Acquilla Clemons - Witness to the shooting of Dallas Police Officer J. D. Tippit 

Dealey Plaza - The End of Camelot to see what really happened with all the conspiracy theories. The FBI agent in charge of tracking Marina Oswald James Hostsy harassed her and Ruth Paine unmercifully setting Lee off. They had no idea where Lee was or that he worked at the Texas Book Depository. Lee went to the Dallas Office looking for FBI agent James Hostsy. He was not in. Oswald was screaming and making threats to see him. He handed a note to his secretary to give to him in an envelope, contents not seen. On Friday, November 22 at 12:30 p.m., JFK was shot. On Sunday at 9:30 a.m., November 24, Agent Hostsy and the FBI Station Chief met at the Dallas FBI office and flushed down all notes and information about Oswald and his wife down the toilet. What about that Conspiracy? In my research for Dealey Plaza - The End of Camelot, I went to Swarthmore College Library’s Ruth Paine section. I spent three mornings reviewing Oswald’s information. I viewed a rough draft of a letter Oswald had scribbled on a plain piece of paper that Ruth Paine had found in her house. It was a strange, rambling letter with uneven margins all broken up, revealing a confused state of mind. I have studied people’s handwriting most of my life. His handwriting was unclear, meandering across the page, very childlike, a scribble in places, unsteady with no continuity. His grammar poor. A bizarre letter - wandering, nonsensical. What engrossed me was his “Signature Block.” It was a jumble that screamed an indescribable horror leaping out at me from the page, frightening me, captivating me for minutes. It was like looking into hell only worse. I saw the “Embodiment of Evil,” a horrifying numbing experience, a horror beyond description.

She's mistaken and the conman Mark Lane is manipulating her...don't let him trick you too.

If you're referring to Mark Lane's manipulations and invention of 2 shooters in his book, one of the shooters being "short and stocky with bushy hair", then are just choosing to believe his story over the consensus of the witnesses. That's not too credible or compelling.

@@peterfraser9070 No nothing of Mark Lane or his book. Why aren't you focusing on what this woman is saying? This WITNESS sounds credible and compelling to me!

We know fully well he manipulated the people before the interviews into thinking there was a def conspiracy and that others knew this too and they ought to as well, and he encouraged this lady to think that her mistake of thinking there was someone else with Oswald was correct.

And th other witnesses don't back up the 2 gunmen lie.

@@peterfraser9070 The woman said that there was only one gun - therefore there's only ONE gunman. Why are you erroneously banging on about "the 2 gunman lie" - nobody else is.

I think I might be losing mz mind, but for some time I think that the Universe does not want this revealed still. :D Maybe it will be revealed why and who killed JFK close to the end days.

Jack Ruby was in the Dallas Morning News office building buying an add for his strip club when Kennedy was shot. Witnesses reported Ruby was so devastated by the assassination he was visibly upset and had to sit down for “a while.” Tippet was shot just 45 minutes after Kennedy so I think it stands to reason that it wasn’t Ruby.

She described one of the shooters as tall and thin and one as short and chunky. Clearly Oswald was not 'Tall."

@@DavidArbuckle-sc8zc Crawford and Ruby, perhaps??

@@DavidArbuckle-sc8zc David, this lady was full of crap. 8 different witnesses including a cab driver and maid who witnessed the shooting would pick Oswald out of a police line up. Virginia Davis literally SAW Oswald throw the empty cartridges from his .38 into the bushes as he ran from the murder scene. Ballistics would 100% match those spent cartridges to the gun Oswald was arrested with. Come on brother, Oswald pulled out a fully loaded revolver and pointed it at 30 cops as they cornered him in the Texas theatre. Does that sound like an innocent “patsy” to you??? Oswald is guilty as hell for both JFK and the Tippet murders.

That's who I was thinking.

Yes. Ruby.

That's what I was wondering....

That's been the scuttlebutt for a while now.

Exactly what I was thinking,

What do you think her disappearance suggests?

@@wizardglick1coverup lol

@@wizardglick1they did it to many other witnesses as well lol

@@jamesbaka1206 I thought maybe she took herself off the radar, hiding. Because she was frightened

@@wizardglick1 they did hv radars in the home back then, for her to step off of

I'd like to think that she stayed well. Roger Craig didn't even leave, he just kept telling the truth. Imagine; to have a policeman like that but instead of a promotion, evil won in the Dallas PD.

They knew she was telling the truth that’s why they hid this gem interview 💯

Almost everybody that was a witness like this came up missing or mysteriously died

She was told to shut up or... So she left.

@@arcanondrum6543 That leads me to this question. If you watch closely any fil footage showing the swearing in of president Johnson on Air Force One, you will see Dallas police chief Jesse Currie being there. I thought that only federal people would be present at the swearing in. Yes being chief of police of an important city like Dallas is a high position, but it is part of local government . I am prepared to be corrected about this.

Oswald shot Tippit. He was seen doing it. The shells were matched to his gun. He was caught red-handed minutes later trying to shoot a second cop. He observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die," after asking about the penalty for cop-killing. Etc.

@@aaronz7056 Where do you come up with this stupidity? Originally they reported Tippit was killed with an automatic and then changed it to a revolver that Oswald had. Why would there be shell casings at the scene if Tippit was shot with a revolver? I have read several books on the subject and can pretty much shred anything you have to say on the subject. I have actually done research so you are wasting your time with me but go ahead and try to mislead others.

Of course he was the killer of Tippet. Don’t be a conspiracy nut

@@paleo704 You ever wonder what "the conspiracy's" Plan B was if Officer Tippit simply outdrew and captured his attacker, blowing the whole plot? lol

@@aaronz7056 The first reports were of an automatic weapon and that came from eye witnesses and officers first onn the scene. SGT Hill who was actually on the scene broadcast over the radio that the shells were automatic casings! You can't deny that part as it is a matter of public record and no way he made that mistake as they say AUTO on the base! But they took care of that little discrepancy, just like everything else that didn't fit! Do you honestly think that Lee would unload his revolver right there at the scene and throw the shells on the ground at the crime scene? Come on A-Rod......

Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses.

@@aaronz7056, Eye witnesses, people who were right there -- like the eye witness in this video -- say that J.D. Tippit was shot by a short stocky man. That's not Lee Oswald. Of course, Lee Oswald was murdered two days later, so he was never charged and never able to properly defend himself.

@@aaronz7056 So this woman is lying? Were YOU THERE? judging by your reaction you are only believing the WC witnesses who, Funny, all have lived a nice life... this woman here was never heard from again after this interview. GYHOOYA!!!

@@ILSRWY4 Oh, of course, she was accurate and everybody ELSE was lying... lol Clemons's words, and God knows she didn't even see the actual shooting, make it clear enough she saw at best a shooter and a bystander who was almost certainly Benavides or Cimino, never mind that: - other witnesses much closer to Tippit than Clemons said there was but one shooter - Oswald owned and possessed the revolver the shells were matched to - as I just said, nearly a dozen witnesses ID'd Oswald - Oswald was soon plainly seen trying to hide from and dodge police - Oswald was soon caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop - Oswald fought police so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him - Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing - there is no point in risking attacking a cop on a public street since Oswald is already being sought anyway - there is on logic in attacking a cop since if anything goes wrong here, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they just end up confirming a conspiracy exists...

👍😔

Then handed off his pistol to Oswald, who conveniently discarded his jacket afterwards and tried to commit suicide by cop after that?!.. lol.. Are you sure?.. lol..

Lemme help you.. If the killer discarded a jacket, and Oswald discarded a jacket?.. You may wanna consider those 2 dudes were actually the same dude.. You’re welcome!.. Smh..

@@jacobjones5269 Doe some research.....after you are educated on the subject......we'll talk.....

@@johnhyde7297 Haha… I’m betting I can deconstruct your “research” in about 30 seconds?.. lol.. Don’t believe me?.. Try me..

you are right.

THIS, which is flatly contradicted by other witnesses, is "all you need to see?"

@@aaronz7056 Post links please. Why did Tippit's killer eject the spent rounds and reload?

@@stevestars303 What the hell do you mean, "post links?" How about the investigation and the testimony? Oswald was plainly seen ejecting the shells manually and presumably he was expecting further trouble, as he soon demonstrated when he was caught red-handed trying to shoot the next cop to approach him.

@@aaronz7056 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9pivIGJXjxg.html

yea, and now where is she.

"Someone didn't want her to talk" about what??? Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses, and you are saying some conspiracy took pointless risks gunning down a cop on a public street in front of witnesses just to frame Oswald, who's already on the run anyway? What happens if Tippit simply outdraws his attacker and blows the whole plot?

I heard he had a girlfriend there

I was hoping someone else would say it because when I mention it I get kicked around by Warren Report Apologists, for telling "lies". She was a waitress at Austin's BBQ, where Tippit worked part-time. They had reportedly a child together as well. It was also a known hangout for Ruby and Oswald. And Ruby was seen having coffee there with Tippit a few days before the Assassination.@@ceciliapreziose3783

That's exactly what I was asking myself. Those questions seem elementary...

"One woman said, "Tippit's Car was parked in front of the house where he LIVED.": Why wouldn't Tippit have parked his police car in front of his own house?? Come on, give it a rest.

As usual, you have completely missed the point. The question is not, why wouldn't he park in front of his house? The question IS why would anyone think he lived there when he clearly didn't and didn't patrol that area? He was recognized because he was there all the time because his lover lived on that street at that home. So obviously there is more to this story than meets the eye, and is probably way beyond your comprehension. @@peterfraser9070

Jacket was matched to Oswald's shirt and how the hell does any conspiracy know Oswald will decide at the last minute to put on a jacket AT ALL, plus then discarding it. Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses, owned and was in possession of the revolver to which the shells were matched, was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop minutes later, and observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking police about the penalty for cop-killing. And you just sit there lecturing the killer was "most likely Jack Ruby...."

W🤔W

Ruby is a known killer. Am I right? His apartment where he lived with Crawford was three blocks away. Ruby and Crawford fit the descriptions of the two men at the scene PERFECTLY. LHO never shot anyone (just like he said). Jacket matched to Oswald's shirt? What does that even mean? Oswald was never at the Tippit scene, period...just like he was never at the 6th floor window of the TSBD. It would be natural for anyone fleeing the Tippit scene (Crawford) to discard clothing. Criminals do it all the time. How do you explain the FACT that Officer Westbrook "found" LHO's ID at the Tippit scene? Woops.... LHO had it with him when arrested at the theater, too. Lol. The setups are all painfully obvious to anyone paying attention. Ruby and Crawford were known criminals and Ruby had DPD/FBI/Mob ties. LHO was a fake Russian defector (I'm sure you're aware that CIA/ONI had a fake defector program in 1960). When he returned here he was more useful to the CIA as a patsy...exactly what Lee said he was. Get over it.@@aaronz7056

​@@aaronz7056why would Oswald have on a jacket? There are no photos ever shown showing him in the habit of wearing one. I live in Texas and can tell you that there rarely is ever a need for a jacket, and there certainly wasn't that day. Most men in the crowd in the crowd were in shirt sleeves, the car was open and no one was wearing winter clothes. Only one of the photos given in public evidence shows him wearing anything other than a Tshirt is when Ruby shot him. He had a sweater on then. I think there was a photo of him at the book depository in a white shirt. The whole problem that you and every other person that thinks as you have is the admission of Dallas Co sheriff that they really didn't have the evidence to convict him of anything. The other thing that chaps my rosey red derriere about you folks is the idea that someone who had just shot and killed the POTUS would walk to a bus stop, catch a city bus away from the scene and hang around in his neighborhood. Look maybe you think someone who learned Russian in a year's time well enough to speak it somewhat fluently is stupid, but I don't concur. One might get away that way murdering an ordinary citizen, but it was anything but ordinary. Witnesses by the dozens were ignored/not included in the investigation that contradicted every assessment the WC proposed--witnesses who just year's before were in combat in WWII. They testified to multiple locations and multiple shots. The 1st hit the pavement missing the target completely. Then you have the physically impossible idea that Jack's head exploded and a goodly portion of his skull went backwards caused by being struck from the rear. Anybody who knows rudimentary ballistics knows it AINT SO. Many witnesses reported hearing two shots fired close enough together that they almost sounded as one, a physical impossibility for even a semiautomatic rifle much less that Italian pos war surplus. Those witnesses were war veterans mostly well versed in the sound of rifle fire in combat. No, my friend, I'm a shooter who rolls his own well versed in small arms ballistics. I've shot fuzzy tailed rats running through hardwoods in E TN & MIDDLE TN. It's hard enough to find and hit a moving target using iron sights. With that pos that Oswald owned and its tube sight, it would be next to impossible to put two kill shots out of 3/4/6 (depending on which group of witnesses you believe) into JFK. Given all the high muckyups that hated Jack, head of FBI, freshly fired head of the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, LBJ, organized criminals--you name it--everybody who was somebody in DC wanted Kennedy dead and were very vocal about it. Then you want suggest that I should take the word of the main suspect/s who were guilty of the assassinations of dozens of world leaders all over the world, hawks in Congress and the Pentagon not wanting peace as a topic with a POTUS talking of nothing but, and, as far as CIA ops go it, went about as good as they ever did. Come on, get real.

@@ronaldharding3927 How's this for getting real? Your "rarely needing to wear a jacket" is your idea of "evidence" exonerating Oswald, as is "how often do you see him wearing one???????? He had to use a bus, he didn't own a car. He didn't "just hang around his neighbourhood," he was heading out. His learning Russian in decent time is "evidence" he wouldn't have made dumb mistakes during his little killing spree??????? You seem unaware blood and gore went in all directions, splattering everybody seated forward in the limo as they all firmly testified. Any idiot just watching Zapruder's film will clearly see several seconds separate each of the 3 shots, for crying out loud. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Connally's said the shots all came from behind. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind. Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a perfect trajectory, tracking straight back to the window. View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy's massive exit wound seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos demonstrating the shots came from behind. Witnesses a few fee directly under the window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. You are bursting blood vessels straining to let Oswald off the hook.

Nearly a dozen witnesses ID'd Lee Harvey Oswald.

🖒

@grumpymf8913 Greetings fellow traveller. Who do you think she possibly seen? Crafard(Crawford) and Ruby? I wonder? You know throughout her life Marie Tippit (atleast publicly) bought the Oswald story. I have to wonder if privately she had her doubts.

@@jackpalance9509 Oswald wasn't short and heavy nor tall and slim. Ruby and Crawford fit those descriptions. The jacket found belonged to Crawford and was later traced to California by @lordbuckley

There is no evidence Oswald had any "handler."

Atlee Phillips.

@@jeffeverett274 Swell. There is no evidence Oswald had any "handler." Enough with the crackpot conspiracy rubbish.

@@aaronz7056 The Chicago assassination attempt was thwarted .....because of an informant tip by the name of Lee.....

patsy

@@jeffreyrichardson-fe4fw Nah, Patsy wasn't fat either. Could be Patsy's brother though.

You are sick and obscene, just giving your middle finger to the family of a decorated police officer who lost his life in the cause of his duty as you accuse the man without evidence of being a conspirator so long as it suits your crackpot "theories," hope you are proud of yourself. This is not a parlor game.

RIP the people he made no attempt to warn about the deathtrap they were visiting at Jonestown as he ran away and saved his own ass while they were getting gunned down at the airstrip.

not amateurs,the us government.

Okay, name the problems please.

Okay: -He’s leading Ms Clemons! -He’s not going into any depth beyond what he wants Mrs. Clemons to portray (eg. what were you doing when you heard the shots.) -He’s not asking obvious questions that would diminish her veracity (eg. how far away were you from the shooting? In truth she was 300 feet away!) -Her observations were made from far away and her descriptions were probably mistaken (ie. the ‘bushy haired man’ was a perfect description of Domingo Benavides.) -Mrs. Clemons is not answering the questions naturally. She answered the questions without any thought as if she knew what was coming-as if she’d been primed to answer a certain way-unnatural witness response. -A prosecution lawyer would have a field day with her and her responses! If you’d like more I could go further but this video has many potential problems. There’s no way a defense lawyer would put her on the stand giving this type of testimony!

He was wearing a jacket, and she was far away.

Because there were no conspirators, of course. Mark Lane knew this.

LIAR! Prove it. She was NEVER heard from again after this interview.

Even if she was saying that maybe her life was threatened if she didn't lie. Look what happened to Ruby Freeman in 2020. There are some dangerous people in power who are desperate to remain in power!!@@thespy7795

⁠@@thespy7795prove that she was never heard again???

Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing. The shells were matched to his gun. He was plainly seen trying to hide from passing police. He was plainly seen ducking into the theater to dodge more passing police. He was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop. He fought so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him. He observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.

@@aaronz7056the shells didn’t match Oswald’s gun. Two slugs were removed from Tippit’s body, a .38 revolver and a .38 automatic.

@@wanyedrumrace What the hell did I literally say above? The shells were matched to his gun, he was using different types of ammo, and different types of ammo were found in the revolver. Who the hell do you THINK shot a cop on a public street at that exact time, in that exact location?

@@aaronz7056there were actually 4 slugs removed from Tippit’s body, all from an automatic pistol. So I was wrong before. And a fifth slug fell from one of Tippit’s buttons at the hospital later, it was also from an automatic. Every witness testimony seems to change each time. Some say they definitely saw Oswald fleeing the scene, others say they saw a short, fat man and a tall, skinny man leaving in different directions. When Oswald tried firing his revolver in the theater, it misfired due to a misaligned firing pin. Oswald was also seen with both Tippit and Ruby prior to the assassination at a cafe near Oswald’s rooming house.

@@wanyedrumrace J. D. Tippit's family have now had to endure 60 years of watching armchair detectives smugly accuse the man without evidence of being a conspirator so long as it suits their crackpot "theories," hope you are proud of yourself spewing this bull. Firing pin got misaligned during the struggle in the theater when Officer MacDonald got his hand caught in it and yanked the gun away from Oswald, who you oddly neglected to mention was trying to shoot him. Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses, in fact. Who the hell do you THINK was gunning down a cop on a public street at that exact location at that exact time???

TWA 800 didn’t explode on its own.

All evidence and logic points to Oswald.

@aaronz7056 Are you a bot? We are expected to believe Oswald pulled off two monumental crimes within 40 minutes of each other and was miraculously able to get away from both of the crime scenes, only to be caught sitting at a movie theater... This woman contradicts the official Tippit story. And as for JFK, we have common sense as the evidence: One person cannot fire that many shots, and do that much damage, to two people, at a sniper's distance, in a moving vehicle, with a BOLT ACTION RIFLE, and still hit the target, in that short span of time. Do you know how a BOLT action rifle works? Do you know how long it takes a person to re-attain aim between each shot? Answer those questions please. This would make LHO a better rifleman than any other human being on the planet.

@@kalyddessalines769 No, I just see value in alerting the unwary to when they are being misled by conspiracy theorists so paranoid they assume anybody not on board for this crackpot rubbish must be a "bot." Oswald's timing: Oswald managed to get out of Dealey Plaza, he panicked and shot the first cop to approach him, he was seen trying to hide from passing police and seen ducking into the theater to dodge more passing police, you can't figure this out? Clemons' story: "This woman" didn't even see the actual shooting and her words make it clear she saw at best a shooter and a bystander who was almost certainly Benavides or Cimino. You neglected to mention that other witnesses much closer to Tippit than Clemons firmly said there was but one shooter, and in fact nearly a dozen witnesses ID'd Oswald as the man they saw shoot Tippit and flee. The same Oswald caught red-handed minutes later trying to shoot a second cop and who observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing. The same Oswald who owned and was in possession of the revolver to which the shells from the crime scene were matched. Oswald's rifle: Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds. That's child's play for a Mannlicher Carcano. Oswald's wife saw him practice with that bolt-action rifle for hours on end. For just two examples, you can see Josiah Thompson in Who Killed President Kennedy and John K. Lattimer in Beyond Conspiracy easily operate that kind of gun within that time frame. Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorecard and Kennedy was a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Witnesses a few feet under the sixth floor window firmly said all 3 shots came from directly over their heads ("Boom, click, click, boom, click, click, boom, click, click...").

@@aaronz7056You’re a shill

@aaronz7056 New 2023 CBS documentary "JFK: What the Doctors Saw" admits that there was an entry wound from the front and one from the back. Do you care to explain how Oswald acting alone could shoot him from the front and from the back? Are you now willing to revise your wrong position?

I just can't say it enough. You are a certified Bozo.

Nearly a dozen witnesses? Helen Markham and who else? "Witnesses to the shooting".

they were wrong

@@jeffreyrichardson-fe4fw Of course, she was right, and all of them were wrong, including the one he exchanged words with. As were the people who matched the shells to his rifle, the witnesses who saw him trying to hide and dodge passing police, and the 3 policemen injured just disarming him when he was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop minutes later. Since you are saying somebody else shot Tippit, we look forward to you explaining what the hell the point is of attacking a cop on a public street since Oswald is already on the run anyway and obviously if anything goes wrong in Oak Cliff, such as Tippit simply outdrawing and capturing his attacker, they will just end up confirming a conspiracy is operating.

@@aaronz7056 Did she lie about the threats? Shut up or else? Not the first witness to report this sort of behaviour. In the 60's in the UK we had the Kray twins ruling the East End of London. If they told you to shut up, you stayed shut up. The CIA has tried to manipulate regimes in various parts of the world. If people in the wrong places needed to be disposed of, they were disposed of. Or I am fantasising again? 🙂

Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses. Who do you THINK gunned down a cop on a public street, never mind the shells were matched to his gun and he was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop minutes later.

*_@aaronz7056_* ☑

How can someone be a color? 😂 Did you mean ‘moron?’ 🤡

What is a maroon ? Merci

Hardly.

You cant handle the truth

By your comment you are extremely ignorent of the extensive research Mr Lane has produced thru his investigation!

🙄

wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Final_Judgment.pdf