AI and Quantum Computing: Glimpsing the Near Future 

Agreed

Im here at an average of 9 atm.

@@AIroboticOverlord fucking facts

A reference to 6.66 perhaps?

It grabbed me and I watched to the end I was like , ok … I’m watching this

I like Brian but he needs to learn an interview format. Let your guest answer your question especially when they ask for the opportunity.

I could not agree more.

I'm delighted that you found your purpose. This warms my heart ❤️ and delights my soul. May you continue to delve into this new purpose of yours and find what your purpose means for all of us. Now let us pray 🙏 . Thanks 😊

I was exactly the opposite

Says the AI

So glad to hear that you reached your goal. 💪 ❤️ 🌎 Awesome. I pray that you reach your next big goal too. 🙏 Thanks 😊

Thank God we know this wasn't written by AI.

Yes but he’s an idiot when it comes to politics. He’s part of that globalist group that want one world government. Listen to him. He gives it away

the is the artificial sentence i ever heard.

so the logical!

Yeah, but I don’t trust it because his politics at the end like pushing the liberal agenda. Gives you an idea in his mind what he wants and that’s what they all want is control. these are egotistical people think they’re better than you and they’re not. They’re just stupid in the way of the world, but brilliant in their respective field.

Precisely! See my above post.

Not to mention such bonehead views on immigration

I am getting chills as I listen to Mr ES

Maybe Eric knows shit that made him appreciate Henry…both of them are (were) the GOAT 🐐 s

is that old walking tumor still alive ?

My exact same observation. He starts out discerning the insane totally immoral mass National Suicide of the Vietnam War, and ends up being best friends with one of it's main spiritually illiterate morally defective Architects? Regarding "AI", this is an absolutely brilliant conversation right up to the minute on what humanity is facing with AI, but I find Eric Schmidt profoundly suspect. Me, U.S. Army, 1969-1971. I had my eyes wide open through the whole experience and took notes. There is no way this morally defective Nation is going to survive. Those who's economy lives by the sword, will die by the sword. We are all on the road to the FINAL SCENE in "THE GAME" as so clearly stated in the profound 1978 PROPHETIC Allegorical Film "The Deer Hunter" which will most definitely be coming in the looming 2040's. Now Retired, I worked 41 years as a Application Development Software Engineer. I loved every single minute of it. But the Dr. Strangelove factor of Eric Schmidt is just too much for me.

Jeez I thought the same thing when he said that. Like…um…ok, so you are an enabler of one of the worst elitist evil-minded humans in the 20th century. No wonder you can be a billionaire with no moral compunctions… 😕

@@ashleyobrien4937 no, worst thing about that, he never had to face a day in court for his warcrimes ... just like Bush W. ... Then again, not like americans still give a shit about a million dead iraqis from an unjust war the populace was tricked into(most rightleaning folk still think there were WMDs ^^ and that Jan 6th was done by antifa hrhr). I guess the next news cycle, the attention span of amebas while somehow thinking they have the devine right to do whatever the fuck they want aka american exceptionalism plays a role in that.

That’s exactly the case

Very scary indeed.

whats the timestamp for this part? I just finished and must have missed it.

Yeah, it very cringey to hear, like he's dikriding kissinger who is known kill many people in multiple wars and genocides

Democracy is a temporary patch to a bigger problem: humans need control because we're savages. I welcome the moment humans will not need any form of control or control will be deemed to something better than us. It's 2023 and we are still at war with each other, we are clearly broken.

Also he starts out by saying Chinas way to deal with the internet is bad. Then proceeds to complain that the US and the west isnt implementing the exact same system of mass surveillance

Big government is technologically illiterate, so we need big corporations to save us from ourselves, Putler, Xi Jinping and their evil minions.

Several commentators are thrown by Eric’s friendship with Kissinger. Men of their times both brilliant and both have remarkable strengths and glaring weaknesses. I’m also guilty of having remarkable friends and hope I’m not condemned for their missteps as I have made enough of my own.

@@martywells9961 Point acknowledged but do YOU have a body count in the millions to show for your oopsies?

You can be friends with people of different opinions and beliefs. Didn't come across that way tbh. Kissinger like Hitler was not all bad. No human is, but he seemingly aligned himself with Kissinger. I do remember Kissinger thinking Mao had the moral high ground when they met and Mao probably thought so too. People are poor judges of themselves. Do No Evil was actually a red flag to delusional infantile minds with no personal insight. Now they are cynical political minds with a facade of moralin their heads to make their elongated lives tolerable ​@@martywells9961

No he just was to nerdy and boring for having liquer booze drugs and having a good time once and a while.

@@AIroboticOverlordAnd, is that bad? …

look at his girlfriends and u see the treatment !

he drinks baby tears

​@@michen25yes

Oh for sure What happens when we simultaneously introduce an alpha intelligence/species and shatter the majority of non labor jobs?

In a sense I feel like you could say that experimentational results or "evidence" as you're referring to it there is effectively proof by demonstration. I guess the funny part is: you don't even really need to understand or know what you are proving. The math does itself, you just gotta look at the results and then try to figure out what the math was before it did what it did. Of course nature has the final word on being the best model for... Itself. But I don't really understand your approach here to downplaying mathematics in terms of it's ability to describe nature. It is eerily effective at describing it. To the point where you get genuinely amazed by it over and over again the deeper you go into studying these things. Hell, Dirac (iirc) discovered anti-matter by correctly interpreting that a square root solution must be positive AND negative. The correct mathematical notation of a square root is the symbol with a + - symbol infront of it. Since two negatives times each other equal a positive. So he discovered anti-matter, before the experimentational discovery of anti-matter (as in, where they understood what it was), without even really knowing what it was except for expecting an opposite charge. In a sense, the mathematics he was doing was more accurate than he intended. It was *better* at describing reality than anyone expected in that specific case. It showed the existence of anti-matter before we discovered the existence of anti-matter. And all because of a rather abstract and generally not very important mathematical fact about square root operations. LOL. So I'm sorry but I genuinely think you are underestimating mathematics. Particularly, although this is personal opinion, I think you're extremely mistaken about mathematics in the sense that we're the ones making it up. We're making up the symbols, we're making up some axioms and trying others just in case, and so on. Our math isn't perfect either, not even close. There are some problems we simply don't have the tools for. (3n+1), Riemann, ... But see that's the thing though. Nature's mathematics, so a theory of everything, IS PERFECT. It cannot be anything but perfectly mathematical. If there are any faults in mathematics, then it lies within OUR interpretation of it. Because the right answers are there to find. The problem is we need the correct tools. And it's very easy to use a wrong tool.

(Terrific explanation, thanks btw) ..So would you say -- and this is only "coincidentally" related to your example -- that for example the discovery of the possibility of the square root of negative (-) numbers and how it has given us a framework for real-world application in electricity, engineering, fractals, etc, could be an interpretation of math/nature that is eerie to us humans because it's true nature may be potentially beyond the scope of human interpretation even though we can still leverage it in practical ways? Just thinking out loud, not trying to get off topic, but that reminds me of hologram universe theories. :)

As someone who does mathematics as a hobby (although kinda passionately so), my personal opinion is that there is absolutely something "eerie" or "freaky" about mathematics. Or at least certain concepts within it that reveal something. Like for example 1/3 = 0.333... 2/3 = 0.666... 3/3 = 0.999... = 1. Like this is the most simple example I can think of and I often bring it up... If you are thinking about this deeply and you don't find it freaky, I don't think you understand it. Maybe I don't either, but I must've gone deep enough to feel the freaky. Hahah. I love this one because it's kinda like a limit in math without being an actual limit. An infinitesimally small number so close to zero that it equals zero. Or an infinitesimally-close-to-1-number, which is so close to 1 that it equals it. You can surely claim more advanced knowledge, I'll concede it. You can go into depth and explain this all you want. But man, isn't this freaky? Something freaky going on there. And this isn't even remotely chaos theory or all that stuff. This is just division and multiplication of fractions, and already we can run into things we don't *really* understand (I think). Well, as far as I know, mathematics is full of that.

I’m not opposed to AI but also please remember that he (literally) has a vested interest in the success of AI.

The beautiful thing about our moment in time is anything you didn't understood fully, you can ask chatGPT or your favorite LLM and ask it to explain it to you in a way you can fully understand. 🙂

Don’t sell yourself short.

as an "to be" teacher (still at the end of my bachelor), i was recently wondering if its still worth finishing my studies with how fast jobs are replaced and i had the same idea about it with it being individualized etc. even maybe an AI-classroom in VR format etc. but i think ploitics and people (parents) will be very slow to adapt (10+ years) even once the tech is there (And ripe). im not opposed to it at all though, will be great. just like wikipedia but SO MUCH MORE.

@@kliersheed yes, finish

Well said. The guy is a powerful deeply problematic sociopath

I meant Schmidt not Herbert