First contact stories always strike me as records from a more magical and mysterious age, where one could stumble across whole continents of humans with totally dissimilar languages, beliefs and traditions.
we still have totally dissimilar languages, beliefs and traditions. If you want to travel a short distance and experience a rapid change in languages go to png for example.
@@MusMasi That's not even near comparable. What he means is you could find contients with different humans and cultures that is totally alien to what you're used to.
@Thomas Neale you gotta remember people were more isolated from each other. People spent their entire lives never knowing of other peoples, countries, religions, traditions and cultures. We now have the internet where we can access a plethora of information about the world around us. Albeit, culture shock is still a thing and perhaps always will be, but we are far more aware of what and who inhabits this planet than our ancestors ever did. At least today we have some degree of knowledge of what to expect in the various nations that exist...back in the old days they had to simply travel and find out, many a time with no existing information at their disposal prepare for it AND there were so many instances where they didn't intend to discover an entirely different civilization.
Yes, I’ve been digging into the history of the Silk Road for a year, mostly from Chinese records written 2000 years ago: 史记, 汉书, 后汉书. I wish one day I could follow Zhang Qian’s path and travel to the other side of this amazing continent.
The Arabic account of the Vikings was my favorite. The writer spends the entire time describing how vile the Vikings live compared to the Arabs only for the irony that the Vikings believe the Arabs are vile due to how they treat their dead. It’s a really poetic account on the two culture’s flipped view of what’s important.
Gotta remember that this is just one man’s account, which is probably highly misleading and twisted. Most other accounts of Vikings claim that they were almost fixated with cleanliness and beauty, which most archeological findings prove (combs, tools for cleaning ears and nails etc).
@@sebbe4914 Most of Ibn Fadlan's observations have been deemed honest by historians. There is no reason to deny the correctness of the ones that bother you...
@@jadawin10 Don't be mistaken, it's incorrectness that bothers me. And as someone else said he met with the kyivan rus, which probably were a bit different from scandinavia. however, i'd love the source to the studies by those historians.
@@sebbe4914 Arabs for the time placed extremely high priority on hygiene. While the Rus and their Scandinavian brothers were very cleanly compared to other European states of the time, Arabs were on a whole different level.
@joegreene7746 good question. There's a lot of common things in different cultures' mythologies during the middle ages There's almost always ogres, goblins, witches, dwarfs. It's weird how consistent it is.
What never ceases to amaze me is how each civilisation viewed itself as somewhat superior to their counterpart based on race, empire or religion. There's often a condescending attitude attached to these accounts describing their encounters with other people's whom they deem inferior to them. I guess that's why it was so easy to wage war back then because as far as they were concerned, the people they were fighting weren't a worthy adversary.
It's also pretty common for writers to go full "Noble Savage," talking at length about how praiseworthy other cultures are over their own. Both styles are a bit silly.
@@odysseusrex5908 😐 True...Consider the proud and noble Bubba we see before us and observe his big blast. His primitive Pre-AI brain is something of a marvel, and as you can see here, His excitable nature has compelled him to attempt communication! _Fascinating!_ I must admit that whilst I sit in here and enjoy the warm glow of artificial intelligence, there's a certain brutal honesty in the way he lives which i find quite compelling...Indeed.
Yes, as I digging in that history I find it gets more confusing, in the history records like 汉书 and 后汉书 there are several cities sound roughly like “Alexander” spread all over the Central Asia, luckily they have the rough locations of those places so that I am able to cross exam their true identity 😂
@@derwolf3006 thank you, it sure is, but digging in the 2000-year-old records is already an amazing thing for me to do, as a Chinese myself I feel so privileged to be able to read the original books. Currently, I’m learning the Ptolemy’s map during the 1st century, hopefully I can connect some of his map’s locations to the Chinese recorded locations, that should be more fun to do.
Shaka pulling the oldest trick in the book Shaka: "Tomorrow we will hunt elephants, come along!" Englishmen: "We don't know if we have permission, nor are we inclined to do so" Shaka: "Scared?" Englishmen: "..." Englishmen: "We agree to hunt with you"
@@bigbadndn you ever watch the border displays between the Indian and Pakistani Armies? It's a clown show of the highest degree but also can be deadly serious at the same time.
@@tunxlaw it’s more PC than it was decades ago. Gaijin is racist so Gaikokojin is acceptable, but it doesn’t matter they think all Americans have sex all the time and we commit crimes. If you come here you’ll also be stared at
@@ge2623 Perhaps the ones who funded these expeditions, for the explorers though I'm sure it was curiosity. We saw the same thing with the astronauts that rode missiles into space.
Most of them were peaceful. Only the Vikings and Indians one ended in fighting. I think that's likely because those were raiders who accidentally ran into some hunter and fishers instead of being diplomats or traders as the rest were.
I think the British were partly fascinated, partly curious about the Zulu. It has Ceasar on Galic Wars kinda vibe, "if we built up our enemies, it makes us even more impressive" but I think the British mentality, and the whole imperial success, was built upon not uselessly antagonizing everybody and trying to win them over and make them do your biding peacefully. It is cheaper, less bloody and sometimes even quicker.
@MrSomebody-zh3ccouch touché . Now , if you can judge people based on ignorance, imagine how others can judge you based on what they can really see. Your profile pic is unsettling t😅😬 ✌
The last story of the British meeting with Shaka is pretty heart warming, usually anything to do with Europe and Africa ends with dead natives or some very uncool words being written about them, but in this acount the British seem to really be more friends rather then strictly empriacal visitors or conquers of the Zulu people which was a very fun exprience to watch. As always, your videos are one of a kind!
The British generally had good relations with the Zulu. It wasn't until the Great Trek really stirred up relations that things went south and the Zulu war started
I get the feeling that most of the time things started out quite nicely, sometimes even remarkably friendly and then things happen later, when the adventurous, explorative spirit is replaced with: alright, now how can we profit? And that's usually different people than the original meeting.
@@kjn3350 If you think about it, explorers and consuls can't really expect a profit when making new contact, they do it for the sake of it, or at least for the sake of other people. It's only when greedy bad actors realize there's money to be made and take over that things go south. Or when the diseases take over. Or cultural differences get in the way. But greed is a big one.
@@bobmcbob49 A really good movie that shows this is Zulu. While both nations are at war, they never call the other inferior, and when someone does, there is always a person there to shut that idea down immediately.
Because of ethnocentric expectations of manners that we are accustomed to due to being Western. Also, British manners are largely about reserved emotion and perceived nobility. Like . . . it's okay to take over cultures and completely change them but hey let's say how decent but primitive they seemed. It's actually a way of making themselves sound better. Because you're just doing decent but primitive people a favour old chap. Dashed good of us
@@rhiAction. Actually British Imperialism, was mainly economical. The culture changes was a side-effect, not the goal. French imperialism on the other hand, very much so.
They're still happening, as there are still "uncontacted" tribes around in the Amazon and Indian Ocean, probably a couple others elsewhere, and I'd imagine their descriptions of non-tribe humans would probably be interesting to say the least.
Ngl the poetry of witness writing from those explorers are top notch Whilst internet made us without bounds anymore, we can probably still do tourism or travelling and writing our own accounts on different places.
Ibn Fadlan was such a gentleman. Everyone else is basically calling foreigners horrible, malformed creatures and abominations against natural order, meanwhile he just berates the Viking Rus for their dirtiness but still calls them gorgeous.
@@sheheryardanish546probably lots of Vikings had some understanding of Arabic, it was one of the most spoken languages of the Middle Ages and they probably sold lots of slaves there. Not to mention lots of trade in other goodies. The Scandinavians traveled all the way to Persia and the holy land
And the funniest part is, the Norse were some of the cleanest people in Europe. So either the Rus lost that practice after going down the Volga, or Middle Eastern standards of "cleanliness" were really high.
@@chickenlover657 Except no, they were Rus - the Mongols didn't arrive along the Volga until the 13th century, that is nearly 400 years after Ibn-Fadlan's account.
@@jackarius101 Actually that's not quite correct. You're talking about the period when the wars started, but the mongols were around long before. But my point is he's describing typical mongol "hygiene" practices, not that of the slavs.
"Our arms aren't sufficient for hunting an elephant", proceeds to drop one with two shots . These people are using spears and bows which obviously worked well for them but nothing beats the boom stick .
@@PlaylistProleteriatYeah, those muskets weren't very accurate. That's why they used to fire them in long firing lines, basically spray and pray that at least some bullets will hit something.
To be fair they probably assumed they would need a much larger caliber gun like the elephant guns that were eventually made for the job to take it down
The Japanese account in this video needs some explanations, otherwise it’s quite misleading. The text (Kirishitan Monogatari) was written in 1639, that means 96 years after the first arrival of the Portuguese (1543). And it was written with the specific purpose of denigrating Catholic missionaries. It was published right aftermath of Shimabara Rebellion (1637-1638), the last and the largest uprising against Tokugawa Shogunate in the former half of Edo period. The Tokugawa strengthened its dominance by destroying Toyotomi clan at the siege of Osaka(1614-1615) and they replaced pro-Toyotomi Daimyos with pro-Tokugawas in the region. Shimabara was once the domain of the Arima clan, which had been Christian. The Arima were moved out in 1614 and replaced by the Matsukura. The rebellion was mainly against Matsukura's misgovernance by peasants, with Christians and discontented samurais later joining the rebellion. Because the shogunate suspected that European Catholics had been involved in spreading the rebellion, Portuguese traders were driven out of the country by 1639, the exact year Kirishitan Monogatari was published. Basically Kirishitan Monogatari was written as a “propaganda” to instill the horrendous image of Catholic missionary in people. It consists of 12 chapters depicting the events in chronological order from the arrival of the Portuguese to the Shimabara rebellion. The part you heard in the video is the beginning of the first chapter of it, so it’s not “a naive first account” at all.
Funnily enough, expeditions to explore for colonisation weren't always in bad faith. Just sadly many slight bumps in communication or culture would lead to immediate hostilities. Not many new settlers wanted their neighbours to be aggressive so it was originally cooperation or war, and so there's plenty stories of cooperation but of course those of outright slaughters using advanced weaponry are more prevalent due to significance.
Susan Wise Bauer, in her book series about History, (The Ancient World, The Medieval World, The Renaissance etc.) in the first book have a great story that would fit your format perfectly, in the preface she writes: SOMETIME AROUND 1770 BC, Zimri-Lim, king of the walled city of Mari on the banks of the Euphrates, got exasperated with his youngest daughter. A decade earlier, Zimri-Lim had married his older daughter Shimatum to the king of another walled and sovereign city called Ilansura. It was a good match, celebrated with enormous feasts and heaps of presents (mostly from the bride’s family to the groom). Zimri-Lim’s grandchildren would eventually be in line for the throne of Ilansura, and in the meantime the king of Ilansura would become an ally, rather than another competitor among the crowd of independent cities fighting for territory along the limited fertile stretches of the Euphrates. Unfortunately, grandchildren didn’t arrive as soon as hoped. Three years later Zimri-Lim, still hoping to make the alliance with Ilansura permanent, sent the king another daughter: Shimatum’s younger sister Kirum. Kirum, sharp-tongued and ambitious, was expected to take her lawful place as second wife and servant to her sister. Instead, she decided to lobby for a position as the king’s first wife. She involved herself in politics, commandeered servants for her personal use, sneered at her sister, and generally queened it about the palace-until Shimatum gave birth to twins. Immediately the childless Kirum plummeted in the palace hierarchy. “No one asks my opinion any more,” she complained, in letter after letter to her father. “My husband has taken away my very last servants. My sister says that she will do whatever she wants to me!” Given Kirum’s behavior to her sister in the early years of her marriage, it is unlikely that “whatever she wants” involved anything good; and indeed, Kirum’s letters soon begged her father for rescue. The plea “Bring me home or I shall surely die!” progressed to “If you do not bring me back home to Mari, I will throw myself from the highest roof in Ilansura!” Zimri-Lim had hoped to make the king of Ilansura his friend. Unfortunately, leaving Kirum in the the man’s household wasn’t doing much to increase the goodwill between the two families. Seven years after the wedding, Zimri-Lim gave up, made a royal journey north, and in the words of his own court records, “liberated the palace of Ilansura” by bringing Kirum home.
🤨 "Kirum"...Who's royal bloodline and arrogant expectations passed from generation to generation, until it was anglicized in the West to become the dreaded "Karen" of modern legend.
@@josh-oo fair enough, but before i go back to Dwarf Fortress, lets just take a moment to appreciate your name. It's a name that charlie would approve of.
The Japanese description of the missionaries is great. What I'd love is to hear the account (if it exists, of course) of the same missionaries so we can have parallel stories of the same event(s). Awesome as always!
I am sure there's plenty of documents in medieval Spanish. If you learn modern Spanish you can probably read them and understand 90%. A lot of times these things do not get translated into English because of the historic rivalry, but they most certainly are readily available.
I've actually heard a video on this channel of a Portuguese missionary's account of Japan Edit: here you go ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qu-pSBEnMt4.html
I like how the Arab guy was dissing the Rus so hard, then at the funeral one of the Rus basically turned around and finally dissed him right back and even gave a good explination for WHY he thought his people's funerary practices were better - would've loved to have seen how the guy reacted! XD
I’m not sure that was a good explanation, because if you know how nature works, you’d know how the cycle of life works, and the cycle of life means you go back to which you came from. We are from the earth, so we go back to the earth, we are not from the element of fire. So no, the more civilised Arabs/Persians were again smarter and more civilised than their Slavic/rus counterparts. Hence why a lot more was contributed from those ancient civilisations as opposed to the other.
@@larshofler8298 Well, considering the Rus were Norse people that settled in Eastern Europe, and the Norse were pretty infamous for being way more hygenic than most other Europeans at the time according to other contemporary accounts, I'm inclined to say that either A)the Rus wildly diverged from the rest of the Norse in terms of hygiene, B)this specific group of Rus were unusually filthy, C)he misinterpreted what he was seeing and thus didn't record it accurately, or D)he deleberately exagerrated what he saw or outright made some stuff up to make a better story
@Amy he says that the rus showered once a week. He also said they use a communal wash bowl in the morning. These are things that we know vikings did, as western European sources mention it. Difference is the Europeans thought this was because the vikings were vain and cared too much about their looks, while ibn fadlan thought these habits were gross and that the rus aren't very clean. I'm inclined to agree with ibn fadlan.
@@larshofler8298 the _original_ Rus were Swedish Vikings. But after they took over Novgorod and Kyiv and the lands around there, they seem to have merged into the local population pretty quickly, and their name became used for the whole population.
Modern russians were called "muscovites"(and they in fact are) before 1725 year, when Peter I steal "Rus" name from ukranians and litvins(belorussians)
Amazing as always but just a little suggestion, would love if you announced the new scene and the context each time like you used to. Most people I think listen to these like podcasts and it is very easy to get confused
I love how extremely racist they are too, it's very much like how kids would react upon seeing someone of a different race for the first time. Edit: A lot of people assume I'm being unkind by this remark, but I mean so meanness by it. I love human nature, and even when humans are weirded out by each other, it's kind of endearing to me.
An interesting point, the legendary horse Red Hare ridden by Warrior Lu Bu from Pre Three Kingdom era is actually a Bactrian horse origin. This is why Red Hare was larger and sturdier war horse.
@@charlesk22 presumably just conjecture that any horse of superior size and ability at the end of the Han Dynasty was a descendant of the horses seized in the War of the Heavenly Horses because it would be unlikely to otherwise produce such a horse in China. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Heavenly_Horses
"What he said could not be understood at all, his voice was like the screech of an owl." That Japanese account is the first time I've laughed out loud watching these videos
They mention interperters, that makes me wonder how the job of trabslator started, who was the first among their people to try and learn a new tongue to try and mediate between 2 cultures, and how difficult it must have been learning with no prior help
The reason Ibn Fadlan visited this city north of the Volga river was that the Governor of this city offered to become a Muslim in exchange for the Abbassids to send supplies and provide protection. So the interpreter was most likely an advisor in the Governor's court.
Well it could have happened in a lot of ways. The native Americans and Europeans communicated and learned each other's languages by just pointing at stuff and calling it in their own language. Like pointing at a rock and saying rock. And over time they eventually understood each other's languages. Another ay was to grow up near and around both types of peoples so they'd be familiar with the languages and cultures and be a bridge between them.
Yes, there is no such thing as “European” people, we are Portuguese, Italian, Polish, Swedish. Each as different and old from each other as most cultures in the world.
@@macbatz6734 just because you don't, doesn't mean others don't. No. Our military presented Afghans with a plaque shaped like their country, they had no idea what was.
@@noneyabizz8337 my great aunt was a teacher in the USA , the most ignorant and benighted country on this planet. She told me that her pupils failed to recognise the shape of the US , were unable to place new York and LA correctly on the map, and thought Europe was a country. And you dare to invade and boss around the rest of the world?
A detail on Ibn Fadlan's account: - He was accompanied by an interpreter whose primary language wasn't Norse and didn't understand the Kievan Rus culture much, so mistranslations of actions and customs were pretty common.
@@caveman8557 Well, sounds are one of the fundamental ways that we make observations. So, if he observed, he listened. Thus, if he saw/heard something he didn't understand and asked his interpreter for answer, said interpreter definitely got some things wrong due to his own cultural/linguistic barrier.
@@vicenzostella1390 Literally most of his observations are their customs , he mostly described what he saw . I wonder how you can mistranslate 29 Vikings using the same basin to clean themselves. Also what he mentioned are in league with other accounts like ibn rustah and other European accounts .
@@nutyyyy I get what you're saying, and in many cases you're right...but the Vikings are an exception. His accounts are not unique, these are all well known Viking practices. They did wash their face with snot water. Things like shitting anywhere you wanted (yes, they had "toilets," or rather, holes in the ground...but they mostly only used them in their own 'cities,' and were more guidelines than rules) and performing "reproductive acts" in public view of the whole town, were considered "wrong" pretty much across the board, from Japan to Turkey to Portugal... While it may have been ESPECIALLY disgusting to some cultures...yes, many of the acts of the vikings were pretty much unanimously viewed as the worst humanity had to offer at that time. I know many want to deny the Vikings were barbarians because there IS a lot of biased misinformation (for a reason) and they DID have a fairly sophisticated culture of their own (even though they had no written language and war was their main cultural driving force), the fact of the matter is, they were pretty barbaric. Literally the first thing they did when they saw Indigenous Canadians is kill them. Like, right away. And they supposedly took pride in this, no regret. And that's not even including their pillaging practices. I'm looking more at COLLECTIONS of historical accounts than what archaeologists today want to view through rose colored glasses, especially because Scandinavia takes so much pride in their Viking history...But you can generally see the overlap to determine what was truth and what was twisted. It also of course depends which period of Viking history you're looking at - I'm referencing more pre-800-1200 AD before they had largely settled around Europe, and thus adopted European practices, but were also still Viking. ...Granted, your name is "the great Scot," so if that's a reference to the Scots, well...Scots were indeed influenced HEAVILY by Viking culture, so I can maybe see your perspective here 😆 One final disclaimer: Yes, other more "civilized" cultures also did similar barbaric things. But a) that was usually limited to a particularly cruel leader/general, as opposed to a widely accepted cultural practice and b) it was usually worse for "revenge" attacks, as opposed to just a simple raid of a fishing village...Vikings didn't care either way.
Knowing where the Brits and Zulus met and hearing them describe it is so weird when listening to these stories which are mostly from another universe 🙂
I remember seeing a video recently on the burning of the library of Alexander, and how it said that it wasn't really THAT much of a loss because it was mostly cultural records that got destroyed. This video, is a perfect example of why the part of that other video is just objectively wrong.
@@MusMasi Understanding anthropology is the key to our species success. All the technological advancements in the world mean nothing, if we dont have the wisdom to pilot them correctly.
It is a fact that we did not loose that much though. When the harbour of Alexandria was burned by Caesar, the institution had already been neglected for centuries, leading to the decay of entire sections of the library and its scrolls. Subsequent damage sustained by the library during christian riots of late antiquity, and the arab conquest actually destroyed very little, as its works had already been taken and dispersed all around the Mediterranean. And you have to remember that the library of Alexandria's primary role was conserving copies or copied originals of already existing works. Much of what was "lost" in Alexandria already existed somewhere else, and thus wasn't lost at all.
@@remilenoir1271 Yeah i've seen nearly every single youtube video about it, and have been studying ancient history for decades. Still sounds like anthropologist copium.
@@darkranger116 That and the fact that the literary production of antiquity is largely overestimated because we take at their word ancient writers who were prone to exaggeration in order to glorify such city or such ruler. Academic study today is still extremely hindered by what I would call the "antiquity complex", this idea that the ancient world was superior in every way possible to pre XVIIth century societies and that nothing of importance happened between 500 and 1450 CE in Europe. The same modern scholars who would usually brush off accounts of ancient battles involving millions of soldiers as mere exaggeration, strangely take at face value the descriptions of libraries of mystical proportions numbering millions of scrolls... That sort of bias gave rise to absurd beliefs such as the idea that the literary production of antiquity as a whole (official registers; essays on philosophy, science, history; poetry...) was only topped in Europe in the XIXth century. Which is extremely stupid when you take the time to think more than two minutes about it.
These first contacts giving similar vibes to preliminary study or introduction chapters of some discipline/courses. Fascinating and holds the graps of what would be uncovered next in depth detail
Thanks for more first contact stuff. This and petty griping reach me the most. You can learn a lot about people when you study how they react to leaving their comfort zone.
The Vikings and Inuit becoming fast and lasting friends is my favorite. Makes perfect sense too, they share the annual hardship of far northern winters. Modern Americans who are living as semi homesteaders out in the frozen sticks of Alaska will tell you: reliable and honest neighbors are all too often the difference between life and death when winter is upon you. I postulate that this fact being so well known to both the Vikings and Inuit that it is woven into the cultural fabric of both peoples is the reason why this particular case of first contact between 2 desperate peoples living worlds apart DID NOT end in bloodshed.
There's also the portuguese encounter with natives from Brazil on 1500. There's a letter that details the encounter: "Letter of Pero Vaz de Caminha" ( Carta de Pero Vaz de Caminha )
I wish I could find really good documentaries on ancient history like this. I feel like typically a documentary follows one person, or one ruler, not the country it's about and their accounts or trades with other countries. Idk I just mean these are really interesting and detailed, it's cool seeing other ancient people in the perspective of a different ancient country.
I recommend listening to Fall of Civilizations podcast! They start off the episode with a foreigners' first contact with remnants of the empire before diving into what living in the empire during it's peak was like, what food they ate, what the people of the empire were proud of in their poems, and what eventually caused the empire's fall into the ruins which the foreigner in the beginning of the video saw when they rediscovered the place.
That description of christianity by the Japanese is incredibly interesting! It's pretty spot on afterall, really the kinda stuff I'd imagine a missionary of the time would be eager to tell everyone that will listen, but it still sounds so fascinating when you consider it's someone with no prior knowledge of the Abrahamic religions describing it by comparing stuff to things their own people will understand where it's needed, it's just real neat.
It's not a real first contact account though. This was basically a propaganda piece written 96 years after first contact with the specific purpose of making christian missionaries look bad.
This is one of the most bizarre and interesting videos I have ever seen on RU-vid. I totally appreciate how amazing it is and how it made me feel completely different than I was before I watched/listened to it! Thank you for your work!
Very interesting to see all the Portuguese religious terms transliterated from speech into japanese orthography, like Bateren=Padre (Priest) and Iruman=Irmão (Brother).
Pêro Vaz de Caminha's letter narrating the first encounter between the Portuguese and natives in (what would be) Brazil is fascinating and would be a great addition. On a sinister note, but an important one, Gomes Eanes de Zurara's account in 1444 of early African enslaved people brought to Portugal in his "The Chronicle of the Discovery and Conquest of Guinea", although I can't conclusively judge if it is appropriate for this channel as it is very upsetting.
Crazy to contemplate how many of these scenarios ended horribly, despite initially being so jovial and kind. Christians in japan, British in zululand, anytime the vikings came across ANYONE.
Funny thing, my school in Portugal was in honour of Padre Pedro Arrupe, a Spanish priest who was the first to get in Nagasaki after the city was bombed, transforming his house into a hospital and having a major role in creating the jesuista order. Funnily enough, one record he recall was how the Japanese kids would call him a certain name due to his big nose
The Christian's arriving in Japan was fascinating. It is rather interesting that the Padre is described as completely black save for his nose. I assume that the priest was swarthy, perhaps Mediterranean and perhaps tanned from his journey. As the Japanese at that time would not have had contact with Africans, or other black people, they would have considered the priest to be black, at least in comparison to themselves. The description of the priest looking like a goblin, might simply have been the writer being unkind, or perhaps the priest was not the most handsome of men, though the description of him having claws on his feet is puzzling. Perhaps he is referring to the pointy toes of courtly shoes. The description of the converted beating themselves seems to be a description of self flagellation practiced on some Catholic sects. It is all very fascinating seeing it through alien eyes.
I guess that because the Padre's vest was black from neck to toe, and he probably had black hair, black beard and black eyes, so it looked like only his nose was not black. The Portugueses are tanned, but Japanese men are usually much darker, so I guess the black vest has something to do with it.
@@Kanukosan Yeah, when I was in High school people used to mistake my friend's Japanese father for Mexican because he used to work outside a lot and was very tan. I never understood how they were so confused he has a distinctly Japanese facial structure but apparently tan = Mexican in a lot of my peers' eyes
@@clarehidalgo Same thing on China. My colleague told me how the kids in her class used to laugh at her because she was black, when all she was, was tanned from playing outside all the time. In all cultures, even African, the darker your skin the more ugly you are considered.
Arabs at the time were disgusted at Spaniards and Franks too (Spaniards more tho)..... The only Europeans we don't see Medieval Arabs describe as disgusting were the Byzantine Greek.
I like how they called the homes "fixed abodes" in the first account. Says a lot about how people viewed "their home" back then in that region. Some people were probably fine with abodes that were not "fixed" lol......which in the Western world, is a strange and alien idea these days.
The Chinese were historically bordered to the north and west by nomadic tribes that they considered barbarians. People in those regions having "Fixed abodes" would have been a sign of civilisation for the Chinese.
Well in this case you will love the toons of arabic chronicle (the famous in the west so translate a lot is « Journey » by Ibn Battuta (a Morrocan traveler of the late middle age)…but toons with a lot of day to day descriptions exist and are really like time machine for people that love history))
I am a little intrigued at the description of Zhang Qian about India as China and India had relationship since the days of Ashoka, which was quite a few centuries before Yuezhi (Precursor to Kushan's in India).....the two countries were tied by Buddhism .... yet somehow Zhang Qian describes India as if he is learning about India for the first time.
Very succinct narration and cool artwork choices. This video kept my attention and entertained, as well as informed me of some intriguing historical stories. I love this format!
😂😂😂😂 We think it's hilarious. It's normal that they would see us like that. Let's face it we must have seemed smelly and ugly to a Japanese😂😂😂. In the end at least they understood we were not complete idiots that's something 😂😂😂.
@@kingleothesomethingsomethi285 And what is even funnier is that the Norse were considered to be some of the cleanest people in Europe at the time. Which can mean of three things: - The Rus lost the practice after going down the Volga. - Middle Eastern standards of cleanliness were much higher. - European standards were so low that they saw the Norse's minimum effort as overboard.
@@larshofler8298 Well, that individual Japanese anyway. The Portuguese were very successful in South Japan. However, the government began banning Christianity from the country, leading to mass persecution, forced re-conversions, rebellion, and even more persecution. They were able to survive underground by carrying on the teachings of the exiled friars and using the Buddha mother statue as Mary in disguise. But yeah, first-contact impressions would definitely be hilarious. I know that you were making a joke, but I can't pass up the opportunity to teach.
@@vicenzostella1390 Probably the latter two. Islam to this day places a lot of emphasis on purity and cleanliness, and western Christiandom in particular moved away from the Roman traditions of bathing (and also lost a lot of the other hygienic practices and were largely unable to maintain infrastructure like aqueducts and sewers/latrines). Pagan Europe certainly smelled a lot better than Christian Europe, if nothing else. There's no shortage of accounts of west Europeans stinking, historically (Native American, Mesoamerican, Arabic, Ottoman, Byzantine, Japanese, Chinese, Indian, etc) and of Europeans noting how "obsessed with cleanliness" other cultures were, tbh. The religious motivations for not bathing at least died down by the tail end of the Victorian era, and then germ theory did the rest.
The descriptions of mister Ibn Fadlan's are so rich, so beautiful, I lost myself in the pictures I imagined inspired by his words. I want to learn more about him.
It's always funny to see how non-Christians react to seeing Jesus on the Cross. They're usually horrified, and rightfully so. We're so use to seeing this display of brutal violence as an everyday thing.
I doubt the Japanese were in any way shocked or horrified by the “brutal violence” of a crucifix, samurai used to chop peasants in half to test their swords, it was probably just quite absurd to see a strange looking man nailed to a wooden beam.
Non-christian: "Hey umm... what's that?" Christian: "Oh. He is our lord and savior who was nailed to a wooden cross from his hands and feet and died there." Non-christian: "Why tf do you have a commemorating figure from such horrific event of you good lord being killed hanging on your wall?"
@@jokuvaan5175 Uneducated Non-Christan: makes offensive underhand anti-Christian comment disguised as humour Christian and Historian: rolls eyes and has to state what the majority of Christian and non-Christian historans on the planet already know about any cultures martyrs, and could easily work out by using half a brain cell ''well obviously to remind people of the pain and suffering and sacrifice made in order to save the souls of mankind,so that they are grateful for the enormity of God's love''...
@@monkeymoment6478 The Japanese of the time were no strangers to crucifixion; it was a punishment they themselves had used. It was more the novelty of the context, of a kami (a divine being) allowing himself to be so ill-used. ='[.]'=
@@monkeymoment6478 If you're referring to tsujigiri, it's actually not known how common it actually was (Or whether it really happened very often.). Indiscriminate murder is indiscriminate murder, no matter the social class.
Well, that explains why the writer described the Portuguese as black, having never encountered Africans the Japanese would have consider the swarthy Portuguese as black.
Interesting that the Arab account of the Viking Rus is depicted almost to the letter in the movie 'The Thirteenth Warrior'. Great movie. Highly recommend it.
There was another Muslim explorer who met them and he had a much better opinion of them. He also associated them with the Zoroastrians in his homeland in Iran. But Iran had contact with Germanic people since before Islam even existed as many would come down the volga and through the Caspian Sea into northern Iran and trade with Iranians.
@@thepiousskeleton6046 More likely? Why? Because you don't like the idea of vikings being nasty? Considering nothing else was exaggerated in the writing like they were 7 ft tall with red noses; it's more likely that was the truth.
@@Metonymy1979 Considering that we have no other first hand accounts of such practices, no it isn't likely. Sorry if you have a weird gross-out fetish that you want to indulge but it's more likely that the account was colored by the man's religious and racial biases that resulted in exaggerations.
Japan's first contact with the Arabs should be included. the Japanese historian thought Arab women were beautiful but he considered the variety of skin tones among the population peculiar. he visited during the golden age so obviously he was mesmerized by the technological advancements.
Just found your channel and I really enjoy the content! I don't know if it would be much trouble but maybe adding a short introduction to each section, already for videos like this one where you have multiple accounts. Like half a paragraph to a paragraph of the time and setting, or any other relevant information. Regardless this is now one of my favorite channels!
There was an Iranian explorer who met the Viking Rus and he had a much different and positive opinion and his description is accurate to how the English talked about how obsessed with hygiene the Norse were, which matches actual real history on the Norse. He also relates their religion to that of a more primitive version of Zoroastrianism in his home country.
Saying that vikings were obsessed with hygiene is ridiculous. Hygienism is a modern concept (and a harmful one at that). They were obsessed with looking good, which is quite different, and is the reason the Anglo-Saxons mocked them.
@@ultra-papasmurf It's not pedantic at all, it's very important. If you don't make the distinction between basic hygiene, and trying to look good, you fall into the common trap of thinking people in the middle ages were pigs constantly covered in shit and refusing to even touch water. Western Europeans men during the Middle Ages couldn't care less about looking good, which was vanity and womanliness to them, but they cared a lot about hygiene. They were stoic, not neglectful.
Moctezuma, was told that the Spanish smelled. And when he first talked to Cortez, he didn't actually see him as a god (as many would believe) but he told Cortez: i am of flesh and bone as you are.
Keep in mind the nature of the men writing such accounts. They have political motivations of their own. They write to stroke their own egos, and those of their superiors. They make promises of resources to exploit. Accounts from common folk are not so widely shared or preserved
In my country's folklore, Dokkaebi is known as creatures that wields strength or knowledge about craftsmanship. I found out that these kind of folklore's fairy or gremlin was usually refering to people with different color that used to trade with my ancient country and some of them that decided to settle in my country. Many of them were Turkish or Northern nomadic tribes
Interesting that the series Vikings incorporated that basin routine that Ibn Fadlan talked about, in the same order he mentioned too! They must’ve done their fair amount of research.
Well, from what I've seen from the show it isn't very historically accurate at all. Even if they got one thing right, starting with the armor, which is a mish-mash from all different time periods, to characters appearing which should have been long dead or which weren't even born by then. Also they're depiction of Norse women is wrong too, even though the Norse were more "progressive" than the rest of Europe at that time, the mere notion of a woman having any real power or participating in a raid or even choosing her own husband was unthinkable for the Norse. But at least the show was entertaining, even though it shouldn't be viewed as an accurate depiction of Norse culture or history.
The movie “The 13th warrior” is loosely based on the writings of Ibn Fadlan. Everything he spoke about they show in the film. Minus the main antagonist’s of the film. But all of the customs he speaks about are shown.
In ibn fadlan story there's a missing part about the gang rapping of the female slave for some time before killing her with her master which he explains in shock but it was detailed
How the Japanese account describes Christianity in terms of Buddhism is so interesting to me. Accompanied by traditional Japanese art interpretation of Christianity, too!
Ibn Fadlan's story on the Viking Rus reminds me of the flick called the 13th Warrior. Because that is what they did in the beginning of the flick. One of the best flicks that I throughly enjoyed. Be safe and be 😎
Why do people say "When the spaniards reach America" or "When the British ruled India" but when it comes to the Portuguese, it's always the "europeans". It was a specific people from Europe ffs