I’m surprised you didn’t mention the full integration of 5G in China’s huge shipping docks; for example the seaport in Shanghai. 5G in China’s ports has enabled them to implement the the fastest loading and unloading of huge container ships.
@@teoengchin Not likely!! In China 5G download speeds can reach 10 gigabits per second. That’s up to 100 times faster than 4G. For example, in China 5G will download a movie in just 40 seconds. On a 4G network in the USA, this takes 50 minutes on average. China’s implementation of 5G is much faster than the slow American version, maybe the American companies intentionally slow down their 5G connections, whereas the Chinese ports use 5G running at least 100x faster than American 4G.
@@LaowaiDaveJCP According to Huawei's website, Yangshan Port in Shanghai was fully automated back in 2017 with 4.5G LTE. I'm guessing it was working fine even before 5G: "The fourth phase of Yangshan Port in Shanghai, China started trial operations at around 11:00 a.m. on December 10, 2017. This ‘Smart Giant’ seaport, which has been constructed over the past three years and now offers seven large deep-water berths, becomes the world’s largest automated container terminal. The systematic trial operations of what has been given the nickname of ‘magic container terminal’ is largely attributed to an industrial wireless network built on Huawei’s first-of-its-kind 5.8 GHz Long-Term Evolution (LTE) technologies. To date, 4.5G LTE technology based on Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) standards is becoming a key enabler for diverse industries and sectors to accelerate their digital and automation transformation."
I think you guys are correct. I am not aware of any real 5G connectivity in the US, maybe except in a lab set up. Overheating is one of the challenges not yet overcome in a practical real iofe environment 😀😃🤣
5G technology is not only able to get high-speed internet (above 500 Mbps), but the application of 5G technology in various fields of work by creating technological innovations and producing them to be implemented in various fields of work, that is the big benefit of 5G technology developed by Huawei-China .
It's a shame the West and China fell out, ( I'm not interested in politics). But 5G was quickly being rolled out, and the government put a Huawei ban on 5G equipment hear in the UK As a result 5G rollout has slowed to a cruel. So you only get 5G in the big cities reliably.
5G isn’t what I want. I would love to at least get GPRS in the Tube. I think 5G is a stretch when we don’t even have 2G there. Every metro in major city in Asia have 4G signals especially the ones in ex British colonies like Singapore, Hong Kong and Malaysia. Losing signal due to going underground hasn’t been a thing since the 1990s for those ex-colonies, You’d think the capital of the British empire would’ve at least be on par in this regard. 🤪
@@WarrenKLiu They are installing 4G on the London underground. It might be 5G as well but have not looked into it. But have heard a few adverts on the radio, so is happening.
@@gavinnorthants yeah I was being somewhat sarcastic. I believe the Hong Kong MTR company has been handed the contract to manage the London Underground a couple years back or at least part of it. Haven’t heard anything on the news on this in a while but I remember my reaction on this was, nice now we are finally going to see modernisation. Not sure what’s the status but HK MTR is one of the best metros in the world. It’s probably 5G since most 5G deployments as I understand it, are an add on to existing 4G antennas which is how China is able to deploy them so fast. The issue is Ericsson didn’t designs theirs like Huawei did so can’t just upgrade existing antennas. I do hope regardless of which vendor is used, mid band is being deployed instead of mmWave. I rather have consistency of signal than inconsistent ultra speeds. Mid band is what China did, I averaged speeds of 350-550mbits while in Shenzhen and never had signal issues above or underground while there. mmWave supposedly gives you 1200-1500mbits but you need direct line of sight to the base stations
I think an important factor you are leaving out is the latency. This is very critical for many industrial and commercial uses. Also China's 5G uses Huawei's patented protocol. I believe this protocol was licensed to Verizon a few years ago.
We are getting consistency in teh US also. We are getting consistently getting about 30M B/s in Silicon Vellry. Even it shows 5G with 4G phone. Cool, right? 5G does not mean anything here in the US. The speed is as same as before, slow.
Most of the "5g" that we have in the United states so far uses the same frequencies as lte. But newer mid band like n41, n77 are making speeds faster in a lot more areas.
In america it is all about marketing ruse and lies. They are good at lying about china. They keep american living in a cave. Yes verizon 5g speed is basically lte speed. It is completely garbage in maryland
@@americanknow8232 at least their ads is honest and beneficial. I used to have verizon and their 5g is a scam. Now with att like week already feel their speed is better.
Hahaha...that's freedom of speech for you in a western democratic society. It's propaganda (Advertisement) only, never true to what they say, or most of the time at least.
I'm a bit irritated that the graphic text overlay guy is posting units in the wrong capitalization. mmWave - millimeter wave (who calls it "m-m"? Mbps - mega *bits* per second MBps - mega *bytes* per second MBPS - ?????
If we look at South Korea and Swiss, they have a smaller landmass, and their cities aren't that big, population is much smaller too. So rolling out mmWave makes more sense and easier for this two and similar countries. It's much easier for them to cover the amount of spacexpopulation. In real life usage for a phone user, mmWave doesn't really give any advantage over the mid-range wave. Unless you are streaming video, downloading big files or playing heavy load games. But honestly, how often is that for a normal user? On the other hand, for construction machines that supports 5G as it is massively rolled out in China, having mmWave is much better, but the coverable area is much smaller too given the wavelength is much shorter, so you can only use mmWave at a closer distance to the signal tower, and it cost way too much to build many. So Even though in S.Korea and Swiss had build towers that supports mmWave, I doubt majority of users can benefit mmWave everywhere, given each tower are not build closely together. Maybe a little different in compact areas of the city. But economical wise, having 5G with mid to mm wave is definitely a benefit to the nations that had build it. Using S.Korea for example, video gaming is one of their mainstream businesses with competition held every year. Having 5G and mmWave, they can pretty much dump away the broadband and have competition host almost everywhere around the cities. That brings a lot of income, and it gives most businesses a more efficient linkage to the internet to get work/meetings done. So looking at this topic, US has really become a joke in many areas, and politically saying, sanctioning Huawei just because US had fell behind in this area is a stupid move. So instead of trying to play catch up, US and many western countries prefer playing Big Brother to threaten and suppress others who they see as a threat to their power. That's dumb and it's a given due to western history.
Not all 5G use the same technology. Huawei 5G tech is still the best in terms of speed, reliability, and cost. The date of this video is June, 2022. Today, Huawei has 5.5 G telecom technology, which is even better than the first generation. Finally, China’s 5G has to cover a much larger country than S Korea. Hence, mmWave is not available to all of China.
I live in Snohomish and have T-Mobile. I live only 0.29 miles from the T-Mobile tower. I use Megenta MAX and in home 5G broadband. Speeds I get are from inside my bedroom is: 1) 5G: 700/100. 2) 4G LTE: 300/50.
I live in a world where I had a 28k dial up line and it was considered a luxury. 56k dial up in my days back in year 2000 in Shanghai, was supposed to be like king. When the speed game started, it got to a point where practical use is key, so the question becomes, can I live with 3G, 4G and still be okay or when do I really need 5G or even 6G one day? My internet speed is ok using a cable. I could see 5G is beating my cable, but then I could have a fibre coming into my house directly (u cannot be quciker than a proper fibre optic coming into my house, can you?) My conclusion is, 4G/5G is more than enough to do the job. The question is how well are we going to use this "advantage" of speed over other countries? Does it make my McDonald burger more tasty? Or I could watch a one hour movie within 30 mins? What's the actual benefit for 5G (versus 4G for example)?
Unlike earlier generations, 5G is about much more than phones. It supports a wide variety of connection, from low bandwidth devices, such as utility meters, to very wide bandwidths. It also supports lower latency for services that need it. It also supports a much greater device density. It's a who new world.
@@rubinsahu4554 I’ve lived and worked in NYC, India and London. Nothing compared with Indian sewage, especially outside the cities. People shitting directly into trash filled filthy rivers in absolute slums. Shameful. Enjoy your broadband though.
Some hotels in Beijing, China and in Shenzhen have RU-vid and Google Unblocked for the tourists. They use VPNs and also big news stations like CGTN and South China Morning Post.
@@idontcare9797 Depending on the 5G plan you get, it range from 20GB to 100GB, and the service providers often give special discounts or free data capacity to users. For example, I had moved to China for about a year, but I had signed up a plan from one of the service provider for about 3 years ago when I travelled here, my plan is 30GB but I get 10GB more for free each month. The cost is lower than what I paid in Hong Kong for 5G or 4G plan, and much much lower than Canada for 3G/4G plan with 1-2GB. I had also got a fiber optic broadband service from another service provider with 1000mbps plan with a fix price, and they also gave me 3 sim cards with monthly/80GB of 5G usage to me as long as I'm using their broadband service.
In the 19th biggest metro area in the country, I get average 5G DLs @450mb, & uploads over 110 MB. My best 4G speed was around a third that, around 160mb. And I thought that wast fast for a long time. It's really 4+G. The early 4g was nowhere near this. Once it became almost all LTE saturated, the 4G became respectable. TMobile had significantly improved by leaps and boundaries in many areas. Midband is LEGIT. It's not all about SA v NSA anymore. All NSA wins.
Background: 4g or 5g plans in China can get 5g speed with graded speed limit, users would get 300M limit for free, and may get 500M, 1G, 2G based on services they choose and the cost. So you won't get any higher speed even though 5g-a is deployed and testing in some places😢
You did your test in Shanghai, which I believe is a fairly densely populated area. How is performance in more rural areas? I live in Canada and I don't believe any mmWave has been deployed here yet. The highest frequency my carrier provides is 3.5 GHz "C band". I have seen over 400 Mb down with that. The company I'm with has a few other bands where they're running 5G, the lowest being 600 MHz. Some of those bands are shared with 4G. And yes, when 5G is used on the same or similar bands as 4G, the service is a bit better, but nothing to write home about. It's only when you get into the mid bands where you see a significant increase Another thing to consider is 5G is about far more than just cell phones. The first three generations were mainly about phone use. With 4G, sometimes it was used for wireless Internet, often in backup for wired connections to businesses. On the other hand, 5G is aimed at much more than just phones. It's aimed at much more than even 4G, with things like vehicles, utilities and much, much more. It also has something called network slicing where virtual networks can share a physical one, providing connections for the various services, including quality of service (QoS) and more. In addition mmWave is often aimed has dense user areas, such as stadiums, transit hubs, etc.. So all these things may use a lot of the available bandwidth, so you'd wouldn't see it on your phone. I've had a 5G capable phone for just over 2 years, but 5G was available for some time before that.
I live in Sweden and the 5G is way better at the cities compared to what I can see in the videos. It is Ericsson (which is much better than ZTE or Huawei) but still the experience is so different! Coverage wise Europe has to work on it…
5Ge = AT&T’s version of LTE+ on their network. a lot of people think it’s 5G when really it’s not 5G in anyway. as where Verizon and T-Mobile have the same thing with their data companies, but they just don’t display it on the data label, so it would just say traditional LTE.
Even Comcast representatives tries to sell you their "10G" (which not for wireless but internet) technology and boast from it. Well in fact just a bubch of dsl wires bundled together.
In China, the 5G network covers almost all cities. 5G is not propaganda. The download speed of 4G network is generally 220Mbps/s, while the speed of 5G network can reach 400-650Mbps. The delay of connecting to the same server is only one-third of that of 4G network. China has two-thirds of the world's 4G base stations, and you can use 4G networks even in remote mountainous areas.
Bro.. you are giving wrong information. In speedtest app the actual speed of 5g is in Mbps (Megabits per second) but you mention MBps(Megabytes per second). So, the average speed is 400 Mbps = 400/8 MBps i.e. only 50 MBps
5G in Canada is 30mbps, 5G in America is 90mbps , 5G in China is 300mbps (average speeds) my LTE in Canada is 150-200 mbps …. It also uses less battery Many thanks to our southern neighbor for the super fast 5G speeds!
@@YourOptionsSaga WOW you’re 5G is so fast it’s 5 times faster then the world’s fastest 5G (South Korea) President Biden needs to send a delegation to experience your 5G and teach America 😎 … incredible 20 times faster then American 5G
@@jasondong9721 no bro I do this in public at Walmart or the beach and I get around 300-400 Mbps. Except at places near the border or in the mountains. My home internet is 2gb speed.
All US 5G implementations are sub 6GHz because it’s got larger coverage area and as a result they don’t have to install many base stations. They do these to maximize their margins so their stocks can move up and their execs can get rich. Meanwhile they pretty much ruined all the potential commercializations and monetizations that could’ve resulted from faster speed of connectivity and better positioning/location accuracies. In China, 5000 tech startups could’ve spun off from the real 5g network, in America and the countries that followed US orders not to use Huawei, you would be lucky to see 500 startups.
china has build 2.7 million 5G stations all over china and 5G Mobil users in china is 650 million , USA now just build 0.1 million 5G base stations in USA
@@rixyrohaizieI'm from india bro, believe me in only in major city and speed totally depends on your location I left my city to come to a tier 3 city's mountain side to a med school . 5g here is complete meme Totally inconsistent, speed drops and connections are lost anytime . Idk about USA or other speed was good earlier like 250mbps even here in mountain side . But Indian telecoms are giving out unlimited 5g offer so many Indians are on the network and load has increased that's why they intentionally throttle the speed Now speed sometimes reaches 150mbps and suddenly drops to 20mbps anytime It sucks , man I would pay more but just give me speed
Skorea and Swiss are small countries. Their 5G cover only small landmass. China, on the other hand, it is a hugh coverage. There is no comparison here.
I was with Verizon before, and their speedy 5G was only at some spot. However, 90% of the time it was 10-60mbps. I'm with AT&T now, and the 5G is something like 02-30mpbs. AT&T is pretty crap compare to Verizon, but at lease I'm not overpaying for shit service.
It’s very common for countries such as BRIC countries to outpace roll out of new technology compared to American/European counterparts because those countries literally skip waves of tech and are able to put all their spending and resources to rolling out that new product. Kind of like Indian households went from having no telephones to suddenly having wireless only but no landline infrastructures. Or how a country like China goes from no infrastructures to 3G right into 5G. Where USA and Europe have had to roll out countless technology prior to the next big technology also a country like China where they spend unlimited amounts of money on infrastructure in their artificial economy it’s easy for them to do it as there is no red tape
One downside of 5g is that with the current data transfer amounts that different software use no one really needs the speed that 5g offers. It’s fast but anything above 30mbs or about you are not really going to notice a difference with most internet usage. Maybe if you are constantly downloading a bunch of large files you will notice a difference. But really carriers in the USA put the high band 5G in downtown areas. Because that is where the most population density is. Really carriers just care about providing enough speed to keep their customers happy. That is the goal. In China they are almost over investing in 5g too early giving people speeds they will never need for a while. but I guess they do have more cell phone users so it makes sense to certain degree. But with chinas coming population decline some of the investment seems a bit wasted. But with all the crazy money china throws into 5g it will be the king in high data speeds for a while.
Once you get away from the hype and look closely at the details a different picture emerges. Firstly, no one, not one single operator one any country is racing to keep up with China. Why? First of all is the business case. Where the west built 4G at breakneck speed there is no reason to build 5G at the same pace. Why? 4G is not yet maxed out, won't be for years and the use cases like URLLC require spefic coverage poi ts, not blanket coverage. We're doing that already. Second is power usage. 5G uses on average 3x what 4G does. That blows a business case apart. Third and lastly, the big one - deployment costs. 5G is on average anything up to 10 times more expensive to deploy. You need new fiber everywhere to support the 10Gb circuits you now need. I don't think it's the west who has slipped up here. It's more like China responded to a command from the CCP that will (and is) crippling the operators.
Are you sure? India rolled out 5G to 78 cities in a matter of months with home grown tech. India has set policy to beat China in 6G by being the global leader by 2029. The West is just sleeping. The level of innovation in the West has stagnated which is why the West doesn’t go beyond 4G. In the western countries where innovation is still not dead 5G is doing quite well - Switzerland.
In China, there are also millimeter wave base stations to achieve a high bandwidth of more than 1000MBps, and they are installed in densely populated or other places where they are needed. Find it.
You from the UK? lol...when has anything coming from the western countries are not lies or propaganda? It's freedom of speech and information for you in a western democratic society...get used to it🤭