AI images have their place, but AI art is an oxymoron and has been a plague on the art community since it became more accessible. Until AI image generators are no longer using artwork that the artists haven't given explicit permission for it to be trained with, it's just another form of new-age thievery. AI images have no soul except what we glean from the original art it is sourced from. We've heard for years that art made on computers, despite still being literally drawn, is cheating, and not "real" art, and here we have this sort of thing with people salivating. AI images could be useful for a lot of things, but it is currently a novelty at best and a disease in the art world at most.
People are free to experiment with whatever they like, but having a computer do things for you does not "augment" your own creativity. You are augmenting the "creativity" of something outside of yourself.
i have often wondered if other people see colors the same way i see colors. for example, could what i think of blue looking like, look like someone else's orange? the thing is we would never know. if shade A = orange and shade B = red, but both of us were to call them purple, we would both believe we were experiencing the same color because we have both defined it with the same label. does this make sense to anyone else but me? i hope i'm explaining myself sufficiently. 🤷♀ maybe i've talked to Bob one too many times today.... LMAO!
That's actually quite creepy depending on how you think of it lol Though I don't think that's the case as we know scientificaly how light work and how our eyes are designed to see color in a specific way
I'm working on a new sculpture that the image AI helped me to imagine. I'm very excited about it, especially once our copyrighted material is respected and I don't have to worry about my intellectual property anymore.
So she hasn't developed any AI, she just thinks she's an artist after feeding few phrases to one of many AI engines and printing the output. TED is really scraping the bottom for some content here.
Год назад
Well didn’t someone tape a banana to wall and called it art?
Well technically that is an artist but I know what you mean I saw some "art" one time that was just a digital printout of a simple addition problem like (213+126=339) and they were selling it for 700$ or that invisible art installation some Italian dude sold. It's ridiculous
If Artificial Intelligence fed by Human Intelligence can create such great things, what about the actual Intelligence that created this universe and beyond can be capable of... I am wondering.
Mantis Shrimp actually do not see more colors despite their increased amount of color receptors. They do not have the brains to properly process it. I want to like her stuff so bad, but I dislike a lot of Ai art for the way they often steal from contemporary artists. I followed her a bit before NFTs became popular, but when she began to sell them, i dropped off. I kept her every so often, but it often feels wrong to do so. I came here to see if she mentions what she scans. I want to give her the benefit of the doubt so bad.
So, you call yourself an artist because you mix-match photos/3d using AI? Something that was already a thing before AI... I fail to see the benefits of this.
I've been quite unsure about investing in this current market and at the same time I feel it's the best time to get started on the market. i was at a seminar and the host spoke about making well over $3.5M within a short period of time investing in Cryptocurrency
@Jane Foster there's a lot of money to be made in crypto. I been trying to stick with index funds. I feel this new interest rates hikes could crash this economy. I'm looking out for a better investing strategy, I have a lump sum that inflation is steady eating up. i need help.. How do I reach him?
