Hating women is literally the first law of being alt right. Not all gay people hate women, but all people who hate women are spiritually gay, and racist, which is to be genetically gay, and typically Nationalist/Isolationist, which is to be politically/internationally gay.
Women are evil only from the perspective of the negative ego that is the evil itself self projected onto it. However from a spiritual perspective, women are ironically the extreme opposite, they are divine, because they represent the source of creation as a microcosm of the cosmic womb/nothingness/wholeness/God reflected by the sound frequency of the letter O, whereas the masculine is reflected by the sound of A. The whole world was created by feminine force that rules through chaos which has a divine order, not man-made order. This is why women were designed to rule and dominate over men, to teach others and elevate mankind by dissolving the ego that creates more patterns/divisions, because the feminine represents the heart, the water, the ocean of the soul that transcends duality of good and evil, it is a trinitarian essence and a gateway back to garden of eden. The evil and division exists within the masculine energy that represents the fall from garden of eden, because it creates the patterns (masculine/patriarch - PA as in pAter) in the wholeness (feminine/matriarch - MA as in mOther) which creates divisions, and also time and space, and of course aging. Masculine is the mind, feminine is the heart, and it is through the heart and the mergence of duality of good and evil that the spirit can ascend. This is why this sexual dynamic and polarity has been flipped and inverted over time to make men think they are meant to dominate and control women, which literally suppresses mother nature which includes Mother Earth, and this is how the man falls deeper into hell, because they are refusing to surrender to the wholeness of creation reflected by the feminine. In other words, it is the division within the mind itself that is the real 'evil' here in its truest sense. Men are responsible for this, because they are falling deeper into hellish realms if they are not unified with their own internal feminine on the inside. Inclusion/unity makes the spirit ascend, exclusion/division makes the spirit descend. And inclusion requires destruction of patterns, which includes borders, nations, beliefs, laws, norms, morals, etc.. etc.. This is why it is not easy, and this is why chaos/perversion/destruction is the medicine this world needs to dissolve all the control of the world. Scary, isn't it? But that is what is coming, and Nietzsche has rightfully predicted this when he said there's going to be a triumph of nihilism for the next two centuries. Only people who have fully awakened to this spiritually might be aware of this by now. This is the major reason why the inclusion, validation and sytemic integration of trans people in the heart is helping to dissolve these patterns and merge the masculine and feminine within them, this is why trans people have been weaponized by the powers that be throughout the history to keep the collective consciousness within the prison of the duality matrix. What is destroyed in men by women is their ego, because the masculine first and foremost is dominated by the internal divisions, this is why in sound the masculine is so close to the word mask or machine, it leads humans into a machine-like state of existence, because the masculine energy creates more patterns and is bound by the two dimensional consciousness. This is why the entire fascistic ideology was all about elevating the masculine energy, to create more divisions, more wars, more disintegration. Whereas the feminne is symbolized by a unity of love, it is a third dimensional consciousness, it is the unity of creation. As the bible said, at the beginning there was a word, and it is the word that give birth to creation, and the sound of these two letters/words O and A are essential blueprints of creation. The more patterns are created, the more time and space is created, more aging, the more the spirit is falling into hellish realms out of the unity/feminine/heaven. So when men are destroyed by women, that is by design for failing to merge with the internal feminine, so they could merge with the external feminine, what is being destroyed is that what creates more internal and external divisions, the feminine dissolves them, and that is its purpose. So before people try to regurgitate half truths of a philosopher to spread more internal divisions, maybe they need to spend time alone and asking for answers within, because the so-called truth they are buying into from him is bound to be severely detrimental to their soul and life on earth, and I would suggest people to take this bloody seriously.
Don't forget that black doctors, pilots, lawyers, engineers ect. were very likely accepted into and allowed to practice their professions with significantly lower standards.
And remember fellas, he wrote this in a time when women were more modest and lived in real patriarchy that started to crumble. And he saw it through, can you imagine what would he say now? Everything he said is 10x worse now, but he clearly predicted it and dissected it to core.
If intellectual qualities are inherited from the mother, why does Schopenhauer write that the female is not possessed of sufficient--let alone great--intellect and lacks the reasoning capacity and judgment of the male? Where is the female getting her intellect ???? And if men love in the woman what is deficient in himself, then mating and love is the pairing of opposites; ugly and dumb people find love with beautiful and intelligent people--this is not borne out by experience. Furthermore, given all these considerations that must happen between two opposite sex individuals, how can Schopenhauer advocate polygamy--since for the man to find that one woman that uniquely completes the whole to produce the best possible offspring, the difficulties in finding multiple women must rise exponentially.
Schopenhauer's argument is specific to youth--not to middle nor to old age; if such passion arises anong individuals of the opposite sex in these respective stages of life--which naturally is past the urge to procreate--what would Schopenhauer say about love between such individuals?
I’m going to have to listen to this entire book a few times and I want to read it. This is really interesting and deep. And it seems relevant today 9/4/24
Pretty solid grasp of evolutionary psychology threaded in here as well. This is why Schopenhauer is the man who brought me back into thinking philosophy is more than just unfinished scientific method. I disagree with him in some areas, like his views on polygamy. I also think his views on motherly love are based on very limited evidence. While women do tend to enjoy infancy with their children, I think it’s not the rule that they love their children less as they age. I think it would be more accurate to say women are more comfortable with helpless children because they can protect their very expensive biological investment. Fear about offspring interacting with the outside environment might come across as disapproval of the child but I think that’s all it is for the average mother: fear. I do find it interesting how much the average woman has changed in attitude in the west. I would not describe women in western culture as happy or easily pleased.
I love Schopenhauer cause he was the OG blackpiller but he’s wrong about women looking past beauty if a man is manly. They will love a beautiful man who’s not manly (think Justin Bieber kpop etc), and they won’t necessarily love a manly man if he’s ugly. Women probably cared less about looks back then but today they care more about a man’s looks than a man does about a woman. Men can convince themselves to love an average to ugly woman if she’s feminine, submissive, etc but a woman will never change her mind and love an ugly guy even if he has the perfect personality. This is why so many guys get friend zoned because they think they can change a woman’s mind to like them by being friends with her first. I think in shopenhauers view women are far more instinctual because they judge much faster whether a man is suitable for sex (will of the species) than a man will judge a woman.
He said he is talking about ordinary women. There are some extraordinary women but men would probably see them as masculine in their thoughts and behaviors so would not be attracted to them mostly. Men are usually attracted to simpleton women.
It's because the extraordinary woman is coming from a competitive place and that ruins any chance for romance to really flourish. What happens is the man sees another man basically and is not interested in that. But an extraordinary woman who understands that needs to know that only he can be the man in the relationship. She can be extraordinary outside the relationship.
