@mick40m same I rode one 16miles on b roads. Rode it back after my sisters friend bought. It bounced all over the place, trucks passing me and the position of the rear brake pedal was horrendous. Will never go on another, those scooter boys have some balls and live in a different timescale.
LOVED my TL1000s, 97 Model, Hyperpro rear damper unit sorted the handling, BONKERS Engine, Apparently tall, skinny blokes had problems with headshaking, due to front end , I was short and chunky, and we got on just fine! Love the channel. Cheers, DINO.
I found the H2 easy to ride fast, and knew better than to try to ride a big early-70s Japanese bike fast through bumpy bends. Not the sort of bike I'd buy, though, because I treated the throttle like a control, not a switch. The H1 500? Now that really was scary, flexing frame and no brakes. Not a widow-maker, however, because most of its buyers/victims were single.
@@bertmeinders6758 , I built my H-1 into a drag-bike complete with Bill Wirges expansion chambers, Avon 4.00X18 slick, I traded it for a 427 Chevelle SS. When all said and done it was putting out between 90-105 hp, it was very scary, that's why I traded it, lol.
A guy i met when we both used to do rider training lent me his TL1000. He used to race bikes, so he knew how to handle it. We both agreed that the main problem was actually the rider, not the bike. They never respected it, so rode it like an idiot and came a cropper. When I took it out, I just took my time to get to understand it before I pushed it. Yes, it was a hairy chested bike, but it was fun. When I dropped it back to him, I had a beeming smile on my face when I took my lid off.
I would whole heartedly agree with your comments, I found it to be a totally engaging ride and didn't understand why people demonised the TL. I did however end up completely changing the front and rear suspension and felt it did make quite a difference, a more settled controlled feel and that motor was such a fine piece of engineering, its no wonder it's still around today
@@bikerdood1100 I've owned 23 motorcycles my brother many more. We've made changes to every bike we've owned so that they work better for us. Motorcycles are mass produced, humans are all individuals.
@@matauboy only 20 ? Humans are indeed individuals Well mostly I do wonder about the extent of free will when everyone buys the same products And slavishly follows trends
Thanks for another interesting selection of bikes. I seem to remember that the V-Rod was first sold in 2002. I briefly considered buying one before deciding to buy one of the first Buell XB9Rs. From the 1999 model year, H-Ds big sensation was the launch of the first Twin Cam 88 bikes, including the FXDX which I think was quite a capable roadster.
30 years ago a friend got a Vmax and a new nickname, he became known as "Clunk" because if he went around a tight corner there was often a clunk as he was in the wrong gear and dropped the Vmax😂
Some of the scariest bikes I've seen were the ones ridden by my mates in the 90s/00s. Nothing special about the models, mostly Japanese 4s around 1000cc, but it was the condition of them and the attitude of the riders that was scary. Frame cracked? that will be ok - rear brake not working? I'll just take the pads out - front brake sticking on? I'll just open the bleed screw and let some fluid out. We used to go away for the weekend on group rides, and do 4-500 miles. I don't remember a single occasion when all the bikes made it back under their own power. My T140 was the oldest and slowest (on paper), but I was a mechanic, and mine was the only bike that never broke down. As far as the others were concerned, maintenance was something that happened to other people, and you only fixed something if it stopped the bike running. I still miss those days though, sitting at the roadside, trying to patch up someone's ropey bike so we could get back before dark, because someone else's lights didn't work.
@@rickconstant6106 my last group ride was a funeral for a friend . I was the last bike in the group . That was 5 years ago . Most riders were on Harleys in that group so my Honda at the back was appropriate in their eyes . Luckily nobody broke down .
Great video, really enjoyed it, what about the 250 two strokes of the late 60s and mid 70s 😮 , I’ve got a 1973 Suzuki GT250K resplendent in candy apple 🍏 green, i had the first one in Northern Ireland on my birthday in April of 73 and I still get a kick out of just looking at them. I’ve got one in the shed that’s had a complete nut and bolt restoration, she’s still in bits, but come hell or high water I’m gonna try to git er built this year before I get any older 😮😊lol
The first motorcycle I ever sat on was my oldest brother's Kawasaki 500 triple in 1970. He was a drag racer and it was his first and only bike, I was a four year old and I was hooked! My roommate had an early Suzuki TL1000, as I recall it was almost immediately recalled to have a steering dampener installed. I noticed an aftermarket one on the bike you featured. It's nice to have some association with a couple of bikes on your list. Maybe you could make a scariest vintage list, there were some questionable things going on in the early days, the Megola rotary engined machine or the Brough Superior come to mind. Perhaps the shortly lived Cyclone from my home town of St.Paul, Minnesota (1912-1917) with 45hp and 100mph top speed was the most criminally insane motorcycle of all time.
Nice video , well done. I think the Suzuki TL engine is one of the most longlasting being used in slightly different tune and engine case materials, in the SV and DL types.
sure, yet the the TL 1000 isn't exactly a DL 650. One is certainly a lot more bland, but isn't trying to kill you, and isn't going to do it very quickly anyway :) Great bike still
Another good and well narrated video. Good selection. Agree with one poster that most scary bikes are those that have been neglected and ill setup by inexperienced owners.
As far as I can remember, the scariest bike I’ve ever ridden was an old Harley Davidson Duo Glide Panhead. The absolute lack of brake force was mind boggling. It really didn’t have a place in modern traffic. And I have ridden V-Rods, TL 1000, V-Max and the two 500 cc 2-strokes, so fast bikes wasn’t new to me. 250 kilos of steel and no brakes scared me. 😂
The tech involved requires lots of engine internal parts for a NA 1100 GPZed. The turbobike was built stout, needs only turning the wastegate adjuster to make more boost. It does require clipping of one wire to put the ECM into "race mode:.
@@bikerdood1100 With modern rubber fast is a whole different thing on a turbo750. Pushing luck applies to all matters involved with humanity. Focus on the machine at hand always. Be it moped or turbo Hayabusa. Which is my oldman touring dream build. I am old, time to build one. Too much is just enough!
@@upsidedowndog1256 different mind set A bike is how I get around and my passion How fast it goes is surprisingly low down my list, especially when covering big distances For me a bike is not and never has been a toy Would I ever buy a Hayabusa Hell no 😂😂😂
@@bikerdood1100 The island you live on would not necessitate such a machine, I am sure. Good doctors are 100 miles away for me. To get to CA from AR is about a 24 hour boring drive. Turn on the boost!My bikes are not toys.
A mate had one of the first RG500's. He offered to give me a lift home after I had dropped my bike at his workshop. He was an FN quick rider and in hindsight I should have known better from the way he was grinning as he made the offer... I made several promises to all the gods on the way home that I would be good hereafter if they would. please. not let me die a horrible death. With my weight on the rear it monowheeled most of the way when not on its side on the by-pass RAB's. Not even Vanish could have shifted the stains on my boxers. So why do I still want one...
I moved to Hastings in 1989 and I can remember going to the pub in the nearby village of Pett one evening shortly after we moved and seeing a Yamaha V-Max with Nitrous Oxide injection. What a beast..........
Yup! Had a 500 Mach 3 with aftermarket pipes. It was a white knuckle ride with extreme frame flex & poor brakes! My friends never wanted to ride it a second time!🤔
The original V Max had around 143 / 145 bhp, not 120. I remember it coming out, as I was 18 at the time. There was a lower power version imported to the UK initially ( a poxy 100 bhp, I believe!), but that was not a standard machine, obviously.
120 at rearwheel. The restricted 100 hp version is basically the same engine but without the VBoost system. Still a strong bike though. My Canadian version does 240 kph on the clock on German Autobahn maybe 225 kph in real... and stable to top speed. It is mainly the pilot who cramps himself to the steering bar bringing in strange behavior of that bike at high speed. Just hold it smooth and it will bring you more fun than most other bikes. I will NEVER sell the 1200 VMax even though I own the 1700 as well meanwhile.
@@henrydegan6204 nice comment. What do you think of the 1700 v compared to the old 1200? Im in two minds about owning one. I've had the 1200 16 years so its now a family member.
I have actually heard of all of these bikes, but I cant think why but one bike would not go near even when riding in my prime is the MUNCH MAMMOTH, that 1200cc air cooled NSU car engine with a motorbike lashed to it just looks scary as hell to me stood still LOL, I seem to remember MUNCH bringing out many years Later (after it thought the brand was defunct in the MOto journals and whatnot) bringing out an 1800cc version so powerfull even highly seasoned riders were unnerved due to its constant desire to wheelie in any gear. Great video though , you explain why these bikes are scary.
Interesting list. Back when my T595 Daytona was fairly new, I was on a road one night behind a guy on a V Max; I was surprised at how he started to pull away from me heading into a freeway entry, but was even more surprised at how hard I had to brake going into the curve because he was going so much slower than I was at that point! No idea how much of that was the bike and how much the rider, but he was considerably faster in a straight line than going into a corner! And as for the Mach III, years ago I recall reading an article saying the handling problems with early ones in particular were due to the chassis being a bit off, causing the front and rear wheels to track on different lines. Definitely does not sound like fun.
I saw vid of guy doing a resto on one. When he disassembled the rear shocks he found they were adjusted differently at the factory. After a proper rebuild he stated that the handling was satisfactory.
For touring i have an old FJ1200 very nice to ride . I only gave £1000 for it and you wont get better for that. I did have a ST1100 and it cost me a small fortune for a rotten swinging arm and then electrical issues . My fave bike of all time was my old Yamaha FZR1000 EX-UP. Very quick and you had to ride it and not let it ride you lol. Love your stream many thanks 👍👍👍👍👍
Loved my tl1000s, black lines on the road under acceleration! Was fine up to about 80% effort but got a bit vague after that 😊. I miss the v twin sound with 'less ' restricted cans 😊
OK, I'll admit it. I had just turned on and hadn't fumbled my specs on. But when I saw "5 of the Scarlet Road Bikes" I thought "Scarlet Road bikes - that's a new one on me". Either way another enjoyable video 😉
I used to have a BMW K1200r in black. The acceleration and the induction noise was so addictive that I began to fear for my soul. It handled like a canal barge on the Twisties but I think that was a lot to do with my rear tyre being squared off. Loved the futuristic looks and it was used in two films, Resident Evil and Bangkok Dangerous.
Having ridden many bikes over the years, the original z1 kawasaki was lethal at speed but today i have a few bikes still and one is a vmax full power, it may be mad but i smile everytime the vboost cracks in!
They hade a real problem with carb icing here in the Uk Hit the press at the time following a few incidents Kawasaki retrofitted an icing kit Definitely a beast of a thing and as quick as anything out there at the time
@@bikerdood1100 It was a bike that I always regretted selling, but I've now got a cbr600rr 2005 which is a great bike but it's getting old like me, safe riding and best wishes.
I have a 95 V Max, you are right with the 120bhp at the rear wheel, the 145 bhp was crank hp. It is mosly an easy bike to ride, a bit like an XJR or a big Bandit until you hit 6K rpm and all hell breaks loose, absolutely fine if you treat it with respect. Interestingly the 1st gen Max runs the same1/4 mile time as a gen 1 Hayabusa (which i also have)
Back in the 90s I rode some demos at a bike rally in Canada. One was a new model; CBR900RR. It was great, if you like a torture rack that's extremely fast!
Hey my biker friend, my 1976 Yamaha RD400 modified, bored.040 overbore(wisco pistons) polished ports, carbon fiber reed valve, DG race pipes, anode shocks, progressive coils, electronic CDI (63hp) would bury the needle(200kph) Lost bike in a shed fire!! miss the bike, nasty power band!! lol, Cheers.
I rebuilt a standard RD400. It lasted two weeks before seizing up (at 70mph). I scrapped it as the left hand prison had turned to granules. It was the last two stroke road bike I ever had. (I had a couple of much newer Gas-Gas trials bikes much, much later)
The very first Ducati 1078 Streetfighter was so scary to ride with its light switch power band. The first VMax was scary to ride slow because of its relatively high center of gravity and bad turning radius. Both these bikes take a lot of getting accustomed to.
The Boss Hoss featured a V6 or V8 care engine stuffed into a motorcycle frame. It was a truly scary looking machine. I sat on one when I lived in Texas, but never tried to ride it.
Nice! You forgot the hairiest bike ever made, the 84-85 Kawasaki 750 turbo. That bike was 25 years ahead of tire technology. I own one. The TL1000 morphed into the SV1000S, a great bike. I own one of those too. The 85 VMax was the only year that they made 140hp, after that they were neutered. I have ridden one. Kind of fun but too heavy, no reason to want one. The 750 turbo is king in my mind. Crazy power delivery, good chassis and brakes. Sounds badass.
@@bikerdood1100 Really? Have you ridden one? I bought mine in 2003. Every time I ride it I get the same thought from the 1st ride. How is this legal to ride on roads! 2nd gear exceeds all speed limits. 3rd makes it easier. 4th, 5th, and 6th (rarely used on my bike) are your ticket to jail time with a barely perceptible twist of the wrist. That settles it for me. I need a 2010ish CBR1000rrr, pre "rider aids"!
@@bikerdood1100 I've never tried the Turbo 750 but I did have a Gpz 900R. Very fast back in the 80's , it handled well for a jap, good brakes but the anti-dive forks were a gimmick. Simply adjust them down to the minimum settings and it behaved like a normal bike instead of the front wheel bouncing across the road when braking going into a bumpy stretch of road. I note that none of the bikes you have mentioned here are British or Italian. I wonder why I still ride an old Bonnie and a proper Ducati?
I took my TL1000S touring in Europe last year, with a pillion, it was faultless apart from having to share a rucksack and binning dirty socks at every hotel. Replaced it with something more suitable for touring though. I will have another.
I have had a series of different Kawasaki H1 models, in fact I sold my 1976 model only recently (I'm 74, and graduated to a Kawa Vulcan cruiser), and I have done thousands of miles (later changed to Km in 1974) on my Triples, with never an incident ! I had the first CDI Mach III in Australia; rode it to work (400+Km round trip) for years, and the worst occasion was hitting a rabbit when accelerating hard in the country - bits of bunny everywhere; had a hard time getting it out from between the cylinder fins ! The most scary thing about the machine was the tendency to wheelstand when carrying a passenger when the revs cut in !
As with many machines it really depends how the machines are ridden, that said the machines inadequacies are Very well established. Poor suspension quality and a chassis not rigid enough to cope with the bikes performance
I've ridden all sorts of very powerful sports bikes on racetracks as well. Scariest, customised Hartley with high handlebars, noise that can't make you hear anything, virtually no brakes, weighing 500 or more pounds, vibrations that cancel any driving sensation, riding position as if I was on a deck chair. Fine in a straight line with no traffic, that's all, you're just a passenger.
I owned a V-MAX for 6 months and got rid of it . I have been riding for over 40 years and what a beast . I also had the V-ROD and i loved it. Fitted it with a power commander soooooo fast. Didnt like the twisties . I have now gone back to my fave 1200 Bandit and a CBR1000F .My other bikes are a rare 1963 Royal Enfield 500cc diesel great fun in the summer.A nice plodder. I also have a MC19 CBR250 wow thats a fun bike 250cc with the power of a 500.
As a 17 year old know-it-all back in 1970 I latched on to the H1 version of that Kawasaki H3 500. Probably the most dangerous thing I have ever owned. Bad ergonomics, suspension that hated any turns above a few miles per hour, wobble at random times and roads, bad brakes that belonged on a Honda trail bike and a two stroke engine that did nothing but bog until 4,000-5,000 RPM. Then a split second to 9,000-10,000, shift, and back at 4,000 for a return neck breaking ride to the moon. Treat it right and you could keep the front wheel on the ground. But that took some finesse and skill. Once it hit that magic RPM there was almost no middle ground to redline. But as a 1/4 mile stoplight to stoplight street drag racer nothing could touch it. Even back then I was smart enough to get rid of that girl before she killed me. The V-Max is a beautiful one trick drag street pony. Not much good for anything else.
I just bought a low mileage one previous owner TL just like the silver one featured in this video. I always liked the look of it. I got this one dirt cheap. MOT failure. On a dented rear wheel. £40.00 on ebay, same colour with a new tyre. Mot passed. I spent the last five months rectifying all the cock ups the previous owner did, indicators all different block/ spade / bullet / household electrical connectors. Under tray not secured/ butchered O.E underseat storage. The list goes on.... I remember having a go on my mates TL - R. It was set up for his weight. (He weighed more than me and my wife together) And it was VERY easy to get the front wheel of the ground. But this one i own, is rather under whelming. I have ridden pretty much every bike from the 80s, to around 2017 working in the bike trade. And plenty of SV1000, cagiva raptor, DL1000. (I hated having to do a valve service on the DLs because usually the customer would bring it in with a full tank, and they are massive tanks and hold a large amount of fuel. And a lot of times previous people who had worked on them didn't seat plug caps correctly so reducing power. This is not the case with my one. Its just not as rapid as i hoped, or expecting. But ultimately after spending time doing it up and finally getting to ride it, i hate it, it is a younger persons bike, Which I no longer am. It looks awesome. But getting off after 20 miles walking like John Wayne going "Ow, Ow, Ow, Ow,...." certainly doesn't look awesome I also removed the steering damper to make it easier to manoeuvre around at low speed. I have had a couple of lively moments but nothing worse than i had experienced on early blades, KR1S, RGVs, R1s. If you ride like a moron, i dont doubt it would bite you in the butt. Just don't ride like a moron on public roads, expect the unexpected
Having owned or ridden all of them, is a pretty good assessment. Steering geometry was just way out on V Rod and Max, just look at the front end/forks. Chops and specials of course can be seriously more dangerous!
You missed the worst one. The Honda CT90 step through farm bike. My brother had one but his self esteem was very low. I was terrified that someone would think it was mine !
My bike in 1974 was a H2 750 Kawasaki trick heads and exhaust. I was wowed at that time by Dick Mann testing a Yamaha 2 stroke 4 cylinder 1000 cc bike at lime rock. He said the front wheel never touched the ground in the straight. Fearing lawsuits Yamaha cancelled the bike before production could start. Most dangerous bike I’ve ever ridden?, not even close, the Cushman scooter.
Indeed, the Kawasaki Mach 3 500 triple was the most frighting thing I ever leaned into a corner. Riding a friends bike for the first time, I entered a right hand corner about 10 mph slower then I would have on my Triumph. I soon realized how poor these things handled. Later, I read that the bike was rushed to production and the location of wide engine's drive sprocket and chain caused the rear wheel to be off-set from the front by about an inch. However, not a problem at the drag strip where most of these bikes played
I've read the kh750 the wildest of the kh's, more power and speed=more madness and terror, and you know the TL was bad when they fitted a steering damper to calm it down., would still have one.
@@bikerdood1100 lol . From your perspective and the ubiquitous British style there I get your drift . British bikes are rare here. It's mostly Harleys and Japanese bikes in my neck of the woods .
V4 bikes have an insane amount of torque and the V-MAX was the largest. I have a 750cc Honda V4 and even that is a bit scary to ride. The V-MAX weighs more than my Harley Dyna, lol. I rode a V-Rod once on a test ride. It was a pretty insane machine and I bought the Dyna instead. The problem was you had to rev it a lot higher than the typical Harley rider revs to get into the power band so everyone hated them. It is definitely too low and built like a drag bike. Not my cup of tea. With some mods to suspension, including a lift in the rear and running on open headers, the Dyna has plenty of clearance and the right damping rates for some serious canyon carving. You will have to shift your weight more than on a sportbike but that's just good exercise. Better to ride a slow bike fast than ride a fast bike slow!. Oh, the TL1000. I rode one at a demo night in the early '00s. It is not at all suitable for the average rider. It is a twitchy bike even without the damper issue (I rode a late model). It is basically what you'd get if you went all out modding a SV1000 into a track bike. Makes a CBR1100XX seem easy to ride, another bike I've tried out before.
Lambretta sx 225, absolute death trap, did about 85 no brakes no handling, ended up in a old lady's rockery on her front garden, the fella walking his dog 😮
Well there’s no doubt that all litre class sports bikes are far too powerful for the road Saw an interview recently with Carl Fogarty where he said exactly that and if a multi world Superbike champion says it you have to take it seriously
I’m saving them for a video on most stupid😂 Too much power for the chassis, too much heat and all round too much trouble More cc’s instead I think. Especially in the 80s because the technology simply wasn’t there. We may well see them return in a much refined form I think
Xs1100 should be on that list , powerful ( for time ) but terrible handling . Using its top speed on race track of course ....could require most of the road to deal with I slight turn ! Great hairy chested bike
To be fair to Yamaha I don’t think they ever envisioned the bike as a competition machine. I am aware it was campaigned with some success in Australia,but they are obviously a bit mad down there 😂😂 Or brave Probably both 😂😂
I'm a teenager in the 70s. I buy a used Kawasaki 500 triple and I go to Syracuse University and this is my transportation.. forget wdowmaker, reviews on a motorcycle magazine said, "Sudden death on two wheels!"
Kawasaki also made a 750cc 2 stroke triple that had all the same problems of the 500cc bike with even more HP and torque. One real problem was the frame flexed too much and torque wasn't linear. It pulled like expected until around 2000 rpm than everything hit and you'd better be ready for it or it would shoot right out from under you
It’s tru to a degree. I do mention the 750 in the video It does feature quite a number of chassis improvements and was less psychotic than the 500, but definitely was not a fine handling bike
BS, no vacuum involved, they were/are pulled open by a cable attached to a servo motor which is controlled by a CDI box, servo starts at 5750rpm to take up the slack in the cable, chokes stats to open at 6K and are fully open at 8K, i had to rebuild mine so know how it all works, it's a primitive system but reliable.
@@bikerdood1100 yes I often wondered that ,I know of two that I managed to bend one on a pothole and the other a diesel spill on a roundabout ,learnt the hardway in my teens👍
A mate of mine had one of the first unmolested ones and rode it like a lunatic. He coincidentally featured on one of those crappy satellite channels " The man with the 8 stone Testicles" 😮
Cool video. I agree these bikes were quite intimidating to ride🫣 But may I also add the old Yamaha IT490 that had a powerband like flicking a light switch and would throw you off as soon as look at you and also (believe it not) the Honda CX500 v-twin that would get an extreme death wobble if you backed off to fast if you were going over 100 kmh (at least mine did anyway) I seriously almost shat myself the first time I experienced it🤯
Owned a CX It would weave a tiny bit but your had to be hammering it, certainly well over 100kph and it was quite predictable. The problem with many of the bikes on the list was that they were indeed genuinely dangerous. Like the HD if it grounded out, which HDs do far too easily then it lifted the front wheel, that’d more than a bit scary 😱 Have covered scary MX bikes before and may well return to it at some point.
A rubber framed wheelie monster with no brakes was a term used for the H2 750 a friend of mine brought an early H1 500 cheap and not running distributor model by reseting the timing I got it going another friend's father raced an AJS 7r in the 50s and took the 500 out for a spin came back with a huge smile and tears stream around to his ears from speed wonderful memories . The Airforce boys in the 70s in Christchurch NZ hand Z1 900s yoshimora modified to 1150 and used them. Men respect their weapons of choice fools do not know their limitations understand your vehicle.
I had a very scary bike. You’d not expect it to be scary - but it was! It was a 1981 Moto Guzzi V50 Monza Mark 3. The scary part was the front forks! They used sealed cartridge dampers with what can only be described as damping fluid with the damping qualities, viscosity and smell of cat’s piss. At a certain speed round my favourite long right-hand sweeping bend, the forks would lose damping control and go into an evil pogo-ing death weave. The cure? Drill down into the damper, and remove the oil with a syringe and a brass tube, then refill with 15w damping oil - as on my current Monza! Still handling a treat 20+ years after I did the damping oil mod! And does trackdays as well with no wobbles.
Had a v50 and we have a V35 Imola which handles very well Fork oil does require regular replacement however Something often missed Fork oil does smell I have to say Having changed it on many machines Quite unpleasant stuff and and that’s assuming the correct oil grade has been used in the first place of course
@@bikerdood1100 - the fork oil is purely for lubrication. The oil in the sealed dampers controls the front end. I reckon they put the dregs in my dampers! 😂
You are talking to a 1985 V-Max pilot and that's coming off the 1975 500 cc Mach III, two of the 5 on your list, lost my mind riding Doug Poland's 851 and would go on to the incredible 2002 998r that Suzuki was chasing with another bike on your list, but nothing could prepare me for MV's answer to Ducati's MotoGP desmosedici, the 1078 312 rr making the same numbers: "Maverick, your ego is writing checks your body can't cash"
I’m more o& a corners person myself We had a Harley for a few years and while it was pretty good I’m not sure we would have another. Replaced it with a Guzzi V7, a much better bike in all areas to be honest and we certainly don’t regret selling
When I was 18, I lived at home, left school and got a job as a postman. My Dad ruled the roost and I asked him if I could buy a motorcycle. He told me I could have a motorcycle of 50cc or under or a scooter of any size I wanted. So I opted for a Lambretta 200. It was the biggest scooter around nearly 50 years ago. Quick up and down on the short road where the back entry to the shop was and I was on my way. It was an absolute piece of cr@p, but I rode it like a motorcycle, wearing leathers 'n all. Dreadful thing but I learned to ride on it. It handled so badly that I could ride most things after that... Got proper bikes as soon as I could after that. The wierd thing is how much these dreadful things make on the second hand market when their performance, handlung and build quality is so much inferior.
@@bikerdood1100 In Aussie mate we also have Cr500 RE's here which can be registered as well how that came about is quite the story it nearly cost an Aussie Honda bigwig his job
2 Stroke 250cc in the 70s and early 80s were lethal in the UK !! A 17 year old could just jump on one with a provisional licence and NO test or nothing !! I knew so many young many young men who died !
@@bikerdood1100 Yes up until when the two part test came in for anything over 125 !! l knew a few who died after !! In my area some kids just carried on riding 250 on a provisional sut hoping the Police would never catch them !
@@Sam_Green____4114 Well I had a 125, not much fun I think the industry is to blame really. Had they built sensible bikes only lik3 a wet Dream it would have been ok? And those bikes prepared riders better for larger bikes than a pesky 125. But they hade to build bikes like the RD making a change in the law inevitably
I see what you mean scary for the time. My TST 765 would walk all over these... but is still a fun bike... all of these you listed needed serious rider input... eg skill. You had to realise what you had and adapt you to get the best out of of you and it. Even litre bikes were easier by comparison but again skill was required.
Well litre bikes are rider aided to the max Given that most buyers are middle aged portly gents this shouldn’t surprise really Hell I have a 1930s SV 250 which is much harder to ride that any litre class bike 😂
