He isn’t actually abandoned, he is punished for a bad action he did and left outside on the porch to sleep and later a evil man lures him over to a carriage, before taking his collar off and sells him to a cruel owner. This IS a true story.
He’s not a cruel owner he gets sold to a nice man and woman to be a sled dog which is stupid because he’s not even a sled dog type but we can just ignore that then he gets sold to the cruel owner
In the book the dog kills humans and realizes how easy it is to kill them and he and his wolf pack become feared as man eaters across Alaska and John dies running in the snow until he collapses from the cold and dies peacefully
As someone who read the original book, I do wish this movie was more faithful to it. It's a very dark story with an important lesson about survival and learning to overcome the cruelty of life through strength and experience. Buck suffers a lot more in the book, and he gets blood on his teeth in various instances (like in the book, he KILLS Spitz. Brutally. Because Spitz is a total jerk who also beats on other dogs in the team who kill each other too, so Buck chose to take him down and become pack leader). And I cant believe this movie didn't include the iconic scene where Buck pulls over 1000 pounds during a bet made by John Thornton! It's a great, intense moment that truly shows off how much living among the cold wilderness, etc. has improved his abilities and powers as a beast! The book isn't even that long. It's only 7 chapters, so idk why this movie couldn't have just stayed loyal to the original story.
probably to make the movie somewhat more kid-friendly because if they see a dog as the movie star i dont think they will think about having actual blood scene in the movie
"Blood on his teeth" is simply 4 word , maybe take less than 2 sec for you to type that on your keyboard but would literally keep tons of audience and entire families out of the theater, just due to the rating alone. The screenwriter lighten the theme up "just enough" to create a story that can be enjoyed by a wider audience, that benefited everyone. I'd say if people want hardcore lessons, either goes with other darker genre or like you said read the original .
Jack London's novel is a fictional adventure novel. However, London did spend time in the Yukon area before writing this novel, so his descriptions of the area are accurate and realistic. This could be why The Call of the Wild appears to be a true story even though it is not. Buck is based on a dog London met while adventuring in the Yukon. This real-life Buck (coincidentally named “Jack”) inspired London. London combined his real-life experiences with Jack-the-dog and his imagination to create his protagonist. "Buck" of The Call of the Wild.
Everything different we could spot about the movie that contrasts to the book: 2:20 - Initially, in the book Buck had a friend (dog) named Curly, before meeting the team. Spitz, and a bunch of other huskies teamed up and killed Curly right infront of Buck, causing Spitz and Buck to always be fighting for leader in the pack/sled team 4:51 - This entire fight did not play out how it was in the movie. Buck, although being mostly a pacificist and docile, killed Spitz during the final battle between the two. Proving him as leader. 6:34 - After selling the team, in the book it was not actually Perrault and François team that was the mail delivery, it was another team. During the time, Dave was getting weaker and older and eventually got killed off by the team, being shot in the book. 11:23 - In the movie, Al killed John Thorton. But in the books, John was brutally murdered by a team of Yeehat Indians. Buck wasn't able to make it in time but ended up killing all of them off in the book in the most violent way possible. In the end, Buck found him buried under rubble, dead.
The original version (aka the book) Was WAY more brutal. I think Spitz was killed by buck. Also, buck joined a wolf pack and one of his human friends were killed by native Americans. One dog was half blind, Spitz killed another dog right after she joined the team, And buck and his wolf pack ended up killing said natives, eating them, and terrorising them. Also he killed a moose by himself. He also bred with the wolves, too.
I believe you have to have permission to read or describe "The call of the wild" by Jack London but that is what this film is loosely based from originally, it follows Jack London's book "The Call Of The Wild."
-gurr, telegraphs did NOT put a dent in male delivery. Letters, packages, pictures, small goods and items, mail order items, were HUGE, and these were carried by the teams. As good as a telegraph is, you couldn't "wire" pictures.
isn't the ending completely different from the book ending? I thought I remember the guy getting brutally murdered by a tribe of native americans whom Buck ended up totally eviscerating. And then Buck had to fight off the wolf pack who had cornered him before they were willing to let him into the pack.
Uuugghhhhhhh this annoys me so much because this is not what happened in the book at ALL buck isn’t a soft and docile dog, he commanded respect from the other dogs, spitz and him rivalled AND spitz is a big white dog, not a black and white husky, grrr
in the book i read spitz didn't leave, buck killed him, and the guy in plaid who bought him ran several of the dogs to death, and after leaving buck, he and the girl tried to cross a iced river fell through, and drowned, along with all of the dogs they still had.
@@Just_SomePerson yeah I know it's just kinda scummy that these types of channels don't even mention the name of the film before or after the recap. Like how hard is it to begin the video with "today we are recapping a film called Call of the Wild which released in the year 2020 and stars Harrison Ford as a leading role. We begin ...... (entire recap of the film)."
@@fox9296 I remember watching one who said the name. And if I don’t know the comment section got the answers. Sometimes. Honestly glad they don’t do book recaps- cause the book compared to the movie… Not for little kids.
