I'm impressed by the inclusion of the decelerons, well done. I've even noticed that some of the access panels on the upper surface of the outer wings were visible. Kudos on this.
This would be absolutely awesome with a few mechanical features. Like spring power canopy, landing gears and flaps. I am absolutely in love with it already though. Great job!
Let's look at this 2 ways and both are 100% positive, anyone who gets this as a toy or superior detailed model is absolutely deserved. Let's look back 10 years to now. Then look forward 10 years, we will see seemless lines 100% clear canopies, cockpits that put current day 3d decals for cockpits to shame. Perfect panel line shading, type in 100% squadron markings with aircraft decaling. Yes even CURRENT cannon riflings several inches in. Now, step 20 years we will see Zoukei-Mura complete subframe assembly with say magnetic removable panels.... 100% AWESOME job. You are the future and thank you for your incredible artwork you have created for the masses. Tally ho Rosie
Reason back is heavy is its not counting the weight of the full gun either get some fishing weights and put in nose or increase infill to compensate. This probably could be scaled up and made to actually fly.
some people prefer the look a hand-held camera brings when used with quick on the fly zoom-ins/closeup shots vs using a tripod - just depends on how you want to present the subject matter; tripod is great for static, single-view point, repeatable shots - the hand-held footage brings more "motion" and "life" to the assembly of a miniature version of a combat aircraft . . . and I absolutely agree - the model does looks *_Great_*
I love this design as I do all the others of yours that I have printed and built. I'm just having a bit of an issue with this one with the ailerons. Any suggestions getting parts C & B to fit into A? I'm printing the at 0.1 as suggested but when I put C&B together, I can't get them to snap into A without A breaking. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
You should be selling them I'd pay one hundred and 80 dollars for that A10 I flew one you killed it I love your make the front half of the canopy open to show off instruments
Looks amazing, may i suggest the cessna a37 dragonfly? You could as like the oposite do the cessna t37 tweet wich is the trainer version meant for non combad
I use this build bed. shop.fab365.net/products/energetic-new-spring-steel-sheet-heat-bed-platform-applied-ultempei-build-plate-magnetic-base-for-artillery-genius-3d-printer-3d-printer-parts-amp-accessories
You will need some time printing other things and getting used to printing. Recently got my printer but haven't really come out with anything good as in video
Oh man...! That's what I need...! a model kit like this...!! where can I get it...? can yo made another sample to sell it to me...? if you can, please contact me to do business, I love details like engines, flaps, canopy and landing gear...! it's amazing...! hope to hear from you soon... greetings from Mexico...!
Please vote this link for making. fab365.net/requests/3510234858/P-51_Mustang_I_think_some_aircraft_from_World_War_II_up_to_modern_day_would_be_amazing_to_3D_print_considering_there_are_current Thank you~
Muy lindos pero yo.prefiero fabricarlos desde 0 con mis manos y mi cerebro la satisfacción de ver el resultado final al y las gabachos cuando vendo un modelo son muy gratificantes
@@fab365_official Oh nervermind, i tested it out: it fits perfect! only the main fuselage has to be rotated 45° on the Z axis in order to fit the buildplate.
Not to nitpick, but….. I think you could engineer real retractable landing gear rather than the swapping of gear that’s up for gear that’s down…. I guess whoever builds this A10 could probably create full retractables…. Just thinking out loud
