A Google Earth Tour Of Star Forts In the U S A Part 2 

Strong Freemason motifs.....is THAT the answer to the mystery?

@@elrioviolino3549 I don't know what your problem is. Are you suggesting that Europeans were unable to raise huge stone strongholds before star forts? That is pretty stupid argument seeing all these massive castles made in earlier centuries. "and the implication they were built when? In the 17-1800's???" - They were buit from XVth century up to XIX century when they have become obsolete and were replaced by simpler, but more roboust polygonal forts. "If true, (which it isn't)" - Evidence for that please... "this would have required thousands upon thousands of workers" - Where is a problem? "when there existed scant infrastructure of roads, quarries, and how were the architects and civil engineers assembled?" - Again, are you suggesting that huge strongholds weren't build at that times? Seriousły? You have Malbork castle for example... "Why and how can this be an almost worldwide phenomenon?" - Forts were build in countries which became colonial powers, it is perfectly normal that they build them in their colonies. It is also normal that neigbour countries started also using this technology. "Who on earth built these "forts", all of which exhibit consonant design features strongly suggesting a coherent underlying culture?" - First was Italy, thaen other countries started to build them as well, as star forts were giving good protection against cannonballs. "Who the fuck were they??" - Europeans. I don't know why some people are seeing some big mystery over a normal defensive structure...

@@przemog88 You, sir, are a complete idiot and "can't see the forest for the trees". Go play with your Lincoln logs...

@@elrioviolino3549 So no evidence? Colour me suprised...

@@waterotterrock6778 There never was country named Tartaria. There was a still unexplored region called that because people suspected that Tatars lived there as a remnant of Mongol Empire. We know who Tatars are (some of them are still living in Poland). You obviously don't.

I like the one where they say the Sun is a million times bigger than the earth...lol' what a crock of poonie'.

I know two he missed . FORT PITT and FORT DUQUENSE in PITTSBURGH where the OHIO RIVER is formed by the ALLEGHENY and MONONGAHELA RIVERS .

Go see them on your vacations, and after you retire, one at a time, until you get 'er done!

Yes, to the extent that they were designed as big piles of rock and dirt. No, to the extent that you are a crazy person who believes in pixies.

@@williamchamberlain2263 Shocking, you are telling me that you do not believe in Pixies!

Uhm..they still function as what they were built for: defending towns from sieges with cannons. Sadly..nobody uses 17th century cannons anymore...and todays artillery can deal with those fortifications pretty quickly. What they can't do is to produce just an ounce of energy. The people who used them and built them have not told us anything about that function..nor were we able to ever detect such a function to be possible. Thats why NOONE has have built a model of a star forts and demonstrated that it could harvest enery ro heal or do any of the bogus people believe they were able to do. So what is the believe that those things were anything but defense structrues based on? Right..the wishful thinking of people who already believe in those pseudo-scientific technologies and realized that claiming that past people used them is MUCH easier than the impossible: actually demonstrating they would work. Thats why NONE Of those people is actually interested to measure any energy flows in an actual star forts.

@@dergutehut3961 Fair questions, but can you prove that they were built as defensive structures for primitive cannons. No, you cannot, any more than anyone can prove that they were built as energy devices or for any other reasons. Star Forts were built by a people who have been erased from history for reasons we have no history of, so anyone's guess is just as good as anyone else's guess.

Great reply, but I still must disagree, because star forts are almost everywhere in the world, to include the American deserts and many other places they have no reason to be due to their geography. Yes, I have read the Official Narratives on specific star forts and the official explanations are ridiculously absurd, as are their comments on the Old World buildings, who built them and how long they took to build. In fact, their explanations are impossible! I'm not saying you are wrong because I certainly do not know the truth! Anyway, you keep doing your research, I'll keep doing mine, we will keep disagreeing, because Mate, this is the way in which we may learn something about the truth!

Thx Martha !

Yes it would be ! I'm working on something like this, plotting all thr forts that are the EXACT same design and seeing if there is any correlation. Its taking a while though because there are so many!!!

Absolutely. They appear to be built on ley lines of the earth natural grid system. 👍👍👍💖✌

The earth is spherical but hollow, and we are living inside.

@@Andy_Holmes - There is zero evidence of that! Unless you can provide otherwise?

They tend to be built near navigable bodies of water.

Thanks D P ! Yes I found out about that one after making these USA tours, looks so awesome ! I will be including that one in a video I am building about that entire area, many mysteries there ! There is a land formation called Turkey Mountains very close by that has many strange things on and around it, including the Fort Union star formation. I'm still doing the research for that video but will hopefully be out by the end of the year.

Circuit board. Looks like a lot of underground stuff goin on there to

crazy how they lied about everything

@@philyb3040 Yes, it is crazy how liars like you try to rewrite our history because of your incompetence in learning anything.

@Crow Magnon No, I'm certain that YOU are TRYING (is this word to hard for you to understand?) to do that.

Oh no...tell me it ain't so! So, you are trying to convince me that Pixies are not real, no, no, no...in that case, I must question who is the crazy one, you who do not believe that Pixies are not real or those who claim that they are real.

@@stankygeorge... what?

@@Mygg_Jeager What I said, is what, take it for what is is worth! You have a cool name, Happy New Year to you!

Stadiums all over the world, are built on portions, of star city foundations. Complete with existing tunnels.

Moats are very practical for a defense building. We already see that in castles.

@@dergutehut3961 Who were they 'defending' against?

@@allenschmitz9644 Basically against other countries. Every major world power built them from XV-th to XIX-th century.

@@przemog88 not buying that.

@@allenschmitz9644 So you not buying a fact that countries fight each other? Is that a joke?

Bastions used to be the standard defense buildings that every city or outpost or trade post wanted..since nobody likes to be pillaged. With such an important function it would be a miracle if we didn't had that many.

Thanks Joe ! I'll be sure to include that one in part 3.

Word?

I'm noticing a lot of video games are Starfort. Originally starforts were not for military SMH

No. The earliest star forts came with the Europeans..who shortly before discovering America developed that technology...or the Italians to e precise. NO star fort exists anywhere prior to their advancements in the 15th century.

@@dergutehut3961 I’m aware of the mainstream explanation bud question everything

@@enzocautela5376 Questioning is good. So is there anything wrong with the answer that they are defense structures?

I checked out fort Worden and I think you're right. I will have to dig and find more information before we can be definitive with that conclusion. I would like to find some old photos of this fort to see what it looked like after its "original" construction date.

American Indians never had artillery.

@@dinahnicest6525 and I doubt any star forts had cannons, the people century's later put shit like that in them and called them forts.

@@allenschmitz9644 So why did these prehistoric civilizations build these things that happen to offer the ideal, most efficient defense for the use of muzzle loading artillery and muskets? Did all of these historians lie about building them themselves? Did they forge all the documents that still exist in the archives? Why didn't they make them impervious to rifled artillery? How did they know the right sizes of the forts that would be garrisoned on the expanding frontiers? It doesn't take much research at all to see that they were all built from the 15th to the 19th centuries, the age of muzzle-loading weaponry.

@@dinahnicest6525 Wow tell me about the star fort navy and work gangs and earth moving equipment and portable brick kilns and there Blue Prints that all have the same harmonic 440? Hz Frequency trust me gun powder had nothing to do with why these structures were built, only liars will tell you they know.

Best evidence of an ancient advanced civilization. Strangely similar to futuristic “Venus Project” cities. Looks like we’re between golden ages. :-/

military anti-seige forts.

Cole =troll

Cathy if the stories are true, then indeed they were built as military installations. However if there is more to the story which there seems to be with many of them, then there is a possibility that they were found and reconstituted as military fortifications. If the latter part is true, then perhaps the original purpose of these structures is something else entirely. It is important to look at all the information objectively and not subjectively. As to what that original purpose may be, if not military, far more information is needed before any conclusions can be made.

@@anthonyblankenship3644 its not fair to call someone a troll because they're opinion is different. Though I don't agree with Cole either, it's important to stay objective when taking in information. Without all the necessary info its hard to be conclusive. It's entirely possible the stories are true, as much as it's possible that they are not. It seems the powers that be want us to butt heads and be at odds with each other, as it prevents us all from learning from each other, so let's not play their game. I appreciate Cole's comment as he is here and willing to discuss it. The moment we cannot talk to each other is the moment we have lost.

Ah, good old bs about empire of tartaria eh? No thanks, I'm not drunk enough for that.

@@przemog88 --- so just keep on drinking that good old kool-aid that you overdose on

they're batteries. Harnessing free energy.

They're castles for a period when cannon were reliable and aircraft didn't exist yet.

Yes. All forts have batteries.

"Theres a reason printed circuit boards look like our cities from above" - What is that reason? "theres a reason most everything we humans make looks like something humans made" - So you arguen that everything we made looks like things we made... Genius :D "This is more than just a lost technology or technique. Or a change in style etc etc..." - That means literally nothing.

This technology isn't lost. All the old treatises survive. The technology was made obsolete by the invention of rifled artillery.

@@dinahnicest6525 I don't buy that ... but its an interesting concept.... there are older more powerful and more accurate weapons than "rifled artillery"...

@@dinahnicest6525 mahabharata

@@gilligan80 Such as?