Want to hear something kind of funny,,,it is almost coming down to perfection will be in the eye of the beholder. I’ve had SG’S got a 62 standard. But check this out. R Y a Gibson lover. Or are Ya going to be a lover of the SG tone and sound. See what I am saying. Gibson has been at it for a long time. But where is the consistency? I am finding luthiers quite able to make a superior quality product, at a cheaper price, But the SG has been a major focus in the shaping of rock and roll,,,only con, neck dive,,,great vid!
this model was my first expensive guitar purchase as a teen, in 20 years Ive bought and sold maybe a dozen guitars. The SG has remained constant. I've added locking tuners in 2008 and all else is stock. the case was a mouldy gig bag (still got it) but its been kept in a flight cases when stored. I've added a few minor dings from gigging but the colour is amazing, cant see the 2 piece part like with yours but is aged well. I do have some neck dive but I love the 50s neck. As a kid I remember people telling me the neck was weirdly chunky for an SG. I love this guitar and the fretboard has indeed turned to a glass like finish
I immediately noticed the two piece body and thought hmmmm it looks a bit cheap. Nothing wrong with mismatching wood joints if going to be painted over with a solid colour, but shoddy factory quality control for a 'transparent' finish. However, you like it - so that's all that matters. I also would enjoy it's imperfect wonky charm if I'd got it for a bargain price.. I vaguely remember guitar forum complaints about early 2000s budget price Faded USA Gibsons not being much better than far cheaper Chinese imports. But it seems to be in our nature to have love/hate relationships with Gibsons. I own a couple of 2015s - which may have been one of the worst ever years for problematic Gibson guitars. But I got lucky enough with low prices, so I'm more than happy to put up with their faults.
