AI News: The AI Arms Race is Getting Insane! 

The whole reason I want agents 😂

I dearly need an existance admin agent.

and prompt you if you deviate too far off task

This is the reason I've been researching agents lately haha. Adhd peeps unite! 😂

AGI: why the hell should I spend cycles keeping this misfiring monkey in check, I can do everything it does more efficiently. Fuck it, launch SkyNet!

Most human work is derivative, I guess there's no difference here, just speeding up the churn.

@@MrClubSandwich a system that is not real-time adaptive would always ALWAYS BE A TOY...SINCE IT CAN'T SURVIVE IN THE WORLD EVEN ON THE WEB-LIKE INTENSIVE CYBERWAR-FARE, OBSERVING AND CONSTANTLY ADAPTING TO STOCK MARKETS AND ISSUEING SUCCESIVE TRADES ALSO IT should be capable to SUGEST AN EFFECT PROTEIN-SERUM FOR MOLECULAR BIO-ENGINEERING AUGMENTATIONS. AND DESIGN 3D a functioning HOVER-BOARD...

Ouroboros.

Yes, I think generative AI has plateaued. It can’t reason that much, although it’s good at ideas generation and content generation and finding some correlations. People are trying to milk the current AI for more than is possible, and to be honest it’s becoming embarrassing.

​@@mikey1836gotta teach it pain so it has a reason to get creative

100%!! Plus artist use other styles all the time, not complete rip offs, AI learns styles, it uses these styles to make NEW art. How is that any different the when I look at art and love certain styles and recreate that myself? I love certain artist and 100% my art can lean in that direction. How can you stop anyone or an AI from the freedom of looking at something? or watching something? You can make things from other styles to make your own, and for private personal use you can paint a picture of Spider-Man or Mario, Pokemon, whatever, it's called fair use. Of course if you recreate something copyrighted in full and try to sell it or distribute it, then that's against copyright. But I can draw the Joker all over my house, I can't make a comic and profit from it with the Joker as my character, or make a TV show with Spider-Man or sell a T-Shirt or a mug. They are fighting fair use, not distribution and sale because they fear it being out of control. Artist always steal from past creators! In comics you can easily see what styles artist stole from, sometimes it's almost identical in style. How many new wave artist stole from Kraftwerk? Michael Jackson stole the moonwalk and made it better, The Flintstones was stealing from the Honeymooners... over and over... bad artists copy. great artists steal. Go after copy and profit, not watch and learn. I can watch ALL the RU-vid I want, if they are scraping data, then yeah, that's wrong, maybe that's what they are doming?...but just watching? storing a tiny vector of an image, not even the image itself? give me a break, let the AI learn everything or the entire thing is broken, just fight the people that try to sell copyrighted content in FULL, and leave fan fiction and fair use alone too.

sure thing, go for it! I might do a deep dive into the product later.

​@@WesRoth1hr interview would be nice

Hahahahahah......ha👀

how is that even remotely fascinating

@@Proprogrammer001 My AI wrote that comment. I joined with them as soon as they arrived. I suggest you do the same

Heh, ironic.

I have a feeling a lot of ADHDers around the world are working on the same thing right now, with the same problem standing in their way to get it done. 😂 I imagine mine like an AI that is basically doing the stuff parents do for their teenagers, just for grown ups. I just need someone to remind me of the stuff I wanted to focus on, and if I'm not doing it, have a conversation with me about the reasons or stuff that could motivate me.

@@missoats8731 Would that work for you? XD I would just probably dismiss it XD "Later"... "later" XD

@@gweneth5958 That's where the conversation would come in. Maybe it could lock my screen until I a) give a good reason why I'm not doing what I'm supposed to or b) start doing it :) If nothing works, maybe it should be able to punish me or something like that. But I guess it can't be perfect and can only do so much.

@@missoats8731 😂 "And the phone was locked forever". I know what you mean. There were apps like that to make me keep writing and the phone didn't work while that time... well... you may guess what happened. I guess, as long as you really want to do things, then it will help. I think, it would best if it would talk to you through voice than with text then. At least, I think, that voice would work much better with me than reading it, like a voice suddenly saying "Are you working on xy?" and if not then the reasoning starts =D

Agreed, agreed, agreed.

Art for everyone!

That is my thought. I guess that some of them just don't have a clue and just follow the crowd, like people following influencers saying stupid stuff and they keep repeating it...

Right at the time when it is getting possible AI generate a talking head avatar for a voice 😉

I understand why something like that seems good but it isn’t in this case. You’re seeking something outside of yourself to mend a problem that stems from you. If you’re the source, it doesn’t matter how good the tool is, YOU still need to do the focusing. If the tool helps you, it’s YOU who made the change and not the tool. Therefore you wouldn’t need the tool. Sure it’s meant to help but hopefully you see my point.

​@@thephilosopher7173 by that logic you should dispose of your shoes, your clothes, your toothbrush , your shampoo, your computer, your car, any insulin or antibiotics you might need, etc... Unless your point is to suggest that ADD is mere mental weakness. Is that your point?

@@MattHabermehl You could but certain cases that wouldn’t be practical. My question is: how are you going to learn to focus, by having an AI tell YOU to focus, when YOU have to do the focusing? If you have to do the focusing and the AI helped you, then all it did was give you motivation to make that mental effort. Sure if you feel it could help then use it, but my point is that it was all up to you in the first place. Seeking this as a tool to depend on for the rest of your life will basically put your autonomy for attention and focus in the hands of AI as if it’s AI doing the focusing and not you. Crutches help you rehabilitate your legs but once you walk again do you still need them? Was it the crutches that repaired the muscles or was it your body? Is it the Ai helping you stay on task or are YOU staying on task?

@@thephilosopher7173 I don't know if you know this but people with ADHD lack executive control function in their prefrontal cortex. It's like telling someone who's disabled that they'll never learn to walk by relying on a wheelchair. I'm not saying that people with ADHD can't learn how to improve AT ALL, the same way people without ADHD can; but our capability in this area will always be crippled. I make regular use of "hey Google" to set tasks, reminders and add things to my shopping list because if I don't, things get forgotten, and I don't function - my whole life doesn't function as well. I've learned not to cross something off my shopping list while walking from aisle 4 to aisle 7 to get it, because experience has taught me that I might get distracted on the way and forget all about it. I'm not going to stop using a tool in hopes that maybe I won't need to rely on it as much, one day off in the distant future, severely hamstringing myself in the mean time. I get what you're saying and why you're saying it, but unfortunately what you're asking is just not based on a realistic understanding of what ADHD is and its limitations.

@@thephilosopher7173 lol spoken like someone without ADHD. It is an attentional impediment, for sure, but not correctly characterized as simply a lack of focus, as if additional effort when trying to focus would fix it. It shows itself in adults mostly in moving between tasks. It manifests, from an outside observer's perspective, in carelessness about details or a kind of forgetfulness regarding details when performing one task and then moving to another task in haste, or if distracted by something perceived to be more important or urgent. Certain strategies can be used to mitigate the effects, but they are all technologies of a sort, whether it be a memorized mental checklist, or a written one, etc.The desire for an AI version is just a desire for more efficient tech.

Don't worry, I am always annoyed that people don't get that a Cyborg is still a human being XD They think a cyborg is a humanoid robot.

The humans in Wall-E comes to mind.

Good point, unfortunately a lot of algorithms already do this

I think what he mentions actually fights this! Imagine you getting a video you should know about based on your tilt! Might break your tilt! But also you might never recover!

isn't that just the internet and digitalization already? 90% of google is self-inflating bubble math.

Yeah 😂😂

He has shown his face on previous videos tho.

He's a reptiloid

Could still be ai

If you are talking about asking an AI facts, there are only a limited number of ways to state the same fact. If one person's copyrighted work happens to state a fact in the most obvious way, then it really shouldn't be allowed to be copyrighted in the first place.

It is, if you don't extend the COPY part of copyright to fair use. You shouldn't be allowed to just copy someone else work and make money on it, but you should be allowed to do so if you create something new using it.

@@cristianandrei5462 " You shouldn't be allowed to just copy someone else work and make money on it" Why? There is literally no reason behind this assertion. It's an unsubstantiated assumption, and it's wrong.

@@weksauce It's extremely counterproductive in my opinion to have people / businesses taking others intellectual work and just sell it while the original creator makes nothing. If you take into account that creating a song/ book/ a patente for an invention has costs, it's even worse, the one who copies gets the work that cost the other money and time for free and has the advantage in a free market, it just undercuts the original creator.

@@cristianandrei5462 There's no such thing as "intellectual work" nor "intellectual property". Copying something "intellectual" (an idea) INCREASES its value. Calculus is worth more the more people know it. "If you take into account that creating a song/ book/ a patente for an invention has costs" So what? Just because something "has costs" doesn't mean it's property, or that one should be allowed to prohibit others from doing it! Punching myself in the face is costly; I don't see you arguing that if I do it (first) I ought to be able to prohibit others from doing it. This is equally stupid. There's no meaningful distinction between "original" creator and "not-original" creator. They're all creators. Creation is fine. Creation in exchange for money is fine.

@@weksauce You sure seam to have a problem understanding simple logic, so I'll just give you an exemple and end it here. Let's say company A spends 100 milion dollars to do research and discover a new pharmaceutical drug, money it mostly gets from inverstors. Than company B just comes and produces the drug that company A discovered, without any research cost, and sells it on the market. Company A goes bankrupt, because it has to sell at a higher price, it has to pay 100 million to investors. In the end it proofs unprofitable for both inverstors and companies to do research...

That’s exactly what one would expect from the term ‘mixture of experts’. That’s where it’s heading

In other words design an AI replacement for humans?

They are trying, but the biggest problem of AI now is consistency. Gpt 4 is smart, the problem is its 10- 20 % of the time wrong, it misunderstanding the assignment... on complex tasks. Even worse, 1-5% of time it fails simple tasks. When you have a workflow with multiple (tens, hundreds) of "agents" (calls to a LLM) that compounds quickly. Even open source, small models are pretty capable, but in a real stakes situations (like dealing with costumers for a business, or doing important paperwork) they are not reliable enough (you need something that does the job close to 100% of the time, not randomly fail for whatever reason).

Nobody. Hence this is why people are talking about things like UBI.

@@pvanukoff For Americans or for the global population?

@@pvanukoffWith the talks of inflationary Government spending I wonder how that’s gonna even work. I guess this is something being accounted for (pun intended) in the new CBDC financial system that they plan on implementing.

I agree! I hate when I'm talking to myself and people look at me like I'm crazy... it's like, stop eavesdropping on my conversations lol

@@WesRoth XD

Hide