The speed in which humanity is disconnecting itself from its very own roots is frightening. The very things which make us human, cooking, painting, traveling, music, etc are being invaded by AI and mere networks of wires and cables. They might make and do things consistently but with the very number of permutations and combinations with which us humans do things "inconsistently" is what makes it beautiful. We should really carry the mindset of how to make things better as humans than of how to make things less human. It is very hard to imagine a world filled with robots and less people, almost frightening.
@German Ninja For that revolution of big number of unemployed will take care after debt bubble bursts. After politicians shit their pants they will regulate AI labour market. Votes make difference.
Technology is not about "human's roots" but solving efficiency problems. AI is used as a buzzword, but many machines are just automatons, not even robots. They don't make chef-grade food. They make consistantly average food. They're not on the same market nor have to compete with good standing restaurants to begin with, aside for the ones used as tourist attractions (which imply people go to these places for reasons irrelevent to food quality anyway). Most of robots and automatons are targeted at scenarios when people would normally choose fast-food because they don't trust average restaurants. There is a good reason why people are wary of places they don't know, as the human touch isn't always positive. Machines would at best rise the quality for lower grades of services by handeling food instead of incompetent people from failing places who make a bad reputation for every other average restaurants. Robots are not gonna make any chef-d'oeuvre anytime soon and are not designed to do so to begin with, with the very exception of robots trained to imitate real human chefs. But that last category are a niche luxury, not an average product.
Cooking, painting or music are not a human innate traits, humans are animals and you don't see a black bear cooking a beef Wellington in the wild. About travelling, I haven't seen anyone send a robot to replace his holidays in the Bahamas either 😂.
Why everything relates to future development is considering as artificial intelligence seems like human is not trusting himself and just creating a new species which is much better
It's in the nature of men to seek for perfection. Technology is the next step and we as humans are trying to make it better every day. In the process we are creating a machine which will be far superior than ourselves. There is no stopping it now.
It’s because humans have to much unbelief. This is the enemy once again establishing a war. First it was between father in heaven Angel vs (fallen) angles. Now it will be humans vs machines. Both will have catastrophic consequences and results
I think the cost of labor, Worker's Compensation, liability insurance and hassles of hiring, training, employee disputes, customers attacking employees, and the tax costs of flooding the country over and over with low-skilled workers will soon lead to a lot more automation.
To use an automotive analogy, the intelligent automation business is where the car business was in 1905. What's coming will be amazing in so many ways. AI and robotics will, in the next few decades, perform tasks previously done by humans faster, better and cheaper.
Salad dispenser: Constantly need to be refilled, which means it still needs the employee who worked at the salads spot. Rotating conveyor serving: Had existed for quite a few years already and is really niche anyway. Not gonna take your average job Robot assistant: Don't offer more you can already do by ordering with your phone or at a digital kiosk. Not taking a job to begin with Drone delivery: This one may take a job but one people don't want because there are always place they may get mugged. Would you rather lose a drone or a human life?
Salad dispenser: Constantly need to be refilled, which means it still needs the employee who worked at the salads spot. Rotating conveyor serving: Had existed for quite a few years already and is really niche anyway. Not gonna take your average job Robot assistant: Don't offer more you can already do by ordering with your phone or at a digital kiosk. Not taking a job to begin with Drone delivery: This one may take a job but one people don't want because there are always place they may get mugged. Would you rather lose a drone or a human life?
The options is you learn to teach other humans how to understand, how to build machines, structures, buildings, automated mobiles vessels, assist in security and create art, music, program vitual A.i, digital content creation.. have all the time to stress free and with the people that you deserved to be with, travel the world!!! What more would you want?
Your video is very informative and i enjoyed it. While technology is good i fear its taking people out of jobs as well. What required 50 people to do now only needs 1 person who is operating the machine
It's hard to tell how the future will turn out to be. As per Elon Musk, the world will see a rapid decline of population by 2050. Maybe we are just developing these technologies for the future generations.
"What required 50 people to do now only needs 1 person who is operating the machine" If anything, you're saying that one machine could output the efficiency of 50 employees...Which is a HUGE improvement! Install as many machines as you had people in your kitchen's crew, gain 50 times the efficiency without anyone losing their job (since they now operate the machines) nor having to hire more people? That's just too good to be true. The robot-job ratio depending on the bot would be up to 1-4 for most machines focusing on a specialised set of tasks, but certainly not 1-50. Even 1-10 would be pushing it, and that's if you forget that there's not 10 employees at that one spot to begin with. Many machines also have the problem of having to be constantly refilled. While theorically taking multiple spots in the process, they require an employee most forget to add back when counting the ratio of tasks. If robots are neded depends on the scenario. For kitchens that can't realistically serve as many clients as there are sittings in the restaurant, the increase in efficiency would solve one big problem of having to refuse clients even when there are empty tables because your crew is overworked by the complexity of the dishes one choose to put on the menu. Yes, it wouldn't be chef-grade food, but a crew of 4 would all be dressing up the plates while the robot manage those "50 little tasks of cooking" and cleaning, efficientely. Another exemple is pizzas. Automatons can easely replicate the steps needed for standard recipes (when the product arn't straight-up frozen goods) and thus deliver a 24/7 service under the limit of avaiable stocks, using an order tablet and mailbox-like delivery door. It doesn't even need complex robots, this one already exist and is used in pretty small places. Just like those vending machines that output a pizza and other reheated food, this isn't the highest grade of food, but doesn't need to compete with chef-grade food. Robots are efficient at always doing the same task, it is great but monotone. On the other hand they don't make random mistakes you hear of in so many restaurants. It's a trade-off like any other. What they are good at would be in scenarios when people usually choose fast-food, except here, the efficiency allows for healthier dishes to be served as fast as a burger would. A machine is just a tool, and while robots can be detrimental for some business models, they can save other places that face a completely different set of challenges. Systematic use isn't the answer, people just need to define the needs for their business and weight if it's worth using a machine in their own, specific scenario. And the same goes for the question of robots in general. In many cases, automatons are enough to solve the problems.
In the restaurant business, the problem is there are very few willing to work in the hot and stressful environment, and getting paid next to nothing while being required to start early in the morning and work till late at night. Rather than pay their workers a fair wage, the restaurants owners opt to buy robots instead
Jongeren en hun drang naar een goede betaalde baan het blijven zoeken in hbo of academic manager te kunnen worden zullen bedrogen worden door de ouders droom van hun ouders. Wil jij of zij in de komende jaren nog werken dan zou ik maar is snel aan robotica of programmeren gaan denken niet doen staat gelijk aan bijstand een leven lang het is aan jullie zelf.
There are already automated solutions for places like pizzerias. No robot needed, just an automaton and digital kiosk. They can even take the shape of a vending machine. It is also easier for an automaton to make pasta and salads, than it is for it to flip a burger, so those "mobile unmaned restaurants" of your dreams may actually end up having healthier meals than fastfood.
Yes, keeping the human shape can be very detrimental to a robot's efficiency, depending on the task it is asked to perform. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-spTPYFHy1QI.html Those are way better at transporting multiple orders
El operador de hamburguesas... Trabaja Lento para no dejar en ridículo... A la torpe máquina... Las máquinas son buenas para HACER trabajo por millares... Pero no está aun completa a hacer trabajos por unidad... Que Ascó de COMIDA... Pero sí así es el futuro... Me imaginó, que de acá a un tiempo se venderán en los restaurantes, rodajes, pernos en hidrolina, tuercas al lubricante... Despierta están jodiendo y matando a lá. Gente...
what an incompetent video. Nothing in this compilation has anything to do with AI. All the machines shown, work on simple rulesets and react once certain conditions are met. They're no more intelligent than your basic mechanical clock. AI driven machines learn as they work and adjust they behaviour according to previous results, and none of these do that, because if they changed their parameters as they worked, they would not produce consistent results. Also using other people's footage without proper credit and explicit written permission is a copyright violation
