I had one of these..... Most comfortable seats I've ever seen in a car.... huge leg room both front and rear..... more power than you would expect from 200 hp in a car that big. The ride was a bit spongy but a great car.
@@ibinshootin2427 turns out it was completely rusted through, had to sell it unfortunately 💔 whoever the previous owner was, left it out in MN snow which ruined it
The performance left something to be desired and even worse it required premium. The best part about it was its durability. The Ford HO 5.0 had more power and far better fuel economy plus it took regular, but it couldn't take as much of a beating as Cadillac's 4.9.
I just bought a 1992 for a weekend driver. My dad owned one for 10 years after my uncle sold it to him. I know every issue with this vehicle but damn are fast and ride smooth! Just got it with 42000miles for $1000 bucks
I bought my '92 Cadillac Sedan Deville with 92,700 miles on it. Since brought it up to 94,500 miles. 4.9 engine is powerful. But doesn't tempt me to speed. It's a cruising type of ride.
these are SO HARD TO FIND in good condition. nothing i like better than this series of cadillac. nothing was as serene and comfortable a driving experience as with these autos.
Tell me about it. '91 was the only good year as it had the 4.9 and coupes still, at least for the FWD Fleetwood. Very few coupes for '92 and maybe 1 in '93. More Deville coupes in '92.
Love this car. Bought it for 400 bucks. 128000 miles.. Had to so some work like the starter, belts, radiator, and such. Great travel car. Not so good in city. I avg about 17 mpg. Not the best on gas and burns a lot of oil. But, all in all great investment. When cleaned and detailed it looks sweet. Old school is best. (-:
BruceTheSillyGoose Oh it's not my barn it's a friends barn. She is quite the gem though. And a fun first car teaches you about comfort and driving easy. Not all fast and dumb like those civic owners.
@@russelljohnson1303 yeh when i drove one it forced me to go into slow mode, slow movements, calm. the calm vibe was the total package. relaxing actually. even the strip speedo was calming, in addition to having that hood ornament out front guiding the way.
So I’m looking at the same year 92 Cadillac DeVille 4D with 67,000 miles for 8k anyone think it’s a good deal or no ? Wanna get in to classic cars all red interior too looks sweet just need opinions
hate to be that guy but the heat doesnt come out of the vents on these cars but rather from the floor vents some weird design they had with them back in the day but either way its a nice car nonetheless
Had one until ten years ago, could never figure out why I wasn't having hundreds of electrical problems like other GM cars, were using tungsten contacts in all the switches and switches it did have. Called it my highway car before they came out with this stupid winter gas, only 75% the BTU rating of summer gas, got 33 mpg on the highway, cit was 15 mpg no matter how careful you drove it. Avoided driving it on on salted roads, another car killer, but in around 2008 four ABS lines, three fuel lines, and two transmission lines all rusted out. Replaced the all myself, that was a major job if GM only used better materials, like a little nickel in these lines. Been driving Cadillac's since my 1937 Limo, but the 1993 was the last good one, after that, junk from Caddy, were also bad in the late 70's using a Chevy or whatever engine, maybe an Olds. Test drove a CTS in 2010, was exactly the same size as the Cruze, well not exactly, had one more inch of rear seat foot space, and a 340 or whatever HP engine you could not use in a country with a 55 mph speed limit. Cruze was practically the same, but $40,000 less. Feel that 1937 with a V-16 was the last good Caddy made, all downhill from then.
Only thing I hate about it is the analogue gauge. The digital one is so nice. Odd as I've seen them both with and without the digital; guess it was an option still after '92. My '91 has digital, my family's '92 had analogue, and saw a '93 recently with digital again. Shame they showed no RPM. I have those same Firestone FR710 tires on mine. For a $65 or $70 tire they are quite excellent.
@@amcmoass1751 92 Cadillac Brougham D Elegance. Now I remember that after 76, Cadillac started down-sizing the DeVille. By sometime after the 70's, They really down-sized. the DeVilles were so small, compared to the 75 I owned, I just stopped paying attention to them. I owned the Broughams and forgot Cadillac was manufacturing the smaller, down-sized version. Do you like the smaller DeVille? The 75 DeVille and 75 Brougham I drove were great cars. 500 cu in engine. sucked much fuel.
