5. Hayes Process Macro - Model 4 |  

As usual, clear, precise, and detailed. This is very helpful. Thank you Dr. Fawad!

Very extremely helpful video. Browsed through 10 videos to understand mediation and moderation analysis and understood it from here only.

I really appreciate this, particularly the last part, I understand the results but wording them was what I was sturggling with - massive help thank you

Thank you so much. I've been struggling to get my thesis analysis done but this video has helped me a lot. Thank you

Your video helped me to interpret the table. Thank you so much!

This was so detailed and excellently explained. Thanks so much

Amazing video! Helped me so much for my SPSS data analysis, thank you so much!

You are excellent at what you do Sir. Thank you.

Thank you for the video, was very easy to follow and explained everything clearly.

Your style of explanation was very clear. Thank you very much

This is very clear, and helpful!

insightful work. thank you so much

Respect and gratitude. Thank you sir.

thank u sir its really simple and informative ❤️

Really fantastic video. Thank you!

Excellent explaination👍

it really helped a lot, thank you so much sir

Have binge watched many videos in the past few days to understand mediation through Hayes Process and this by far is the *most* clear one👍 thank you so much, going to subscribe and share this for sure. One question: is the write up at the end in APA style? I have been looking for tables in that format but can't seem to find any

Thank you. Very helpful.

excellent work sir!

Thank you for this wonderful tutorial👍🏼

Sir ur vedio is very informative, doing PhD analysis by watching ur vedio 🙏

Thank you so much for this video

Sir, thank u so much for such a wonderful explanation. how to calculate the t staistics which u have mentioned at the end of the tabel sir.

Excellent...

very well explained. Please also explain the difference between Beren and kenny moderator/mediator and Process macro

Thank you very much for your clear explanation, it helped me a lot. I only have one thing I can't figure out. At the end where you show all the results in the table, you show the t-statistics for the indirect effect. How/where do you find that number (5.583)?

Thank you!

Dear authors, thank you so much for this insightful and informative tutorial! In addition, may I know how can we compute the p-value and t-value for indirect effect path? Really appreciate if you could assist on this

thankyou for a detailed video. Can you please explain how will we calculate the effect size in this mediation analysis?

I appreciate this video, to deepen my understandings. In my findings, direct effect is not significant, but indirect effect is significant, also total effect :P=0.523. Can I interpret that this mediator is a perfect mediator? Thank you.

Very very helpful thank You.. just wondering if we have two groups in the IV (experimental vs control) and using mediation analysis how to know which group has the most effect on the DV through the mediator

Hi, thank you so much for making this video. It's really helping me through my thesis. One question, In the final write up, the t value for indirect effect is listed as 5.583 but I cannot find that value in your shown outputs. Maybe I missed something. Could you please advice where to find the t value for the indirect effect? Thank you so so much!!

Very helpful thank you! Do you have any videos on Testing Assumptions for Regression Models?

Thank you very much for your presentation, it is very helpful and informative. Please, I have 2 questions: -Is the significant outcome of the path (a) and (b) a condition of mediation (as is the case with the conditions of Baron and Kenny (1986)? If not, what are the conditions of mediation according to Hayes' method? -According to the results of my thesis: paths a and b, as well as indirect effect, are significant. But Total effect (c) and direct effect (c') are not significant. Are we talking about mediation here? If so, is it total or partial?

Dear Mr.Fawad, thank you so much for the tutorial. It helped me a lot! I had a question, how to adding control variables in mediation analysis? Thank you Mr.Fawad

Thank you very much for the informative video! It was really helpful. If you don't mind me asking a short question: If my current research (mediation - model 4) uses binary dummy coding on the X-variable (i.e., 0 & 1), instead of a continuous predictor. Can I still run Process Macro the same way you did? If not, how would you suggest I do it? I am aware that for X with 3 categories, I would need to tick the multicategorical box before running the analysis, but mine only has *2 categories* as aforementioned. Would love to hear from you!

Thank you so much sir, very informative lecture. I have a question, how to do mediation analysis when we have one categorical indipendent variable and more than one continuous dependent variable?

Really helpful! I do still have a question. Can I also use PROCESS model 4 to test partial mediation? Or should I also perform linear regression to test the direct effect?

Thanks for this video. I had one question left. If we want to perform a regression analysis, should we perform this with the use of PROCESS when we also want to check for mediation. Or is it possible to check the effect of X on Y with just SPSS first and then the mediation effect with PROCESS? Because PROCESS gives slightly different values for my unstandardized coefficient than SPSS does.

Hello - thank you for your video, it has been really helpful. My findings show negative coefficient values for my total, direct and indirect effect all of which are significant (my b path is positive and also significant). What does a negative coefficients mean for an indirect effect? (ie. are both my IV and M increasing and my DV decreasing or is it something like my IV is increasing my M is decreasing?)

Hello ! Thank you for this well explicated tutorial :) I have one question and I hope you can answer. My mediator variable is a score on pre and post test, so if I want to make this analysis, do I have to do it using the post-pre scores ?

Your videos is really helpful for my research...sir i have one question, can i used mutiple regression to test the relationship and process macro to test the mediation.??

Thank you so much for this insightful and informative tutorial! In addition, can you tell me know name and link of thesis that you used in video?

This is an excellent video, well explained and robust. Please, how did you get the result for the t-statistics (5.583)?

Sir. Thank you so much for simplifying the method. Sir, I have one more doubt how to calculate EFFECT RATIO. Plz guide me sir.

Thank you for this tutorial! Very helpful.. In fact, I have a question : could I use Process Macro to test mediation even if my variables are kind of higher order construct? If yes, how can I proceed? Thank you!

Allah razı olsun kral ya 🙏🙏🙏

Great tutorial! One question: How am I supposed to run the analysis if my IV is a 2-level nominal variable? when I run the analysis it doesn't make distinction of the 2 conditions. Thanks.

thank you so much sir for this amazing video, I have a question about my findings SIR in my results " the Total effect and Direct effect is significant while Indirect effect contains NEGATIVE sign, so is there is mediation exist or not or we can say that its a competitative mediation" thanks again sir

Thank you for this! I have one question, how will I know the % that accounts for the mediator?

Salaam Aleykum, thanks for this great video again. I would like to ask how did you decide on a t value of 1.96?

Hi, can I use this analysis also when my DV is transformed into a logarithmic variabele? Because of a violated homoskedasticity assumption, I transformed the DV into a log, but not sure is this is necessary for Process Macro Analysis.

Thank you for the helpful video. My question is that from where have you calculated the value of t statistics

I'm so very gratefull see this video and i want to asking you sir, my path B its not significan with p = 0.0192. but for indirect effect its significan. Can i say my mediating variabel its significan and can i say its mediating?

Great Video! Thanks a lot. I have a quick question, however. If I want to test for a mediation effect and I have multiple IVs in my conceptual model. Do I run separate regressions for each IV or one multiple regression that includes all IVs and my mediator variable?

Hello sir Thank you for explaining so easily. I have a question kindly answer this. My total effect is sig and positive. My direct and indirect effect is negative and also direct effect value is LLCI-.0127 and ULCI.3075 Is this relation is significant or not? Also if it is not significant can i still run a moderation analysis using model 7?

Dear Mr.Fawad, I love your video. It is very easy to understand and has helped me tremendously in my thesis reporting process. I did however struggle to find the t-statistics number that you put in the table 1 in minutes 15:27. Would you be so kind to help me by pointing out where I could find the t-statistics number to be put in table 1? Thank you 😁

Respected Mr. Fawad small clarification from the interpretation part from where did taken the t value as 5.583 and when i have 2 IV and 1 MV and 1 DV how to performance a test????do you workout like that models ? I sincerely appreciate and thankful for your response in advance

Excellent explanation. I have a question regarding the structure of a thesis. Should students also include descriptive statistics, tests of normality and so on, along with the results of the mediation analysis?

Thank you for the great video ! I am running the process for mediating testing of my dissertation. I have some problems with the output interpretation. My output did not display the indirect effect, but it reported the error # line..... Cold you please explain what does this mean? Thank you.

How did you get the value of t-statistics that is presented in the table? Is it the t-statistics of direct effect of X on Y? I am confused because in the mediation analysis table the value is t = 5.583 while in the matrix output the closest to it is t = 5.5426.

Thank you Dr Fawad, this was helpful. But in my model I have four IVs with one M and one DV. Please suggest where to put three additional IVs in MACRO? I have used SEM but want to test the results with Process Macro as well?

Hi, I have a question. Is it still possible if the Independent Variable is categorical (based on to conditions 1 vs 0)?

Thank you for your great teaching in the video. I have a question. What if my a path is not significant, but the b path and c' path are significant. Is it acceptable to say there is a mediation? Appreciate if you could answer this

I have question about objectives to put in the analisis. As first, I put all participants including target population(for exampe: score

Sir, could you please explain further where is comes from the t-statistic value 5.583 at the mediation analysis summary in Table 1. Thank you

Thank you very much for your presentation, it is very helpful and informative. Please, I have a question: -According to the results of my thesis: paths a and c are significant and path b, as well as indirect effect, are insignificant and includes a zero. But Total effect (c) and direct effect (c') are significant. Are we talking about mediation here? If so, is it total or partial? m quite confused about results as it shows mediation or not? kindly guide me

Hi Fawad, Wonderful research videos. I have subscribed your channel and also shared in research groups. One query. Is there any condition that direct effect should be higher or lesser than indirect effect?

If I have 1 IV, 1 Med, and 2 DV, should I use Model 4 twice to calculate the mediation effect(s) for each DV? Please advise.

Hi Sir, thanks for sharing! I want to ask what I should do if the mediator is a categorical variable? Just put it on the bracket as you did in the video? Thanks!

Thank you for the explanation! I have a question. Path a, b, and c are significant, while c' is insignificant. From my understanding, path c here shows that IV and DV has a direct relationship. Since c' is insignificant, is there full mediation?

How did you get the t-statistic of 5.583 for the indirect effect?

Where do you find the value of the t statistic for the indirect effect?

AOA. Does Hayes Process take in account the sign of the direct and indirect effect for computing total effect size? For instance, when the signs for both direct and indirect effect are different, does that explain *why* sometimes the total effect is LESS than the direct or indirect effect? Because logically it doesn't make sense that the total effect would be less than either of the two. If not, what other reasons could that be? Suppressor effect?

Great video! One question: Is it possible to get different outcomes for a direct effect in regression vs in Hayes process? Thank you

I have a question: where does the t-value of 5,583 come from in the report? I see a t-value of 5,543 with direct effect. Is this a typo? Or should this value be obtained from somewhere else?

Sir, please let me know from where you get the value of t=5.583??? (t-statistics) last part

Hello very nice videos you made,,,,,,,have you covered this concept by stata software? if yes, can you please provide link for the same.

please this is important, so my question is how did you get the t-value in the last final table? it would be a huge help Sir. Thanks.

when i'm putting the values, output says "set printback=off" and no results are shown, can you help?

Assalamualaikum Really it was a very helpful video for us thank you very much sir. Sir can you help me to know the reference to this video. I mean book or any other literature.

Sir if both CI values (upper and lower) are negative, does it indicate there is no mediation?

Why is t in the table 5.583? Where does that value come from or how is it calculated?

Hi, I have significant path a, b as well as significant indirect effect. However my path c and c’ is not significant. Does it mean I have a mediation or? Hope to hear from you soon!

Dear Dr, How did you get the value of 5.583 for t statistics that you have shown in your Mediation Summary Table? I hope to get an answer for this soon. Thank you.

Sir, what is the difference between standardized and unstandardized coefficients?

Dear Mr.Fawad, thank you for the explanation it helped me a lot. However I have one question, if path a was significant and path b was not significant we can say that path ab is not significant. Is that right?

On the final where you reported the key statistics of the analysis, how did you get 5.583 the t-statistics. I guess I can’t trace it to the output of the analysis.

Appreciate the video and explanation. Would love if you could help me out with this question: I am running a mediation study. My results show path a (sig), path b (sig), path c' (non-sig), path c (non-sig), indirect effect (sig). The beta value from path c to path c' has also dropped, both being not significant as aforementioned. Does this mean a mediation has occurred? If yes, is it full or partial?

Hello Dr. Fawad. If I have 6 IVs, do I have to run the process one by one? Its different from using multiple regression right? In multiple regression (SPSS), we can enter all the IVs in the Block 1 (Linear Regression ). Correct me if Im wrong.

Sir , Independent variable is having 5 items.... So how to have one value of X to run Process?

How can I find the number for t-statistics? Thank you!

Where does the t-statistic (5.583) value come from in the latest report table, sir? I could not see the value 5.583 under the t values in the hayes program.

Can you please tell me why we only used model 4 and didn't used any other model for mediation calculation ?

PLEASE HELP I HAVE A DEADLINE: my indirect effect is significant. my direct effect from X to Y is not and my total effect is not either. is this a mediation then?

Why indirect effects of X on Y does not explicitly reveals t value and p value , in other case , direct effect of x on y ,it has effect , se, t value, p value , LLCI and ULCI . pls enlighten

Is the p value 0.0001 or is it p 0.05 ? I am a bit confused on this on one side you have written 0.001 but during your explanation you quoted 0.05. also one of my variable has a p value of 0.0021 does it mean its significant ?

sir i have a written a paper on impact of financial literacy and financial confidence on borrowing behaviour . sir outcome variable and financial confidence is a (5-point Likert scale) ordered variable and financial score (0-5). The editor gives me a comment on taking income is a mediator variable on financial literacy and financial confidence. sir, please help me how to handle this problem....

I appreciate this video sir. I have one question. In my findings, the relationship between IV and Mediator is non significant. Both the total effect and direct effect are significant and but indirect effect is non significant. and Preacher and Kelley (2011) Kappa-squared is also significant. is there still exist mediation?