A380 Almost Stalls 

I came to the comments because i think that A380 was this “-“ close to stalling

Also, Vstall is relative to airspeed, not ground speed. We don't know what the headwind was, that day, and there was no windsock in shot.

Clickbaity titles every time

It’s landing 😂

@@DarkStar-wu9nqno its not

Almost rich.

@@jiubboatman9352 he would be totally rich. That A380 was not even close to stalling

@@steelpldid you not get the joke?

@@thunderbums6964 Poe's Law

Almost 3 minutes.

I watched a C5 Galaxy come in on final. It looked like it was just floating there. Quite the sight to see.

B2's fly over my place to get to Whiteman. Sometimes less than 3000 ft. Very cool. I live 35mi North and if the wind is right you can hear engine testing.

Not beautiful, A380 is a graceless chump of an aircraft. The best lines belong to the 747, the Spitfire and weirdly, the Catalina.

@@bendenisereedy7865 Connies have awesome lines with the tri-tail.

@@bendenisereedy7865opinions are like buttholes

Inflation is such a b!tch! 10 seconds less this month, next another 10 seconds...

Bring back the thumbs down count!

😂

Airship: Ehm...let me introduce myself

It boggles the mind. The wings never seem big enough.

It’s likely doing over 150-160kts. Probably quite a bit over. Even with a headwind of 20kts that’s a ground speed of at least 240km/hr. That’s not slow. Stand next to nothing going that fast. Perspective is everything.

Talk of human progress in engineering. A guy from ancient times would call that magic

"Dog did it" :-)

I remember flying LHR-DOH in an A340 and there were literally 7 pax in economy in total. Best flight I've ever experienced felt like I was flying in a massive private jet.

I love that kind of flight. And the approach/landing is even better. You get to float in your seat for a while 😆

thats awesome!

When I was in the USAF, I did a commercial flight from JFK NY to SEATAC on a UAL Super-DC 8. There were 7 passengers and 6 crew members onboard and more than 150 empty seats that morning. I hope they were hauling mail or cargo because they didn't make a thing off the passenger fares.

Vbmm ? Knows bvvo

That is good

Hello again 👋🏻

@@EggsAviation Hello again 👋

Probably?! Had I been there, I would've instinctively reached around for the controls! 😂

❓ On touchdown do the wheels pivot in the direction of travel and help bring the aircraft inline❔

​@@James_BrownJR No, they don't on most airplanes. As soon as the main gear touches down, the pilot puts in rudder to straighter out the plane und let the nose gear touch down relatively straight. The main gear can handle a bit sideways action. The only airplane, that comes to mind right now, that can actually turn the main gears to land and roll in the crab angle, is the B-52.

Absolutely!

Nah

Tried to get a like from him and failed

I see positive guy 👍

So you would prefer it named "2.95 Minutes of Aviation"? Or some asterisk footnote disclaimer?

@@glennhaley7404yes

⁠@@glennhaley7404 yes

@@glennhaley7404 yes

​@@glennhaley7404 yes

Kalle Rovanpera or Carlos Sainz driving???😆

"Hockey stop"

Sainz would have rolled it.

I'm wondering if it ruins the tires with skid like that? Or those tires don't wear out that quick to get big enough flat spot?

No chance of stall is factually incorrect, there’s a chance BUDDY

Ok buddy, as a pilot I bow to your superior knowledge. I suppose there is always a chance it will be hit by a ufo, but the chance is minuscule. So to satisfy your pedantry, there is no chance of a stall in that configuration, angle of attack and aircraft mass. Satisfied?

@@johnfarnborough6424 woop woop

Jimbo - twunt

@@johnfarnborough6424 facts are facts big boy, I don’t make the rules

More like 16 seconds if you add the 7 second intro.

​@@Zacht1980 why are you responding to a bot?

​@@Jeeve_StobsHow do you know which comments are bots?

@@theboardshorts click on the profile picture. Only takes half a brain to figure it out.

and this leak affects ALL of the spoilers?

Needs whatever is leaking to be fixed, and then a wash.

@@ghostrider-be9ek No but the fluid behaves more like gas, ie spreads everywhere around on any horizontal flat surface, since the flaps are also rubbed upon retraction/extraction. Then, when washed by the wind while the aircraft gains speed, it further spreads backward. After some time dust and thin particles in the air, especially not fully burnt organic particles upon startup concentrating around the wings will stick to the fluid. This makes the "contaminated" flaps (and other surfaces) look dirty and filthy very quick, like a whole mess occurred. The culprit? Yeah, the tiny leak was the source, but the number of days since the last wash are the ones to blame. Not saying a leak can be left unfixed, just scaling down the gravity, some spillage which is a small percent not enough to be a safety issue can make that entire wing black, if ground crew tells you you can still fly and gives you 30 more cycles before an unavoidable ground repair (preferably at one maintenence center of the company), check the last time the plane was washed if you don't feel at ease.. 😊

Would still feel safer flying on that 20 year old 777 than a brand new one off the Boeing assembly line today...

@@splits3c0nd29 i totally agree

it did look a bit slower than usual and the ascent rate didn't particularly look normal.

@@deeptanshubhowmik5073it was a fly by. So no, it wasn’t intended to be normal. But wasn’t too slow either. Nowhere near stalling.

​​@@deeptanshubhowmik5073 some hints : listen to the engines spooling, that's not a take off roar, that's maintaining a fixed speed, meaning it's a flyby/low pass airstunt, not a take off. The A380 is big, very big. Don't be fooled by its seemingly lazy/slow attitude. I bet, if one applies motion photogrammetry, the resulting speed would be around 120kts. Yes, that's below the usual 140kts of a similar airliner on short final, but that A380 has no passengers, no cargo nor luggages, probably only 3 pilots onboard and around 5% fuel. In that case, its stalling speed wouldn't be around 112kts, it would be around 96kts. Also, just an hypothesis on my part, but you only performs a low speed low altitude stunt when you're facing the wind, as a rule. I don't know if everyone follows, but any pilot is well aware why he/she should; assuming it's the case and considering the weather, a photometry computation with ponderation (after eliminating perspective scalings) would increase the A380 airspeed by 10 or 20 kts... Stall speed is still very very far away. 👌

@@deeptanshubhowmik5073 its for an airshow. This is why this channels dumb titles actually work. Lol

@@WeLoveWave how many folks watched too , 5k when I watched it. Your spot on.

Yup!

Clickbait. In this airshow, the Malaysian A380 were waaaayyy above the stalling speed, comparing its motion to the background cloudy sky. Around 114-121kts. But in an airshow, the A380 is empty, no cargo, a crew of 3 and approx 5% fuel, its stall speed is around 91kts (stall warning initiating around 100kts in that configuration). Plus, but we don't know for sure, assuming you can present the stunt in a steady 25kts headwind, you can make people believe an A380 can levitate magically........ 🙃 So, clickbait, but it's okay, 3 min of aviation, we forgive 😊

Almost!

@WetterFlug The idiot that runs this channel...

@@StephenKarl_Integral I don't forgive! Speaks for yourself!

@@StephenKarl_Integrallikely more like 140-150kts. That still looks slow for a big plane.

You got that right.

@ANONYMOUSLY2376 Looks to me like the wind angle changed a lot at the last second.

I hope you know this comment will blow up 😂

@@Aviationeditz330 yo ihave subbed to u like ur my fav yt

@@Fanaviaton_A350 Thank you so much ❤️

@@Aviationeditz330 yw

almost

Bad pilot those nose tires are probably trashed now.

You must do one input or the other. Ie, in loose configuration (no manual inputs and no autopilot), a plane this class loosing speed is *designed* to naturally nose dive. Well, "designed" is a big word, rather "you'll have to try hard" or "design the plane very different" to make the aircraft behave otherwise. The main wings... lift the entire plane, they must be put somewhere in the middle (longitudinal axis). You can't put them in the back unless you have very heavy things like engines behind them to even weights. You can't put them in front unless you have very heavy things like... engines in front to even weights. The horizontal stabilizers plays almost no role in lifting purpose. They are there to control pitch (attitude) and stabilize flight (hence why they are called horizontal and vertical stabilizers). If the plane loses speed without changing pitch, slowly, the angle of attack increases, ie the airflow hit the plane from an increased angle from below. This just virtually increases lift on main wings, which changes (almost) nothing on the aircraft attitude, but now the horizontal stabilizers starts to generate lift, and they are in the back... what happens is, they naturally lift the back of the plane which creates a nose down behavior, and the plane pitches down naturally (and loses even more altitude) To maintain the same altitude, you either had to gradually pull the yoke to increase lift from main wings while continually negating lift on horizontal stabilizers (beware, without speed maintain/increase, you'll stall shortly), or input the necessary autopilot modes and controls to maintain altitude (and preferably also the speed by letting the computer add slightly more thrust when required). The aircraft computers do the job of pulling the yoke and advancing the throttle at your place (and it generally does the job better than anyone of us nowadays), like a robot. That's why I said you must input the controls to produce a sustained nose up attitude, or configure autopilot to make said inputs at your place. Both cases are likely intentional, meaning what you see is something planned. Just for the context in case you missed, it's a Farnborough Airshow, in UK, the low pass part, at low speed. Plane is empty. Hope that helps.

@@StephenKarl_Integral Very impressive analysis but it would help knowing the difference between 'loosing' and 'losing' for anyone to take you seriously.

@@verifiedtoxicangel2411 Merci d'avoir signalé la faute de frappe, j'en suis navré. Il est clair de nos jours qu'il soit assez facile d'éviter ceci avec toute l'assistance à disposition, cependant, je parviens malgré tout à maintenir un niveau décent d'anglais, *qui n'est que la troisième langue que je pratique,* en évitant de dépendre d'un traducteur/correcteur. Les seuls endroits où j'irais narguer quelqu'un sur sa grammaire ou son orthographe en français ou en malgache sur internet, serait une plateforme dédiée à la pratique de ladite langue, ou dans un comité professionnel en ligne où l'on ne tolérerais pas ce genre d'erreur. Pas sur youtube, pas sur les réseaux sociaux. Thanks anyway, for reminding me not to be eager to help people especially when in a good mood, I was sick for a few days and started to feel a lot better, thought it would be great to share something. Guess in the end, people aren't willing to receive/interact, forgot that fact for a moment...

😳Donuts on the runway!! I’d happily fly on this pilots plane.

Piss poor pilot!

@@alanwhiteside410 Course he is, captain……..??😏🙄🤔

It's the Cybertruck of the skies. Washing voids the warranty.

You've never met my mother in law. 😂

You scare way too easy.

My guess he was at a "Pride" Intersection.