8 INVENTIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES THAT WILL CHANGE OUR WORLD! 

Ben Franklin generated all the electricity America used with but a kite and a key

He also said the kite was 295 ft diameter and 500+ feet in the air. If that turbine hanging from the kite was 295 feet in diameter that kite was 1/4 mile long.

what could go wrong? "it's a bird, it's a plane... nope just a giant 500 pound kite landing on our house killing our kids.

@@thorstambaugh1520 no he didn’t generate any electricity. His experiment was to demonstrate that lightning was caused by electricity.

At those wind speeds, it's like a airplane turbine. It's spinning very fast.

What about the Wells turbine?

Thats the ONLY worthy idea in this video . But submerged that deep will be a hugely expensive maintenance project. More than its worth. The last one is the idea i had in the early '60's

Riytssu

Rust never sleeps.

I'm sure he said it powers around 2200 homes, which isn't a lot really. Also, abandoned driftnet, kelp, rust, seals, whales... and quite an 'etc' once you start thinking about it. I think the most upsetting thing about these sorts of videos is - for the most part, that's exactly where you'll see most of these inventions for a very long time - on videos. Why does it take so very long for governments to get their act together and start employing these devices? I quite like wind turbines to be honest, but certainly if those little Spanish ones produce 1MW of electricity - 'each!' - they are going to be a heck of lot less 'visually obstructive' in the eyes of those who don't like the rotating sort. Strap one to the top of plenty of other visually unimpressive structures (pylons, street lamps, water towers), and no one has any right to get huffy.

CO2 at 0.04% is a 2,500th part of the atmosphere. That means to warm the climate by just 1"C carbon dioxide molecules must capture 2,500"C of heat energy. That is impossible. It also breaks the fundamental laws of thermodynamics. Methane at 0.00017% is a 600,000th of the atmosphere so it's even more impossible. However, the climate is changing. This is because of deliberate geoengineering programmes, in particular ozone thinning away from the poles. Though largely unreported ozone thinning effect is directly observable, this summer you can see a unnaturally bright sun just as we did last year. Under these conditions the pain felt when looking at the sun is not only from the increase in visible light but the much larger increase in infrared. (Look up at the sky and you will see a range of geoengineering operations in progress, these include chemtrail induced cloud or hazing, ripple patterns caused by HAARP installations, bizarre and unnatural cloud formations). Climate change is a programme to force change in accordance with the implementation of Agenda 21 /2030. Current events demonstrate this transition is well underway and will involve massive population cull through injected nanotech (re transhumanist programme). Agenda 21 also sees the permanent loss of all property rights with the introduction of universal basic income (ref NESARA/GESARA) and has/is being promoted by The World Economic Forum. 'You will own nothing and you will be happy' WEF In a depopulated world the surviving brainwashed and controlled population will be confined to mega cities. Carbon limits will be used to restrict consumption and liberty. Meanwhile the re-greened wilderness will be the exclusive playground of the ultra rich elite posing as conservationists. The CO2 hoax amounts to the theft of the world and the enslavement of humanity by a parasitic few. Welcome to the future! _________ I have included a debunking of 'accumulated heat' as it is so often used to explain how trace elements, so called 'greenhouse gasses', can warm the planet. Accumulated heat whilst sounding a reasonable explanation of how heat can build up is rather nothing more than gobbledygook. In fact it shows those using such arguments do not even understand what heat is. When we measure temperature we are measuring the heat energy a thing is losing. In short heat is a measurement of flow, the transfer of heat energy and this will always be in the direction towards the colder. For this reason a thing can never 'accumulate heat' in the way those advocating CO2 climate change describe. The temperature of a body is the measure of heat output, it can never be greater than the measure of heat input. Output = input. When a thing is warmed it is heated to an equivalent of the heat input. If this input is not maintained it will cool. Those that propose that heat can build up to be hotter than the total measure of heat input at a given time either do not understand what heat is or are being deliberately misleading. To illustrate, an object being heated by a flame can never become hotter than that flame, it's temperature cannot rise inexorably to the temperature of the sun for instance. Heat cannot be accumulated. When we think about it common sense tells us this must be the case. NASA and even Nobel Prize winning physicists have expounded 'accumulated heat' as the explanation how CO2 is able to warm the atmosphere. They claim that over hundreds of years CO2 has captured heat energy and this heat has 'accumulated' to produce a serious warming effect. As I have just explained, this is totally impossible and fundamentally violates all the laws of thermodynamics. That respected scientists should support such uneducated, unthinking nonsense is disturbing and only reflects that in terms of being able to think clearly about a subject they have no facility or inclination. These are the Dark Ages of science. Belief has outweighed logic or any critical thought. It tells us that we should not unquestioningly accept anything we are told, that experts can be fools. (NB: be aware of attempts to discard thermodynamics by talking about biology. Eg. 'It only takes a drop of arsenic to kill a person.' This would be somewhat desperate, muddled thinking. Clearly biological processes based on the reaction of a cell are not the same as the laws of physics/thermodynamics). (AS PROOF THIS DECEPTION IS REAL, DISSENTING INFORMATION SUCH AS THIS IS BEING BLOCKED. THIS COMMENT WILL BE BLOCKED, BURIED, OR DELETED WITHIN HOURS. PLEASE COPY).

yes, agree, this people don't know what they are talking about, KPS went our of business last year.....

Who cares bro, its not like this video's gonna be used to make actual decisions. At best its gonna inspire some kid to be an engineer

Exactly what is incorrect in this video? Your statement about it being 'misinformation ' smacks of mindless censorship of which there is too much lately. Evidence what you say or don't say it.

Also did you know that looped music was invented to drive us all insane?????

I would avoid walking on those squish-able tiles.

@KHALIIL01 It would be like walking up a hill because it's specifically designed to remove energy from your walking. Also it's about as efficient as solar Freaking roadways

Liquid Fluride Thorium Nuclear Power is the should be high on the list

Check out coastal tidal generation storage....the idea is the invention of peter tse and is a ground breaking revolutionary energy source for the future which does not receive the media coverage it deserves the spin offs are unbelievable ie it feeds a eco system which has the capability to solve future food shortages brought about by our ever increasing population. It could and should be funded by central government. Peter has formed a company and patented his idea but if it is taken up it will probably be by foreign investors ,it reminds me of the long dead British motor engineering industry .which failed to move with the times thus was killed off by Japanese and other Asian countries.

Same with tidal power its in long term testing now

Actually most of these are bad or exaggerated

it is a sustainable technology because all are need the input. but with few weight W=L x E or E= Lx W modifications. by the same we can make vehicles with the spring actions and gears. firstly we will not get satisfactory but that will bright some sence through the same. because I done it. ex. bicycle's pedal with 2kg. will become as lever principles and get revolution.

curiously inactivated somebody 's to combine to get new things to new World. because everybody wants to get power free. it will happen while I shall get with a full support. anybody come forward for the same.

Making stuff complicated and shiny is always a good thing. Now put a phone charger on it, some eeeh wifi network coming out of it and you start the 10 industrial revolution.

Its a well know fact that the electric company's will take the loss on their behalf, just so that everything returns to the green like when the dinosaurs were alive and not oily. Everyone will understand each other hold hands and have great nature inspired orgies.

Yep

A 492'... 'Bladeless' for which almost certainly there is a applied materials problem that has yet to be solved. Was I not even supposed to blink when they said it was 500' tall?!

Wave power though... I mean... they're almost certainly killing sea creatures with some of that stuff, but the real problem is the energy that is in waves is NEEDED... butterfly effect of extracting it, and all the sudden Ocean Currents slow to a point where some area of the ocean that was more sensitive to subtle changes in current jsut utterly dies off, and watch when that was an area with a critical role in the local ecosystem, and then we have a cascade failure... and once again, we all die. Back to the drawing board on those... we don't need any of these technologies anyways. We already have what we need, it's just been demonetized.

We never get real talk about that stuff ..

They're climatologists and other scientists.

@@TheCatLady65 But not "many specialists". There are very, very few.

The cost to run and maintenance of these units. There is zero profit. Plus the sea life killed from the blades.

1.5 ? You are being generous, I think. I would hate to see the visonal pollution like wind power has brought. Until we have a storage solution, I don't think they are practical.

When you hear crap like "megawatts per hour" you know you are dealing with a clueless person just saying stuff he does not understand. Enjoy the images and do actual research for things that feel promising.

4:12 also an induction generator, waggle of stick in air moves the magnet through a coil. No real _"Secret"_ here.

but what if it's a free energy device?

@@electronresonator8882 😆 if you want to call people vibrating / moving a surface as they walk across it, or wind shaking a pole, "Free Energy" then yes it is. I'd prefer to call it "gleaned" or "neglected" energy.

For that kind of money you can build a non solar tracking system 10 times the size

That's too expensive.

For your $30,000 investment let me show you what to expect , what does 2 kilowatt really means .... Power ÷ Voltage =Amperage 2,000 watts ÷ 120 vac. = 16.66 amps US Standard 2 kw or 2000 ÷ 220 vac = 9.09 amps European Standard .. my information was assuming that this put out alternating current .. which means it would take DC put out by photocells ran it to an inverter to turn it into AC voltage ..

That's why the company went bankrupt...

Pretty dirty and destructive to the environment

Hydro is good, but we've already dammed most of the rivers in America (including a lot that should have been kept natural), and it's still nowhere near enough. Dams consume a massive amount of concrete too, which is on the way to scarcity.

Yes, at 2:13.

I was going to ask the exact same question.

What the????? What is he doing up there???? You know, I could think of about a thousand better spots to bag some rays...on my face, seeing that he was fully clothed. haha