98% Loses! Worst Bad Beat in Texas Poker History? 

I'd say when you run like this there's no wrong move you can make in poker... Except folding ofcourse =)

This was a 1/1322 chance vs getting struck by lightening which is a 1/15300. So really not that close.

He must be the anti me, because my name is Chas and atm I’m running like shit

@@michaelbubly the odds of getting struck by lightning is far bigger than that…depending on the time frame I guess

Your calc / logic assumes the hands to be randomly chosen, which they were not ☕️

he deserves that indeed , wtf is he tanking for

He slams the Ace over like its a hard decision with top pair and the nut flush draw 😂

1700 to win 2200 which is like 2.3 to 1. Against a set he would have 33% equity. He also blocks semi bluff hands like 89hh and nut flush draw. His only good calls are 76dd which is still nearly a coin flip so not even that profitable, 76o (only fractionally worse than suited diamonds), 89, worse hearts and maybe 54s. I want to say this is never a stone cold bluff either, I think Chaz is better than to bluff shove that flop after a check raise after SB limps pre-flop.

@@happycat6836 for real, why is he check raising flop if he intention isn’t to call off?

@@hallzy1745 fair

Wym what took him so long? His opponent overbet pot by 5x, not getting very good odds to call against sets and two pairs and blocking the two semi bluff hands you want him to have (89hh) (AKhh)

@@radirad2218 how tf is AKhh a semi bluff that’s top top with nut hearts

@@emphatically forgot about A on flop my bad

@@radirad2218 haha he never has a set there. Noone open jams in that spot with a set

@@douglasavenell702 I actually remember someone open/ jamming the flop with a set of 88s in a spot almost identical to this, against me. It definitely wasn't what I was expecting to see

That is the snappiest snap call in human history. Guy wasted 3 minutes of everyone's time he deserves the suckout.

@@TaPzGaming It's getting a bit old the way these guys posture and wait.

Seriously. It was like the poker gods came down and striked instant karma for that horrible nit-roll.

haha didnt even read comments and after 5 seconds thought wtf

That nit roll is the only reason Ming gets a slight pass for his table talk about a hand he's not even in.

It's a cash game and I mean that's a lot of money so Im assuming he just wanted to be completely sure

Because Chaz must have a set, because Joey had all the flush draws blocked.

Maybe in a normal live game at a casino but these guys know what they're doing. More than likely you're going to run into a set and then you're pretty far behind with a flush draw. Im honestly more suprised by the KQs shove there considering hes only getting called by hands hes losing to and his hand is pretty face up considering the board texture.

@@devinblox Actually statistically speaking you're never that far behind with pair and flush draw. Even against a set you still have 31.92% equity. The issue with this particular hand is that Chaz just rips it for 6x pot on the flop, which makes the pot odds really out of wack. If Chaz had only had 500 left or something and shoved it would have been an insta-call.

Yall are acting like he had pocket aces

@@urbrt2653 top pair plus nut flush draw beats practically all other hands more than half the time. Sure you could be a dog to pocket 6s and 7s but how often are you gonna run into someone shoving with a set into a flush draw depending on their image sure but even then the hearts can bail you out. easy snap call and you cant be mad with any runout with that hand.

Why? He is very far behind a set.

@@Jermo484 chaz blind bet 100 before the flop came out .. you hit top pair with a nut draw facing a 3 bet jam it's one of them moments where if he hit a set then he hit a set but would a set really jam there ? just give a sigh and snap it off .. quick and easy call in my opinion

@@urbrt2653 ^

The machine got the flop wrong, look at the flop at the table and then at the screen. The display shows KQs flopped a flush so KK have runner runner outs to a boat.

Slow roll, deserved

You still have to consider pocket 7s and pocket 6s. You will still win about 33% of the time with a call so it is the right decision.

@@Brandons125 even then, I’m committed everything on that flop with the draw to the 🥜. He has top pair as well. Granted his kicker isn’t that great. But with all the money that’s already in, and knowing if I hit the ❤️, I’m getting paid. I’m putting my opponent on a big draw, or as you say, pocket 77. But still, I’m snapping him.

​@@Cwhiten11 i mean any set or ace-x with a better kicker, had him down to only the draw flush draw, both are more reasonable then him having a low flush draw... with chaz opening preflop and flop, then three bet shoving, it would definitely make more sense to be those then a lower flush draw... its still right to all in... but definitely wasn't snap if your playing as smart as possible

Lol, right. Worst part of he probably thinks he's good,.

@@eldogjd1973 “thinks”? The proof is in the pudding, brah! Dude is taking all the $.

@@thegodhead you definitely don’t understand odds. Wanna play poker sometime??

@@brycemlinar2037 you definitely don’t under sarcasm. 😆 Yeah, I’m down to play next week.

@@brycemlinar2037 You can't even work out this dude's sarcasm so your definitely not out playing him as he's already 1 step ahead and got you all messed up 🤣

Like pretty most of his sessions？ You have no idea how good BDZ has been running for years.

LOL!

yeah but consistently getting it in good is gonna be profitable in the end

What do you notice?

percentages are based off the graphics which are wrong

honestly thank you, couldnt figure out what he thought chaz had

Yep. Taking KK against QQ on a QQ2 board and winning is much more impressive

@@bobbywhite1645 Yes. Now THAT is a bad beat for QQ. When did that happen? Is there such a hand that was played and documented? KK had 2/45*1/44 =2/1980 or 1/990, roughly one chance in a thousand to win that once the flop and players' cards were known. I can't think of a more unlikely situation to win than that. Can you? Maybe preflop one could create a scenario if one said that two of the flop cards were known but the third was unknown, like QQ knowing the first two cards of the flop were QQ and the third was not known, then if someone had, say, A, and we knew that the three remaining board cards had to be Aces, the A would have 3/46*2/45*1/44=6/91,080 or 3/45,540 or 1/15,180 in equity. That would probably be the most extreme thing I could imagine setting up on purpose to make the worst bad beat possible, but there is no such situation in poker where we know only two of three flop cards. So, the situation you describe must be the most extreme kind of bad beat possible in poker. Nothing with a straight flush could be any different because it's the same thing: two cards runner runner needed and by then there are exactly two possible (in the worst case when we set it up to be as unlikely an outcome as possible). Can you think of any even worse than that which is actually possible?

@@joemiller95 You described that perfectly and very impressively! I was just making the point that no way a 1 in 50 is "the worst bad beat in Texas poker history" and in fact wasn't even CLOSE to the worst! And you're right I was thinking about runner runner straight flush coming in to beat quads or a flopped boat but its the same odds, has to come 2 perfect exact cards on turn and river Nice to know its 1 in 990 or 0.1% to win. Imagine playing 1/2 and knowing your outs, you'd need to get $2 to win $2000 for it to make sense to call!

@@bobbywhite1645 Exactly. Well put.

Okay, and? If you get cooler’d, you get cooler’d. Even if he has the open ended straight flush draw, you’re still way ahead. He has 8 outs, and even if he hits one of his non heart outs on the turn you can still re suck out on the river. If you’re constantly slow rolling because you’re worried about someone sucking out on you, you shouldn’t be playing poker. Dude had top pair and the nut flush draw. It’s a snap call and if you’re really worried about it you ask to run it twice. It should not have taken him that long to call.

@@WolfishJew986 I'm not worried about getting sucked out on. There's is other times in that situation where I have been against sets or 2 pairs & lost. I'm just saying I don't think it's a snap call like everyone here thinks

Yeah that’s a snap call I mean idk what he tanking for

@@dolphinfan1493 He's tanking for the stream/show. No shot hes ever folding there. Terrible play by Chaz, but justice seeing the nit roller lose

@@davehimlin2374 couldn't agree more your gonna have all these people talk about variance which in theory makes sense but after 15 years of playing poker I've learned there are lucky player and unlucky players most of the big names are all good but they are also lucky people like to argue with me on that they just haven't played enough yet lol

@@davehimlin2374 Right. Every losing player only has bad luck to blame 🙄

I agree with this. I always felt that way about Daniel N. Sure he makes some amazing reads and plays but we've seen when the cards aren't his way he comes back down to earth as we've seen recently.

@@tanthony298 luck is 50% of the game minimum. In stakes less than 5/10 its probably 80%

QQ runner runner!

That's not 99.9% lol

@@dawnmarie2893 that's cuz it was 99.999%

@@jordanlee3078 It’s 0.3% chance he wins 1.62% chance of a chop. So no, not 99.9%.

@@jordansadler8608 im still 99% wtf u want from me