5 Bands That Will Be Remembered In 100 Years 

I did have a time machine but I screwed up and am now in Ford's Theater Washington in April 14th 1865 in the seat behind Lincoln. I got some 'splaining to do....

beep boop

One American band … okay, fair.

@@KitWriter i didn't even notice that

​@@KitWriterNirvana? 😅

looooooooooooooooool

The future breeds machines.

Lullabies for stoned people probably won't be fashionable in 100 years time.

That’s so the abrasive finish on my Les Paul doesn’t rub the letters off my shirts!

yeah the fact metallica makes this list but not ironmaiden brings to question this dude's musical competancy. Metallica is the most overrated metal band of all time. they could barely play thier insturments when they first started and by the time they were getting fairly competant they lost their best guy as far as actual muscial understanding (Cliff) . their style of burying the bass guitar under every thing in the mix did more damage to music than 100 poser bands could (and no it wasn't just AJFA, go back to those early albums aside from killem all , cliff was usually burried in the mix too) and in true fashion when metal started fading from the frontlines of music they derivitavely do two grunge albums of their own abandoning their heavy metal fan bass durring a dark period of metal history (load and reload). musically they've always borrowed and in some cases ripped off bands and band mates around them. yet so many act like they single handedly invented thrash , when there were 3 other thrash bands coming up in the scene back in the day , and metallica was not even the first to get signed.

Cunther point.

I hate Led Zeppelins guitar tone, it's thin, cold and scratchy. Plus they did all that stupid hippy acoustic folky stuff as well.

@@user-qb1sm3rk9r Yeah. That's exactly my point.

Funny how that cliche argument about humans has been used over and over for the last 2 centuries. More recently, people even thought we wouldn't get to live past the cold war "prepare for sticks and stones". People from 100 years ago (1924) thought our race would perish before the 80's. And here we are, and shit here we go again.

Why?

The Rolling Stones.

well 100 years ago things were done so differently. in the 1920's jazz was all the rave , and jazz bands at that time were massive orchestral arrangments. this was before the 4-5 man band standard that Buddy Holly started. People were less focused on the performers in such an arrangment and more focused on the music itself. popular music of coruse took a major change around the 1950's. first with elvis who was bassically the blueprint of later pop artist like Prince and Micheal jackson. many call him the king of rock and roll , but the fact his band arrangment was more like a pop artist makes me hate this labeling of elvis. in truth the first "modern" rock band arrangment was with Buddy Holly's band. which consisted of one guitar (buddy) one bassist (up right bass at that) , one drummer and one singer (also buddy) . this set the format for rock bands that still last to this day , granted most folks add a second guitar to their line and few have three . the basic format of a rock or metal band is still, the same today , guitar , bass , drums , vocals. it was this samll band format along with pop artist like Elvis that started the modern craze over individual musicans , since the band itself was so much smaller teens could actually memorize the entire band's names., thus also making the band name self more immportant to the youth . were before bands were huge groups of 50+ musicians and no oenc ared what their names were , or their whole toupe's name.