This sounds well and good, but there are two fundamental issues here. 1. Both wokism and liberalism are the ideological descendants of protestant Christianity. The worldview where the oppressed are the virtuous ones is the one professed by both Christianity and wokism. With Christianity as the moral foundation, there is nothing to say that both liberalism and wokism will not see continuous resurgences. 2. In order to maintain an advanced civilisation, it is require that the people that partake in said civilisation have the cognitive capacity to understand and maintain it. This would exclude most of the people from the world, including a multitude of Christians.
To be fair progressivism, it has been argued, stemmed from reform protestantism, it is heretical to orthodox protestantism and other sects of Christianity.
"The worldview where the oppressed are the virtuous ones is the one professed by both Christianity..." This is actually not the whole council of Biblical revelation. The oppressed are victims, but victimhood is no virtue. If you're being abused, you're being oppressed. It is a common sense truth, that abuse of any kind is wrong, so virtue signalers and wokists employ the victimhood claim for strategic value (realistically true or not is unimportant), to tug on heart strings -- liberal protestants will of course use the same strategy, and I of course agree that liberalism is an ideological descendent of protestantism. Wrong is wrong. According to the Bible, a master being kind to his slaves is virtuous; but, a businessman abusing his workers is evil. The virtue being in an economic model or social construction, is an abstraction and distraction -- these Biblical truths are truly paleoconservative virtues, that the liberal, capitalist, and protestant would be repulsed by :)
Thanks very much for uploading this, I’m hoping for more in the future. A very good read/listen, but I must say that I disagree with the contention at about 5:57.
I would definitely suggest taking a high level unbiased look into the reality of Christianity as it is probably the most propagandized subject of the last century or so.
Europeans have been Christians for over 1000 years at this point. You can't simply sever that anymore than Christianity could've severed the pagan aspects of european culture over 1000 years ago
As Oswald Spengler said there is either Jesus or Pilate, the realm of truth or the actual and that these two are irreconcilable. If you choose Christianity your kingdom is not of this world, and thus this Christian nationalism is nothing but cope and if you choose Pilate, you will not have the truth or religiosity, but you will have the earthly world.
@@ShowMeMoviesInc.A terrible misreading of Spengler. He suggests that each represents to him a take on truth, and that for late civilization it was not even a choice. Skepticism is the default.
