Тёмный

A Bizarre Fat Airplane that Changed Military Aviation Forever 

Dark Skies
Подписаться 624 тыс.
Просмотров 1,6 млн
50% 1

The early 1930s saw the most extravagant aircraft with unique shapes and sizes as part of a widely experimental phase in the aviation industry. And still, the Stipa-Caproni stood apart.
The inventive airframe designed by Italian aeronautical engineer Luigi Stipa and manufactured by the Caproni Company was in many ways like a cartoon aircraft. But it was functional!
The so-called flying barrel consisted of a mere tube for a fuselage and an engine and propeller that washed the airflow through the cylinder’s length, creating thrust.
Some experts consider the Stipa-Caproni the ugliest aircraft ever built, while others still call it an aerodynamic aberration. Still, there is reason to suggest that the bizarre concoction was the direct predecessor of the modern turbofan engine…
---
Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

 

20 сен 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1 тыс.   
@QuantumRift
@QuantumRift Год назад
Yea, I have a degree in aeronautical engineering and remember studying this. I remember my instructor saying "...now if Stipa had put 4 of these beasties under wing of a larger aircraft, he'd have had something...."
@travisverlinde191
@travisverlinde191 Год назад
Was thinking the EXACT same thing, ducting a Pratt and Whitney double wasp from the p47, multiplied by 4 in nacelles (which could be slightly armored even, puting a chin, rear plus top and bottom turrets with three .50 cals or some configuration of maybe twin 303,s x 2 plus 20mm cannon for defense it could have likely tripped the bomb load of the b17, and carried it just as far, faster it could have really been something then later improving it with twin 28 cylinder 3000 hp engines with superchargers for altitude, then pressurizing crew compartment puting an aiming camera system in the guns and control it from the compartment the crew could have not frozen to the extent of slower reaction time to bandits or nausea from being in a quickly spinning and even upside down gun turret physically could have provided an improved defense, ability to run, once empty of bombs it could go faster still already likely 70mph or more faster than the b-17, now we're talking
@geradkavanagh8240
@geradkavanagh8240 Год назад
@@travisverlinde191 I tend to disagree. The P&W wasp was radial engine. Would have blocked airflow beyond the advantages given.. Would need a very narrow, very lightweight high horsepower inline engine(4,6,8,12 or greater ) to really make a difference. Or just reconfigure the Bernoulli tube and stick a big pulse jet in the middle. It will suck air in at front and blast it out out back( Similar tech is used in commercial aircraft slide bags to inflate them.)
@chr0min0id
@chr0min0id Год назад
I like how it’s essentially a big ducted fan with wings, stabilizers, and a cockpit attached to it…
@andrewyang7507
@andrewyang7507 Год назад
basically anyone's first plane in ksp
@dopium1770
@dopium1770 Год назад
Looks like one of my notebook doodles from elementary school when I was obsessed with ww2 for some reason
@WhuDhat
@WhuDhat Год назад
that it entirely what it is
@etceteratv8712
@etceteratv8712 Год назад
@@dopium1770 N Mo L do. Too Too so
@bruceevans3476
@bruceevans3476 Год назад
I like it when people speak in plane English.
@Comanchee0689
@Comanchee0689 Год назад
Stupa seemed to have a great idea he couldn't expand on...not a turbofan, but a shrouded prop with a venturi behind, he was so close. Him suing for copyright infringement makes me think he had some hurt feelings when someone was able to take in that step further.
@CaptHollister
@CaptHollister Год назад
It works exactly like a turbofan. On a turbofan the majority of the thrust is provided by the huge fan which doubles as the first compressor stage. The only real difference is that Stipa used an internal combustion engine to power the fan whereas modern aircraft engines use a turbojet nestled in the heart of the duct.
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 Год назад
The Caproni Campini N1 took the concept one step further and added an afterburner…
@edrosenquist6541
@edrosenquist6541 Год назад
What if you put this shroud around a bombers engines in nacelles in a flying wing design?
@MichaelKingsfordGray
@MichaelKingsfordGray Год назад
Says the anonymous cowardly infant!
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 Год назад
@@jakelittle1261 Nicola Tesla never understood what he was playing with. Tesla wasted time on wireless power transmission and went broke. Marconi did. Marconi used radio for communication and made a mint. Both were building on the work of Heinrich Hertz who discovered radio waves in 1892 - he died two years later. Neither Tesla nor Marconi were the discoverers - they merely developed applications (which they patented). Marconi took out his first radio communication patent in 1896 in England. Tesla took out his first radio patent in 1897 in the United States. So Marconi was first but Tesla beat him to a United States patent.
@CapitalTeeth
@CapitalTeeth Год назад
You gotta admire how people back then had to actually put their designs to the test and often risk their lives in the process just to see if something worked.
@stevej3297
@stevej3297 Год назад
Absolutely. Watch Franz Reichelt plummet from the Eiffel Tower with his self designed parachute.
@squirrelpower1666
@squirrelpower1666 Год назад
Dude; Tails wouldn't touch that flying abomination. As a true Tails fan you should know that; 'cause that flying sausage ain't no Tornado.
@ryanbarber184
@ryanbarber184 Год назад
They still do, there’s just a much longer set of initial tests before they leave the ground for the first time.
@rock3tcatU233
@rock3tcatU233 10 месяцев назад
Because they didn't have access to the cheap computational modeling tools of today.
@lookstothetroon
@lookstothetroon 7 месяцев назад
software creates cowards, lack of software creates people with giant, sun-eclipsing balls of chromium
@daveanderson718
@daveanderson718 Год назад
Actually, this Italian effort is recognized and credited as a foundation in jet design, even if the patent is not.
@brettbuck7362
@brettbuck7362 Год назад
No it isn't, it had nothing to do with jet propulsion (which works on a fundamentally different principle) and was just a bizarre dead end. A different Italian pseudo-jet design really was related to jet propulsion (also by Caproni). Note also another clickbait title.
@brettbuck7362
@brettbuck7362 Год назад
@will hardy +1 for that one!
@brettbuck7362
@brettbuck7362 Год назад
@will hardy Frankly, it seemed obvious.
@daveanderson718
@daveanderson718 Год назад
@@brettbuck7362 You are correct, It is Obvious to everyone that you spew quite a lot of nonsense here on RU-vid and anywhere else you can get away with it!!! LOL!
@simonyun1883
@simonyun1883 Год назад
Feels like they accidentally made the first thrust vectoring aircraft by putting those tail controls right after the “nozzle”
@CaptHollister
@CaptHollister Год назад
Pretty sure it wasn't accidental.
@sls12III
@sls12III Год назад
you ain't wrong.
@cristianzaharescu8694
@cristianzaharescu8694 Год назад
Nope! Traian Vuia invented and flew the first jet plane in 1912!
@CaptHollister
@CaptHollister Год назад
@@cristianzaharescu8694 Nope! You got the wrong Romanian and the wrong year. Besides, only in Romania do people believe that Coanda invented the jet engine while everyone else points out that it's not a jet engine if there's no combustion chamber. Furthermore, the plane he built in 1910 never flew. Once the Germans and the British designed, built, and flew actual aircraft powered by actual jet engines did he start claiming that he had done it first with ever-changing stories.
@cristianzaharescu8694
@cristianzaharescu8694 Год назад
@@CaptHollister yep! you are right about everything but one thing! The plane actually flew!
@kirkbolas4985
@kirkbolas4985 Год назад
This is ducted fan tech. I’ve flown RC aircraft off and on for decades and many of the “jet” engine RC aircraft are actually ducted fan powered with an internal combustion piston engine providing power for thrust.
@paoloviti6156
@paoloviti6156 Год назад
This is interesting to read! Thanks for sharing this info 👍
@senorpepper3405
@senorpepper3405 Год назад
Neat
@outdoorfreedom9778
@outdoorfreedom9778 Год назад
Once in a while an old ducted fan RC jet comes up for sale at club auctions and swap meets. I never had one but they were popular for a long time. I recall the kit for an F-86
@elm4nsuri
@elm4nsuri Год назад
@@C.Mc. well said my friend
@michaelmartinez1345
@michaelmartinez1345 Год назад
@Kirk Bolas, Yes!!! You hit that nail on the head.... And this design, like the high by-pass jet engines as compared to pure jet engines, is noticably quieter than an engine with an exposed propeller...However, the main differences between this propulsion design and an actual high-bypass jet engines seem to be : the power to weight ratio, and the AMOUNT of power, driving the 'Fan' .... Otherwise, there are a lot of similarities to a modern high-bypass jet engine....
@joegordon5117
@joegordon5117 Год назад
Fabulous! If this had been in Studio Ghibli's The Wind Rises with other Caproni creations, most would have assumed the animators made it up for comedic effect, but it was real. It does look comical, but given the period, it has to be seen as early days, aviation developing by trying radical new ideas. Many would not work out, but some did...
@stephencumbee845
@stephencumbee845 Год назад
It would have been a great addition to Porco Rosso.
@Savior967
@Savior967 Год назад
Hayao Miyazaki lead the way🇮🇹
@honorb4glory606
@honorb4glory606 Год назад
I love it. It's brilliant. Certainly not a perfectly designed aircraft, but a well executed concept.
@garylawson5381
@garylawson5381 Год назад
I have been an aircraft enthusiast since childhood, but I have never seen that Fat Airplane. Thanks Dark Skies for another great documentary video.
@aka99
@aka99 Год назад
Same here
@TaiChiGhost
@TaiChiGhost Год назад
Check out the Gee Bee racer. It was from the 1930s and would fly at 300 mph. They look the same, but were full of engine, and crashed easily.
@Kendro311
@Kendro311 Год назад
Imagine walking down the street, and you hear some buzzing in the air behind you, and you look up and one of those is bearing down on you...
@tigertankerer
@tigertankerer Год назад
Italians: are known for their love to beauty and sport shapes Also Italians:
@drstevenrey
@drstevenrey Год назад
When you think about it, Stupa invented the ducted fan, and that is the future of, well, everything flying. The high bypass turbine powering the world is just a further step from this incredible aircraft.
@lewisholmes5745
@lewisholmes5745 Год назад
Thanks for the history lesson. As a history buff I'm always interested in untainted and straight up history without a bunch of embellishments of others! 💯👍
@thatchanguy
@thatchanguy Год назад
Designer: Do you want me to start with the engine or create the airframe’s fuselage? Government: Yes.
@michaelwood8071
@michaelwood8071 Год назад
That is awesome! Very innovative. It’s a shame the design was not viable or exploited in its time.
@shadowopsairman1583
@shadowopsairman1583 Год назад
It was impractical and fragile, the Military wasn't interested.
@brokenrecord3523
@brokenrecord3523 Год назад
It wasn't exploited because it was not viable.
@TheJhtlag
@TheJhtlag Год назад
What it is, you try stuff and see if it works. Even if it doesn't, others see it and and gives them a platform to think about things in a different way which might lead to innovation. You do get the feeling he had the concept down, just that there was one component missing to make it work, ie, jet engines which were only a few years in the future.
@brokenrecord3523
@brokenrecord3523 Год назад
@@TheJhtlag The scientific method: Observation - Research - Hypothesis - Experiment - Analysis - Report Saying it is "try stuff" gives a really distorted impression of what went into the effort.
@sunnyjim1355
@sunnyjim1355 Год назад
@@shadowopsairman1583 Big area to shot at, for one.
@jamesowens7176
@jamesowens7176 Год назад
This is a great episode! I'm an aerospace engineer, but never learned about this aircraft until now! Thanks for presenting it!
@Google_Does_Evil_Now
@Google_Does_Evil_Now Год назад
Never heard of this plane before. It looks "right". 15 years after his design every fast military jet had that look - engine in a tube, wings on the side, and a bubble canopy on top.
@georgelstuart
@georgelstuart Год назад
You should check out the Custer Channel Wing
@festushaggen2563
@festushaggen2563 Год назад
Don't you dare body shame that plane by calling it fat! It's full figured and should be proud. 😆
@mikeohagan2206
@mikeohagan2206 Год назад
ha ha ha haaa, love that comment. soon we will be forced to become obese by peer pressure. and its pleasantly plump.
@snoman003
@snoman003 Год назад
Keep doing what you do so well. There are may military pers out here that haven't even seen info like this. Well done.
@michaelmartinez1345
@michaelmartinez1345 Год назад
A very interesting plane that was created with un-conventional methods... This design would be very effective, for short take off / landings... A lot of drag, kept the speed down, but the range was long, and the rate of climb was high...This fuuselage really reminds me of high by-pass jet engine outer cowlings, found in so many airliners and other types of planes....
@blackcorp0001
@blackcorp0001 Год назад
Carrier based stealth bombers ?
@michaelmartinez1345
@michaelmartinez1345 Год назад
@@blackcorp0001 yeah!!!! The radar folks would think it is a bird, flying at those bird-like speeds!!! Maybe a good way to disguise the plane, could be to put several flush mounted bird seed pans in the fuselage , so the birds stop and harness themselves on the fuselage for food/drinks & bird entertainment while in flight then have them escort this bomber/recon aircraft to the areas of concern... Again, the radar folks will think it's just a group of birds.... 😲
@samysilver8917
@samysilver8917 Год назад
this is the first jet engine concept ever invented, whatc it like a engine whit wings, italy was the first
@karimshebeika8010
@karimshebeika8010 Год назад
@@michaelmartinez1345 the birds work for the bourguoisie
@michaelmartinez1345
@michaelmartinez1345 Год назад
@@karimshebeika8010 Good one!!! Maybe they will get more water & seed in their feeders!!! 🐦
@johanalitalo8331
@johanalitalo8331 Год назад
Quite the unusual aircraft, but interesting nonetheless.
@jerryjeromehawkins1712
@jerryjeromehawkins1712 Год назад
The USA BeeGee aircraft from 1932... built in Springfield, Massachusetts. Very similar.
@jonathanperry8331
@jonathanperry8331 Год назад
I thought it was a racing plane. There are several designs that look like this even to this day. It's just a tube imagine how light it was even though it looked fat.
@rickmaldoo4205
@rickmaldoo4205 Год назад
Quite the interesting aeroplane, but unusual nonetheless.
@senorpepper3405
@senorpepper3405 Год назад
Neat
@andrewcarlson3486
@andrewcarlson3486 Год назад
Reminds me of the gee bee race plane or what Jim Winchester calls it in his book "a sewer pipe with wings"
@grndiesel
@grndiesel Год назад
What jumps out at me is the elliptical wings. Seems to be a very early example of that air foil. The brits used it on the spitfire, but the american P47 also owed some of its speed advantage to the elliptical wing.
@NoName-zn1sb
@NoName-zn1sb Год назад
You sure do get a lot of mileage out of 4.5 seconds of clip footage. How resourceful!
@blurglide
@blurglide Год назад
It'd be interesting to see a modern interpretation of this, with a high bypass turbofan
@falloutfart9917
@falloutfart9917 Год назад
It would probably be something like the a-wing in Star Wars fast but difficult to steer well
@Karibanu
@Karibanu Год назад
This is also an annular wing, which is probably more interesting than the ducted fan ( given every turbofan is also a ducted fan ).
@dagwould
@dagwould Год назад
You have: an AB 380 engine, but with the cockpit on top of the engine instead of in the fuselage.
@dangeary2134
@dangeary2134 Год назад
Nearly every jumbo jet has high bypass turbofans mounted on the wings.
@blurglide
@blurglide Год назад
@@dangeary2134 No shit. They don't use a high bypass turbofan for their fuselage though. Is the difference really that difficult for you to understand?
@martinpennock9430
@martinpennock9430 Год назад
Weirdest thing I've ever seen! Thanks for bringing this unusual, to say the least, aircraft to our attention. As always God bless you and yours and thanks again for everything you do!
@ffjsb
@ffjsb Год назад
I think the biggest problem is that the engines and materials of the time weren't advanced enough to provide the justification for the aircraft. It would be interesting to see this prototype built with a modern engine and construction techniques.
@rexxbailey2764
@rexxbailey2764 Год назад
OOOOHH YEAH!!! TOTALLY WOULD BE COOL! 😍😍👌👌👍😄😀
@thingamabob3902
@thingamabob3902 Год назад
If you put the engine somewhere else like in the wings and only connect a shaft to the propeller you could get rid of the drag which hampered the Stipa Caproni. Ofc you then need sturdier wings than the little fairy wings it had ^^.
@ffjsb
@ffjsb Год назад
@@thingamabob3902 Engines to day are probably much more powerful than the same size engines of that day, so that alone may solve the drag problem.
@thingamabob3902
@thingamabob3902 Год назад
@@ffjsb definitely more powerful, but then you still have wasted energy you could put to use if you optimize
@ffjsb
@ffjsb Год назад
@@thingamabob3902 I wouldn't call it wasted energy, I think it would translate into more speed.
@Google_Does_Evil_Now
@Google_Does_Evil_Now Год назад
It looks right. Something about it, it just gives you that feeling.
@karstendoerr5378
@karstendoerr5378 Год назад
This aircraft was the first to use a shrouded propeller. The advantage of this arrangement over a "free-running" propeller is that the shroud reduces thrust losses due to turbulence at the blade tips of the propeller. There is an increase in power relative to diameter, but not in propeller efficiency. The first mention of the shrouded propeller is found in 1918 in a patent specification of Mercur Flugzeugbau GmbH. This describes a "device for improving the efficiency of propellers" based on the use of guide vanes with adjustable pitch and a ring surrounding the propeller.
@donmears4090
@donmears4090 Год назад
The first thing I thought of was that it looked like a ducted fan with the fuselage being the duct. It also reminds me of a high bypass jet engine with the jet replaced with a piston engine.
@Orygunner67
@Orygunner67 Год назад
Awesome as well as informative! Thank you for bringing it to us! 🤓
@rahulupadhyay3570
@rahulupadhyay3570 Год назад
This is awesome. Simple and to the point
@simonbrooks6073
@simonbrooks6073 Год назад
Great story, well researched and delivered.
@andersschoen3613
@andersschoen3613 Год назад
Very innovative and ahead of his time. Thinking out of the box for sure.
@7th_CAV_Trooper
@7th_CAV_Trooper Год назад
It's wonderful! So chunky. I bet the elevator was very effective being directly within the prop stream.
@gregmullins6927
@gregmullins6927 Год назад
That is fascinating,your documentaries are excellent.
@tjombom
@tjombom Год назад
This barrel airplane is simply ingenious.
@Sam1jere
@Sam1jere Год назад
No way this unusual looking plane's engine can overheat. Impressed nevertheless. 👏
@ragoonsgg589
@ragoonsgg589 Год назад
DA TOOOOB!
@sheldonrobertson8670
@sheldonrobertson8670 Год назад
Undoubtedly the best channel on this subject, your content and very unique delivery is one of the best if not the best, my hat is off to you and your channel, keep up the great work, all your channels are top notch!!
@robcat2075
@robcat2075 Год назад
When all the narration is uttered with breathless urgency, none of it has breathless urgency. Contours. Phrasing.
@danieldelvecchio5340
@danieldelvecchio5340 Год назад
I enjoy you videos, thank you! In this one you have misstated (or possibly understated) Bernoulli's Principle. It almost goes without saying that the velocity of a fluid (liquid or gas) increases as the diameter of the tube through which it is passing is reduced. How could it be otherwise? Bernoulli's innovation is that "an increase in the speed of a fluid occurs simultaneously with a decrease in pressure..." This is much less obvious. Later in the video you suggest the air is "compressed" in the tube by the action of the propeller. Not quite; the propeller has an easier time of it precisely because there is an area of reduced pressure behind it.
@jimmyc3238
@jimmyc3238 Год назад
1:55 The 1920's?? Daniel Bernoulli published his "Hydrodynamica" in 1738. Nevertheless, thanks for creating and posting this video. I remember reading about this airplane (along with many other oddities such as the German Horten bomber) in an oversized comic book back in the late '60's. Fascinating stuff!
@Moletrouser
@Moletrouser Год назад
Also: _ a reasonably well known axiom?_ An aeronautical engineer not familiar with Bernoulli’s principle would have been an odd fish indeed, whatever the date. Also: There is a bit more to Bernoulli’s principle than that.
@cheapgeek62
@cheapgeek62 Год назад
The Bernoulli principle actually states that "the internal pressure of a fluid decreases and its speed increases". It doesn't say anything about a tube because that's irrelevant.
@slunchtime
@slunchtime Год назад
And Viktor wasn’t Australian. He was Austrian. 🤣🤣🤣 Great work!
@MakeshiftMartyr
@MakeshiftMartyr Год назад
I absolutely love the Dark * channels, keep up the good work.
@zippyt.libertine3787
@zippyt.libertine3787 Год назад
The Dark Skies narrator constantly speaks with the tone of voice as though everything is a secret conspiracy. Hard to take seriously.
@no_handle_required
@no_handle_required Год назад
If Dyson had built an airplane
@digger105337
@digger105337 Год назад
Great idea for delivering large pipe. Stap on wings,cockpit, landing gear, engine inside with remote control. Flying pipes, great for remote location oil pipelines. 😉
@incomegeniuslive
@incomegeniuslive Год назад
Also, I wouldn't necessarily call him a crackpot, as his ideas were powerful and still resonate with many to this day.
@Betto_333
@Betto_333 Год назад
L'AEREO BARILE!!!!!! FINALLY!!! thanks for the vid!!!
@hiota45
@hiota45 Год назад
I'm surprised they didn't at least try a dual engine variation with a center fuselage.
@jeremywells9019
@jeremywells9019 Год назад
Imagine if it had an engine from a late ww2 plane and two props push and pull.
@SamuelBernofsky
@SamuelBernofsky Год назад
I really love your productions. They’re always really nicely made, informative and interesting. You have the “dirty film” effect on the b&w title slides. Are you adding this effect to the rest of the production or just the slides?
@ianbigsand7
@ianbigsand7 Год назад
I hate the dirty film effect, totally pointless and distracting. Used on other film on this channel.
@craigmandall9420
@craigmandall9420 Год назад
I had forgotten this plane existed but your video has jogged the memories of my youth
@timothymulholland7905
@timothymulholland7905 Год назад
If he used two tubes, one on each side, he would have had a modern jet like the ME 262
@AndreiTupolev
@AndreiTupolev Год назад
This is one of those that, if you HAD ever heard of it before, it would have probably been in the context of one of those "the most stupid aircraft ever!" vids. But it seems to have worked. I wonder what kind of performance it could have had if they'd resurrected the concept a few years later and contrived to squeeze, say, a DB601 into it
@MrNaKillshots
@MrNaKillshots Год назад
Genuinely fascinating.
@markbarber7839
@markbarber7839 Год назад
Wow, thanks for bringing this to our attention !
@baggieknight8411
@baggieknight8411 Год назад
What he should have done was build it as a dual engine with the cockpit in the middle and that would have solved most of the problems with view and turning
@jameskwon7617
@jameskwon7617 Год назад
I'd say turbofan is a stretch. However, ducted fan is a possibility. I think Boeing entertained the idea of using ducted turboprop pusher configuration with counterotating props on a modified 727, but never went to production because of noise and other issues.
@lucienpapercraft5171
@lucienpapercraft5171 Год назад
Literally a flying engine, a good example of modern turbofan engine
@brianburchart7592
@brianburchart7592 Год назад
Thank you! What a wonderful informative video.
@LadyAnuB
@LadyAnuB Год назад
Has anyone done a computerized aerodynamic study of this design? I would think that we could learn a lot about this design by computer flying it.
@streetfighter2471
@streetfighter2471 Год назад
It's kind of like the old sabres and other early jets.
@josega6338
@josega6338 Год назад
NACA published an study, conducted under supervision of mr Stipa himself, providing evidence of too much drag. Can be located ay UK Cranfield repository. Blessings +
@regsmith7604
@regsmith7604 Год назад
I can see it being a direct predecessor to the modern turbo fan engine. It looks like one, but with wings
@xmasinpacific
@xmasinpacific Год назад
Its more a direct predecessor of the Kort nozzle (1934)- the only thing this has in common with a turbofan is the round shape.
@matthewsecord7641
@matthewsecord7641 Год назад
One of my favorite channels.
@benjaminrush4443
@benjaminrush4443 Год назад
Fascinating. "Close but no cigar." Thanks.
@msgfrmdaactionman3000
@msgfrmdaactionman3000 Год назад
It honestly looks like Spy Smasher's "gyro sub". It could fly too!
@paoloviti6156
@paoloviti6156 Год назад
As an Italian airplane enthusiast I know very well the peculiar looking Stipa Caproni airplane. In this Luigi Stipa demonstrated a high engineering skill but ultimately this airplane never really caught the interest of the aviation because did not offered advantage compared to the conventional airplanes. Sadly Stipa was embittered by this lack of interest and never having received what he viewed as his just recognition for inventing the jet engine. Honestly I find it stretching a bit too much his claim but he definitely should have been supported much more by the authorities of the Italian Regia Aereonautica......
@oneshotme
@oneshotme Год назад
Enjoyed your video so I gave it a Thumbs Up
@watannen
@watannen Год назад
Caproni studied at the Montefiori Institute of Liege, where he met Henri Coanda ( yes, that one ), who displayed a similar, piston powered, ducted centrifugal rotor design at the 1910 Paris Aeronautics exhibition.
@_techana
@_techana Год назад
Wow! This literally brought tears to my eyes! The design of this aircraft resembles the design I put in early 1990s to build my own aircraft, although mine used a jet engine! I've had never known about Stipa-Caproni till now! I was young and full of ideas and dreams ;(
@riverraisin1
@riverraisin1 Год назад
And now we are old and full of angst......
@Harold710
@Harold710 Год назад
"Tears to my eyes" One of the most worn out fake phrases used for comments.
@francescotravi6615
@francescotravi6615 Год назад
Finally an Italian design, I love your videos! Please! Cover also the history behind MC. 72 the fastest seaplane in the world since 1934, 709,209 km/h (441 mph)! The record still holds today!!!
@alexander1485
@alexander1485 Год назад
Thats not true, the usa made a jet seaplane concept
@darkgeneral0192
@darkgeneral0192 Год назад
@@alexander1485 keyword? Concept
@soaringvulture
@soaringvulture Год назад
@@darkgeneral0192 The Convair F2Y Sea Dart was more than a concept. It was a supersonic delta-winged seaplane and several of the aircraft were built and flown.
@francis8062
@francis8062 Год назад
@@soaringvulture propelled, not jet engined.
@TallDude73
@TallDude73 Год назад
As soon as the video mentioned compressed air, I was thinking "jet engine". That's so cool!!!
@jirihamersky6152
@jirihamersky6152 Год назад
I only knew this plane from photographs. It seemed to me that it was just a suggestion. And when I saw the video, I was shocked. Smooth flight. Thanks for the video.
@miztatone918
@miztatone918 Год назад
man I think it looks awesome and for the time definitely a huge engineering feat. I bet it handled relatively well. I'd love to have one today, could you imagine the looks you would get flying that 😂 I think it's awesome. thanks for the video
@LoserEater303
@LoserEater303 Год назад
I think it self-stabilizes, so when you turn you have to fight the natural stabilization. He mentioned in the video it was hard to turn.
@bradmartisius2625
@bradmartisius2625 Год назад
I like how you show film of random aircraft (US P-26, Fairey Battle, etc.) while talking about the completely unrelated Caproni. Confusion always aids comprehension.
@thomasmallon9107
@thomasmallon9107 Год назад
This is SOP for the Dark documentary series.
@markfergerson2145
@markfergerson2145 Год назад
Someone could always volunteer to do CGI versions of never-built aircraft for illustrative purposes. But bitching is easier, I guess.
@senorpepper3405
@senorpepper3405 Год назад
Neat
@jaredevildog6343
@jaredevildog6343 Год назад
Very interesting video. Thank you.
@tomstulc9143
@tomstulc9143 Год назад
Another several innovative concepts in that design.
@gregwaugh8069
@gregwaugh8069 Год назад
I believe you meant to say Austrian instead you said Australian. No big deal. Incredibly interesting plane. Love your docs
@rorychisholm8863
@rorychisholm8863 Год назад
@@jakelittle1261 He's talking about the V Schauberger reference, not the replica. Schauberger was Austrian.
@blackcorp0001
@blackcorp0001 Год назад
Porco Rosso :P
@lancerevell5979
@lancerevell5979 Год назад
Porco wouldn't be caught dead flying that slug. 🙄
@martinpennock9430
@martinpennock9430 Год назад
Great anime!!
@blackcorp0001
@blackcorp0001 Год назад
@@lancerevell5979 true, but it was designed by an Italian
@haydenharris3059
@haydenharris3059 Год назад
So futuristic ❤
@projektkobra2247
@projektkobra2247 Год назад
Crazy!!!!! I love it!!!
@prjndigo
@prjndigo Год назад
Now, imagine a blimp where the main propulsion is two engines with large slower propellers operating within a tube down the center and that tube is a large proportion of the structure of the blimp.... imagine the blimp made almost entirely out of stealthy materials and the interior tube also housing all fuel, and the avionics as well as other systems.
@WeighedWilson
@WeighedWilson Год назад
Now imagine a horse drawn carriage. And a steam locomotive. And any other obsolete technology. Them put a gps in it. Viola! Innovation!
@DFX2KX
@DFX2KX Год назад
well, being a *blimp*, stealthy materials are not going to save it from having the radar cross-section of a postal code. However, ducted fans (which this is the first example of) are used in lighter-than-air craft.
@incandescentwithrage
@incandescentwithrage Год назад
Pointless
@dutchman7216
@dutchman7216 Год назад
Genuinely interesting. It's a shame the Italians didn't have the foresight to give them more room to work on his project.
@GilmerJohn
@GilmerJohn Год назад
Well, it was the Italians that funded the original effort. A lot of good engineering comes from Italy.
@xmasinpacific
@xmasinpacific Год назад
It was not a successful design - no amount of doing was going to make this design less draggy.
@jozsefizsak
@jozsefizsak Год назад
Excellent video.
@robertbate5790
@robertbate5790 Год назад
Interesting story, thank you 👍👍
@luislugo1289
@luislugo1289 Год назад
El caproni Stipa, si no me equivoco
@senorpepper3405
@senorpepper3405 Год назад
Ich vertehe Sie nicht!
@corduroycal
@corduroycal Год назад
big chungus plane
@gordtron
@gordtron Год назад
bring back the chungus!
@Tom-jw7ii
@Tom-jw7ii Год назад
I love Chungus!
@RomaRoma1992
@RomaRoma1992 Год назад
It's so cute, little fat plane and I want one.
@raphaelrae8186
@raphaelrae8186 Год назад
Now do one of the Gee Bee R1 and R2.
@markhughes7927
@markhughes7927 Год назад
9:50 ‘Austrian crackpot’? I think this man has a high reputation not only for profound research into Nature’s applications of powerful reserves in latent energy defying conventional mechanical explanation - and also for demanding humane and respectful conditions for his allotted captive assistants from SS masters who in other cases expended their energies and worked them to death under the terrifying conditions of Nazi Germany.
@HubertofLiege
@HubertofLiege Год назад
Australian?
@markhughes7927
@markhughes7927 Год назад
@@HubertofLiege Sounded like that to me but he was an Austrian naturalist and animal lover - he didn’t even like to be near the atom-smashing experiments near him - completely holistic it seems.
@senorpepper3405
@senorpepper3405 Год назад
Neat
@roomtemp6374
@roomtemp6374 Год назад
Yeah, calling him a crackpot is way out of line. Even if he was a little eccentric he was obviously a brilliant guy.
@talk2thoran
@talk2thoran Год назад
When I hear such clearly out of place and incorrect assertions as "Australian crackpot" I presume an agenda and tend to be wary of whatever else is said.
@jimmidan59
@jimmidan59 Год назад
WHAT A BEAUTIFUL AIRCRAFT!
@jerrydeem8946
@jerrydeem8946 Год назад
......this is a new one on me......and l appreciate that. Thanks.
@maggnar
@maggnar Год назад
Simply amazing.
@mohammedsaysrashid3587
@mohammedsaysrashid3587 Год назад
Wow what strange, unique design of this airplane ✈️...thanks for sharing
@wildhogOW
@wildhogOW Год назад
I don't think the Stipa-Caproni looks ugly. It definitely looks goofy as heck, but I think that's what makes it so wholesome too.
@florencemodina6293
@florencemodina6293 Год назад
i think your content is superb.excellent.
@pokerandphilosophy8328
@pokerandphilosophy8328 Год назад
The great Italian chef Enrico Cannelloni was much impressed by the design of the Stipa-Caproni. He eventually bought the patent and successfully turned it into pasta.
@neilmackenzie4394
@neilmackenzie4394 Год назад
I particularly like the narrator's vocal delivery, no nonsense!
@infidel202
@infidel202 Год назад
I think it's beautiful, what a brilliant idea
@NumberSixAtTheVillage
@NumberSixAtTheVillage Год назад
It would be interesting to take old technology like this and then iterate and develop on it further, just to see how it would evolve.
@noneed4me2n7
@noneed4me2n7 Год назад
So neat looking, I want to fly in one.
Далее
The WW2 Aircraft that Totally Fooled the Luftwaffe
15:07
The Secret Nazi Fighter Jet You've Never Heard Of
10:32
You won't believe how fast this thing is!
12:10
Просмотров 709 тыс.
The Best Plane in the World that Went Terribly Wrong
13:25
(4K) Mega Rare ME-262 Startup,Takeoff and More
11:03
WW2's Most Controversial Fighter - The P-39 Airacobra
13:11
How Pratt & Whitney Changed Aviation
18:18
Просмотров 708 тыс.
#car #shortvideo
0:21
Просмотров 2,7 млн