I'm loving the Lewitt MTP 550. The PGA58 in your review here sounds amazing but I've heard it sound like crap in other reviews. Meg can sing me the phone book. One of the best vocal demo singers in any video.
Great presentation. Your demos are always so detailed and real world. The mics all sound great with subtle differences to my ear at least. If I had to pick any, the Beta 58 and E835 seemed the nicest sounding in this comparison.
Not only is that girl, at your place, an excellent guitarist but she's also a great singer, never knew. Hmm? Interesting review. Super cardioids are a little weird on stage cuz if you move your head from side to side at all you can lose the signal but I get the feed back rejection thing.
The E835 wins it for me, closely followed by the Beta 58, then quitte a bit less sounding the Lewitt MP550DM, then a bigger step down the Shure PGA58 and last but also very least the SE Electronics V7
I need a mic that I don't have to feel like I need to be pressing my mouth against while I'm playing guitar. I have a strong vocal presence and need to have a mic that can project my voice from left to right (of the microphone) as I stand onstage. I need a mic that can even pic my guitar sound up well. Any advice is appreciated.
I absolutely love Meg's voice but wonder why she sings so far away from it. If this is a comparison, most people want to hear these mics used at the distances most people would use them at, which is to say a few inches closer.
As a vocalist since I age 6. I didn't hear much of a difference. But the real test would be for each person to try them out. In a real band. The technology has finally caught up with the rest of the instruments and PA. It will be interesting how it all plays out.
I really like the warm sound I get from my Beta58a, but it’s lacking my needs for side rejection. i play electric harp, and the Shure picks up my playing pretty loudly, unless I literally turn my back on it. I tend to sing half again as close as your singer, so a minimum of proximity effect is important. That said, I’m surprised you didn’t include the Audix OM5, with boasts the best feedback and side noise rejection of any other mic in its class. I was skeptical, until i found out Bonnie Raitt has used the OM5 on her tours for almost 2 decades. include it on your next mic review, eh?
@@norleymx Our other singers use those and they are also wonderful. The difference is all about the magnets used. The 935 has more punch(stronger magnets) than the 835s, in my opinion.I don't have to sing as "hard" as it is more sensitive...
Good job brother, all the mics sound good but when it come to how the mic handled vocal spread Ill go with the lewitt, you'll need headphone to see how quickly the vocal stops spreading which its can be a good thing for house of worship performance or in a small room, all other mics here have almost the same top end but lewitt have more control of it.
The se v7 does anyone know if it would still be decent for studio vocals? I know it’s better to record vocals with a condenser mic but I do not have a treated room
Well, definitely you can use it for the recordings as well. I have both Sennheiser e835(which works better at lives as for me) and seElectronics V7( and also I have my condenser Rode Nt1-A) so I must say that V7 is realy great, I did a few covers, I guess it`s perfect for not very loud songs. I also asked my friends who produce music and all of them approved that the quality is enough for my purposes.
@@JoeStuffzAltyes I’ve seen ALOT of people say the v7 gives shure a run for their money but I besides being good enough for studio vocals I wonder how the proximity effect is. My favorite singer is diverse often being very close to the mic quiet vocals and then pulls away some for loud belting chorus etc .however they had ALOT of analog gear back then and the vocals sound rather thin in my opinion. Yet I’ve heard other albums where it sounds much thicker beefier tone but this was probably due to digital eq compression multi effects from a more modern computer. I’ve also had interest in the telefunken m80 which I hear is amazing for up close singers but double the price. V7 is 100$ m80 is 199$ however telefunken m80 says of the get go that they claim their mic is suitable for BOTH the stage and studio. So I guess I’m saying I want a mic that can do double duty. I understand this will come with limitations but can only afford time being to purchase ONE new mic
The sE v7s extended frequency response has nothing to do with it been a super cardoid mic. Novices look to people like you for advice before spending their hard earned cash, So please, get your facts right!
Sir, I am beginner. I want to record my written poetry professionally. In which my line will go in high tone and will also come in low tone. Tell me such a mic and audio interface. So that I can record and mix later. My room is not sound proof. My total budget is $300. But a shopkeeper told me that you cannot do recording with dynamic mic. Please tell me what should I do. Tell me such a mic and audio interface that I will not regret after buying.
It’s aluminum, not Aluminium. But overlooking that it would be nice if the singer would sing the same song, rather than different sound clips for each microphone.
One problem...to test vocal microphone for live you have to sing with microphone placed in front your mouth not 1 maters away. That test is worthless, looks like you never worked on stage with vocal microphones :(
S sssss too much from both host and guest singer, maybe the m8cs are really bad, a really good mic should sound nice no matter the situation, now I know these aren't good enough.....thanks
