A Learned Discourse on Justification, in Modern English - by Richard Hooker 

There is a typo on the chart that appears at the 5:24 point. The first line should read, 'The translators divided the text into six chapters.'

I'm always pleased when these old books get updated to current spelling and put back in print so the English discourses of the time don't just stay shrouded in mystery, confined to hard-to-find, hard-to-read PDFs online or in the backs of dusty libraries. Personally, I think it'd be neat for some publisher to put Catholic Gregory Martin's "A Discovery of the Manifold Corruptions of the Holy Scriptures by the Heretics of our Days" (1582) and Puritan William Fulke's response "A Defense of the Sincere and True Translations of the Holy Scriptures into the English Tongue" (1583) back into print, perhaps both together in one binding, so we can get a good impression of the dueling tracts of those days. I recently read a short piece published online by the Harry Ransom Center (University of Texas at Austin) where they had a copy of Fulke's parallel Bishops' Bible-Rheims New Testament, with Fulke's annotations, and it was quite interesting to read what the seventeenth-century owner (a Catholic) had written by hand in the margins, himself dueling with Fulke's notes as, of course, this was the only legal way to own the Rheims in England at the time. "I suppose we must take his interpretation along with us, or he will not allow us our reading" was one marginal scribble that gave me a chuckle. It calls to mind that comment I believe you once made about crossing out notes in the RSV NOAB, and it makes me imagine a modern reader stuck on a desert island with their only Bible being a Study Bible by an editor whose views they disdain.

You had time to do this after the last few days of poll questions!!??😅

Calvin Robinson should be leading the Church of England. Its an absolute shame whats happing with the lgbtq affirmation stuff. Supposed to bring people out of sin, not let them drown in it.

Very cool, thank you!

Lengthy and convoluted sentences… hmmmm 🤔 Me!

Curious, have you considered reviewing Matthew Barrett’s new book?

A question about Bible, will it be correct to say that Christian Bible was always a translated book? Or were there early community of Christians who read it in original languages, in both Hebrew and Greek? I think the Jewish Bible was partly read in Hebrew and partly in translations throughout its history (depending upon the circumstances), but Christian Bible was always a translated book.

You seem to have a lot of material on the anglican church. Just wandering are you a member of the Episcopal church or ACNA?

Would you ever make a review of Pope Benedict’s book, Jesus of Nazareth?