6k vs 4k Which should you use? 

Only at 1000x zoom on the baseball like you said.

Loved the edit man. The phone screen overlay was great, and I know it took you forever to pull off, so great job! I have found the biggest advantage of the higher resolution to be, as you said major zoom in, but also if you want to add noise reduction to the image. In DaVinci Resolve if you have the 6k pixels at your disposable it amazing how much better the noise reduction works. Also I find tracking to be more accurate!! This is my experience using the GH6 5.7k vs downsampled 4k. So basically if your going to be doing any VFX or extreme zooming with the footage I do think its easily worth it to shoot in the higher resolution.

I experimented with raw 5.9k on my S5 and the sharpness you gain vs 4k is insane ... IF you want to zoom in post 3x or more. For everything less than that it was really hard to see any advantage.

Well… I saw the difference, and right guess with the result. And 6k is a more better, but file sizes 😢

Thank you 🤩🙏🏻🎥

I just wish we had 4K or 6K downsampled to 1080. I think RU-vid butchers content uploaded in 1080 though.

That's just not true that only a handfuil of movies are shown in 4k. We are in the streaming era. Netflix requires all new productions to be 4k. That's a tremendous amount of films. Also Arri now switched to 4k for their latest camera. 5 years ago this comment would still mostly be true, but we're now entering an era where acquisation in 2k or below will be the minority almost certainly. Projector technology really is the final thing holding back 4k being the norm across the entire spectrum.

Thank you so much. It’s worth it when it’s appreciated 🙏🏻🎥🤩

Thanks so much 🤩🙏🏻 glad you enjoyed it. 😂😂 💪🏻

Thanks so much! 🤩🙏🏻 it’s worth it when you get the appreciation 🎥 thanks for watching

Definitely agree. You put a lot of work into this video and I can appreciate that too!

Thanks Em. Yeh it’s great if you need the extra resolution for cropping etc. just gives ya that extra freedom. Even if you just need to reframe slightly 👌🏻

😂🤩🙏🏻🎥

Thank you 🤩🙏🏻🎥

Thank you 🤩🙏🏻🎥

@@SamHolland you’re welcome

S5 has 6K

@@AlternativeTakes No just 6K photo, it is more 5K than 6K, and the picture is cropped, no way to use IBIS BOOST etc.

@@slows728 it has up to 5.9Kp30 RAW out over HDMI with the atomos. No crop

Haha thank you 🤩🙏🏻🎥

@@SamHolland Am waiting for the next video to be mentionned for that :p haha

Thanks man

@@SamHolland You are welcome - had to watch this again as still procrastinating

There's no 6K 60fps on the Lumix S5 II. It shoots a max of 6K 30fps and 4K 30fps unless you shoot in APSC crop mode, then you can get 4K 60fps but nothing above 30fps in 6K and nothing above 30fps if you record externally to USB (with a paid $200 upgrade or wait for the Lumix S5 IIX to come out for the same $200 more)

@@DARKLYLIT Yeah that why I am not sure if I am going to swap out my whole Canon Echo System - BUT I just love the colours of the Lumix with VLOG

YOU TRY

Hi. Honestly the kit lens is so good! 20-60. Or the 16-35 too. But I prefer the kit lens to be honest 🙏🏻🤩🎥

Hi. No it doesn’t. There’ll be a new one released soon

Thank you. 2 days to edit. 🙏🏻🎥

I have links in the description. Well worth considering. Also check out that colour grading video I link at the end because there’s a conversion LUT that is incredible! 🤩🎉🎥

I like 4K. Better dynamic range and less noise. 👌🏻🎥

Sorry, I don't have a Telegram account

💪🏻

🥈

You are very wrong! The Sony FX30 shot in 4K 60fps, not 120fps. Sony is APSC and Panasonic is full frame. Panasonic is about $300 cheaper. Panasonic has the best IBIS. Panasonic support 2 cards. On Panasonic you can shoot open gate for vertical video too. Panasonic is by far a better option.

@@AurelianIrimia Look up the specs. S5 II maximum 30fps in 4K. FX30 120fps in 4K. Sony is $400 less and better auto focus.

@@DARKLYLIT You're right! I have only seen the top of the specifications. Normally it starts from the top with the highest number of frames, Sony has put it at the bottom of the list, that's why I haven't seen it. [XAVC HS 4K] XAVC HS 4K 59.94p/50p 200 Mbps 4:2:2 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 59.94p/50p 150 Mbps 4:2:0 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 59.94p/50p/23.98p 100 Mbps 4:2:2 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 59.94p/50p 75 Mbps 4:2:0 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 59.94p/50p 45Mbps 4:2:0 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 23.98p 100 Mbps 4:2:0 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 23.98p 50 Mbps 4:2:2 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 23.98p 50 Mbps 4:2:0 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 23.98p 30 Mbps 4:2:0 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 119.88p/100p 280 Mbps 4:2:2 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265, XAVC HS 4K 119.88p/100p 200 Mbps 4:2:0 10bit MPEG-H HEVC / H.265 I have seen the specifications of Panasonic and it records 4K 60fps but in APSC mode, and in full frame up to 6K but no more than 30fps. About the price, I don’t know where you live but here in Spain the Sony cost 2300€ and the Panasonic 1900€, body only for both. For me personally, 120fps is too much. In general I never use more than 60fps. Almost almost all my projects are shoot in 5K 25fps or 4K 50fps when I want slow motion. I also can shoot up to 180fps at 1080p with my Panasonic GH5M2 but never used.

@@AurelianIrimia That's interesting that Sony is more expensive than Panasonic in Europe. It's the opposite in North America. US prices are: Lumix GH5 IIX= $2198 Sony FX30=$1798. Check out DSLR Videoshooter review. Panasonic is definitely improving but there are still bugs in the autofocus, especially at higher frame rates.

@@DARKLYLIT the price I give you is for the Lumix S5II, not S5X. Lumix S5X is not available for now, for preorder.

😋

It’s less about 6k more about the open gate size for anamorphic for me.

😂👏🏻