Тёмный

A NEW Hypothesis for the Origins of the Great Sphinx of Egypt | Ancient Architects 

Ancient Architects
Подписаться 575 тыс.
Просмотров 160 тыс.
50% 1

As stated at the end of my last video, a part 2 on the Lost History of The Sphinx was a necessity because there is still so much more to reveal and the true story of the great monument is more complex than I thought. It’s time to cut through all the noise and look at the facts, plain and simple, to create a new hypothesis for the origins of the Great Sphinx of Giza in Egypt.
I stated in my last video that The Sphinx has been renovated, and not just in the past 100 years, but also by the Romans, Greeks, Ptolemaics and 18th dynasty Egyptians. The first half of this video will look at why I do not think the Sphinx was ever originally a lion, as I show amazing photographs, some of which you will have never seen before, to try and prove my point. The second half I will give my own hypothesis and timeline regarding the origins of this enigmatic monument.
In its original form, I present evidence that The Sphinx was not a lion or a jackal, neither Aker or Anubis. There is no evidence that the monument originally had feet or a tail as these were all clearly masonry constructs.
In Old Kingdom Egypt, The Sphinx therefore was just a natural piece of badly weathered limestone. We're not looking at a lion sculpture from 10,500 BC as there is simply no evidence.
With a fresh look at the rain erosion hypothesis and analysing photographs of the Great Sphinx, I build a timeline of events around The Sphinx complex and the picture painted is that this is a sacred landscape to one of the most ancient Egyptian gods, Sokar / Seker, the god known as 'He of Rostau' and the original god of the Underworld who would eventually become absorbed into the popular god, Osiris.
Is the Sphinx actually a representation of the Primordial Mound and, in Old Kingdom Times, was the head actually a falcon or hawk, and not a lion, jackal or person? Not only some the Sphinx complex include a representation of the Primordial Mound, the Sanctuary of the Henu Barque Boat and the Temple of Sokar, it also includes the entrance into the Underworld. Watch the video as I unravel my hypothesis.
All images are taken from Google Images, opencontext.org/subjects/09e4... and archive.org for educational purposes only.
Special thanks to Robert and Olivia Temple for their fabulous book that everyone should read, 'The Sphinx Mystery', available now at all good retailers.

Опубликовано:

 

6 апр 2019

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 890   
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
I made a script error at the 12 min mark saying “it hasn’t rained in Egypt for thousands of years” - it obviously has(!) I meant “it hasn’t rained enough to cause the erosion we see for thousands of years” - apologies for that! So, I mean it’s a natural formation of the Sphinx is taller than the bedrock and the Egyptians did cut down further to make an enclosure for the water, making the island in the middle taller through quarrying. What I’m saying in this video is there is no evidence they were carving a lion. They just extended the natural anomaly. This is a theory in its infancy but one I’ll be looking into further. I’m just trying to take a critical look at the evidence as I’ve long believed the ‘Lion - 10,500 BC’ hypothesis. Anyway, thanks for watching. Please do Like the video if you enjoyed it and please subscribe! If you want to support the Ancient Architects channel, I’m on Patreon at www.patreon.com/ancientarchitects - thank you!
@pantherplatform
@pantherplatform 5 лет назад
You've got my support mate.
@buckroger6456
@buckroger6456 5 лет назад
You're videos just keep getting better. At this rate I can see the channel hitting 500k then 1mil.
@sojuz
@sojuz 5 лет назад
purely occam razor kind of explanation, presented with the evidence
@Mikenoronha
@Mikenoronha 5 лет назад
I agree 100% with the head of Sokar theory and appreciate your hard work. I just wanted to point-out that head of the Sokar could have, at some point in Old Kingdom history, been carved into a different human head, unlike the one we see now. That of a different leader (of the original Old Kingdom people that lower Egypt which Narmer overtook and conquered), because the sphinx depicted on the Narmer Palette doesn't look like it has the same ethnicity as the current head that sits atop the sphinx. The fact that the Sphinx' head is very disproportionate, suggests that the original head, whether it was Sokar's falcon head or a human head, was likely bigger and looked more like the one on the Narmer Palette, but was later carved-away to look more like the people that conquered the peoples of the old kingdom.
@okacid
@okacid 5 лет назад
I don’t think the pyramids are as old as the alternative explanations says either. In India a upward pointing triangle means the 3 upper chakras. And if the capstone was made of gold it would be the perfect way of protecting it. You can’t climb it. There was no place to stand and pull it down. And the top chakra is the spirality. When the hard core Tibetan monks are on a spiritual retreat. They sit in a stone casket for many days. Like the casket in the pyramid. I think this is just a very old spiritual temple. And the capstone of the black pyramid says that the spirit of the pharaoh is above the Eye of Horus. So maybe they thought their spirit got locked in the top of the pyramid. Also there are no inscriptions in any spiritual temples. Not of the donator nor the architect.
@fcsuper
@fcsuper 5 лет назад
Based on your presentation, I have doubts regarding the conclusion that the Sphinx rock outcrop was left as is while the surrounding rock was quarried, and that water filled the area. First, if Old Kingdom did quarry from that site (which we know they did), they would've continued the quarry up to and around the outcropping. Since the outcropping is below the level of the land around the quarried area, there's no reason to believe the the Sphinx body wasn't quarried to its final shape. That means, the random shape you present as the original body of the Sphinx doesn't match the intent of quarrying the area. Since we know the area was quarried as a fact, it isn't reasonable to conclude they would've left such a random shape in the middle, especially since all of it was apart of the ground, not actually an outcropping, per se (other than the head). Second, if they quarried area was indeed meant to hold water, we would see evidence of erosion where the waterline would've been, not only around the walls, but also the Sphinx itself. Both would indeed have a matching waterline erosion of multiple layers. I invite you to go to any reservoir to see how such held water affects the natural surrounding barriers, particularly as the water level rises and falls. No such erosion is present at all in the quarried area. I think you have a bit more work here.
@pawoodsman1737
@pawoodsman1737 5 лет назад
I didnt think about the water line erosion. I would agree with that. Ive seen this in many places. It dosent take long either. I also argree with the rest of your comment.
@patricioansaldi8021
@patricioansaldi8021 5 лет назад
great point, I was thinking about that too cause that is one of the pieces of evidence that gives the rainfall theory credence, as we would expect to see the water level erosion on those stones as well
@markbalencia8214
@markbalencia8214 5 лет назад
As dr Robert schoch said you can easily tell where the much softer rock was eroded leaving behind these stream line, undulating marks on the surface. Completely agree that we should see a much more even erosion pattern if the enclosure was filled with water. Clearly that’s not the case
@johnwalker1553
@johnwalker1553 5 лет назад
Actually i do think this deepening around the sphinx could be paving. like around the pyramids it was kind of Sandwich technique. above was basalt plaster 1m high, below Limestone form fitting united.
@akiranp
@akiranp 5 лет назад
Thought I'd have to write up a lengthy explanation to why this theory just doesn't cut it but then I read yours and you are spot on. Good on ya
@MKCarol-ms7lg
@MKCarol-ms7lg 5 лет назад
If the sphinx was sitting in the middle of water, maybe it had the head of a duck.
@pentirah5282
@pentirah5282 5 лет назад
M.K. Carol Quack Quack...
@jerryb.9754
@jerryb.9754 5 лет назад
Is there evidence for ducks in dynastic Egypt?
@pentirah5282
@pentirah5282 5 лет назад
@@jerryb.9754 Well, actually YES! Some of the illustrations during the time of Akhenaten show ducks and other natural scenes. This was a totally new approach in Egyptian art, fostered I presume, by Akhenaten himself who was trying to break away from the old traditions.
@nsjx
@nsjx 5 лет назад
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a distant relative to The Great Sphinx of Egypt
@pentirah5282
@pentirah5282 5 лет назад
@@nsjx Ha ha - very droll.
@Mikenoronha
@Mikenoronha 5 лет назад
I agree with the head of Sokar theory, but the head of the Sokar could have, at some point in Old Kingdom history, been carved into a different human head, unlike the one we see now. That of a different leader (of the original Old Kingdom people that lower Egypt which Narmer overtook and conquered), because the sphinx depicted on the Narmer Palette doesn't look like it has the same ethnicity as the current head that sits atop the sphinx. The fact that the Sphinx' head is very disproportionate, suggests that the original head, whether it was Sokar's falcon head or a human head, was likely bigger and looked more like the one on the Narmer Palette, but was later carved-away to look more like the people that conquered the peoples of the old kingdom.
@alphalunamare
@alphalunamare 5 лет назад
it wasn't a bird ... that looks cool but you can't add rock once carved
@Mikenoronha
@Mikenoronha 5 лет назад
@@alphalunamare Who said anything about adding rock? The current Sphinx head is disproportionately SMALL...that suggests it was carved out of a BIGGER piece of rock.
@schwingblade4290
@schwingblade4290 5 лет назад
Your mind is really quite remarkable ... most researchers and academics fall into the confirmation bias trap. Instead, you always follow the facts in whatever direction they take you. So refreshing. Thank you!
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
Cheers
@PaulBrown-uj5le
@PaulBrown-uj5le 5 лет назад
Ya think? O^0
@jonysevn
@jonysevn 5 лет назад
Ha ha surely most remarkable is his tone and rhythm, don’t forget that!
@speciesunknown8279
@speciesunknown8279 5 лет назад
Most academic researchers know better than to stray too far from the line being towed. They like to stay employed and funded, as well as being safe from ostricization from fellow peers.
@speciesunknown8279
@speciesunknown8279 5 лет назад
@@davidleomorley889 Lol, you bring up a good point, sir.. My only caveat would be to say, that most RU-vid viewers aren't employed to sort out fact from fallacy... I doubt many even realize their cognitive dissonance...
@sojuz
@sojuz 5 лет назад
Great deduction, no bs, no wishful assumptions. Very informative; great job as always. Thanks!
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
Cheers
@placepoint
@placepoint 5 лет назад
Amazing work! I really respect your ability to follow the evidence and evolve your theories. This is an amazing journey and I am happy to be along for the ride.
@canthama2703
@canthama2703 5 лет назад
My head is still spinning from the many hypothesis, every time seems so solid, the latest one is very convincing and likely, it makes sense Matt, well done.
@samdavisok
@samdavisok 5 лет назад
The erosion wouldn’t be uniform throughout if the sphinx was repaired many times throughout time.
@flawlesswill1987
@flawlesswill1987 3 года назад
not to mention you have to take into account the smaller things would be covered first so would be protected by the sand sooner, also it was all built over time not the same day so you cant expect the erosion to be exactly the same. and as you said its been repaired we dont yet know if other areas were repaired also.
@schoolhomevrtechnologyassi6286
@schoolhomevrtechnologyassi6286 3 года назад
The erosion is Far from Uniform displaying paradoxical massive erosion where it was known to be buried and protected and very little long tern erosion on the part that was sticking up!
@dreyn7780
@dreyn7780 2 года назад
Mate, you Can't even maintain bicycles. Humans want money for nothing. Finders fees. It was found and you pay them. Humanity is a 1 trick pony. 1% of the population actually makes life on earth better by making stuff.
@Greenninjadjh
@Greenninjadjh 5 лет назад
Love it. well researched, thought out and presented. You're really stirring them up now.. keep going. Great critical thinking from an open minded perspective. This type of debate is exactly what is needed.
@ovvenn.
@ovvenn. 2 года назад
ah yes i agree green ninja
@moreagain5628
@moreagain5628 5 лет назад
Great work! You are on fire lately!
@lolthatshilarious5602
@lolthatshilarious5602 5 лет назад
Wow ! Great work Matt. Thank you as always.
@shannonk.6528
@shannonk.6528 5 лет назад
You do a tremendous amount of research for your videos and it shows. Thank you for your channel. You are a wealth of information for those of us who do not put in the time (thank you) that have a keen interest in Egypt and it's history.
@nineoclockhero
@nineoclockhero 5 лет назад
Couldn't help noticing a badly eroded human like figure on the front view of the sphinx. If the enclosure was filled with water, what were the tunnels/passages under it for?
@colleptic
@colleptic 5 лет назад
Exactly, there are an enormous amount of tunnels under the Plateau, some going hundreds of feet down into tombs. I have always had the theory that the enclosure erosion could have been from flooding, but I do not think it was supposed to be flooded, due to what is underneath the Plateau.
@pentirah5282
@pentirah5282 5 лет назад
The water would immediately have drained away through the many underground tunnels. There would not have been sufficient contact to cause erosion, perhaps.
@DilbertMuc
@DilbertMuc 5 лет назад
@@pentirah5282 Not really. It is not tap water, but monsoon water from the mountains of Sudan. Look at floodings in our time. When water drains away it leaves a huge mess of sediments. Those Nile sediments were urgently required for the surrounding agricultural land to refertilize each year. Underground shafts and caves would clog up with sediments pretty quickly. Just as the Assuan dam is clogging up with sediments which bring problems for the functioning of the dam.
@pentirah5282
@pentirah5282 5 лет назад
@@DilbertMuc I know all that. Just a thought: if the underground tunnels were silted up, where is the residue of the silt now? Where did it disappear to? It would need a colossal amount of silt to block all those tunnels. Observers say they go on for miles.
@DilbertMuc
@DilbertMuc 5 лет назад
@@pentirah5282 Yeah. I was saying that the old Egyptians would be more than stupid to build so close to the river Nile if all their buildings get inundated and damaged periodically by the annual monsoon floods. They would spend the rest of the year cleaning up the mess and emptying the clogged drainage canals. With a nile flood all underground cavities and above ground buildings would be filled with dirty, muddy water for weeks, leaving ten thousands of tons of drying mud everywhere. When finished cleaning up the disaster then the next flood arrives and the cycle goes on and on... I am saying that this "Ancient Architects" hypothesis doesn't make sense in any way, in a logical view. However that the Sphinx was a natural rock ensemble and might have had a birds head is quite plausible. But that's another hypothesis.
@craigygerrard1694
@craigygerrard1694 5 лет назад
First a lion...then a jackal.. then def a lion...now a hawk...but also an outcrop of rock.. I just love your channel Matt..
@stevenbelanger7660
@stevenbelanger7660 5 лет назад
Good day! You should look into Brien foerster research, you would find some fasinating facts.
@alexleadbetter
@alexleadbetter 5 лет назад
mind blown, I hope you can continue to make lots more of these
@DG-ur3yf
@DG-ur3yf 5 лет назад
Brilliant video. Must say your videos are getting much better as time goes on.
@yassersilva2673
@yassersilva2673 5 лет назад
This is really amazing. Keep up the good work!
@Rusty.Shackhouse
@Rusty.Shackhouse 5 лет назад
Amazing video. Great work 👍🏻👍🏻
@Ryecrash617
@Ryecrash617 5 лет назад
Your research and deductions never cease to amaze me. This was an excellent video.
@neilsewell7482
@neilsewell7482 5 лет назад
Fantastic video. Well thought through!
@wpherigo1
@wpherigo1 5 лет назад
Nice work. Very thorough.
@scottmillman
@scottmillman 5 лет назад
Wow, that thing really is a crumbling pile that has been patched together. Never realized just how much.
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
Shocking state. And that’s exactly what I think it was meant to look like - a primordial mound. They didn’t carve it (apart from quarrying to extend it down for the most around it) and it looked like a natural outcrop - a primordial mound.
@AlejandroLaurora
@AlejandroLaurora 5 лет назад
@@AncientArchitects If you claim that it was actually a Sokar/Falcon head, what about the picture you uploaded of the snake that adorned the head of the monument? It belongs to some other big monument? If so, what would be your suggestion?
@mrmcg9288
@mrmcg9288 5 лет назад
Me either! This was eye opening. I had no idea it looks like that! Whole new perspective!
@gudmundurrafngeirdalbragas1513
After you had convinced me in other of your videos, that a water might have been around the pyramids, I wondered if that very same water had then been running down into the Sphinx enclosure and now you actually said it and so much more!
@BrickWilbur2369
@BrickWilbur2369 4 года назад
That is thee best analysis I have ever seen on this!! Great research!
@timberwolfenstein
@timberwolfenstein 5 лет назад
Excellent video! You are definitely on the right track! Keep up the good work. You should eventually consolidate everything and make a movie about the entire Giza complex.
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
I’m building my full hypothesis.
@deksand830
@deksand830 5 лет назад
Nice work G
@larryswindcatcher
@larryswindcatcher 5 лет назад
Compelling presentation and argument. Great job! We will probably never know the truth but thanks for for your astute perspective. Looking forward to your next video.
@Salmon_Rush_Die
@Salmon_Rush_Die 5 лет назад
Outstanding. You have singlehandedly brought more quality theories to Egyptology than anybody in the last 100 years.
@andrewsnalune8368
@andrewsnalune8368 5 лет назад
Best video yet!!
@Mysixofnine
@Mysixofnine 5 лет назад
Love your channel been watching it all morning, and here a new video! Thanks for all your hard work!
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
Thank you
@raymondgoldie7806
@raymondgoldie7806 3 года назад
Amazing concrete work again.
@wbprods
@wbprods 5 лет назад
very interresting hypothesis. thanks for the work.
@Lemon8
@Lemon8 5 лет назад
Well done! Excellent work
@robwilgenhof4386
@robwilgenhof4386 3 года назад
That was truly a great video !! One of your best ! I think you could really have nailed it. Thank you. Keep up the work.
@Laura-li3um
@Laura-li3um 3 года назад
Great information! Thank you, keep up the good work.
@JeppeBlomgren
@JeppeBlomgren 5 лет назад
The head is clearly Darth Vader. Damnit!
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
Shhh - that’s a secret
@mrmcg9288
@mrmcg9288 5 лет назад
I wish I could thumbs up this comment a 10000 times!! lol Really THE best comment about the Sphinx ever!!!
@triggerhappyjay4794
@triggerhappyjay4794 5 лет назад
@@AncientArchitectsWE ARE GIVING AWAY OUR POSITION... I TOLD HIM NOT TO LEAK THIS REAL IMPORTANT INFO .... NOW EVERYONES GOING TO KNOW WHAT IT REALLY IS ....
@isaac-qn1kl
@isaac-qn1kl 3 года назад
They used the force to build the pyramid, everyone go home it is now call Yoda temple
@roodborstkalf9664
@roodborstkalf9664 4 года назад
Excellent analysis.
@ShortbusMooner
@ShortbusMooner 5 лет назад
I think you're right. It's pretty apparent in the old photos that things were added later.. Good job!
@myrtorp
@myrtorp 5 лет назад
Great research dude!
@AsheeAshee
@AsheeAshee 5 лет назад
Well done!
@davelinaker1531
@davelinaker1531 5 лет назад
Very well done! Congratulations.
@quietthunder8373
@quietthunder8373 5 лет назад
Well done! This makes a great deal of sense.
@quietthunder8373
@quietthunder8373 5 лет назад
Your expostulation on the religious aspects of the Mound of Sokhar (pardon the misspelling) is more than compelling.
@bruceyoung3398
@bruceyoung3398 3 года назад
So cool , love it thankyou
@CS-zn6pp
@CS-zn6pp 5 лет назад
Thought provoking. I'm not sure I agree with you yet, will be interested to see what else you come up with.
@HH-nq1wg
@HH-nq1wg 5 лет назад
Matt your on top of this and i always learn so much from you,,,thanks for a job well done
@WubWubLuv
@WubWubLuv 3 года назад
I agree on this one. Keep up the great work!
@adrianneavenicci
@adrianneavenicci 5 лет назад
Incredible stuff. Bit of a rollercoaster of emotions and slightly lost for words. I was actually a bit disappointed as it appeared you’d solved the mystery after all but then excited all over again with your Sokar theory.
@dialeighslow3810
@dialeighslow3810 5 лет назад
Wow! Great video
@SpiritOfAbsinthe
@SpiritOfAbsinthe 5 лет назад
There's a Falcon-headed Sphinx located in the British Museum
@Rootsdrew
@Rootsdrew 5 лет назад
very thorough
@thomasking1473
@thomasking1473 5 лет назад
You rock ! Great vid ! 👍👍😉
@maxmulder
@maxmulder 5 лет назад
Dude....you good! Now a suggestion, make videos on the other 2 main Giza pyramids.
@gaetanfortin1594
@gaetanfortin1594 5 лет назад
Incredible research continue your good work!
@Bud4brains
@Bud4brains 5 лет назад
Brilliant work buddy. Actually makes more sense than any other theory ive stumbled across.
@alisaleh8784
@alisaleh8784 5 лет назад
Interesting ideas and research.
@gristlevonraben
@gristlevonraben 5 лет назад
Maybe the Sphinx was a boat? A rock boat in a glorious swimming hole? A boat is what the sun rides in during the day and during the night? Maybe it was a boat with a round sun sphere on it?
@johnwalker1553
@johnwalker1553 5 лет назад
In world war II US Marine had cement Ships. but these were calculated about water displacement. that monument did never swim.
@pentirah5282
@pentirah5282 5 лет назад
Gristle Von Raben Whatever it was originally, today it has been reduced to a tourist attraction.
@PaulBrown-uj5le
@PaulBrown-uj5le 5 лет назад
What are you on about lol.
@SeeUsFly
@SeeUsFly 5 лет назад
Always interesting.
@RedexsAmcc
@RedexsAmcc 5 лет назад
Excellent plausible theory. Thought provoking.
@steveyoungwork
@steveyoungwork 4 года назад
Great video, I like your theory it makes considerable sense to me!
@gilorillos
@gilorillos 5 лет назад
in january you said.. that it was clear "rain erosion"... now you say it was "the nile"... i'm looking forward to your next claim. :)
@jerryb.9754
@jerryb.9754 5 лет назад
He did say his earlier conjecture was wrong.
@kingsoloman2u458
@kingsoloman2u458 4 года назад
They got to him ...
@rainyday6430
@rainyday6430 3 года назад
@@kingsoloman2u458 god forbid someone change their mind after reviewing new data. It's the people who never change their minds that are the enemy of history, not the other way around.
@DilbertMuc
@DilbertMuc 5 лет назад
I see 3 problems in your explanation about the age of the Sphinx. 1.) according to your theory the Spinx enclosure and both temples (temple and your "boat house") would be submerged every time the river Nile rises. Now, the Nile floodings were essential for the fertility of the Nile delta and the thousands of kilometers of settlements along the river. The Nile floodings brought nutritions and water and... millions of tons of sediments. Now look at current videos of severe floodings and what they leave behind in towns and cities: destroyed houses, things and sediments that turn to hard cement in the heat of the sun. You are saying that the Sphinx and all temples were inundated regularly by the Nile, which means most of the year folks were busy to clean up the mess and excavate the Sphinx and temples enclosure from thousand tons of sediments? 2.) standing water always leaves very significant water marks on rocks. Can be seen at any hydro dam with rock walls. There are none at the Sphinx and the enclosure. 3.) according to your theory there was a drainage canal from the pyramids to the Sphinx enclosure and therefore the water erosion is severe only in the surroundigs of that drainage. Thus you say, it was not rain but river/canal water that caused the water weathering. However the enclosures of the pyramids themselves (e.g. Khefre pyramid) are weathered as well. There you say it was rain and therefore the pyramids are much older. But... in another video you say that since the pyramid canal actually almost cuts through the Sphinx enclosure it means that the Sphinx was there first and later the builders of the pyramid canal made a shortcut through the enclosure of the Sphinx and that's why the Sphinx is squeezed in among the canal and the 2 temples. Now you are contradicting yourself. Please advise on that topic. :)
@patrickdelaney3961
@patrickdelaney3961 5 лет назад
Isn't there visible water marks inside the structure?
@KevinBreak
@KevinBreak 5 лет назад
@@patrickdelaney3961 I remember a video claiming there were water marks inside the pyramids
@yardsaleuw3075
@yardsaleuw3075 3 года назад
Like your comment, if the canal emptied into the enclosure, there would be a Big Gully cut into the limestone to the left of the sphinx, i know, im from Kentucky, all limestone and Gullys everywhere. Plus i bet all the so called caves around giza are all natural not carved. Had it not been turned into desert a sink hole might have opened up and damaged the pyramids.
@jeffborne1
@jeffborne1 5 лет назад
Good research, strong arguments, very plausible theory. It is highly likely you've hit the jackpot, although feels kinda sad to give up previous exciting theories. My congratulations, Matt!
@jimmerhardy
@jimmerhardy 5 лет назад
That's breakthrough evidence and thinking. Thanks.
@travishayes1502
@travishayes1502 5 лет назад
Might you create a short video highlighting the timelines you place the construction of the features of Giza. I believe I might be able to better conceive of the time frame you reference in your videos. Thanks and keep up the evolving hypothesis!
@TraitorVek
@TraitorVek 5 лет назад
Splendid Thoughts as per. Keep it Up.
@melodyclark4347
@melodyclark4347 5 лет назад
Very well done. Definitely food for a new train of thought.
@sallyscott9172
@sallyscott9172 5 лет назад
Fascinating. Basically it looked nothing like it does today. 🐅..>>>
@jensen6735
@jensen6735 5 лет назад
you have really great and new ideas, which are very conclusive! Thats what I like about your videos!
@cognihensionchannel-doctorSSS
@cognihensionchannel-doctorSSS 5 лет назад
How does runoff in such a time that no rainfall was recognized as a factor in other formal geologic papers become suddenly not falsifiable? If the Nile was nearby then instead of temples and statues was it perhaps a 4rth dynasty boat dock staging area?
@QuriedeBerk
@QuriedeBerk 5 лет назад
Really good!
@corneliusjames4312
@corneliusjames4312 5 лет назад
This makes so much sense. Most plausible to me
@MicrobyteAlan
@MicrobyteAlan 5 лет назад
Great old photos. Thanks as always from Florida’s Space Coast
@harpuaslutbag2997
@harpuaslutbag2997 5 лет назад
That is a very interesting hypothesis there Mr. Matt! I don't think you're going to find it's a popular hypothesis with your RU-vid fans. But anyone that has watched your channel for long enough knows that you'll have a new hypothesis soon enough! and that new hypothesis probably will have very little in common with this current hypothesis! One thing I'll give you is you do keep it interesting sir!
@pixelspring
@pixelspring 5 лет назад
Brilliant! Simply brilliant deductive reasoning. Thank you.
@dave8181
@dave8181 5 лет назад
Good, solid detective work!
@SKELTER.
@SKELTER. 5 лет назад
Being able to challenge and change your opinions is a rare thing these days. That's what I love about your videos, you follow the evidence not the narrative, even when I disagree with your conclusions. However I really like your hypothesis here, it makes much more sense than a jackal or lion. Even sounds more plausible than the mainstream archeological explanation for the Sphinx.
@hermesreborn
@hermesreborn 5 лет назад
Well done my friend.
@monastevenson958
@monastevenson958 5 лет назад
Thanks for the analysis. Quite possible given the uneven runoff. Love the reconstruction footage.
@KellyBergerDeusVult
@KellyBergerDeusVult 4 года назад
While im not ready to make any definitive claims on the sphynx, theres been so much interesting research. Thank you for being open to new ideas, and, as science is, being willing to revise your assessment based on new evidence and studies. It does not matter where information comes from, conventional egyptologists or alternative study. Its not being fickle, its embracing the scientific method. Keep going and giving us your thoughts!
@sinister_mister
@sinister_mister 5 лет назад
I just watched your interview video on Rt! As always good work!
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
👍
@SmallFox74
@SmallFox74 5 лет назад
Link?
@Youremyboyblue_
@Youremyboyblue_ 5 лет назад
Please link that
@kirkjohnson9353
@kirkjohnson9353 5 лет назад
/wgat interview?
@sinister_mister
@sinister_mister 5 лет назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HhHOwfqpK6k.html
@wuzgoanon9373
@wuzgoanon9373 5 лет назад
Interesting interpretations. I haven't heard this before.
@chriskelly2939
@chriskelly2939 5 лет назад
Wow I think you’re right. No lion , jackal, just a pile of rocks. Sometimes the simplest answer........
@dreyn7780
@dreyn7780 2 года назад
Penguin finds rock. Penguin goes to get another rock and finds 1st rock is stolen.
@fluxstudio7569
@fluxstudio7569 5 лет назад
Nice this makes much sense.
@RealMeatPie
@RealMeatPie 4 года назад
All what you are saying fit together. Amazing video
@PHR_Pheonix_Rising
@PHR_Pheonix_Rising 5 лет назад
you go back and forward between the orion correlation theory. its confusing
@apex.amatuer
@apex.amatuer 5 лет назад
He changes his mind frequently but rarely acknowledges it.
@patricioansaldi8021
@patricioansaldi8021 5 лет назад
well it doesn't mean it's not valid, it's just inconclusive for right now. I think there's still a few more layers to peel back
@PHR_Pheonix_Rising
@PHR_Pheonix_Rising 5 лет назад
Well I'm personally looking forward to Hancock appearance on jre 22nd April to discuss his new book America Before. I don't see any reason to deviate from the Bauval Hancock / Carlson partnership theory. I think I'd anything their case is stronger in 2019 than ever before
@pete5177
@pete5177 5 лет назад
Excellent work
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
Cheers
@brianreiter6471
@brianreiter6471 5 лет назад
You would expect the erosion to be greater on the surrounding plain than on the sphinx itself because the only runoff to erode the sphinx comes from water landing on the mound, while water landing anywhere uphill from the pit would flow to the pit wall and erode it.
@mikescholz6429
@mikescholz6429 5 лет назад
Don’t forget that the blocks removed from the bedrock around the body were used to build the Sphinx temple, which is faced in granite, but the limestone behind is extremely eroded, and the granite facing stones are carved on the backside to fit to the eroded surfaces.
@nomadscavenger
@nomadscavenger Год назад
Right! So why wouldn't they cover the Sphinx? Every building in Egypt has been ransacked for as long as anything has been built there. If it was clad in granite, or harder limestone then that removed, plundered, you get what you see. And the Muslims tried to dismantle all the previous infidels' creations, for just one outraged (jealous!) occupier as an example.
@izotopestudio6097
@izotopestudio6097 5 лет назад
Wow. Pretty revolutionary idea 👍
@captainmorgan5255
@captainmorgan5255 5 лет назад
I like your idea !!!
@masskhamisi4
@masskhamisi4 5 лет назад
Great video..
@julianclarke9504
@julianclarke9504 5 лет назад
These findings are astonishing. You, sir, are amazing. It's like you're channeling knowledge from somewhere. Did you have an intuition about these results before finding the evidence? How do you put out so much much extraordinary content in such a short time? Startling, as always. Thank you.
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
I don’t have a life 😂
@julianclarke9504
@julianclarke9504 5 лет назад
@@AncientArchitects You're the best. Thanks for replying. Looking forward to the next revelation.
@ashbuchanan11
@ashbuchanan11 5 лет назад
Thank you for answering the question of water erosion on the Sphinx enclosure! That has been killing me for 15 years.
@Stormlaughter
@Stormlaughter 5 лет назад
Fascinating.
@buckroger6456
@buckroger6456 5 лет назад
I think you nailed it here. What you brought forward makes the most sense.
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
Thanks
@jackau08
@jackau08 5 лет назад
More closer and logical explanation before other more out there explanations, this is good logic for its origins.
@TopBananna
@TopBananna 5 лет назад
It just shows you how fickle people are , they watch one video from a guy on RU-vid and that’s it , mind changed completely 🙈
@mikkenieminen9603
@mikkenieminen9603 5 лет назад
Well people believe any ludicrous tale coming from the msm with any evidence provided ,just hearsay.
@resto776
@resto776 5 лет назад
This seems to be the most reasonable theory. Good stuff!
@j.c.3800
@j.c.3800 5 лет назад
Wow! A fantastic bit of reasoning and clear thinking. I also have wondered why we thought the ancients had the same names for constellations.
@SmallFox74
@SmallFox74 5 лет назад
Oh man, i've been looking forward to this one all weekend!
@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects 5 лет назад
Hope you enjoy it!
@SmallFox74
@SmallFox74 5 лет назад
@@AncientArchitects Brilliant as always! Love your level headed approach to this often over-hyped subject. All too often people want the facts to fit their fantasies. You, and too few others, are willing to shape your hypothesis around cold hard evidence as you find it, and for that I am most thankful to you for sharing your thoughts on the matter. Don't ever stop!
Далее
Rope climb tutorial !! 😱😱
00:22
Просмотров 1,6 млн
Давидыч против Тамаева 3 ЧАСТЬ
00:56
Rope climb tutorial !! 😱😱
00:22
Просмотров 1,6 млн