A Pro-Human Environmental Policy | Michael Shellenberger 

Bless you and your dedication and work with the poor. :-)

@@MARYBOORMAN it is a priviledge to be part of something amazing. I am going to be 72 in a month and the saying, planting trees whose shade you will never sit under applies to my work. The children in our school, all 435, could be the ones that make Haiti shine like it deserves. It is a beautiful country with wonderful people.

Cooking over wood fires is worse than smoking a pack of cigarettes a day. However, the other alternative is to build clean burning properly vented stoves out of clay and sand. That doesn't require a change in fuel source, and would be much more accessible to the poor.

nutcase!

@@KennethGriffith_International we have been working on that and have produced bio-mas stoves that are effective and use much less energy resourses.

First line i´m gonna steal for a country song if it´s not already from said genre.

Tony Heller is the same way, do you know of him? I am the same way also. Took me until mid 40s to learn enough to be able to smell the BS properly.

@@jimmoses6617 Is that the Heller that Potholer had so much fun with? Or is that another Heller?

Patrick Moore...

Thank you!! ❤️

Indeed: Kids should leave uni with all the self-rightiousness debated out of them, not parroted into them from only one hymn sheet.

It used to be taught at universities! The problem now is that the students no longer learn to reason because they believe that knowledge is more important than reasoning.

Maybe idiot politicians.

Most don't listen. They all need to go in the military and be straightened out.

Start teaching this in elementary school; that is where our children became indoctrinated by the 'environmentalists' in the first place.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-M8iEEO2UIbA.html

Acapulco didn't happen...

I am listening and nothing he said was true. Great Barrier Reef is not damaged it has increased by 20% .the reefs closer to land is affected by floods and human activity but they bounce back

@@garryrichardson4572His naïveté is on full display. As a defender of free speech, I fully support his right to do that.

@@garryrichardson4572 Maybe watch more than just the first minutes...

Thank you so much for support. This comment made the team smile.

@@arc_conferenceI really appreciate your work and I am covering many of your arguments on my personal podcast that is targeting Swiss Italian community (as you might know, very strong on bitcoin adoption as evolved tool for decentralisation and humans empowerment). Needless to say, Jordan has had a massive impact on my life.

You speak rational commonsense.

I've read and listened to enough real scientists to have come to the conclusion that we are being forced into Global Taxation via the GW, movement, I see the movement as nothing more than a sensational fear-mongering scam, you will see me mention Hegelian Dialectic as you read further, I'm sure you will see how that old playbook ties in with GW/CC, also note that imv they changed the Title from GW to CC so they could 'pretend' to get something right half the time lol. Regarding Nuclear Power I think this is his 'blind spot'. 1 Everything you see today regarding energy is pushing us into nuclear power, NOT Away from it, see Hegelian Dialectic. There is not a snowballs chance in @@@ that Calif for instance will meet energy needs for their Elect vehicle mandates using solar, wind etc, absolutely no way. --------------------------------------------- Opinion; 2 We should use Nuclear power on a limited basis. Nuclear power; 3 Among first targets in war are power plants, which 4 can be destroyed by conventional weapons and explosives, deliverable by several means including 5 terrorists coming in from across our open-border, or terrorists already in the US, as well as hostile jets and drones. 6 We would need approximately 500 nuc plants, evenly distributed throughout the US to replace current power-generating systems. 7 All of our power plants could be damaged to the point of meltdown within one day, rendering America virtually 7 uninhabitable for 100's if not 10's of thousands of years. Barring hostile attacks, the 8 spent fuel is toxic for 250k years, 10k generations. 9 We can't vouch for the state, knowledge or capabilities of the next 3 or 4 generations let alone 10k generations from now, due to natural disasters, disease, war, famine etc.. 10 Nuc power is not clean, safe, affordable, nor responsible. 11 The Fukushima disaster alone, has sounded the alarm on health and safety issues around the globe, prompting Japan's fishing industry to cultivate 'new-markets'.* We need alternative energy sources in America to be sure, Nuclear Power though is an extremely poor choice on 'scale'. *Probably 3rd world mkts, where the consuming public is generally not as aware nor as discriminating as 1st world markets.

This channel deletes posts, probably via GOOGLE AI.

Nuclear is necessary for our energy needs, now and in the future. Fact is it’s more expensive per kWh than most all other sources. That includes the cost of new modular reactors. Michael’s spewing misinformation about US oil and gas production. The US set records in natural gas production and is on track to produce even more each year for the next 5 years. (EIA) The US has been producing the same amount of crude oil as before COVID for the last 2 years (11.7 million barrels per day) and producers may increase to 12 mbpd but don’t want to produce so much more that the price per barrel drops. 600 oil and gas companies went bankrupt between 2015-2021 walking away from $400 billion in unpaid bills. That money was never factored into the price at the pump because they didn’t pay the production cost. (Haynes Boone bankruptcy monitor) I agree with much of what Michael says, but like the NYT he’s lying about oil and gas production and long term promise as a cheap fuel.

​@@jtjones4081Lying is an intention. Do you have evidence that the speaker is deliberately misrepresenting the state of affairs? I'm not fond of this kind of imputing of evil intent to everyone. It may be true, it may often be true, but it should not be the default to accuse people of such.

He has proven himself to be one of the most courageous journalists of our age.

you are wrong@@MattHabermehl

@@bertflisberg8908 😂

​@@bertflisberg8908explain your answer please

He´s no Kook. He is quite compelling.

The one at The Commonwealth Club last year was brilliant and I shared it with my social worker daughter.

What new stuff?

Outstanding summation.

then share it on social media

share share

Share it with people who will watch

Share it with as many people and platforms you can. I tell people about this, especially young people. No need to panic. Just be smart

feel-good fantasies from EU, UN or WEF? The make me ill form all the lies! Power=mad globalists, all.

Almost as brilliant as the record shattering global avg temps of 2023.

@@anabolicamaranth7140 What's your argument? We can't just panic over increasing temperatures, we need to find a sophisticated way to take care of that to degree that we cand and to the problems that we create. To just panic will only generate an increase in mental illness.

@@dennisgenesiuskarlstrand727 No need to panic. The best decisions can only be made if reality is acknowledged. The fact that aerosol masking from coal burning is artificially suppressing Midwest summer heat needs to be recognized. Maybe you just want to run the coal plants in June-Aug.

That sounds good.

Glen and Barry are not on the same page. One supports Palestinian rights. The other supports their termination....

Plus Whitney Webb

​@@Chris-qn6prI'm reading Whitney Webb's "One Nation Under Blackmail" vol.1 (I have both volumes). Absolutely astounding work that is mind-boggling that the same names keep interacting over decades. George Soros bought shares in GW Bush 'oil company' in the 1980s. Bill Barr was CIA. Etc.

​@@gmw3083Calumny.

Glad he explained in detail the concept of Earth Energy Imbalance, the most fundamental, informative climate related metric. Glad he pointed out that it has gone from +.5W sq meter in 2001 to 1.9W in 2023. Isn’t it great that he addressed the issue of Midwest crop production during summers that are +2C above the 1951- 1980. Southern Illinois in 2012 gave us a glimpse into the future. It wasn’t pretty.

My first microwave lasted 30+ years. Since it died I've had 4. Each about 2 years. 😮

I have found if a thing has the following words on it, it won't last long...."Made in China". As I say to my wife and others "Buy cheap...buy twice".

The longest vacuum I've ever owned, my Miele, still going strong after 10 years.

If a product never breaks down, the company that made it only makes a profit off it once. Selling fewer products means employees are paid less, then let go as product sales stall, and eventually the company closes. To keep citizens employed, there has to be reasons to keep building new products. Inbuilt obsolescence is a requirement in a capitalist society like ours. I'm not a fan of it by any means but you can trace it back all the way to the commercial sales of the light bulb. In fact, read up on the history of light bulb sales.

I posted the NOAA graph of the tides in New York since 1850. Yes, sea level is rising, but it's been rising at the same rate for 170 years. No acceleration. YT slapped the warning label on it, and it got six views. For comparison, a video of an opossum in my engine compartment got 2,500 views.

Badge of honor!

I suspect many of you will be stunned by the sky rocketing food prices that you will experience over the next decade. Yes, the Fed are idiots but that will not be the reason food prices go to the moon.

Their agenda is common sense but who the fuck in the so-called whatever fill in the blank bullshit will debate reality. I´ve seen Dawkins literally shaking in a debate with Prof Lennox when confronted with a theologian and scientist who played him like a pathetic individual, fortunately or not but i believe that is what society lacks. I´m not afraid of any ideas, debate and rigorous debate is close to my favourite parts of existence. To laugh to learn to search to go deeper...anyway i´m rambling.

Yes you’re absolutely correct ignorance is bliss

Well, no really. Ignorance was depressing, troubling and isolating. Now hope has returned and the optimistic me is reinvigorated and inspired.@@darkedge4011

Where are they doing that??

@@adriandocherty778 In Scotland they have felled just short of 16 million trees to make way for wind farms...

However. I can’t agree on industrialised farming.

However I can’t agree on industrialised farming.

Fist bump from one like minded Canadian to another 🤜🏼

Love wasn't quite word I had in mind 😂😂 It's the modern version of the gulag jailer looming over you as you look at 4 lights and he keeps telling you...there are 5 lights. 😂.

@@jumblestiltskin1365 well said! 🤣

You're most welcome

Minitrue.....

36% increase since more than 50% of it died off. That means it’s way smaller than before. Learn maths.

As Michael says Peter Ridd has been vilified for getting the facts out about the Great Barrier Reef

Er No. Only the sewage water outflows from main cities are the problem there, not global warming, or hotter seas, as is claimed.@@MZ99698

​​@@MZ99698...Nope. You are wrong. You are listening to the wrong 'experts'. Once they were called out for their erroneous data, they quietly shuffled off.

@@MZ99698Correlation doesn’t not imply causation. The reef has had 36% increase since records of it began. Meaning there isn’t a record of it dying off by 50%, as that was an arbitrary number placement to imply the facade of climate change disaster. Coral reefs, forests, grasslands have all been affected by many things yes, but not by the usage of fossil fuels in the way they’d like you to believe. Did you miss the part of the presentation where they have a direct link of increased energy output being a big factor to these once dying off areas returning to their natural glory? Overfishing, oversized farmland footprints, and deforestation were great causes. Is there climate change? Yes to a degree but based on mud and ice core samples from around the globe, the earth has been both much hotter and much colder many times over suggesting that the earth and its current poles shifting are part of the natural cycle, and will do what it does with or without humans DOJ what humans do. Again, correlation does NOT imply causation like you’ve been told.

Long since lost confidence in Attenborough, question his narrative, he also has more air miles than almost anyone else.

He was pretty much always right...😅

It contradicts the narrative.