Abrupt global ocean circulation collapse. Time to start prepping? 

it was just moved up again in the paper titled "machine learning prediction of tipping and collapse of the atlantic meridional overturning circulation"

There was not a single collapsing AMOC INTHE LAST 13999 YEARS.

​@@Nehner... Which doesn't say nothing zero zilch about next year or the rest of century. Come back and check in 01-01-2100 if yer still right, or frozen solid if you don't

Most likely teary eyed because she doubled as an English teacher and you didn't know the difference between "effect" and "affect". Or perhaps you sang your question and she was a music lover.

@@grindupBaker That was unnecessary.

Cool question, especially for a young kid!

More Salt, less density.

@@grindupBaker like knowing you're shit vs knowing your shit.i guess. You know?

The Nordstream pipeline blow up and the fragmentation of plastics is also a big source of methane

We need the aliens technology and we need them to tell us what we need to do we need their help, maybe this is why they're trying to force disclosure. I don't know but I do know that it's all true what they're saying about the aliens and the secret space program. Because of 1969 when I was only eleven years old and living in Roseville California I would see them anti-gravity craft come up every night on maneuvers look like they were training for something they were very organized I wasn't the only one who saw them in my neighborhood they were very high up though like satellites but it was definitely anti-gravity craft that could travel several thousand miles per hour and as I watched them for four whole years and they had two nights off per week they increased from thirty-five to forty up at the same time I kid you not I'm dead serious. I have never forgotten what I saw those many years ago then my father took a transfer to Houston and I have never seen any in Houston but I have heard others say they have seen them seeing is believing.

Should have been around in the 70's, when I was worried because scientists were worried about the upcoming ice age, which didn't happen.

@@retiefgregorovich810 well, I also remember that prediction but the methane makes co2 look like a child’s Chemical playset. Regardless, we’re all in for a ride and consequences. If what you see as normal in your 50-60+ years, then you’re not paying attention. Ice age was a planetary alignment which should have snapped us back into cooling. That worked in a pre-agricultural world. It’s no longer the rule with all the driving inputs. I know, I know….yammer, yammer dooms day.

@@retiefgregorovich810 this is what they were talking about. In the 70s we just know more about it now makes it worse.

Anytime someone starts a sentence with fascinating I then have to read it in Spocks voice lol

So the delivery has become much more casual and realistic. I've not heard him before but I can tell you he could also sound authentic if instead of reading from a script at a rate of knots, he were to speak from the heart at an intelligible speed which gave the listener (there's nothing to view) those vital moments for the meaningful assimilation of such important information. Is it possible to play this video at a slower speed?

Thank you Vivalaleta. I appreciate your feedback :-)

@@tdowl Just click on the gear at the bottom of the video and pick whatever speed you want from one quarter speed to two times normal.

It's better now. In previous video his delivery was much darker, and that's the last thing we need right now.

Lets say he is a qualified liar

Macpherson is a loon.

“If” it has happened before, it isn’t due to “ human activities “ ( even though they “may” accelerate the process); it’s obvious that there isn’t nothing we can do to stop it! Nature is the Master.

Increased CO2 is greening the deserts, enough with your bullshit fear mongering....

Keyword "on" you survive inside it.

Climate change will not lead to a dead planet... I do not think anyone is suggesting that...

Vast ice discharge from the Laurentide sheet that covered half Canada 2 km thick. It gots the characteristic red mud from Hudson's Bay (the sea not the smashing fashion & jewellery store) dumped it down the Atlantic Ocean. They aren't agreed on the reason for the 23 incidences over 85,000 years of these vast ice discharges from Canada into the Arctic Ocean & Atlantic Ocean but the "binge-purge" bulimia theory where it just got too much ice on Canada and needed a purge has been largely refuted. I don't know where the science is on that, think it's till uncertain. Dane Greenland Dorthe Dahl-Jensen only said it's curious that something happened first and the other thing after rather than the switched around way "you would think" but I've forgotten all the details. The final one was famous as "Younger Dryas" from Europe plants but it was probably the same cause as the other 22 events during the 85,000 years preceding. For study search for Dansgaard-Oeschger (DO) events and Heinrich ice-discharge events and if you want easy-listening videos rather than documents there's Jerry McManus at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-J-YW8Y0ooPg.html and old stuff at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-I9MVmRCz9-M.html and ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8xPAx5IJbX0.html I listened to in 2013 and forgot long ago.

It doesn't fit the human induced narratives.

Mammoths farting ?

@@jcoker423 IDK! Fred and Wilma Flintstone were living pretty high on the hog 🤣🤣

Exactly my thought. If it has collapsed multiple times, is this not just a cyclical event? Is green house gas the cause or something else? When I was a kid the climate science was predicting another ice age by now.

Yes, it will happen within the next 10-20 years or so, the Beaufort gyre is long overdue for spilling over. ru-vid.com/group/PLHSoxioQtwZcqdt3LK6d66tMreI4gqIC-

That's the main thing: we know that all the world should collaborate to slow down or reduce the climate change trends but, at the same time, we also feel that tha's an unrealistic expectation!

Thanks Heather. Much appreciated :-)

Absolutely 🙏 , The narrator does a wonderful job , Keeping it simple analytical and EZ to comprehend ‼️

And fill your head with shite 😂

Right, just follow the science follow the data and don't allow the "masses" to hear or see any of it😳

These facts you mention might still be caused by the natural cycle that stops the AMOC, since the AMOC has stopped many times before in the history of our planet. I do not deny that our polution has global consequences. But we have to know wheather the due stopping of the AMOC is solely caused by antropogenetic warming or that the natural cycle is the main mechanism. In the latter case there is no preventing the collaps of the AMOC and hence the next ice age.

As posted by someone else..... The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from the Consulate at Bergen, Norway. Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds. Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coast cities uninhabitable………I forgot to mention that this report was from November 2 , 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post 100 years ago. The climate has been changing for 4,500,000,000 years, you cannot fathom that number and I bet the aholes destroying art can't even tell you what a billion is. BTW I am typing underwater in NYC since we have been under water for 23 years now.

@@Acccountable You know you're facing a professional or voluntary shill when their argument is 1 - hard to verify, 2 - hinges on a single point, 3 - emulates "justified outrage", 4 - ignores literal thousands of papers arguing the opposite.

Just say you don't understand science. That's more palatable.@@Acccountable

@@Acccountable "As posted on Facebook groups of climate skeptic..." FIFY. Climate has changed overtime but there's enough studies and papers to prove humans are now interfering the natural balance of climate. As far as 4.5 billion years of climate change, that's the age of the planet. Doesn't mean it was habitable the whole time. 800 million years ago was the first multicellular life found, and even at that period I bet no human could live. If your best shot is to cite a 100 years old newspaper article where your same "someone else" added the last sentence just for the sake of destroying it... Tinfoil hat ahoy, my dude!

Exactly. I dont know why anybody would say El Nini was preferable.

I think also its a kind of circuit. More global warming, more clouds, more rain, less sun shine... In the past , scientific have shown co2 concentration have never been cause of warming or frozing but everytime a consequence which act like catalyst. So we have catalyst something who ll.be arrived thousand years in the future.

Do you know enough about it to actually understand what he is saying?

@@garywhapples7172 That's why we are here. To learn.

global panic alarmist. pushing your own end of prosperity. mindlessly, glad to do so. speaking to the public that you are more moral than i. while clueless of sacrifices you will not be so enthusiastic to give up when they call your name.

@@LestatTravesty "speaking to the public that you are more moral than i." and rightly so. People like you and Gary ought to check out this video's description and realise that it isn't all a grand conspiracy to take away your freedoms or what not. Many people are already making the sacrifices they need to. Please set aside your bitter, flawed logic.

@@Syonnach - bitter flawed logic is a a cold truth. many people. yes. and that includes me. i heat one room out of the entire house. house was at 52 degrees this morning.. the same people you are listening to, are the ones promoting a war with Russia. sending tens of billions of our tax money to UK along with a whole shi load of bombs. denying multiple attempts at reaching a peace with Putin....goin as far as VILINIZING ELON MUSK for simply mention it. the same people who kissed a billionaires as's..until that billionaire gained power over them all for knowing all their dark nasty lies, secrets and scandals. in which they are now attempting discredit our one any only true genius, Eisteind of our time....Elon Musk. who hands down has been the only one that ACTUALLY is doing something about our carbon emissions i will not listen to them scum bags that you find more creditable than Musk. i will not buy into their end of the world dooms day shi they been scaring you into submission with.

You seem to have achieved my dream. I’m quickly approaching circumstances that would allow a potential relocation to somewhere else in the world to live out my life, in a manner that you describe. Would you please offer some potential destinations for me to research and consider (?) Thank you. May you and your family have a happy, healthy and peaceful new year in 2023.

All species and civilization's die sooner later ,relax enjoy the ride get a wife have some children 😉

@@sharonmartin9645 stop worrying about the planet the planet could care less about you

Sumer became assumed by Akads and then this group known as Assyrians and Babylonians put death nails in it, and to salt the earth the Iranic peoples begin filtering in in mass.

Definitely start prepping (yeah it's going to make you look nuts) but something is going to give out soon

Adapt2030. Humanity under attack

Unfortunately us humans have advanced so rapidly that we convinced ourselves that our silly imagined human world is all there is and everything outside of it is just there for our use. Sure the weeds growing through cracks in the pavement always give me hope. While "intelligent" life may possibly be a short term self destructive phenomenon, life in all it's splendor has been through hellish periods before and is very capable of coming back from cataclysmic events.

Indeed we have known about this for the last 30 years. It's the old chestnut that won't go away. Helped of course by "The Day After Tomorrow" movie. I was in a tech support job by then, and all my fellow nerds were quizzing me on the movie, knowing my environmental background. The number of times I had to explain that, yes, what was being illustrated was absolutely possible, but no, not in the time span depicted by the movie. And further details thereafter. If I had dined out on every explanation I'd have ended up like Mr Creosote. Excellent informative video Dave, as always. I love those dropped articles. Do you do the graphics? I may have asked this one before.

@@martincrotty haven't given up hope that my quiet corner of this world will be mostly spared from cataclysm. That being said I bought a cabin in the woods and have that stocked and ready to sustain me for a year or so (without nuclear fallout so let's hope Russia simmers down 😅)

Younger Dryas.

I recently found out about glacier girl, a ww2 plane in Greenland that was buried under 250ft of snow in just 50 years. It’s hard to reconcile this with record melting that we hear about constantly.

www.aims.gov.au/information-centre/news-and-stories/great-barrier-reef-not-fine-and-nor-it-dying-truth-inbetween And increased snowfall isn't necessarily counter-indicative of rising temperatures. In fact, increased moisture in cold climes could be indicative of warming.

Agreed. These models are speculative at best and passed off as if they are fact. We don't have the understanding or model resolution and processing power to drive it to get to the accuracy needed for the claims made. Sure it is something of concern and the models might be partly correct, but we don't know. History has shown again and again all these predictions to be wrong. The world has a large buffering capacity that addresses most of the sky is falling issues.

The issue is humans stubborn resistance to thinking beyond their own life span. Add this to little to no knowledge of the past. What we do know is basic physics of greenhouse gases. We have pretty good grasp of how much we're adding to our shared atmosphere, oceans. We also know there's no Oil Fairy refilling the holes with hydrocarbons. That the easy fossil fuel finds are nearly non existent. That these fossil fuels provide overwhelming majority of our fertilizer needs, feed stock chemicals for thousands of products. That a spike in their usage since industrial revolution has added 7 billion new humans with 80 million net new precious humans joining us annually. Business uses the idea of leading indicators and lagging indicators to guesstimate the health of their businesses. Problem with leading indicators is you generally don't recognize them until they pass by. For me this is enough to act on! Don't need 'six sigma certainty' or an impending collision with a civilization ending meteor. Thanks for video!

I can't see how you've got fired for calling for better quality assurances. At the very least you are omitting things here and biases opinion against institutions, leading the readers to agree with your statements by defamation, the readers here dont have access to either your firing case and the scientific publishing you mentioned. That being said, pay for publishing and pay for reading scientific articles make for bad information flow. Even worse, only-positive-results publishing eschews scientific advancement, science should also note, pier-reviewed, what doesn't work, but there are no funds for that. Worst, and related to your post, lack of revision for why certain predictions / published papers didn't pan out don't sell, thus we don't get funds for them.

Yep everyone should share this video and all the other ones anywhere they can, we need to get this info out to everyone around the world.

Mister Cyclonic and Mizz AntiCyclonic know, though they certainly don't agree.

Rename it the Beyonce Gyre to increase awareness.

@@robfer5370 what that the amoc shut down *this time* is due to _mans climate change_ ?

they are too busy watching TV and shopping

Not an idiotic thought but extremely unlikely. One of the tiny regions where dense water shoves south and makes half the AMOC push (a bowl 3,000 m deep north of Jan Mayan south of Svalbard-Spitzbergen in the Greenland Sea) is directly on the fracture between North American & Asiatic tectonic plates. However, the AMOC is pushed almost entirely during the winter of course because summer is too warm there to push it, so it's already stopping & starting annually and there's no relationship between earthquakes & volcanoes there and its seasons. The ocean there will rise a tiny amount if the AMOC stops because the surface water running downhill from the South Atlantic will finally get to finish running downhill. Perhaps that will make an earthquake at that fracture zone.

@@grindupBaker Forgive my shallow speculations, my formal education is sadly lacking in most common geology. It is a beautiful process with nuances slow and swift, and I appreciate your explanation of one of so many movements in this world.

Convection. Physiscs is the same in all places.

Well said, John.

Though you have expressed your ideas very well, it would be good to remember that Floridians (highest spot: 345 ft.) can move to Georgia (plenty of land over 1,000 ft. and highest spot: 4,500 ft.) (Might do well to stay away from Alabama, though; Edgar Cayce predicted southern Alabama would sink.)😏 Holland has some land 6 meters below sea level (That's minus 20 ft.) and yet they have been able to cope and even to drive back the sea for hundreds of years, even BEFORE they had electric pumps. In the German language one says, "Es wird nicht so heiss gegessen als gekocht!" ("You don't EAT the soup as hot as you COOK it!" meaning: There are LOTS of theories going round (believe it or not, making us hotter AND colder) and all from good scientists, but not ONE of them knows all the details of what it's going to be like in even forty years... a few things, maybe; everything: NO WAY! Fogedabodit!😉

“Do not rely on your government to save the day.” This is why I do not trust Republicans on global warming. This is your mantra and you derive conclusions from it rather than from what you see. You know well that the only institution even remotely powerful enough to stop global warming is government which you are ideologically opposed to. It is in your interest therefore to deny anthropogenic global warming, so that government will not expand. I warn you that this foolish and myopic viewpoint will come to haunt the Republican Party, particularly in places like Florida. I do not believe in anthropogenic global warming because scientists tell me to. I believe it because it aligns with the evidence that I see and logically follows from things that science taught before we realized anything about global warming. In the past, like the during the age of the dinosaurs, the earth was significantly warmer as a result of higher CO2 levels. That CO2 was sequestered into the crust and the earth cooled, so much so that our era, the Cenozoic, is far colder than that in which the dinosaurs lived. Indeed were it not for volcanism plants would eventually freeze the earth solid. We have spent one and a half centuries releasing the Carbon that warmed the earth in previous eras. Therefore, we should expect the earth’s climate to resemble that of previous eras on account of our activity. This is an entirely logical assumption and we have photographic evidence of it happening. Of course, the story is slightly more complicated in its details, though not in it’s conclusion. Usually volcanism is slightly more effective than sequestration, for most of the past half a billion years the earth has been free of ice caps. Indeed it’s not as if volcanism has been absent from our present Cenozoic era, in fact it’s been relatively steady. Both volcanic carbon emissions and carbon sequestration by plants have both been relatively steady. So why did it change? Well there is another reason why the earth cooled that had nothing to do with the continuous sequestration of carbon. At the beginning of the Oligocene Antarctica froze solid because of the Antarctic circumpolar current, that and the formation of the isthmus of Panama are the real reason why the Cenozoic period has been so cold. Our oceans will “fight” against global warming so to speak because its circulatory system has feedback mechanisms that favor a colder climate rather than a warmer one. But those mechanisms mitigate normal fluctuations in the warmer direction, and this not a “normal” fluctuation. The fossil fuels we burn are added on top of the steady volcanic emissions, and that is happening on a scale that’s orders of magnitude faster than plants could possibly sequester it. The effect that this has is not business as usual; it is much more akin to the eruption of a large igneous province, like the flood basalts of old. Except this time there are no flood basalts, we are dumping the CO2 into the atmosphere. If we keep dumping CO2 into the atmosphere the feedback mechanisms keeping the Cenozoic “ice house” climate in place will be overwhelmed, and the climate will go back to what it was like during the age of the dinosaurs. Bite the bullet, you need not do anything unconstitutional. Even under a strict originalist interpretation, the Tax and Spending Clause combined with the power to raise tariffs gives Congress all the power it needs to fix this problem. The longer you wait the more extremists there will be demanding more “radical” solutions.

So, the experts don't come to the same conclusions?? So much for climate experts! Let's work on things we CAN make a dent in (eliminate waste, war, etc.).

I agree , weve globally unanimously come to the same basic conclusion that something is definitely happening. 🤔 most go to the denial. . To prepare and stay aware . Gov wont tell anything till after the fact . I think Bidens trying to kill us off. Every leader follows . I despise most people so this is the god send to my boredom , we here in suck wv havent had any traumatic weather for a long time , i mean NOTHING !! So these idiots dont believe anything about global warming (what theres a world beyond west virginia.......rescue me ).so many town like this , how do you "wrangle up " all those hueberoustic know it all's that will call you the idiot ?? YOU DONT .😁😂there in lies the beauty of the culling . Better be clever better stay aware . This bot in our hands is another distraction .

We are the "action groups". What we Choose to do, has a profound effect. So choose wisely.

Hi Wayne, could you tell me what you are doing and what have you sacrificed in our pursuit of this goal?

@@mac2658 hi, I have a full solar PV system on my roof with a Tesla powerwall battery back up, for 10 months of the year I supply the entire house and export to the grid, for the other 2 months I just about self sustain our own household requirements, the installation cost me a small fortune! Both cars are hybrids too. What about yourself?

@@jimthain8777 climate crisis has been on the horizon for decades, but fossil fuel company’s have ‘bought’ so many corrupt so called scientists to discredit the real scientists, money and greed is why we are where we are now, is anything going to change?

@@wayneharrison9222 Nothing, I'm doing nothing because it's vastly exaggerated and what you're doing is useless apart from making you feel good. And I suppose by your stuff you are in the wealthy class and fuck poor people who can't afford your toys.

Accurate climate forcasts would surely have to include the prime heat generator.

Basically all chrophyll converts sunlight into atmospheric heat. The green you see is what isn't converted.

There are multiple studies of paleoclimate changes which were massive temp changes that occurred within a few decades or less. Some of the oscillations are very extreme and rapid according to some studies.

​@@dannybrashear5857 Yes. Oceans currents are well known phenomenon and their cycles are 60-65 years from warm to warm ( or cold to cold ). Now they are turning to cold phase again. North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Arctic Oscillation (AO) are already in cold phase . Last time when this happened we were under ice-age threat which suddenly changed to AGW when they turn to warm phase 1978. Now it´s time to panic coming ice-age again (AGC - maybe?). Climate science use these normal changes as possibility to make money. All studies (there were plenty) which proved this oscillation are hidden somewhere because they don´t support climate change (AGW) script.

Ah but is the rasavoir a game changer for curling ? because THAT'S the ice related one.

Global warming is a hoax - temps this year are cooling dramatically - the sun has the reigns

Good work. You were right.

Cheers Brian

OK but the video title is godawful misinformation CRAP. The video & lead comments are fine enough. The AMOC is NOT "global ocean circulation" (the video title), not even close. Perhaps 20% of it, probably less. GLOBAL ocean circulation is driven around Antarctica NOT around Greenland. So normal for the internet, lying clickbait titles to draw attention. Junk-science drivel not the topic of the video.

Agreed... but face could use a bit more contrast.

Thanks Andrew. I think we finally got there!

Probably not because every time that it happened before the bigger deep current from Antarctica simply pushed further north across the equator and all the way to Greenland because the northern AMOC wasn't there to stop it. This happened 18 times during the "ice age" the Greenland AMOC weakened and the stronger deep current from Antarctica simply pushed further north across the equator and all the way to Greenland. The title of this video is moronic lying disinformation drivel because the AMOC isn't "global ocean circulation", not even close, it's only ~20% of global ocean circulation. The water that fills the ocean basins right now is at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HIKgit9mszo.html at 9:01

Thanks a lot

Hard to tell considering the chem clouds which is government interference. Most gardeners would doubt the CO2 story, considering plants are always starving for more. Its the same in Northern California where I have lived my life. Less and less rain since the 80s. Now our weather is more akin to Southern California patterns. Something is going on for sure.

Here’s a thought for your kids. Ask them how much the sea level will rise in the next 10 years. When they say 1-2 meters , say more like 1-2 centimeters. Then point to this guy’s nice chart showing O(1)mm rise per year. Once you ground their expectations in actual science you should be able to tackle the pole shift question with ease 😂

@@Greg-yu4ij 🌎: "Mmm-Huhn, Mother Earth and Mother Nature have been seriously Hot Flashing for awhile.......Mayans chiseled info on stone for future understandings and weather Cycles. Maybe your help will provide accurate info for the younger American kids-students." 🤗

Not where I live, winter weather has been going on since April this year up to December, that's 9 months! All time record rain and cold days in summer

Watch suspicious observers Ben Davidson. Catch up with world events

I sometimes wonder if there is a rescue in mind (not involving Mars, if we can't do it right here, there's no hope for us there) but regarding Bloom Energy. The devices are in-use by FedEx and a couple other Fortune 500. Is there a scenario where a population collapse is welcomed by the few at which point many Bloom Energy devices (the device purportedly converts as much Carbon Dioxide to Oxygen as "tens of thousands of trees", each) are finally powered and begin scrubbing. But then I remember Growth Capitalism and sociopathic billionaires and I think; _"Ohh that's right, never mind."._ Yes, I did re-post instead of edit.

@@arcanondrum6543 the Earth should always have places where people would survive. Even if there was fires or ice. Not everyone would survive and populations would move to more comfortable regions of the Earth.

Thanks Tolley. Much appreciated

@@peacepoet1947 Hopefully the ones to survive would be intellectually honest and emotionally honest but I don't know that there is a strong natural selection for that

@@grgmetube I'm pretty-near certain that there is a strong natural selection against that

Yo Netherlands . . . much love, usa.

Tip: read the about. Groetjes ;)

Thanks. I am not a climate scientist. I have a BSc in Technology and I was a Project Manager before I started the channel. So I am on a journey of learning, just like most folks.

@@JustHaveaThink We had a "Mechatronic Engineer" among our consultants (I'm retired now). They have some snazzy modern education things now. Wonder if I'm too geriatric (& lazy) to earn an Honours Degree in Twittering now Elon Musk has elevated that to the same status as electric cars and space rockets.

No it isn’t. There was a temporary cold Atlantic blob for a year or two, totally normal and happens frequently.

Still there in November 2022, expected to remain until the 2050’s.

There is a tiny anomaly in the western North Atlantic about 1.5c max divergence at the surface.

You didn't mention why is that : REASON IS THAT THE ARTIC IS WARMING UP MUCH FASTER THAN THE WORLD AVERAGE ! AND THAT MEANS HUGE SWEET WATER INFLOW FROM THE NORTH INTO THE ATLANTIC !

@@galoalbertosantanaruiz5737 And arctic warming is easily explained by increased weakening of the global magnetic circuit and pole shift. and the resulting influx of solar and cosmic plasma radiation and their interaction with the earth's atmospheric and solid electric circuits.

Thank you :-)

You lost your credibility when you denied the pandemic and insulted all the hardship and deathes caused by real sickness and of course made much worse by the stupidity of a certain delusional political right wing fanatical cult

Agreed, and this citizen ennui or fear about actual scientific facts translates into giving up or joining science deniers, such as those who believe in a global conspiracy to control people’s minds.

Thank you Anne. I really appreciate your feedback.

Shameless apple polisher.

You might like my content too.

@@JustHaveaThink 🌎: " 🙂🖐" ..................

No time for learning in schools anymore. There`s an agenda to force into young skulls now. Besides, math is now considered racist so we have to lower all standards of education so nobody gets their feelings hurt or learns the truth about reality or real history. All of that must now be erased and rewritten to fit the new narrative of division and hate. Lots of money is at stake.

There is more money in destruction and misery vs peace and harmony. Wars need money and politicians are invested in wars. Trump was the only President in decades that didnt start a war or continue one.

Your iPhone battery will be the least of your problems.

@@incognitotorpedo42 I think he knows that :)

A number of obviously previous human species have gone extinct mostly due to climate changes. And when chaos happens and no one is able to cool the spent rods we will have massive Fukushimas and that will burn off the ozone layer and a barren rock will remain like Mars.

"I'm glad to hear someone is studying the AMOC". All kinds of scientists are studying the AMOC non stop of course. There are AMOC specialists. The US Clivar videos I listen to have an AMOC series (among other topic series).

@sdkjl5984 I wasn't Alarmed about this 6th Extinction Event kerfuffle until you pointed out my iPhone charger might stop working. Thanks for nothing !

I had thought it was mostly ships' diesel. Just a general assumption though, perhaps not applicable to Arctic. Never heard about the vehicle tyre rubber particles thing before.

@@grindupBaker not diesel, high sulphur bunker C fuel

Not for long is a very relative term. Either way it would be catastrophic in the short term and for a long time after.

@@lrvogt1257 Yup, "not long" could easily be a decade (or more) before the salinity disparity is great enough to kickstart the circulation again. Once halted, that is a lot of water to get moving again.

@pedrolopes3542 Your thermodynamics & oceanography are wildly incorrect there. It isn't esoteric like, say, quantum physics, but it does take some hours of quiet actual fact gathering & study to produce a worthwhile thought. For example, I pondered the +ve feedback aspect of the AMOC force starters from scratch & realized the +ve feedback aspect for 8 hours in June 2020 while plastic kayaking and just a month ago heard Stefan Rahmstorf (mentioned in his video) mention a talk what I had deduced in June 2020, the +ve feedback aspect which causes "tipping point " and a bi-stable state arrangement. It does need a basic science education like British 6th Form and some genuine quiet studying though, not just a quick babble from the hip like yours. It's good that you're trying to think though.

@@grindupBaker that's a lot of words to say absolutely nothing useful.

@@dalel3608 Long is a relative term. It would certainly be long enough to be catastrophic.

Just shut everything down that emits greenhouse gases. People will figure out alternatives pretty quickly if fossil fuels are cut off completely.

More the bureaucracy’s thumb, which is backing EV’s and AI now

We are the only species that won't slove a problem because it's to expensive or doesn't make us money

@@cxngo8124 and hurts the average citizen by making it expensive to live due to more climate taxes and implementation of policies

@@cxngo8124 those china batteries... CO2 is .004% of our atmosphere... More people in larger countries are producing way more... Authoritarianism is the only way to solve this and we can't even agree to not make nukes.

Can you say a bit more about the temporary sea level rise? I find this an odd concept outside of tidal and weather timescales

@@sammason2300 As the Gulf Stream moves north the water is deflected east by the rotation of the Earth aka the Coriolis effect. This lowers sea level along the East Coast. If the stream weakens then sea level to it's west rises.

I think it's wilful ignorance at this point, oil is so profitable that governments are encouraged to plug their ears and shout till something catastrophic happens.

@@vaga4239 I think it's criminal.

its all bullshit.

Spread the word, send links to Dave's videos

Thanks MrEd. I appreciate your feedback :-)

Why are climate engineering operations not being disclosed as the largest contributing factor to this collapse? The U.S military is completely manipulating our weather with technologies like HAARP. Upper level wind currents are manipulated thus effecting ocean currents. The elephant in the sky continues to be ignored to the peril of us all.

@@martincotterill823 yeah. Send the love to Chyna. Climate change is purely a western economic destruction tool unless they get into the game. Then it'll be a global economic destruction tool.

Manhattan has been underwater since 2015. Nobody cares.

We’re now forced to do both

"We should be prevving" There is no WE. Prev if you wish.

@xIcyStarzz "It's literally too late. All you can do now is get ready" The deadline passed 5 minutes ago. Or was it 40 years ago? It is difficult to keep track of all these predictions.

There is We and we should not prevent. Prevent is a mean to control. Controlling implies to alter the natural flow. Time on tine interfering with nature turns out to be a bad idea.

You got a plan to keep the ocean running?

We just haven’t evolved as a species. I hope the next civilization gets it right.

Thank you very much. I appreciate that feedback :-)

The financiers pay the experts who give them the answers they want.

@@richardsmith579 that's nonsense. Would you accept money to destroy the planet on which you and your family live? Then why do you assume "the experts" would? The financiers have no need to pay experts, because nobody listens to the experts. They instead own the media and modulate the presentation of facts in such a way, that public remains aligned with their profit goals.

Subtle climate denial? or just real unbiased un-politicised science, the simple truth is non of them or us really know, and we humans have no control over the universe. Live well now and the future will take care of itself.

If you post something that builds a human induced Co2 climate crisis you will get a lot of well read people who understand that this is a WEF agenda. Many also understand that the climate has always changed and will continue to do so whether we have a personal carbon credit system or not. Also scientists who study solar activity had predicted the coming 2030 freeze back in 2015 however they have now been silenced. Maybe you need to do some research yourself I’d start with the WEF personal blockchain linked carbon credit system.

What do you mean "Climate denial?" No one denies climate exists and changes. Just name climate prediction climatologists have gotten correct. Islands like the Maldives were predicted to have been flooded by now, they've risen by several meters. Our planet has benafitted from more co2. Our biggest danger is pollution, plastic in the ocean. What have you got to say about climatologists adjusting some of the records to make warming appear true, or worse than it is? I can provide graphs by NOAA and the IPCC that have removed the medieval warming period and the 1030s warming.