60hz vs 144hz vs 240hz - The TRUTH about High Refresh Monitors! | The Tech Chap 

aHAHAHA OH YEA

He slowed ti down to the point where a 60hz monitor can see the difference

@@vodkawhisperer3923 NO WAY YOU WATCHED THE VIDEO?! AMAZING!

@@davethecornmerchant905 i proved that him watching it on 60hz wont have an impact because the difference is visible when its slowed down

@@vodkawhisperer3923 it is in the video WOW

the human eye can only see 1.5dB

@@leandrofod kek

@@leandrofod Not sure about that, but I know that it can't see over 24 spaces in a username.

@lendro333 The human eye can see and identify shapes accurately in contrast (black on white, white on black) when only shown the image for 1/600 second. Our eyes are not camera's and cannot be compared to a camera , we don't see in megga pixels , we don't have shutter speeds, we see a constant stream of information and our brains interpret what is important enough for us to see or ignore.@@leandrofod

fans here of 30 fps and 60 hz with bottleneck

aha

I'm that guy cause I just bought one 😐

Mr Sock Muffin yah no point in buying 144 hz if on console don’t think it supports it and people who don’t see a difference from 60 to 144 prob don’t have it set to 144 because they have to set their monitor to 144 which most people forget to do or don’t know how to do

Wouldn't he still benefit from a far lower input lag?

Is that really like that

Funny comment :)

Underrated joke

LOL

Bruh it's such a basic joke but I'm dying 😭😭😭

Ba dum tss.

Its true

Yeah me too i got broke then shifted to 60hz but before im having 1440hz and 1080 monitor. I cant stand it i even lose many times on a game its different having low refresh rate shifting to hrr.

@Neckslit my bad i meant the opposite

@Neckslit u can get a quartz pink razer blade with a 240hz display :P

Do you think there Is a big diference betwen 1440p and 1080p? I have one gtx 1080, i would like to change my 1080p 144hz monitor.

Smoother 👍

To me moving the mouse and OS windows around is the biggest tell between 60 an 144. It is very noticble.

Isn't this still dependent on the in-game fps? For example, if someone has a 1440p triple monitor setup and only gets 70 fps due to the GPU driving 11million pixels/sec, would a 144hz monitor be noticeable?

I just find this "moving windows/mouse feels smoother" a bit funny. I mean, come on, we don't buy these kinds of monitors to do office work or move the coursor on the Windows desktooñp. No offense, but this kind of comments are completely irrelevant.

Oh yeah. You can't go back. That would mean you admit buying unnecessary shit. And it would make no sense at all to change back to an old device. Don't mind, it could be worse. There are people selling crystals that heal cancer and enough that buy them in their delusional worldview.

Original.

Ikr

LMAO

3.75Gb*

Such a boomer

I got a 3070 with an i7 but a 60hz monitor and I’m bouta upgrade to 240hz

Just got a 240hz for my first gaming pc

Quick question, if I’m on a series s, 60fps capped on a game and I’m on 60hz monitor, does 144hz make the game act as a form of better fps, does it make the game smoother?

@@iknowimgaywhenimsayingthis9059 probably makes the game smoother for sure.

@@EdenFL97 sweet, it almost acts as more fps?

Jeto you don’t. Even if you aren’t able to maintain it, it still updates faster. If you are only hitting around 90 FPS Mark of course you won’t get the 144hz but what will happen is you won’t have to wait 16ms for a new frame to appear. So even without a constant 144 FPS you still see new frames faster.

@@Pipsispite Right, but you'll also probably get screen tearing giving you a worse experience that just limiting it to 60fps unless you have G-sync or somthing

True, personally I can't really feel frame drops from 144fps until it goes down to like 125fps. So a decent range before you notice frame drops unlike at 60fps when you notice it even if only a few frames drop.

@@warpigsquad literally everyone good monitor has G-SYNC, hell even laptop has G-SYNC, Both my laptop and my Main Monitor has G-SYNC enabled.

Watching this with my gtx 750 lol

The console peasantry will forever tarnish my soul

It doesn't have to be that way

It is actually the thing i am afraid of - that i wouldn´t be able to play gpu intensive 60fps games when i switch to 144hz monitor.

@@Morpheus-pt3wq got the freesync monitor for that

Reggie Beats I think he’s saying he would be so used to 144 that 60 would start looking choppy when that’s all he can get. Personally I never had that problem. I always play on my 144hz on competitive games and on my 4K 60hz on singleplayer games. 60 to 144 is not as big as a leap going from 30 to 60. I even once in a while play gta on PS4 with my friends and it doesn’t take long for my eyes to adjust to the 30 fps.

Lmao

High refresh is not about skill, it is about convenience and luxury. Once you use high refresh it is really hard to go back. The changes is massive not only in games, but also UI such as dragging windows, scrolling, mouse cursor movement, and system animations.

@RSheikah pretty sure he is.

A better player is a better player, and that dude playing 30 wishes he could get 144hz

blitzcaster Of course, we all know that, but what he means is that his teammate has a 144hz whilst he’s trash at the game

Yes

Lol bang on bro

Still doing that.

@@radiergummi9602 rate it

@@abford03 rate what

Well it's not that bad to be honest

@@techh9171 ikr?

Peasant! I have a 75hz monitor which makes all of the difference!

@@jordanlazarus7345 indeed it does

Here here

playing a game with motion blur and 240hz and rerendering a video

@@gdm00ns83 motion blur fucking ruins the 240hz lol making it look laggy

@@abysswinston1018 true I hate hate hate motion blur. "Simulated speed" look.

@@abysswinston1018 Try proper motion blur and not your usual crappy implementations. Per object motion blur is alright

KaleidoDeer Sure, it might be alright, but then what’s the point of a super fast 240Hz monitor with G-Sync and ULMB? Do you know what ULMB stands for? Ultra-low motion blur. You’re literally simulating what the monitor’s trying to prevent. Why not just use 60Hz then?

that cant be reach that lol

@@uui ouh yeah true this world has no limit tbh

Is this gamer humor? pathetic.

Marrt is this karen humor? I’m gonna tell your manger pathetic

@@TheMarrt imagine not being a gamer boomer

More like 60 fps is 3/10. 144hz is 9/10 and 240 is 10/10 the jump from 60 to 144 is masive is not even close there is no way you go back to plat 60 fps once you try 144 is like crazy cluncky but from 144hz to 240 hz is not really noticeable meybe a bit more but not much

@@Playeriyo20 I have a 240 hz monitor and I play most games at 60 fps. It’s hard to run modern games at anything above that consistently and I’d rather have a consistent frame rate instead of a jerky but high frame rate. Though on older titles, higher fps is nice for sure, especially for more esports oriented titles

@@apersonontheinternet8354 im confused? How is it hard to run modern games above 60fps with a 240hz monitor?

The difference between 1080 and 1440 is massive as well, I'm upgrading and getting a completely new setup based around a 3080 that's going from 1080p at 144hz to 1440p at 175hz

@@robertkieffer8497 I got myself a lg gp850 1440p 180hz soo damn cool

Black Friday coming up...

bummer

This is a good reason why Variable Refresh Rate such as FreeSync and G-Sync exist. High refresh rate monitor combined with VRR is a must.

@Ddog Kbone why don't you read about low framerate compensation (LFC). This is how both Freesync and G-Sync handle framerate below the native refresh rate of a monitor. So basically the refresh rate is doubled or tripled when it is too low for the monitor. This way they can handle framerate far below the native refresh of the display.

blitzcaster lmao g sync isn’t even efficient at 60fps

LiGMA SeNSES

Only the saiyans will understand

@@The_Man_In_Red what is ligma

@@alexsvedegard ligma balls

@@zeusrem565 no only scooby doo fans understand

Sohei BRuh

Coffin meme starts playing

Ahhaha

At 60hz the shadow didn't even show yet.... Sad 60hz players

Bruh😂😂

Then 244hurtz is like the breeze in Hawaii

Hahah I blew on my computer screen to take off that hair XD

@@michaeldariopellittieri3050 and 300 hz is literally the gods breathing upon you

@@Krhiss I've never seen anything above 60 hz. My phone is 60 hz and my computer is too.

@@eljahihamgottin4540 i dont have more than 60hz but i can tell you they're so smooth . RELALY SMOOTH SO SMOOTH ITS LIKE YOU CAN BE AIMBOT IN JUST 1 dAY

You are so absolutely right, John! Also ... internal world update tick-rates (may since the 1990ths (1)) have nothing to do with the display loop. The monitor refresh rates presented here and with them the benefits of them look more like a wet dream of two marketing guys(3). One from the GPU industry and the other from the helpless "AAA" gaming title factory who successfully scams their customers since years, now(2). (1) That is of course not true, if you are using DOOM as your game engine, heheheh (2) The latter one has his head in the backside of the GPU guy. Impossible to produce a good game, just Gfx and BS:) (3) Instead you are a housefly, with the brain of her ... or you simply can't come up with the reaction times needed for such equipment. addendum to (3): No, marketing mumbo jumbo like "muscle memory" or "out of eye sight" won't change how the human biology works. They just change your willpower and the content of your wallet:) Of course the quarterly numbers of GPU/Monitor manufacturers CAN hold up with the reciprocal value of the stupidity of their customers ... in Hertz!;) P.S.: Just have a look at the thumbnail of this video. Artist impression ... sure. But by one with the lack of ALL basic principles of photography, like shutter speed and exposure time. And the use of two different(the content!) frames to compare "inequality" (let's better say ... also the lack of PHOTOSHOP skills) is stand up comedian material at it's best:))))

I guess if you limit it to 120hz you lose some latency which is good

well i have a consistant 240

@@dieSpinnt refresh rates definitely make a difference in gaming performance. a game feeling and playing smoother offers many advantages and is definitely not a scam.

Frame time consistency is very much to do with the game itself and not the hardware.

Neko Paw who says that unironically?

@@noahk a lot of them

Hehe and they buy themselves a PS4 Pro and think it's the shit at 60fps.

HuMaN eYe cAn sEe 1000 FpS iN tHeoRy(Actually true)

Heqrtz more, the eye doesn’t look in frames.

I mean 120fps is still 120fps but then again minecraft

Haha now add sildurs

bruh i cant get 60 fps

@Aydin Miller for what you need so much frames my dude??

@@xTomCat bruh same. That dang game.

That’s crazy, I didn’t know all this they talking about lol. I play on 30 didn’t know it has different on regular tv vs better hz tv. Time to upgrade.

@@chokoramoja time to become Gods!

@@amendment2711 you'll go insano from 30hz to 144hz, give me a ballpark of where you're at like gimmie a rank in a game, say for in valorant at 30hz you shouldn't get past bronze

Dont say god like that

@@amendment2711 works on pc not consoles . Bought 144 hz monitors maaan lol . Looks same on console 30hz-45hz it’s cap. Pc 60hz

I feel ur pain bro 🙏

Don’t worry buddy. You’ll upgrade eventually.

same with my 5 year old asus with intel hd 520

My Laptop is turning 11 soon an still running like a champ. Lol

My 7 yr old Asus laptop has a 120hz display and has a 670mx overclocked by 45% thanks to a custom vbios. You get what you pay for.

corniel I don’t think console players care

Actually we would rather do so especially in a game like siege were Flicking and focusing when you flick is vital

@@leothewendigo4493 You can't flick on console

1. even playing field 2. 4k 60fps cant complain

Cuntsole animals are still playing at 30 fps with drops to 12 fps.

Hello from the future, it's in the care package now

this aged poorly

I'd also never take a study seriously that was conducted by a party profiting from certain outcomes.

I think when it comes down to the Milliseconds in reaction time every little bit helps. Having your monitor refresh 240xs oer second allows you to see the enemy first

wow ive honestly never seen a person go out of their way to type a retarted fucking comment like this

Go use a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor and you will see the difference.

You're right. But there's a reason why the people who actually care about gaming have 144hz screens, they're better.

Ur pc is shit then

you propably have high response time (lower time before frames=better) I got 1msResponseT 144hz 27' and my 2nd monitor is 5msResponseTime 60hz 1440p 32'

@@ac2987 I have I3 and 1050ti

@@paulsad7624 maybe idk

@@vorda9763 google name of monitor

pls educate yourself you homophobic bigot before you talk my dad at microsoft says you can only see 625GB per hour where hour is the amount of apples up your ass divided by the the amount of salt on the sun

@@landlockedcroat1554 tf

@@landlockedcroat1554 I work at Microsoft, Can Confirm.

Human eyes can only sit on gaming chair

lol I'm about to get a 300hz laptop, I wonder if after using it for a while, if 144 would feel bad as well

Edit: yes, 144 feels quite a lot worse lol

@@juhno7659 nah. I has a 360 laptop with a 3080 and it was not much different to a 165. It was smooth af but it was negligable difference. 144-165hz is enough for 99% of user. Even power users. Just the elite gamer esport people will it make a difference

@@ericpeterson2960 I agree the jump is not even close to being as big as 60-144. But after trying out 300 for some time, 144 for me personally feels kinda laggy, no longer do I feel the satisfaction of its smoothness

@@juhno7659 I mean a 300hz laptop normally should be pretty beefy spec wise but make sure you were hitting those high numbers in games and also if you really want to make an accurate assumption monitor the 0.1% and frame time graphs

Very biased and all the 144 and 240Hz players are talking shit about console and lower fps players when in reality they only win cuz of the huge advantage

zachary martz uh huh.

@Diego okay gay pc looser

@@zLusso XD

@@zLusso yes yes their huge advantage being 144 and 240 hz... so whats biased exactly? cause hes literally saying 144 hz over 60 hz is really a advantage.

definitely not once you get 300 i never want to touch 60

@S Pm yes, I don't have a console, so I don't know how it will perform, but I do have a gaming laptop, ROG STRIX that is 1080p, 144hz and some games do play better( COD and CS GO)

@S Pm if you are using it for casual gaming you probably shouldn't make that choice but if you are going for competitive then go for 144 or 240 if your ps can handle it tbh I can't really recommend 300hz it drops frames sometimes and is real performance heavy

Yeah its in Arabic

Written in Arabic اوز You mean the sound of a duck.

you're*

@@JagsP95 Sin

@@buddz874 I suggest you go back to school and learn to read the part that says "if your a gamer"

@@JagsP95 Grammar besides, what's the demographic again?

@@JagsP95 always that one grammar nazi in the comment section

ROTFL! Good devilish joke;) But you should stop using the DOOM Engine from 1995, which has the world/A.I./player update loop tied to the frame display loop. BTW is this another non evidential, sponsored by "feelings" and anecdotal evidence, BS post? Since the times of machines like C64, CRTs and Oscilloscopes the SYNC-Signal is THE facility that prevents TEARING. If, like you state, your wrongly dimensioned GPU is the reason for tearing then you get OUT-OF-SYNC tearing if you switch VSYNC off(1). But thank you. Your "creative" use of logic and your misunderstanding of technical principles gave me a good laugh:) (1) To say it in other words: You don't eliminate the problem, you shift it into the realm of your ignorance

wow,man got owned..lolol..

@@dieSpinnt You’re so toxic

@@merosi1234 Tearing is a GPU problem. So you mean criticism is "toxic", you little F? Oh and how do your feelings contribute to the discussion? You are even worse than talking BS like the OP ... yeah, but more funny, because you troll are obviously useless:)

You meant P2W

only on PC

Faxs

of this matter, there's things more impactful than a monitor that barely changes anything in-game, and for most people, it's of no use, because their setup just allow them to use it for office work.

only for fps games

Same 🤣

@@soapmactavish5223 😂

me too why i'm here hhhhhh

Lol in Battlefield 1 with all the low settings i have 10 fps

@@kastielangel. Is it really necessary to criticize him? Besides, he could be talking about the amount of fps he gets when playing games.

True but for single player story rich games I prefer my OLED 60hz TV. I have a 144hz monitor too for fps games so it just depends what you are playing.

It's really not worth it. The change is hardly noticeable.

@Frog you’re watching a 60p video lol try it irl, there’s no going back.

@@frogdeity especially for shooter games 144 hz is much, much better than 60 hz. On slow single player games, like tlou it obviously doesn't really matter as much...

@@hoodiegamer9256 I have a 144hz monitor... I game all the time with a high-end PC. There's no difference.

Oo please tell !

Man never told us

you can feel it for sure

lmao this is true I've been playing games for over decade on playstation. Now i'm questioning myself whether there is a problem with my console, cause it feels so stuttering compare playing on my PC

LMAOAOAOAOAOAOAO MAN SAID

Ive been playing the new cod since release at 144hz and switched down to 60hz just to try it and i honestly cant tell the difference.

@@perrylenpunsalan3846 60 and above 60 got a little difference in normal circumstances, that's why you hardly could tell the difference. Then what's the advantage of 144 over 60? When a game is in chaotic states (a lot of object, effects, etc are all render in your screen at once), you can rest easy because your game is still running smoothly because it's still above or at least 60fps If you barely got 60fps and your game enter the chaotic states, you will feel the Lag because the fps will dramatically drop a lot. That's also why the Pc mAsTEr rAcE always mention 60fps not 144fps. Because the lowest standard for a smooth graphics are 60fps not 144fps or even 200s fps.

Z Rus i still think acer 4k 144hz with impressive color accuracy is the real best choice for almost everyone with a lot of money

Why bother with 75hz? You can get a 144hz for the same price, so why not get the better option. Remember, shop smart.

@@autumn5592 Except that you can't, a cheap monitor like 24MP59G-P is cheaper than any 144 Hz monitor. Besides, you need quite an expensive GPU to keep up with 144 Hz, assuming you don't play eSports.

Mircea Stan almost all 75hz monitors i’ve seen are $25 cheaper than 144hz and that is called getting ripped off lol

2080ti sli gets minimum 100 fps at 4K Ultra. Or settings on high for 120+. Less demanding games like overwatch or csgo it's easy frames even on 4k. 1 2080ti around 100 fps on 4k on high. Plus you don't need AA on 4k since it's res is so high it doesn't make a difference. So even more frames. And if you're gonna complain about the money it costs then I'm sorry but you can't afford high refresh 4k gaming. Stick to 1080p 144fps.

prolly talking to friends

Lmao

That was odd lol

@@archerok7629 he's got no headset or mic

@@Brian-kr7bw bruh I said that 8 months ago 😭

lmao, i used to have 60hz. I’m now on 300hz. 60 feels so laggy, like I can see the individual frames each time i move my mouse cursor.

😳😳

It does exist but at 120hz and it’s an OLED TV not a monitor. You only need a graphics card that supports HDMI 2.1 but that doesn’t exist unfortunately.

Rip wallet😭🙌🙏

To display true dolby vision you need at least 4000 nits and oled is not capable of that, it would be instant burn it.

@@twistedoracle4555 nice try. OLED technology is not compatible with high refresh rates.

I want a 1000hz 10K Nits HDR MicroLed Monitor. It'll be here within 3-4 years.

when i got my 75 hz my 60 hz looked like stuttering, now when i got my 240 hz my 75 looked like a slide show

It is worth, believe me.

Krulcifer. r/woooosh

@@aryabrahmamaheswara7314 isn't 4k and uhd the same? 🤣

@@deadsec_xz1541 wooow you use reddit you're sooo cool! Said no one ever.

Please, dont fart and blame the dog

And Higher Frame Rate = Higher Chad Energy

@Nightmare bro, are u drunk. In a shooter(and it makes no matter if u camp, or fight) ur image of the monitor needs to be refreshed more times than LoL. In LoL are maybe 400 Pixels moving arround and in a shooter thousends

@@henrik_lamar thousands*

Fact is Higher refresh rate = less money

but sadly it will never be, because 60hz is good enough for majority.

Oof 😅

244 doesnt exist. do you mean 144 or 240

@@inutero3516 we all knew what he meant bro

@@rodjerdankist1125 i still dont. did he misclick a 2 while writing 144hz or did he somehow misclick a 4 while writing 240

Is it worth buying a 144hz monitor when my GPU can only run games at 50-60fps?

​@@emil_king8237 If your GPU can run AAA tiltes at 60fps it can definitely run competitive games at 100+ fps

people wanna get as much info as possible before really buying something like that

Until a week ago me too ^^' it feels so smooth that the first 5 minutes my brain could'nt understand what was happening xD but now it is so relaxing to play on it even in competitive games. It feels very good :) by the way i switched from a 1920x1080p 60hz to a 2160x1440p 144hz.

@x33mmm oups my bad ^^' i made a mistake ^^ thank you for the correction :)

Try overclocking ur 60hz monitor might get it to 70hz

@@tobias2310 Haha we have the same name xD

@@tobiasg.8532 hell yeah :D

I felt that ranked 1 in 1v1s for a while but after monitors came out to the general public I feel off hard turns out we just didn’t catch up as fast

ultra wide????

@@southerncomfort8070 Like PUTIN?!

@ AHAHAHAHH you got it

144hz refresh rate is more for shooters and sport games.

@@MrMakaveli2012 Yep makes sense.

My monitor is 144hz

@@rodolfotsang4327 Welp i have a laptop on 60hz

@@Alwayscommentseveryday your laptop is 60hz? What laptop you have?

Some games are fine with 30fps,like Witcher 3,Batman games,Arkham Knight it's better with 30fps...but GTA 5 it's terrible at 30fps

@@nikolamilosevic6334 I played gta v @20 fps whenever i got 30 fps It felt like butter

@@hopejensen2584 I play always at 60 fps,and for some games it's not enough ,75 it's for budget best at 900/1080p

@UltraJeed Well .. we never known !

Hope Cornell must have been very sticky butter then

it should be only 1.666666666x more, because its not 2x better

Gi Nattak 😂😂😂

so long you do not dip below 25, your fine.

Best comment yet. You win, good sir!!!!!!

hahaha this comment has me laughing out loud over here.

I bet that was the best decision of your life

@@relatabletom Yeah, much better

Not many games can go reach 240hz unless you're playing less demanding games like Cs:go

@@gvillanueva5317 it depends on settings and pc...

@@Gweriaa yea unless you play at low or medium settings

@@gvillanueva5317 most competive games with proper settings and a decent PC. For example, Overwatch is 300 fps with 1070 & 9700k.

I've considered 240 Hz monitor, but I'm too afraid that 4k 120 Hz TV for less competive games would feel too stuttery after that. I guess I should stick with 144 Hz FeelsBadman.

Exactly i had 144hz for 4-5 years and i gotta say its not worth if you are not playing competitive games exclusively. For 144fps you need good GPU AND good cpu, what op forgot to mention. Playing AAA games in 144hz regardless of res is very demanding and sometimes impossible(because game engine limitations). I have now 4k 32inch good monitor and im very happy jumping from 24inch 1080p 144hz tn panel.

use it on a game with high contrast and very colorful, and you'll see it very clearly.

@Zeno 10 inches :)

Gona be 60 hz for 7 years lol

I just bought one its on its way

Been using 60hz since i was a kid, is it worth getting a 144hz? Genuinely debating if i should 🤔

Alex yes it is i have one got it a week ago its insane dude

And,did you get it?What is your experience?

@@sandinkasic4373 I only ordered it today. It's supposed to arrive on Friday.

How is it?

dude you high af , i have a pc with 2080ti , i9 and 16 gb of ram and i don't own a 144 or 240 hz monitor

@@arielscorpion68 thats bcoz ur an actual Asshole bro.

Specs?

Ken same for me and my specs are i7-8700k and GTX 980, I can’t get more than 30fos usually, and I can’t figure out why

I use hd 7770

SoileY Trust me, it’s night and day. Lol

Be happy that you haven't. I had a lan party over my friends house and I've used one of his 144hz screens for almost 2 days, when I got home I couldn't even play games everything felt laggy and looked like shit for almost a week. Had to order my own 144hz Monitor shortly after lol

Smetona why would you be sad that you ordered better quality and performance

NO ONE CARES

Give it to me xD

Wait so if u got a ps4 it not compatible??

@@CrookedInk1 Compatible? Well yes the ps4 will work on the monitor but you wont get 140hz / 240hz