[4K] Crash Team Racing Nitro-Fueled: PS4/Pro vs Xbox One/X Tested + PS1 Graphics Comparison! 

Even the Wii and gamecube Mario kart games target 60. There’s no reason why beenox could have done the same here

The visuals and effects are greater than that of MK, and it also plays better so I think it's a fair trade off

@@tek3576 Plays better? It really doesn't.

@@Collymillad it really does though, I mean mechanically

@@haysen123 Guess we'll have to agree to disagree, in my opinion MK8 would be better than CTR even if it ran at 30fps.

Download the video and watch at 6x for 180 fps

60fps + caffeine overdose

MK8 also plays like shit though

@@tek3576 not at all

@@NexGenTek toujo4 is just mad

toujo4 no it doesn’t go play it

@@tek3576 ahahahaha thanks for the good laugh man

It the games can't reach the 60fps is only bevande all the consoles here featured mount the same Jaguar cpu. The only thing Who changes Is the clock Speed. And even on the Xbox One X the increase of the cpu clock Is top small to garantuee the double of cpu Power needed to run the game logic at he double of the Speed. Wait for the next consoles to start seeing more cpu related stuffs take actions.

@@bomberman4046 It's a PSOne game. There is no reason the PS4 CPU can't keep up 60fps.

@@SoaringDive Like the other crash remastered, this game is made completly from scratch. It's a remake, not a remastered. And that's means re-done from zero. Everything you see in the game is recreated from zero. The engine behind the game is completly different, every assets got remade from scratch, the course are created from zero, everything is recreated holding in mind the look and feel of the game on ps1, but nothing is the same. The proportions of courses are probably all differents, because they are recreates similar to the original, but it's impossible achieve 1:1. Said, this, new engine, jaguar laptop cpu who were trash already in 2011 = you can't have stable 60fps.

@@christophercoey7804 That's not true. Games run at higher fps than server tick rates all the time.

Console CPU's are the reason 60FPS isn't available. The new console generations such as Scarlett etc fix that issue.

There is no excuse as to why a PS1 remake remaster with current gen graphics cannot run a 60fps on base PS4 xbone at full 1080p... what's going on is a dev team favoring "platform parity" which means the game code is sloppy after and is then enhanced to look good at 30fps... then you go to PS4 Pro and xbonex... lmaooo

I picked Team sonic racing over this because of the framerate

It wouldnt be fair to have enhanced owners to have 60fps in multiplayer

General Zubbis this isn’t an Olympic competition. The advantage would be minor at best, and this is how it is on PC for any multiplayer game and you don’t see people complaining there.

@@DeesBees85 I agree with you, but you dont need to change my mind, you need to change the devs mind.

It's not really a problem because even if it's at 30fps the sense of speed is great

Game plays amazing at 30fps. That's what the original ran at. We don't need 60fps for this kind of game.

No buy by me. Yep. Money squeezing in its pure form.

FPS and racing games are garbage at 30 FPS. I'd love to play this game but I Will wait for a Pc version and play at 1440p 100+

totaly agree. Although it's not a real surprise because Activision did not provide a 60fps-mode for Crash and Spyro trilogy on Pro and One X, its still very disappointing because this one is a racing game where 60fps should at least (!) be an option. There is no excuse for this decision, we all know the engine is capable of doing 60fps from the PC-Versions. And: Mario Kart 8 runs in 1080p@60fps on Switch, this should have been a benchmark for CTR.

That is called lazy

@Zaro Zaro true, but i wish the focus was less on graphics, and more on framerate.

@@leonthesleepy Graphics sell games. Framerate doesn't. That's why we have so many 30fps games. Most people don't care and can't tell the difference.

@@RicochetForce Are you sure about that? To me at least I can immediately detect when a videogame is running at 30 fps or 60 fps.

@@nicholaschavez5006 That's you. Most people don't care and that's why these companies keep putting on 30fps games. If you really care about framerates in games, get a PC. It's great here.

@@RicochetForce That's not really that true. What are some of the games that sell the most or are played the most on console? CoD, Fortnite, FIFA and all other sports games...etc. I think even dumb people know that a game feels better to play and more responsive even if they don't know it's because it's 60fps.

But 60 FPS would mean half the graphics quality.

Ioannis Stf compare the textures and the environments.

Xbox one and xbox one is getting old... While ps4 is getting more high quality triple a games this year and next year . While xbox one is.none

@@MrBenedick14 lol yeah right

Pretty sure sales numbers matter most to Activision and this 30fps turd is currently at number 1.

@@Gryzor88 lol

Who cares the best place to play is on ps4! Everyone should feel lucky they can play it because it could have been ps exclusive.

Got a nitpicker here

You’re not wrong. Tom is a man who considered Smash Bros. Ultimate to be a remaster of Smash Wii U as well.

It's a remaster , watch the some of the official commercials. You know more content can be added in remasters right? If they released the game with the same content and characters as it did back then people would complain

@@tek3576 its a remake, its (obviously) not using the same engine or assets. Everything was recreated from scratch to mimic the look of the original.

@@tek3576 Im not sure why you are assuming people are saying its not a remaster because of the added content... its a remake because it was remade from scratch using a new engine and assets. Whatever was used in commercials is pretty irrelevant as well. If it were a remaster they would have used the same code and assets and just optimized the visuals, like the PS1 final fantasy games or something like Twilight Princess HD. Another simple example is Shadow of the Colossus, in which there is both a Remaster and a Remake and the difference is very clear

Or at least give an uncapped option at 1080p. The One X could easily hold 50+, if the S is stable at 30fps.

@@johnnyn6022 Bro, it could easily do 1080p/60 on X. You'll see when it comes to PC and even the most bunk PC can do 1080/60 like with the trilogy.

@@shtiken 60fps would change the gameplay. So every system is locked @ fair 30fps

@@__Pathfinder__ They should have the options for single player and multiplayer should have had graphics scaled back until every console hit 60 fps.

60fps on next-gen consoles....

Its all good anyway!!

Like the original boy. It’s really fast game, anyway.

are you joking me it's only 30fps??? the game came out in the 90s wtf is going on this gen man

@@Cavernicola25 Yeah I know dude, I played it back then too but this game at 30fps aint right for 2019. Its a full fledged remake and if they bump the res to 2k, they csn lower the res for 60fps. Xbox One X at the very least can run this at 60fps no problem. Im sure the Pro csn too.

ps4 and xbox one cannot handle cartoon games with 60fps

@@TheRedFoxMcCloud hold this W

cartoonish.. HAHAHAH the amount of details is what matters. because CTR is stylized it has more textures and requires more processing power

@Zaro Zaro I agree however its not near detailed as FH 4.

Yun Su it’s doesn’t have “more textures”. You think Forza has untextured models or something? Every object in both games is textured, there isn’t a case it “more” unless you mean more assets on screen. Which is debatable and what really matters actually is the polygon count, which we know for Forza is in the millions for each car - something I doubt Crash Team Racing is anywhere near.

ye but ctr has way better grafix

@@gammat8248 Stop smoking.... Horizon 4 is 10x more demanding.

KingChris Gaming I ain’t smokin shit bro, ctr grafix shits all over horizon 4 grafix

@@gammat8248 lmao

I mean, I’ll give you that. It’s the only game worth playing on the X lol

they didn't even emphasize resolution.

@@Dr.WhetFarts yes they did

red dead 2 is a horse simulator running at 30 fps with forced motion blur and sluggish combat.

dr. whet farts with frame drops

dr. whet farts RDR2 is a much more advanced game that pushes consoles the limit. Crash Team Racing is not, the developers have no excuses.

​@@youwhatmadeidk How do you know? Did you work on it to see what's running under the hood? Or you assume it's not because CTR looks "cartoony" to you? While there are explosions and sparkles happening all the time in CTR at least the frame rate stays consistent yet playing RDR in 4k it feels like an old timey 8mm slideshow once you reach San Denis or any big town.

Caffeinated Critic You know you sound ridiculous right ?

@Caffeinated Critic that is the fault of the developer not the console maker. The Xbox one x can definitely run this better but they've limited it. I hope there is an update in the near future.

@Caffeinated Critic Gears 5 will run 4k60. So stop with the fanboy troll bullshit. You know as well as i do its down to the devs. X can 100% run CTR at 4k60...

if red dead redemption 2 can run native 4k 30 fps on xbox one x then this game which isn't anywhere near as graphically demanding should in theory be able to achieve the same.

Shane Jones nah the technology is too outdated that’s why they’re making a new Xbox. Games are more taxing now late this gen.

You can't be serious...

It can handle 4k 60 if the base console can handle it the 4k 60 should be no problem

FesteringKadaver What?

The Xbox one x can run it 4k 60 if they optimize it well the base console can handle it nicely even with 4 players

Weird, since it's bunk.

Lazy ass developers.

What waste.

@@unitymember2050 you do realize that GTSport, forza motorsport, project cars, MGS V, every COD game and many others run at 60fps?? And that's not even the enhanced consoles!

Unity Member Many other developers do it just fine. This is a cart racer, it’s not even a complex open world or something.

Unity Member switch cpu is much worse and yet it runs Mario kart 8 at 60fps 1080p

Dylan Boom last gen Richthofen

What a waste of opportunity for Raven.

They also made a few Spider-Man games

No doubt they will be making a dedicated switch video for this

Matches the 99 version.

@Encore1234567890 Enjoy playing CTR on the go on your One X or PS4 Pro. Oh, wait....

@Hello Thursday Ps4 runs worse than switch

@Encore1234567890 I wish Switch was that cheap in Europe.

The original ran lower than 30fps. It's still playable but if you compare the two it's obvious that the remake has a better frame rate.

Only PAL version was 25fps. NTSC-U/J was 30fps

The pro nor x can handle stable 60 fps. The CPU is very weak.

@@ridwankhan4883 gt sport

Ridwan Khan GT Sport proves you wrong

Ridwan Khan GT sport is 1800p60

Parker this game is simply brilliant and much much faster than MK8. Sorry to say but it’s your loss. 60 FPS is not EVERYTHING as many believe. A good game had to lie at the basis, and CTR is just that.

@@alexanderulv3886 Hard to believe "faster" means anything if it's running at half-speed. The game is half as smooth and by halving the the framerate you've halved the skill ceiling. since you have half the precision.

Alexander Ulv it’s running at half speed of Mario Kart it literally can’t be faster. You may also want to check out MK8 200cc class....that’s faster than nearly any game out there.

@@yanceyboyz Dude you should try Fast RMX. Average Speed is 900mph

Helping Hands RMX is a good game, but it’s completely different as it’s antigrav vehicle’s like fzero and wipeout. The courses are built to allow a sense of speed in straight lines. Mario Kart 8 at 200cc feels ridiculously fast due to the tight nature of the courses that were designed for slower speeds. I’d say wipeout HD at phantom level feels faster than RMX though, again down to track design.

I picked up the switch version over ps4 for the pure portability

Well it's still better than the ps pro

In portable mode it's only 480p/30 fps.

@Luis no

@Luis game looks quiet the same on Switch compared to Ps4.

Why the hell did you need to skip multiple lines to say that?

Maybe they could develop a "performance mode" 1080p @ 60fps. It seems they focused on graphic fidelity rather than high FPS count.

You can only polish a turd so much. 💩

Dude c'mon man Forza 7 runs Native 4k ultra locked 60fps on the XboxOneX, and that game's vastly superior in every graphical way to this game, and so there's no doubt 4k 60 was easily achievable on XboxOneX without breaking a sweat as this was pure lazy developmental effort on part of the devs lmao no 60fps, and only 1440p lol these lazy devs shouldn't be rewarded when they pull this bullshit on the enhanced machines

@@techlord8434 Unfortunately Forza isn't fun at all and has no local multiplayer. I'd much rather play CTR, and I'd argue it looks better too.

@@arbiter- Forza 7 does have local multiplayer.

Because this uses way more visual effects

Bc they chose graphics over higher framerate....

This game uses infinitely higher quality effects and assets. But I'm not seeing any reason why it can't be 60 fps. I know there's engine differences, but how can something like RE2 Remake be damn near photo realistic at 60 fps but this can't even hit 30?

Because mk8 deluxe is still a last gen game.

They shouldve pared back the visuals. Why a remaster has to have cutting edge graphics when the original was using low polygon models is beyond me.

It's not a remake. Just like Shadow of the Colossus (2018), Crash N'Sane Trilogy, Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask 3D or the upcoming Medievil. They are not made from scratch. The have not been remade. They kept the basic structure and code and changed the overall look while they introduced some tweaks here and there on gameplay. Those are remastered. Absolutely amazing remasters... but not remakes. Metroid Zero Mission is a remake. Pokémon Fire Red is a remake. Games that take the original as a starting point to build a new title from it. Not only from a visual perspective, but level and map design are familiar but totally different, expanded story, different gameplay with not just different and better controls, but with new and far more elements, upgraded music and sound... If I'm playing Crash Team Racing on PS1 and you're playing this PS4 remastered... we're essentially playing the same game. Sure, yours looks much better than mine and also has online. But other than that is the same game. If I'm playing Metroid Zero Mission and you're playing Metroid (NES)... we're not playing the same game. The core concept is the same: Samus has to explore Planet Zebes, kill the Metroids and Mother Brain. But what you and I actually do and the way we do it... is totally different. Because Zero Mission is a remake. Not a remaster.

I have to agree with Shinobu Sensui here even though this game is effectively being rebuilt from the ground up it is not a remake it is effectively a remastering of the original game. Nothing is intentionally being changed from the original outside of the graphics. That's why it's a remaster. A remake/reboot is something like Ratchet & Clank on PS4 it is very similar to the original even built using the same tools and by the same developer as the original yet it is very different indeed and the changes were intentional. Even though Shadow of The Colossus was effectively rebuilt visually it too is a remake and underneath it all the character and AI is the very same PS2 code running on PS4 (with minute background tweaks that don't affect gameplay but which allow it to run on PS4 of course). However I disagree strongly with his Smash Ultimate example as that is clearly just a sequel. It's a new game in the same franchise with minor iterative changes and improvements to gameplay, UI, character balancing, music, so on and so forth.... That's a sequel. Crash has had many reboots, sequels and remakes in the past though. For examples of sequels look to the original trilogy. For examples of remakes look at CTR's _'sequels'_ which completely changed the underlying mechanics or even "Crash Twin Sanity" or "Crash of The Titans" and its sequel all of which changed the focus of the franchise dramatically as well. Crash has also had a few spinoffs on mobile like those GBA and DS titles no one remembers similar to "Ratchet & Clank: Size Matters" or even more dramatically "Secret Agent Clank" (which I personally liked) both on PSP. You could argue "Ratchet Deadlocked" was a spinoff (not sure what Insomniac Games says about that though) and another game like "Ratchet and Clank All 4 One" is a good example of a spinoff, but unlike Ratchet & Clank, Crash has no companion titles for example "Ratchet and Clank: Beyond The Nexus" which is a mobile title that allows users to collect bolts and parts for weapons in the main game when players are away from their PS3 (yes, it's an older example, but not the oldest). Anyway the differences between a lot of these things is becoming blurry and messy in recent years with some changes to Spyro bordering remake territory. For example some of the text was changed or outright removed with many animations at the beginning and ends of stages especially in Spyro 2. Not sure if this is to keep up with the ever changing ideals of progressives or what but it is very noticeable in some stages. So Spyro seems like a remake in some ways new voice actors, new controls, some major changes to animations, text and dialogue that can make some spots feel less familiar, but it intentionally is made to be very much like the original including the same levels and gameplay mechanics... So the Spyro Reignited Trilogy is a remaster not a remake. Same logic applies to Crash N.Sane Trilogy and this CTR title, they are all remasters of the original with very few changes to the core gameplay.

While I do appreciate your well-thought-out answers, I will have to disagree on a technical basis of the term ‘remaster’. A remake can in fact be almost exactly the same as the original - it does not have to differ in any substantial way. A remaster involves taking the original code (so including all original polygons) and basically making sure that they work with newer advanced hardware in the best way they can. And like a remake, a remaster doesn’t have to be 100% - Look at Perfect Dark on 360 for example; tons of newly made textures but the game still uses 90% original assets. There is just absolutely no way that CTR can be considered a remaster on a technical basis of the term’s meaning (re-mastering the original code for new hardware). The term might sound cooler, but we cannot use it just because we want to.

@@zachglanz Slight difference of opinion then. I respect your opinion.

Lmao git gud. The original hits 25fps and people still play it and perform quite well. Stop being a baby

Imagine being so out of touch that you didn't realize the vast majority of racing games on consoles have all been 30hz / 30fps... Even the recent Horizon titles we see getting remarkable scores. Keep up the bullshit though, cheers.

@@ucreep6108 Incorrect, the majority of racing games this generation are 60fps.

@DejaVoodooDoll sigh....the point is people shouldn't be HAVING to adapt to 30fps. Enjoy your shite though ;)

@@aquaglow1 Not at 4k, dip shit.

Activision did the same thing with N.Sane Trilogy while consoles (especially Pro and X) were more than capable of running it @ 60fps, DF posted a video about this. As always, it's a matter of time and money.

@@christophercoey7804 The fact that a remake with game mechanics from 1999 can't run at 60 fps even on the weakest system is just so stupid. It is clear that the developers targeted 30 fps from the get go with all these crash/spyro remakes and rather pushed the graphics as far as they can. Soon we are getting an ultra realistic looking Call of Duty game (Modern Warfare) from the same company that runs at 60 fps across all console and yet this game is stuck with 30 what a joke.

@@weaverquest , you're right. This has nothing to do with hardware just stupid devs choosing graphics.

@@weaverquest - You are speaking about entirely different games in entirely different genres, with entirely different games engines and requirements from entirely different developers. You can argue that 60fps 1080p should be achievable with a bog standard Xbox One and PS4, but you do NOT know if the developer was further hamstrung by the shared requirements of Nintendo Switch development, you also do not know the ins and outs of the game engine, you have zero idea how many people worked on the game and you have zero knowledge of how long and how many worked on each version of the game. That's an awful lot of things you don't know. Also we have to bare in mind this game was sold at £35 or $40, so it clearly isn't a tripple A title and obviously wll ha e a much more restricted budget as a result. Less more always translates into less time and/or less people on the project. You can tell me I am wrong if you like - I'm a former senior games designer and former senior producer in development and publishing. I do not know any inside track specific to this game, but I have worked on games that scored 9/10 and I have worked on games that suffered and got 7/10 and I do know that time and money often translates into success and vice versa that a lack of time and money and compromise often causes issues. Lazy devs is just a dumbed down ignorant argument and a conversation not worth having. P.S I worked at Sony and Eidos amongst others. P.S The Xbox One X and PS4 Pro can almost certainly handle 60fps on this game given the stress related results seen with the Xbox One version of the game running at 1080p - 30fps, but like I said - this creates problems on the back end with netcode and with servers - so they have simply not gone there - the multiplayer aspect of the game has made them decide against that. We do not know what those costs are and as a company the publisher and developer has decided against that - that's where we are - period! They could have upped the graphical fidelity on the X and Pro - as this would not have incured the same issues. Maybe they will do that in a post patch - we might see a 4K X and a checkerboarded Pro patch - we have to wait and see. Where the developer and publisher do derserve credit is in the amount of in-game content given the price of the game, in their accurate recreation of the original tracks for a new generation and in their application of customisation - all with the complete avoidance of microtransactions.

@@weaverquest ​ @Cutter Elf - You are speaking about entirely different games in entirely different genres, with entirely different games engines and requirements from entirely different developers. You can argue that 60fps 1080p should be achievable with a bog standard Xbox One and PS4, but you do NOT know if the developer was further hamstrung by the shared requirements of Nintendo Switch development, you also do not know the ins and outs of the game engine, you have zero idea how many people worked on the game and you have zero knowledge of how long and how many worked on each version of the game. That's an awful lot of things you don't know. Also we have to bare in mind this game was sold at £35 or $40, so it clearly isn't a tripple A title and obviously wll ha e a much more restricted budget as a result. Less more always translates into less time and/or less people on the project. You can tell me I am wrong if you like - I'm a former senior games designer and former senior producer in development and publishing. I do not know any inside track specific to this game, but I have worked on games that scored 9/10 and I have worked on games that suffered and got 7/10 and I do know that time and money often translates into success and vice versa that a lack of time and money and compromise often causes issues. Lazy devs is just a dumbed down ignorant argument and a conversation not worth having. P.S I worked at Sony and Eidos amongst others. P.S The Xbox One X and PS4 Pro can almost certainly handle 60fps on this game given the stress related results seen with the Xbox One version of the game running at 1080p - 30fps, but like I said - this creates problems on the back end with netcode and with servers - so they have simply not gone there - the multiplayer aspect of the game has made them decide against that. We do not know what those costs are and as a company the publisher and developer has decided against that - that's where we are - period! They could have upped the graphical fidelity on the X and Pro - as this would not have incured the same issues. Maybe they will do that in a post patch - we might see a 4K X and a checkerboarded Pro patch - we have to wait and see. Where the developer and publisher do derserve credit is in the amount of in-game content given the price of the game, in their accurate recreation of the original tracks for a new generation and in their application of customisation - all with the complete avoidance of microtransactions.

Thanks !

Yes 20fps

@@nicholasellis7494 you wish

nicholas ellis it actually holds a steady 30fps. VGtech has the footage on his channel

And on much weaker hardware.

@@shtiken Which says a lot. Very humiliating on Beenox's part.

I get what beenox was going for. Great graphics, but come on, is this the kind of game where you need pixel perfect graphics? At the speed these games move there's no point in pushing that much detail and giving up the most important thing: 60 fps.

Beenox should take notes from polyphony.

@Zaro Zaro Good point. After some thought, I have to say that I actually don't mind about the 30 FPS now and starting to enjoy that game. I would always say that graphics does not matter and take gameplay as well as performance seriously. But, this CTR remake managed to meet my expectations in terms of gameplay and constant performance. Maybe, they will fix that issue with the PC version (just like the N. Sane and Spyro Reignited trilogies). As expected, the PC master race (as they would call it) has to make everything better. No offense to anyone here. Luckily, I have a gaming laptop so that should not be a problem.

I guess they didn't want to lower the graphics settings that much so all consoles could get rock solid 30 fps.

@@danielgomez7236 why would they have to though 4 player mode runs the same as single player why can't single player mode at least run at 60

@@johannessguten2527 I mean 30 fps, sorry, they adjusted the game so it could run at solid 30 fps on all consoles, including the less powerful Nintendo Switch.

@@danielgomez7236 no I was saying where is the extra horsepower for single player going if it's running the same as 4 player

Yh Im gonna wait too. Shame coz Playstation is Crash's home.

There is even a 480hz monitor now. Albeit, at 720p. Wonder how long until we get 480hz 1080p.

@@jorge69696 Really that's nuts haha, I hadn't heard of that! How big is it, at that res it better not be bigger than 24 inches.

@@jorge69696 1080p is getting dull. needs at least 1440p these days. 1080p especially using tn looks soo crap.

Even though I caved and got the playstation version can’t wait to play the pc version next year

It's a remaster lol

toujo4 A remaster is when original elements are taken and remastered for better hardware (subtle new assets may be created such as 2D elements, but for the most part 95% of the game is exactly the same but in higher resolution). CTR clearly is not using original elements.

alarmclockscreams he’s a troll

Who cares? What's the difference, remaster is a broad description. No one will be left confused, especially when pedants like yourself already litter the comments

Bobert Daniels ‘Remaster’ is not a broad description in the sense that it absolutely does not cover remakes. And I witness almost daily the very real confusion that has occurred *just* from the Crash and Spyro trilogies’ use of ‘remastered’ in their promotional material. This misinformation is spreading like wildfire.

Majority of the developers favors graphics fidelity over frame rate... In ps5 its only a matter of time before they go back to 30fps because majority of the games are cross generation..if all the developers are moving on to current generation, they will go back to 30fps because they prefer graphics over frame rate, this will benefit more on pc.. No matter how powerful the cpu is on console 30fps will still exist as the game evolve in every generation

It'll come. The nsane trilogy is on pc. Why not this game

Same. I'm not trying to play a cart racer at 30 fps.

@@merritt2014 I won't touch it unless it's 200+ fps

@@themarcshark Spyro came to PC as well. Makes sense to port this. If not it's a damn shame.

@@merritt2014 the original CTR is 30fps.. and still more fun than MarioKart or Sonic. 30fps is fine. I'd much prefer 165fps.. but stable 30fps still feels fine

TheRavinoth I played the original in 60fps via an emulator will the difference in framerate be noticeable or will it be easy to adjust to?

Sure but MK8 graphics are a lot worse than CTRNF.

let alone MK8, more demanding games like GT Sport and Forza Horizon 4 ran at 60FPS. how this couldn't is beyond me.

@@anasbakhit4303 Theyre essentially using the same build for all consoles. This version has to run on Switch.

@@yusuf8938 Team Sonic Racing is using the same build as well, ran 30 on the switch and 60 across the ps4's, XBONE's and PC.

@@anasbakhit4303 Theyre probably not running the same build bro.

Not really

Yeah it's by no means a necessity, as anyone who played the original can attest to

Ideally there should be a 60fps option, but it's clearly not a necessity or the game would be unplayable. Forza Horizon 4 is 30fps on Xbox One S too and it's one of the best racing games this gen so it's clearly not as vital as some think.

Man, even the trilogy should've been 60fps.

@@olaf3140 15fps unite! I loved the hell out of the original man.

Or just turn on motion interpolation like you used to recommend, because you don't notice the difference in racing games right 🤭

@@billygunn7713 That's as believable as your 2060 right 🤭

@@NexGenTek Well you're the one who said it. You said FH4 at 30fps with motion interpolation turned on looks and feels the same as 60fps and it was superior to the PC version 🤭

@@billygunn7713 Lol sure! Just like you said you use a 2060 😂.. oops🤭

@@NexGenTek I just checked again and you turned motionflow up to max 🤭 . . . . oops 😎

Yeah....remastering a classic game with great visuals, making it play 1:1, adding characters and tracks from the other games and giving out free DLC. How lazy of them

But hey, still better than 20 FPS PS1 version

I'm a 120fps-or-bust PC player, but this game has some of the smoothest 30fps gameplay I've ever seen. The motion blur really does a great job. I've played 60fps games that look less smooth than this.

@@dayko. 30fps with great motion blur can, indeed, feel smooth.

@@dayko. Well of course it's going to look less smooth compared to 60 or 144 fps. But it still looks smooth. Like I said, I'm a huge stickler for frame rates, and even I'm impressed with the motion blur implementation.

legion 😂😂😂😂

legion Or put this on PC and we’ll get 144 FPS there.

@@Mr.Honest247 or when it comes to PC it'll be capped at 60 lol

N. Guy Well in the PC version of Crash Bandicoot Nsane Trilogy you could unlock the FPS to 144. I forgot how though because I haven’t touched it in a while.

Dayko Is the ini file the same way you unlock the FPS on the PC version of Crash Bandicoot Nsane Trilogy? I forgot how I did it last time and can’t seem to make it work again.

Indeed, I heard Pro/X had 60fps so I was very disappointed. Should have waited for the PC version.

Not really no

They have a video telling you why they like motion blur and what makes the implementation of it bad or good irrespective of frame rate. Yea 60 fps still should've been a priority no matter what

Not really lmao. Stop whining and try it out for yourself

@@tek3576 I'll play Crash Racing if it's free in PS Plus, otherwise I'm not wasting my money on a 30fps racing game. I'd rather play Mario Kart DS, even that was 60fps on a 67 MHz CPU! Illustrates how shocking a 30fps racing game truly is, Digital Foundry are losing their reputation by making excuses for it.

@@aquaglow1 free on* also """""free""""" also it's your loss dude, the game plays and looks great, way better than Mario kart. You're just picky and clueless

@@tek3576 Better than Mario Kart 😂 Not at this framerate

Emulate the original

it would be fun on pc but man id be cheating and modding wumpa coins because aint now way im doing that grind i did to unlock everything on ps4, it beat the soul out of me.

Yeah it's also too "cinematic" for me

You don't even know why 60fps is needed in games, hahaha. It's NOT to please the eyes, with smooth movement. 60fps is important to reduce Control Input Lag. Now I had my doubts if you can acttually distinguish 60fps and 30fps with high quallity Motion Blur, wich is the case for this game.

@@RafaPai84 You're being ignorant to the fact that you use your eyes to discern input delay, there's a clear difference in 30fps Vs 60fps just base on panning the camera. just because it's fine to you, doesn't dictate the same for me. I'm not saying a 30fps game hasn't been playable for me, it's just hard going back. I usually get a headache. After my eyes get used to it all remains is a bit of floaty controls.

It's Akile OK, whats good for me, can not be good for other person... You're right! For me 30fps is the bare minimum, but just fine. I do prefer games at 60fps too. But what we're seeing in all this coment section is like 30fps is a complet trash, wich isn't the case. Specially when using a controler. For mouse and keyboard, yeah, 30fps can feel slugsh. But this game is not a Shooter.

I couldn't even beat the first track on hard. You are the man

HDD power

baxin worst part of the game. But I’ve been loving it lately

Nearly 5 times as powerful as the base Xbox One but only gets 1.8 times the pixel output. Even without proper optimization it could've easily been 1800p. And the lack of a 60fps mode on ANY system is appalling. Pretty sure at least 2/3rds of people would choose 1080p60 over 1440p30 if given a side by side.

Not a stable 60 though,

@Zaro Zaro MK* on switch doesn't run below 60... Digital foundry themselves have tested it and I have played the game all the way through as well. On wii U and switch. Plus on Wii U it was a glitch where it would output 59 frames every other second.

@@Rockymann27 Yes, a stable 60. Show me otherwise.

@@XenogearsPS Digital foundry did a video on it and showed a couple of times it dipped to 58 and 59. Good try though.

30fps games are fine, you're saying that like 30fps games have input problems all the time. And RDR2 has framerate drops and intentional input lag to make it more "cinematic" so I wouldn't put it on a list of "the most responsive 30fps games"

toujo4 yea now that I think about it Red Dead 2 does have input lag that I had to get used to, mainly when aiming and shooting. I should have used Destiny 2 as an example of 30 fps that still feels really responsive. There’s games I’ve played that are locked to 30 fps and you can FEEL it like wtf, I think Killzone Shadowfall was like that.

just wait for the pc release :D

@@somnia3423 shhh let the console fanboys think that their console can do anything at any resolution :)

@@Zontar82 okaaaay :x

Red Dead Redemption 2, God of War, etc. Almost every Triple AAA title that has come out in the last five years (including 2019) has been 30hz / 30fps. You idiots are so clueless, it's hilarious.

👌👌👌

@@ucreep6108 Yeah i know, and you know why is that? because of the limitations of the console And btw, 30hz/30fps, go away pls

for a racing game, that's truly ridiculous being 30fps, 60fps for these type of games are the rule not the exception.

I'm still waiting 2 years later to no avail

Makes no difference my friend, try actually playing the instead of complaining

toujo4 i have more than 2 friends but I (almost) never play Mario kart 8 with >2 players because it drops from 60 to 30. It’s my choice!