787 Pilot Misses Go Around Call 

Wham! Bam! We’re down, ma’am.

According to Boeing, that is the absolutely correct way to land.

Yeah what's the point of mentioning runway numbers while instructing a go around ?

For example, when they have multiple active runway ? But yeah in that case, it wasn't necessary

Pretty sure he was confused anyway lol.

@@nightowl8163 Right. Go around should be interpreted as just that, regardless of the runway you are approaching.

Yeah, go around and clear to land sounds so fking similar, they might even spell the same with CCP

lmfao that was funnier than it should have been

Ahh fuck. Thanks for reminding me I have 3 I have to pay.

I am stupid

its time to pay the damn bills

If it’s running on diesel then they’re going to have a bad day 😂

DPF delete and stage 2 tune on the 747

Definitely diesel

@@youtubestolemyhandle1 the problem with jokes like this is that plenty of people will think you’re serious. That’s how we get flat earthers. Lol.

@@MeppyMantechnically, jet a and diesel are very close. I used to fly learjet 25s and if you found yourself in a place without jet fuel, you were allowed to use diesel. However, you had to stay below 25000 feet and an engine inspection was required within 10 hours I think.

One of the other bases for my flight school has a chinese pilot program, from what I heard from people that went visiting that base 😂😂😂 they don’t even have working proficiency in English 😂😂😂 ahhh safety is an illusion

The ATC saying "go around runway 14" didn't help either

French standard phraseology for a GA is notoriously bad, even giving the wind so it sounds near identical to landing clearance. The UK one is the best in the world “China Eastern go around, I say again go around, acknowledge”

You could simply say STOP, don't complicat you language to foreigners bro. "Undercarriage fire" could simply be replaced with "Fire"

Are you saying ATC should anticipate foreign flight crews operating illegally with lower than ICAO standard level 4 English proficiency?

I used to think the same. But I regularly fly Chile to Australia and the 787 is much better.

What 747 ?

@@georgesheffield1580The air India Boeing one

Aerosucre and overweight takeoffs

Such a dumb ''i want to be funny'' comment. No, not funny and not true.

I don't know in general, but that touchdown was not rough at all.

@@tinchotethe guy screaming at 2:55 says otherwise

@@ldine783 Right. Who better qualified to grade landings than a passenger in a commercial flight.

Captain We Tu Slo back in action after that SF mishap in 2013.

your profile picture is my phone wallpaper lol

@@F4PhantomGaming haha nice 747 is our fav plane!

As long as it doesn't overload like Aerosucre it'll be fine

Sounds like AirFrance

You have not experienced the likes of Spicejet GoAir Indigo yet. United might feel like royal private planes in comparison

Definitely Air France/KLM, o how I miss yesteryear when KLM was still a real airline.

Ah yes, that'll be Tarom............

Cool one mate!

Ryanair has amazing pilots. Unfortunately it's the passengers. I'm pretty sure MentorPilot is an instructor and an assesser for them. My worst plane for heavy landings are 787's. Apart from one captain who flew an Etihad 787 from Ams to Auh. He was actually a good captain all around

@@helenmiddlemas5075 Sorry but the passengers don't fly and land the aircraft. The only reason for landing that rough is ineptitude.

@@ImpendingJoker No, at RyanAir you can get a discount ticket by booking seat 0A or 0B and flying the aircraft. It's absolutely the passengers' faults, you just have to be glad you landed on the runway

@@ImpendingJokerdoesn’t look like a rough landing at all… surely on the firmer side but nothing crazy.

Hey there ! Ryanair do have firmer landing than some other airlines but that is done on purpose. 1st) Ryanair is a low cost airline, to keep the low price of their flight, they land at smaller airports, meaning a smaller runway. 2nd) Ryanair pilot turnaround are 15 mins. That's a short time meaning that any time in the air is a time that could be take for the turnaround. A longer float, a smooth landing or even a Go-Around aren't affordable for the company. 3rd) The 737 wasn't meant to land smoothly, it was designed to land at every commercial airport. A firm landing make the plane slow down faster. That's all the reason for Ryanair to land hard. By the way, a fun fact you need to know is that Ryanair have a really strict rule and not a lot of pilots can join the company. Ryanair are on the top 15 of the best pilots of Europe. And of course, I can't stop this message without this.. *"A good landing is a landing you can walk from"* Hope it helped ya !

it wasnt flown in a long time, it was in storage, rip.

An indian mechanic probably replaced the engines by a Tata truck diesel engine.

Not once, still is.

Yeah this guy always give miss information or false facts.

the pronunciation sounded fine, there's just a strong accent. At least the words and letters sound close to how they should be said, can't say the same for some Aussie or Kiwi folks.

vowel phrasing in bengali language is a bit different from other languages. For instances water is pronounced as u-a-ter..the v sound is pronounced as bhi ..the runway is pronounced as r-aa-n-uay

@Tonysopranoyafinook just say you're racist bruh

aviation is international...not everyone is going to have a British or American accent, deal with it

I agree with you. To the pilot defense, it wasn't very very clear.

the stank in this airplane would have made you cry aswell..

@@stefanmaurer9945 😹😹🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 dude’s so funny

Some focused camera work🤣

I wouldn’t rave about it.

@@inncogneato6341 I’m not, hence the, 🤣

Because that is how the 737 is designed to be landed.

Quality fuel? Lol.

The aircraft was grounded for few years. Not sure if that was a contributing factor for the smoke.

Easy, that’s why we are using standard phraseology.

Had to be because they kept saying the runway number

@@ronwyckoff824 Still of the opinion that the only correct way is how we do it here in the UK, kGo Around, I say again Go Around, Acknowledge” No reason for her to overcomplicate it with the runway number and “discontinue”

That system already exists. It’s called ACARS datalink. Although not used to full extend all over the world.

@@artvandelay4736CPDLC really.

So you want me to stop focussing on landing the aircraft and read a screen filled with text? The language of aviation is English, simply put the controller and the pilots need to understand it. The Chinese airlines are well known for not having high English standards and are an absolute menace.

Landing at full cruising speed as usual!

charcoal.

grounded for almost 2 years

I think it was use of the runway number.

Every ATC in each part of the world speaks “English “ with their own accent. In this case a very heavy Indian accent!

@@veeman1961 **bangladeshi accent

😮

That’s proper phraseology…to state the runway that the pilot is cleared to land/takeoff/go around from

@@jakeoesterreich8037 What manual states that, ICAO manuals sure don’t, nor does CAP413 or any of its SINs, the only thing that needs to be said is “Go Around” anything else overcomplicates, you might want to repeat it though, “Go Around, I say again Go Around, acknowledge”😅