it’s space time and so is the other 3 dimensions.
Note: the 2D people would only see a line because they themselves can only see to what is blocking their view and they couldn't see the rest of the circle that is growing and shrinking. Kinda like if we were to look at a log with no texture and shadows we'd just see a brown rectangle. The only reason we know there is something behind the log is because we can look to the sides of it and see shadows and through past experience we know for certain that putting something in our view doesn't make everything behind it disappear. A 2D being may also have some similar precognition that makes sense in their 2D world.
Actually it can only be moved from the 4d world, you have to apply an infinite amount of force to move it just by holding one of its infinitely many 3d slices.
It's a cool hypothesis, but probably way off. Things are rarely that linear. The reality is more likely that 3D beings simply cannot understand the 4th dimension.
I had a professor tell me he could think in 10 dimensions. He said a book was 3d but it was inside a bookshelf which was another dimension then nested inside a library which was another dimension etc.... I'm started to think he was nut balls.
@@d33p345 that wasn't his reasoning, as you'd move around the fourth dimension, the 3d object (book) would transform into other books. And as you'd move the fifth dimensional object, it'd move around the fourth dimensional object (library) which would change the entire selection.
It actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. The page is 2d. The book is 3d made out of 2d. The bookcase is 4d made out of 3d. The library is 5d made out of 4d. Etc etc. He was using it as an analogy about how the amount of physical dimensions increases Edit: For example how a 4d sphere is made out of 3d spheres.
And we never will. Our perception, our comprehension, our thoughts, our reality all exist in a 3 dimensional space. We can perceive backwards, but never forward. We can theorize about extra dimensions, but our brains were never meant to function in such a way, we will never be able to comprehend an extra dimension on the go without assistance. Be like someone with only one eye not understanding how someone with two eyes can judge distance so easily
Think of it as preservation of mass in a pocket dimension. We cannot directly observe the mass, but we can be certain it exists according to the rules of conservation of mass. Alternatively, visualize it by picking a 3D direction and pretend it's a fourth-dimensional direction. Anything moved in that direction cannot be seen from any other angle.
@@Kraziizwould not 4d world be visualizing the sphere as infinite spheres attached as if a snake of spheres? Basically a time lapse of the sphere moving. But we would see everything in time lapse. Essentially being able to visualize a tree move over time but some how all the swaying over time is one visual image. 4dimension would not be able to visualize "over time". What we see as time lape would some how be seen as stationary by 4d.
And while it would look like it's growing until it starts shrinking, the surface that we are interacting with would actually be constantly changing. Not growing, but sliding by.
Fun fact: a fourth dimensional object would look the same no matter what angle you look at it, that's why most people explain it using a reflective sphere.
