How are the higher speeds on the Avelias going to work? Are they just going to be able to go 165mph where the old Acelas are cleared for 150mph? That's still only 56 miles of track on the entire corridor.
Most likely, the body tilt system will allow these trains to corner faster. Alstom has pendolino trains, they are used in areas where there are many turns due to the terrain or the old railway network.
When I look at these Acelas going by, I can't help but wonder _why_ we never tried to do something like this here in Canada on the Windsor-Quebec City corridor and the one on the west cost.
Probably because almost all of it is owned by the freight companies. Running this type of service requires electrification, track improvements (like grade separation or straightening and leveling sections) which I doubt the freight companies will approve. Amtrak owns the entire NEC between Washington DC and Boston so, after electrification and improvements, it could offer faster and frequent services of regional trains and the Acela HSR service.There are plans yo build a dedicated HSR (depending on the plan between 200 kph/125 mph to 250 kph/255 mph and up to full 300 kph/186 mph) but this has been going for quite a while with many changes and time is running out as I'm not sure the next government (which will most likely be conservative) will support such a plan.
@@AL5520 I think Connecticut is the last thorn in full speed all the way up the NEC due to some areas with sharper curves and a few remaining grade crossings that cant be closed. some google shows all are in one county where the tracks hug close to the coast and so the crossings cannot be closed due to them being the only access points for communities and a ferry. Its unfortunate that good passenger rail is so political here in the US, Especially as planners start to realize that one more lane never solves traffic. but good trains between near city groups are fantastic. I've taken the Acela from Philly to Boston and its a nice ride, much more enjoyable than driving and no anal probing by TSA security theater like flying. Also train seating remembers most humans have legs.
Big "M" the mods for the ACS-64 and P-42's aren't working for me. Is it because, I'm operating bootcamp? At one time the ACS-64, P-42'S and FL-9's were all operating 125mph. Also the E-60's mod doesn't work.
Why do they need cab cars? Don’t all the NE regional have to switch to diesel in DC for going beyond. But, if not they always just change locomotives on each end. I’ve never seen a cab car before
The trains with cab cars are all likely Keystones, which have to switch directions leaving Philadelphia when they switch between the NEC and Keystone corridors.
No, it’s because they’re designed to run that way, much like their French TGV cousins. The two power cars are electrically connected by a high voltage cable, so when one pan is up, both power cars are energized.
Noticed the Avela Liberty trainsed-has only ONE Pantograph. If that fails for any reason, train comes to an ignominious halt. I guess AMTRAK was too cheap to specify pantograph on each power car. Seems penny-wise and pound-foolish.
There is a pan on each power car. Also, if the pan fails, even if there are two, it usually brings the train to a halt anyway because the wire often comes with it.
@@zazaranger5 having one pan up reduces unnecessary wear and allows one pan to be available in the event of a one becoming damaged. They’re able to do this because there is a 25kv wire running the length of the train on the roof of the passenger cars, enabling power from one pantograph to power both power cars. The rear most pan is usually up because if the driver spots overhead wire damage ahead he has more time to react and put the pan down, potentially saving the pantograph. 2 other negligible reasons for using the rear pan are that it’s more aerodynamic and that as the interface material on the pan head wears down the debris doesn’t go all over the roof making it dirty…