Sorry, women (and men). No more drug/alcohol-fueled, consequence-free one night stands. Now, you actually have to be an adult and use protection, or face your consequences head on ... like an adult.
"Rights aren't rights if someone can take 'em away. They're privileges. That's all we've ever had in this country: a Bill of temporary privileges. And if you read the news, even badly, you know that every year the list gets shorter and shorter and shorter." - G. Carlin
Exactly, this whole thing ramped up after they found out mostly white women get abortions. They would not have cared if people of color were the majority getting them
Are we allowed to say "woman" now? As in a "woman's right" to choose? The forehead thumping woke zealots said we can't use the word "woman" anymore, so that means we can't talk about "women's rights" anymore. Or are we flip flopping back to "man" and "woman" again? Please tell me so I can know how to think politically correctly.
Even if she is a white supremacist, she's doing a lousy job at it. Stopping abortion isn't going to increase the white fraction of the population, since if you look up abortion rates by race, white people have relatively few of them.
We have been seeing this a lot over the last few years. I see it as a social experiment, they are trying to figure out where the line is and discovering it is really far right, so they get more support for saying the quiet part out loud from their base without getting much negative impact from anywhere else.
@@neeneko the irony is that rich white woman will still have access to abortion and they are fooling themselves if they think they won't find a way. so what they have actually done is increase the number of poor and nonwhite people being born in US
@@zapatavive1801 I'm not really tempted to respond to emotional arguments. Either you have a rule that's fair 100% of the time or you don't have it at all.
@@annaku_eatswieners_ahaha yo right. Most countries want the poor kids to join the military. When population is to high humanity will set a limit, but when low they will force people to have kids.
True, absolutely, this democracy needs to adapt, but they won’t, it’s not going to happen from top offices. ONLY PEOPLE BASED MOVEMENT will make it happen
On behalf of Ireland, we think you're taking the Jesus stuff more than a bit too far. Our entire country as individuals got to vote on this matter in a public referendum. Only one county of 26 voted no and that was at 51.87%. No freedom or democracy left in the states but these ideas have become such a brand for the US that some people will never see how bad it is now.
Although people still get to vote on this. It's just a state decision instead of people in the judicial branch of the federal government deciding. The decision is more in the people's hands than it used to be. But we're ignoring that because we like to fight with each other instead.
@@francepantz3064 The decision is whether to have an abortion or not. The decision-maker is the person who is pregnant. The decision has been taken out of their hands. Seems people don't like fighting enough as far as I can see!
@@DieFarbeLila88 they'll deal with it how they already are - by not doing anything :( they don't care. that one woman said the quiet part out loud - they just want the white population to remain the majority.
ALL this accomplishes is to keep the poor, poor...this will have grave results for the disenfranchised, underserved, and folks in the lowest socioeconomic groups. Your Congressman's mistress, daughter, staffer will ALWAYS have access to a safe abortion, SHOULD they choose.
As an infamous clown once said:”all it takes is one bad day” but now after seeing the anti abortion and republicans celebrating I realize that the slip of tongue is pretty much a laughable bad day for them😈.
@@lgbtsrgro0mrs36 The Taliban, as you well know, is a militant, fundamentalist movement that favors dark robes, male supremacy and the primacy of religion over government.
1."White life" has two syllables; "right to life has three. 2. She was reading a prepared speech. 3. She did not correct herself. 4.She applauded herself, as did the audience while Trump smiled -- nothing amiss here . . .
Same reason goes for Trevor making a joke about a black judge who has a white wife. By Trevor saying why doesn’t he also try to overturn interracial marriages. How is that funny?
@@jimmysalinas682 because he's climbing up and pulling up the ladder behind him. The joke is funny because it's ironic. But you don't care about that. You only want to whine and whatabout your way through this. Clearly you have no idea what racism is and just scream it at everything.
Supreme court justices should have term limits. They shouldn’t have life time terms. Also, it should be up to the voters. Not the president. They’ve made it obvious that no one in politics can be trusted anymore.
I am Pro-Becky who found out at her 20 week anatomy scan that the infant she was so excited to bring into this world had developed without life sustaining organs. I am Pro-Susan who was sexually assaulted on her way home from work, only to come to the horrific realization that her assailant planted his seed in her when she got a positive pregnancy test result a month later. I am Pro-Theresa who hemorrhaged due to a placental abruption, causing her parents, spouse, and children to make the impossible decision whether to save her or her unborn child. I am Pro-little Cathy who had her innocence ripped away from her by someone she should of been able to trust and her 11 year old body isn't mature enough to bear the consequences of that betrayal. I am Pro-Melissa who's working 2 jobs just to make ends meet who has to choose between bringing a other child into poverty or feeding the children she already has because her spouse walked out on her. I am Pro-Brittany who realizes that she is in no way financially, emotionally or physically able to raise a child. You can argue and say that I'm pro-choice all you want, but the truth is I'm pro-life. Their lives. Women's lives. You don't get to pick and choose which scenarios should be accepted. Women's rights are meant to protect ALL women, regardless of their situation!
Thanks Trevor for calling out the Democrats' inaction in all of this. They have been sitting on their hands, doing sweet FA even when they had the seats and opportunity to at least install legislative failsafes or railguards against this, at least on the state level. And even as a non-US citizen this development worries me, because you better believe "conservatives" around the world are eyeing what's happening and taking *extensive* notes...
Blaming the Dems rather than the citizens of this country is very ignorant. The Fox News megaphone for the Republican Party only works if the viewer believes the b.s. And let’s not forget the churches spewing out their vitriol to their sheeple constantly. The lies are only effective when someone believes it. Democratic States are in the minority. This was clearly evident whenever Republicans win a Presidential election
Dude of course the democrats didn't do anything They couldn't have done anything roe vs wade was unconstitutional therefore it could not be a law it had nothing to do with pro/anti abortion
The Democrats did just recently pass a pro abortion bill in the house, but it had no chance of passing the senate, so you can’t say Democrat lawmakers are doing nothing (the exception being Senator Joe Manchin of course).
I always thought Trevor was a fair thinker on both sides but this is disappointing. How do you justify killing children how is that right? You don't even try to tackle the question.
If you would care to abort YOURSELF, please feel free, but that other human being that doesn't get a vote in the democratic version of democracy might want to live, if given a CHOICE!
@@crazyjacobins305 I would like to live. So therefore you will give me some of your bone marrow. Oh you don't get a choice in this, you HAVE to donate your bone marrow to me.
@@jorilysmatos69 that’s because you don’t believe there is a separate person inside of a woman. I’m not saying there shouldn’t be exceptions or early choice but later is just monstrous, Especially later term. That is also public health sorry.
Usually I would've been against harassing judges at their homes. But it turns out, there's no constitutional right to privacy anymore, so harass away I guess!
This sounds like a criminal call to action, wanna explain that thought? So many people don't understand what this ruling really meant. It means that the federal government has no say in abortion rights, it gives that decision back to the people. After seeing all the morons in government for the past year and a half I'm not surprised there's far more in the population.
I noticed he didn't bring up the Loving decision. He is telling everyone else who can marry, and right to decide what to do with their own bodies, but the one decision that allows his marriage, he conveniently forgets to mention. Interesting...
Maybe we should revisit Brown v. Board of Education as well. Imagine telling him where he can or cannot eat, what books he can or can't check out of a library, or where he can sit on a bus.
@@allie5954 Agree...but he specifically sighted cases related to reproduction, birth control and certain marriages that need over turned. Loving was/is all about who you can marry. If you are dealing with reproduction, marriage is a major part of that and the Loving decision has to be apart of the cases to be over turned. Just using the same logic he has shown so far.
@@historybuff7491 I believe Loving was also prior to Roe; everything he listed was after. At least that's what I imagine will be part of his defense if he ever answers the question.
@@RandomFandomDragon Correct. What I was stating is that he is care to avoid the decision that directly impacts him. He is OK with impacting everyone else, just not him.
Agreed. I feel that pro-choicers are willing to meet half way. I'm pro-abortion which I know would be too controversial, so I am willing to be pro-choice, but pro-lifers don't budge. I'm not pro-baby-killing, because I don't believe it's a baby until it's born.
@@BeautifulMutanto *"I don't believe it's a baby until it's born"* Well you'll be hard pressed to find a scientist or biologist that agrees with you. What part of being born make you more human than the day or minutes before birth???
@@VenomeLord *"it's literally a parasite"* You can try and belittle human life all you want by calling it a parasite, but it doesn't change the fact that it is a human. It deserves the same respect as you and I. So I take it you are fine with killing a baby right before it's born because it's a "parasite".
I can't believe the pendulum has swung so far. We ent from being on the verge of seeing the first female President to women losing the right to choose... next up to bat is marriage equality. Unbelievable
@@RedHawk-cd9ym I guess “right to choose what to do with your body” doesn’t qualify as a choice for you then? That must explain why you’re so pro-life, your parents certainly were…
Well... yeah. As much as I'm angry and disgusted by the people pushing to rescind those rights, I'm equally angry at the lack of action from my OWN elected officials. It's a forewarned tragedy. Trevor is absolutely right- we have to push the Democratic party to AT LEAST the extremes the Republicans are taking.
@@PraiseTheFSMonster I was one of the ones looking at Canada website. I and my family are Spanish speakers so Mexico might be an option though I am also looking at Europe due to family in Germany. New Zealand is just too far away and expensive.
The fact that Colbert, Seth Meyers, and Trevor Noah offer more reasonable and well researched segments on this than Fox News or my country's politicians is concerning.
FYi Colbert, Meyers and Noah are full of 💩 because... 1. Abortion is not a constitutional right. Read the constitution, it's not mentioned anywhere at all. That's why it was overturned. 2. All that's gonna happen is that abortion rights goes to the states and for the states and the state citizens to vote for their states abortion law. So everyone is freaking out, protesting and rioting for nothing. This whole this has been misleading, comedians are not journalists, they are propagandists. Oh and FOX is actually the ones on point, and I don't even like FOX but they are the ones that are telling the truth. Watch some Ben Shapiro, Steve Crowder, ir Dave Rubin... they actually know their 💩 better that these other hacks.
I don't care about US laws or morality, but you should have a right to your own body so long as you aren't using it to harm another life. Same as with guns.
Imagine your right to protect yourself and your family was enshrined in the Bill of Rights, but the Founding Fathers didnt think that the people's desire to have infinite consequence-free hook-ups was important or moral enough to be an inalienable right.. What an astute perspective you have.
@@Gilded_Cage_Princess I kinda think that was the whole reason they have lifetime appointments so they obey the law and not the whims of the citizens. Congress needs this much more than the courts. The problem is they never impeach any judges from the Supreme Court
@@williamperry4896 Maybe so but when the going gets weird the weird turn pro. Hunter S. Thompson. That's what we need to do now. SCOTUS lies, is partisan and embodies all manner of deception so they need to go asap. As for Clarence Thomas and his CRIMINAL wife who participated in Jan 6th and this subsequent conflict of interest, he should be fired immediately just for those two crimes
if it went your way you wouldn't say that. When things go your way you applaud the process for working, but when it doesn't you want to change everything and say everything is flawed. lol
Are we allowed to say "woman" now? As in a "woman's right" to choose? The woke zealots said we can't use the word "woman" anymore, so that means we can't talk about "women's rights" anymore. Or are we flip flopping back to "man" and "woman" again? Please tell me so I can know how to think politically correctly.
@@gailwaters814 well judging from the fact that you're asking that way I'd say you're more of the politically incorrect type. you can use woman but you wouldn't say trans women aren't women. That's the easy to distinguish part about it. So it's not that woman is a bad word it's just that how you address certain people by saying they're not when they are is the "woke" thing
I’m so devastated by this. Anyone calling themselves “Pro-life” you sure you wanna keep calling yourselves that while women and children’s body count increases
Stopping abortion literally decreases children's dead body count, like literally by definition and in accord with reality, not literally in the hyperbolic teenage girl sense.
@@phoult37 that is not reality. An embryo is not a child, you aren't saving anyone denying them access to safe abortion, you are dooming them to extreme choices that can and will end in death.
I fully expect all these pro life activists to now sign up to be foster parents, to adopt babies, to fund child care, to fund pre k, to fund and support anti war efforts, to defend children by passing gun laws that prevent massacres, etc etc.
That is not going to happen. At most would be them advocating that all teachers and children should be armed while at school to repel attack by gun men.
These anti abortion people don’t seem to get that crime and neglect and abuse goes up with unwanted children. Do they also want less housing and even less water? I don’t understand how they think never having any abortions or birth control is going to help when families can’t even afford housing and food today and it’s the biggest drought in a hundred years.
Exactly. They don’t care about people once they’re born. They’ll start figuring it out though when our economy continues to worsen & then in about 15-16 years when crime goes up.
I feel your pain. I've realized that it is impossible to get them to understand. It's frustrating living in a country with so many people with such low IQs.
US needs those unwanted poor children for future cannon fodders. Taiwanese kids don't want to join their military, so they will need American kids to defend their island...
@Gangari TheWanderer Ban abortion without a referendum is not the role of any democratic government. Last decisions of The US government show that the government is not respecting its own population. Your government own an old way of thinking in a new world, there is a mismatch.
@Gangari TheWanderer That is not what they are arguing at all. They are not making a point if a political decision should be done on state or country wide level. That is a different discussion entirely.
Just so everybody knows disabled people are 11x more likely than average to die as a consequence of pregnancy. Include disabled people in your activism.
100% agree. I have 3 ruptured lumbar discs and the doctors told me that I would have to adopt or use a surrogate because pregnancy would render my legs paralyzed. I am sooooooooo grateful I recently went thru menopause so I won't have to run to Mexico for an abortion. (Im in AZ)
Society is based on various individuals who have different needs. What you said shows that you are not considering the consequences of actions by assuming that disabled people don’t deserve rights and women should be forced to have children that can make them more disabled? There is nothing about this decision that considers ALL situations and it puts NO responsibility on men.
As an Irish person that grew up living through Ireland for all my 20 years even us Irish are shocked to see what’s happening, our country was know for strict religious beliefs and now we as a republic have come so far, I’m just saddened by this.
Nothing in the world is permanent. Empires rise and fall religions unite and divide. There was a time catholics colonised america and converted millions. Islam did the same in Asia. In the end our race is all that will matter
Saddened by what? Lack of food or the death thousands of babies across America engineered by none other but other members of the species. Would you trade the experience of life for any other irrespective of how justifiable the reason or reasons may have been? We should encourage young people to be more responsible rather than encourage them to act on their impulses only to bail them out later with despecable acts such as abortion.
I saw the protests yesterday. I’m in a suburban area outside Chicago, heavily conservative. I’ve never seen protests here. They were protesting the right for choice, and as I drove past I couldn’t help but start sobbing. May we have our rights for choice again. To all my fellow woman, I love you.
@@mlh5434 we still have that right now, but if a conservative Governor takes over our state then we could lose it as well. We were marching and protecting here for all the states and people who no have this right.
I'm not sure that's the conservative argument. The conservative argument is that rights not mentioned in the Constitution can be regulated by the state legislatures. Please see the Tenth Amendment for reference.
@@mlh5434 You realize that "amemdment" literally means it isn't in the constitution itself. In other words, the constitution can be changed; and even unchanged can be interpreted differently by different scholars ("well regulated"...).
People with influence over the public talking about issues like these are the reason why people think it is their moral right and very okay to have an abortion. Sad times these.
@@McDJNomi I'm not taking sides here, but what I'm against is celebrities like the host (and others) making a career by talking about serious issues like this (most times taking the side of the public, however wrong and flawed their opinions/perspectives are) just so that they gain favour from them.
@@ruukogchase5165 Yeah, sure, not taking sides, but you are clearly against abortion. Especially, when you are saying, that their opinion is flawed and made by public. Do you even hear yourself? Another thing, he became a celebrity, by being a comedian and a host, not the other way around. Next thing, if you hate people talking about something and taking a side, when its an opinion show, stop watching all shows and most of the news as well. And lastly, may I ask you, if you think, that abortion is wrong,, because you are a religious person?
@@gemourison7152 I'd love to answer your question on whether it's because of my religious beliefs, but before I do, let me ask you your stance on killing/murdering a baby OR taking a life. Surely you don't think that it is right, do you? Edit: Read your comment again and surely you are all for abortion. That explains why you think that killing or taking away a life is okay.
There are many of your viewers who support pro-life, abortion isn't an answer nor is the Supreme Court Governing over our Rights to our bodies, but the child who is living inside a body? When do they have rights! come up with a better solution we have not found an answer as of yet from what I see. Ihave not had an abortion and have 1 child and that was plenty.
THANK YOU, Trevor, for giving voice to my absolute and total frustration with the Democratic Party! Why don't they use their power?! Why don't they show outrage??? Why don't they get STRATEGIC??? There's no comparison with the outrageous action the Republicans take. Stop being so PC and get something DONE!!!
If that little tap on Rudy’s back is “assault and battery”, I must be the victim of domestic terrorism cuz I’ve had way worse than that (even back in grade school).
ah, but you forget : in the conservative ethos, it is not the action but the actors that matter. It only counts as assault if you are someone like Rudy, who's own supporters were more violent to the guy than the back slapper but were not arrested since THEY were on the side of 'law and order'.
Preferably before you find out we have guns. Stay safe and we do shot on sight (when the law allows it, because we actually follow them. Btw stay out of Texas)
i get what trevor is said but women have several options before getting pregnant such as contraceptives and condoms also giving the child up for adoptions
@@bazilda I'm guess I'm confused. Nothing in the Second Amendment says someone must be part of an organized or specified militia in order to bear arms. It seems you are conflating the amendment's prefatory clause with its operative clause.
Rights very much include bedroom. Could you store unlimited contraband in your bedroom? The problem is making laws keeping past in mind and not present or future.
OK. So now I'd like to see some international sanctions against USA because of lack of human rights and lack of democracy. That would be just to give some time for the international coalition to gather troops to invade and reestablish... democracy and human rights in those undemocratic states (which were united, not long ago).
It just became more democratic. The SCOTUS which is not elected by the people, gave the right back to the citizens of each state. Therefore if you don’t like the law in your current state you can now vote for someone who opposes or is for ie: legal abortions.
This has been the topic of conversation with every woman I've met in the last few weeks (live in Europe) and they were all stunned and horrified. I am so sorry for you guys, stay strong, it doesn't have to stay that way.
@@kpokpojiji as someone who's lived for many years in both America and Europe I can tell you that it isn't a matter of civilisation both are decaying and are hollow husks of their former selves.
I live in Germany and abortion is more restricted than it was in the US under Roe vs Wade but less so than it's now going to be in Texas. You can abort up to 12 weeks or so, and you have to take mandatory counseling.
I love that you're talking about this with the women in your life, but may I suggest that this also becomes a topic of conversation in your conversations with men? :)
KittyKitty well said welcome to America where everything is black or white everyone and anyone can have a gun 😱 but then the same people cry that they are pro life what a mess
It's so hard for me to laugh right now (thank you for making me laugh anyway), Roe v Wade being overturned makes me feel so violated, like my body isn't mine. This subject hits close to home, and I want to thank you for covering it.
The problem I have is no one person (Jane Roe) should have the power to create such a law in the first place. All because she didn't want to have a baby.
@@valkryiebonfire9782 Exactly. Most women today aren’t being sexually assaulted, so why do they act like they have no control of their bodies the AFTER pregnancy but not before?
the US has always had a rather split idea of freeome based off two basic idealogies : freedom from, and freedom to. The GoP is heavily ingrained with the later, that both freedom and 'law and order' are intended to support the strong in their freedom to oppress the weak, that laws are something used to benefit them and constrain others. This is why libertarians tend to come up with such oppressive ideas, they view it as protecting the freedom of the strongest to use their individual power over others, with the idea of the weak being able to band together and have power to be 'anti-freedom'.
Well, I think women should sue men for getting them pregnant!!! Since they say life begins at conception, the moment a woman “thinks” she’s pregnant, she should sue the guy!!! Women will be going to jail for getting abortions and nothing happens to the guy who impregnated the woman!!! I say sue the guy!!
@@evelyncolon5497 you want it all Already 70% woman initiate divorce more than men, the men gotta pay for the house the kids and the ex wife new boy toy fun on top of that half of the guys worth he build up from blood sweat and tears you get for free and now you want the guys pay for prenatal care? Nah man it takes two to get pregnant you talking like as if you a victim you don't just fall get pregnant get outta here with that bs 🤣🤣
@@KyriToe yes, prenatal care should be paid for. If women are forced to have children, than the guy who impregnated her should be forced to pay up since apparently life begins at conception. Its only fair
10:41 "So, you were saying we shouldn't ban legal access to firearms because people would just get them illegally if need be?" - "EXACTLY!" "So then you obviously also agree that we shouldn't ban legal access to abortion pills because women will just get them illegally when they need to?" - "... wait, no..."
@@Marcelg13 Militia tights, not gun rights. States have the right yo armed militias. Thatvis the 2nd amendment and gor 200s of years it was how it was read and interpreted. Anyone wanting to claim an originality framework for interpreting the constitution also needs to acknowledge that private gun ownership is not protected.
@@akashkashyap1106 mi·li·tia /məˈliSHə/ noun All able-bodied civilians eligible by law for military service. 2nd Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, *the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,* shall not be infringed. It's a list. A militia and the people's rights shall not be infringed. not one or the other
The assault weapons ban worked. Columbine happened after we got rid of it. Since then mass shootings have become the norm. Remove just assault riffles and we can fix this problem.
"Respect the important precedent of Roe v. Wade" going through hearing just to get the job and the tenure system always got me! Can't we implement some sort of annual performance review to supreme court justices like all general public face in day-to-day job that really making contribution?!
It’s got me feeling “what?” In a way I’ve never felt. I mean I assumed it was coming, but the ever living what? I’m pro-life, but this is a national disaster happening in real time. Theoretically, my daughter gets r*ped by some guy down the street, gets pregnant, and she absolutely gets no choice what to do? I get no say in what I think is responsible for my daughter? My son gets a girl he’s dating pregnant and there’s just no input from any the potential parents or grandparents? My wife gets pregnant at 47, making it a very difficult pregnancy… nothing? Again, I don’t like abortion, but I can still acknowledge there are cases where maybe it’s needed. Also, don’t tell me what to do with my body, that’s the least American thing possible. And I’m a straight upper middle class white guy. This will not effect me at all, I’d send my daughter to a different country and hire a lawyer if she needed one. And I’m still mad.
I might disagree with abortion in general, but I know bull when I smell it. What if the girl is like 11 or 12? That little girl is prepared to be a mother? Really? Like are you serious? A 13 year old me barely knew how to play a game of spades, but childcare, yup got it. And most importantly, we are supposed to be the land of the free, except for your own body? We are going to regulate your own body more than running for office to make a decision about your own body? That’s not blatant hypocrisy.
At least you have the self-awareness to feel for others and to think and engage honestly with circumstances that do not cast an absolutely perfect light on your belief. I don’t approve of your position, but at least you considered things in a fair way when you made that decision. Not everyone can do that.
@a rollingstone I always at least try to put myself in someone’s shoes before I judge them in anything. I thought my message made that fairly clear. Just because I got born on third base doesn’t mean I can’t see first.
What was strange for me is that on the same day this happened in the US, here in Germany the law which forbade so called advertisements for abortions was revoked. Which in effect meant that doctors couldn't freely say publicly that they perform abortions and inform about them.
Everyone that has a baby against their will should sue EVERY judge that ruled against ROE V WADE. I'm sure they will see what they did when it hits their pockets.
@@tanathanradathan3681 No, for all the women and children that have been taken advantaged of and all of the women and children that could die of childbirth due to it being illegal to abort an unborn fetus even if it threatens their own lives. Just the fact that they don't have a choice is ludicrous. 🤬
you're a child advocate but you're devastated that more children get to live? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOUR BRAIN? YOU ARE NOT A CHILD ADVOCATE! you are a wolf in sheep's clothing!
@@tanathanradathan3681 Exactly. With few exceptions, the vast majority of those babies' lives will be tough, never having a loving mother and father, being raised in abusive group homes, growing up into a life of crime, gangs and drugs. It is indeed devastating.
About what? That law on abortion (killing babies) can now be made on a state by state basis. If they dont like the law in there state they can vote for a different leader or move to a different state with abortion laws.
Abortion, too, but not only: Useful Leftist-Content AND A-Political Content keeps being produced by Some More News and Big Joel, and yet: Oth lack the Attribute of Telltale-Fireside of reminding the Left to Vote (even for small Posts, also). Do not forget to Vote and share YT-Channels like Trevor and Some-More-News with People. Also do not forget to use Info-Sources avvessable to you. Use your Options. I cant stress this enough: Dont forget to vote, big or small, and inform yourself about the Issues number-rich-enough that Atheist-Channel like Belief It Or Not, GMS and Telltale HAVE to cover them all the time and can barely keep up cause informing you is so important to them.
As important as comedic relief is, please don't lose sight of the battle ahead. It's IMPERATIVE that we vote out some of these far right Republicans so that we can protect our rights and stop our country from slamming headlong into authoritarianism!! Vote, make sure everyone you know is going to vote, volunteer to register people you don't know, volunteer to work the polls... There are a million ways to get involved. It's now more important than ever to do the hard work, our civic duties, to make sure our country remains free, our vote matters, politics stay out of our personal lives and that we save our constitution and country. We CAN do it but this might be our last chance!!
I thank the stars every day that I never had kids. When I'm stuck in gridlock traffic (a reminder of our overpopulation), that is the one thought that soothes me. :)
You're right about right-wing activists treating this victory as only the beginning. They learned it from all the left wing activists that treated their victories as "only the beginning" for sixty years.
After her comments about “Saving white lives" Republican voter's can no longer say they aren't racist cuz they went right along with what she said without even a gasp
@@ms.bubs4fun506 pretty sure white people has fewer abortions than POC. Shrug... Second generation immigrats aren't having many kids either. Nobody wants to
Why not start by placing hot water and herbal tea in your lobby? Mugwort is DEFINITELY NOT recommended for pregnant women and yet is permitted as an herbal/alternative remedy in the United States (and I'll be growing it if they try to ban it). Best part, it's not regulated. If someone just * happened * to miscarry the next day and a whiny Texan sued, you can always say that it was clearly labeled what the tea was capable of and several of your patients take it for menstrual regularity... just an idea.
As an American, I'll say this: Each state is almost like an individual country. From state to state, demographics, popular beliefs, religions, resources, etc. vary greatly. Because of that, each state is permitted, per the Constitution, to legislate for their respective people, so long as the laws dont contradict laws previously legislated by the federal government. This allows states to tailor laws that best fit the popular desires of the residents of each state. This is preferred because America is so big and diverse, so people in California generally live differently than people in, for example, Missouri or Tennessee. Now, with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, thats exactly what this did - put the determination of legality of abortions back with the states (i.e. the hands of the people). This is the opposite of tyranny. This is what living in a free nation, and a Republic, is like. Now, states that generally approve of abortions may still make them legal in their states, while other states, where the majority of people generally disapprove of abortions, may ban them or allow them only under special circumstances. This is nothing to fight about and has largely been exaggerated.
If a woman can avoid taking care a child through having an abortion without the consent of the father then a father should be able to avoid taking care a child through child support without the consent of a woman. 🤷🏾♂️
The problem with Black Americans is that the moment a black person doesn't do what they want, they start using racist epithets against the person then complain when other people treat them as a monolith. Diversity of thought is so threatening. Why?
Okay, we are angry. Now what? How about we tell the government they need to pay for ALL our medical bills. If they are taking over my body then pay my bills.
@@obrandondonaldson1208 Yes, because Roe should have NEVER been decided the way it was. This reversal is 100% proper. They did exactly what they were supposed to do, rule on the law and constitution. COPE
@@tioswift3676 where in the constitution does it state that fetuses should be carried to term against the woman’s wishes? While you’re on google trying to find an answer to my question, take a few minutes to find a synonym for cope because you need to expand your vocabulary 🫢
I am going through depression for years, Ever since I know Trevor by my friend from South Africa 🇿🇦 the daily show has been my everyday therapy and I can’t wait for the day I will finally be in the live audience. Thank you to everyone in the daily show crew.
Are we allowed to say "woman" now? As in a "woman's right" to choose? The woke zealots said we can't use the word "woman" anymore, so that means we can't talk about "women's rights" anymore. Or are we flip flopping back to "man" and "woman" again? Please tell me so I can know how to think politically correctly.
So glad somebody is calling out the Establishment Democrats and their dumb response. I feel like I am watching a slow-motion train wreck and there's nothing I can do to stop it.
I promise that if I am ever on a jury for an abortion case, there will be no conviction. There will be a hung jury at least. I hope millions more will make the same promise.
@@lgbtsrgro0mrs36 on their way to your doorstep now, along with the dead or broken bodies of women who suffered injury or disease from a pregnancy they did not want.
The only hope I see here is a hard mid-term turnout making the filibuster a non-issue.... Not going to hold my breath, the playing field is very stacked and I wonder if the democrats even want it.
@@lgbtsrgro0mrs36 The only babies dying in these situations is when the mother's life is in danger, in a fairly late term. When abortions normally happen in the early stages, no baby is killed since they are not even a person yet. Just a small clump of cells and nothing else.
Let's lay the blame where it truly lies..... With the Electoral College and the misrepresentation of the people via Senators. Without the Electoral College the person with the most votes wins (true democracy) and so Trump would not have been President and could not have appointed three judges. In the Senate the Republicans always represent a minority of the population, that allowed Mitch McConnel unprecedented power to recommend the three judges despite representing the minority of the population. Whatever the Dems do or do not do, this situation is a direct result of the faux democracy of America...
Many Are taking action, sort out which to support for re-election. In my area, a dem congressperson who voted against (Biden’s agenda, continuing covid aid, for the People measures) was defeated in primary. It’s tough tho, national dems campaigned and spent for the incumbent, local dem officials and others supported the challenger. (Same as what was the reasoning dem national meddled in texas primary, that someone anti-abortion pro-guns easier to elect sigh) hoping our Dem candidate wins in Nov., at least we’re not having to vote for the lessor of evils. ✌🏼✌🏼✌🏼✌🏼🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
The problem could be that most democrats try to make everyone happy. They're nice people who are sometimes lazy. While republicans get their agenda done as fast as they can. Even if republicans can't win, they try hard with an aggressive attitude. They know who they're speaking to, and they go for it no matter what. Republicans don't care about the other half of the country, just them. Maybe it's time for dems to do the same.
At this point, you can't convince me that people who are pro life aren't fueled by religious morality. If they were actually concerned about protecting life, they would be able to see
They won't. Like all religious nuts it's theit identity and they think their religion and morals are the superior and right ones. There isn't much you can do without radical pushback.
Are we allowed to say "woman" now? As in a "woman's right" to choose? The woke zealots said we can't use the word "woman" anymore, so that means we can't talk about "women's rights" anymore. Or are we flip flopping back to "man" and "woman" again? Please tell me so I can know how to think politically correctly.
You should be happy. The majority of Planned Parenthood locations are in minority neighborhoods. It's about killing _us_ off. We are already less than 12% of the population.
I can't believe that a judge that doesn't know the struggle that my mom went through to raise me. Now they are deciding about my body. SMH. There is no way I will listen to s strange person telling me what to do about my body. F***k that
In this shitstorm, I'm proud of seeing the green scarf, emblem of the fight to legalize abortion in my country (Arg), being used as a symbol to defend the same rights in the US.
Man this is just unbelievably against the direction we should be traveling in with peoples rights and constitutional protections. With this backwoods, ignorant approach to law making, one could reason under those thought processes that owning slaves is a constitutional right and that’s just downright ridiculous. It’s tragic what will surely have to come for this to be resolved permanently.
It takes men like you to open your eyes and to stand up for every woman you know. Thank you for saying something. You make a fine point when you say it it tragic to think what will have to happen for this to be reversed. The US is getting too close to the Handmaid's Tale.
Can you clarify how this is a backwards, ignorant approach to constitutional law and how this line of thinking would be used to justify slavery? Because I think you have the issue confused, but I’d like to give you the opportunity to clarify your remarks.
@@austindouglas268 Slavery actually was NOT abolished. The 13th allows for slavery. This is not a joke. Regarding abortion, if control over your own body isn't covered by the 9th, then what is?
The overturn of Roe v Wade ensures that abortion is up to voters... States like Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Utah (who have pre-roe abortion bans) oppose legal abortion by 5-10 percentage points according to 2021 polling from the Public Religion Research Institute. Why force abortion down these states throats? There wasn't a single state on the poll that supported abortion rights that will be effected by the roe v wade overturn because abortion is a protected right in these states! For the record, I am pro-choice for abortion until the end of the first trimester, but believe that abortion should be left on a state basis.
Not to mention when the bodies start piling up due to medical complications and suicide rates. We already have an awful maternal mortality rate as it is.
+1. Not great thinkers or planners- but surely some conservatives have thought about the huge coming increases needed for social services, the reduction in the number of women who can work, or the upcoming crime surge?? They also fear whites becoming the minority in the country. Yet this will most impact communities of color, and increase birth rates in the poorest parts of the country.
I think now that this abortion law has come into effect a lot young men and women will opt for doing operations like tubal litigations and vasectomies, especially if they can't have access to any kind of birth control.
Over half the woman who seek tubals already are told no for many reasons and not one is because of health reasons. And if you happen to be married your husband has a say.
