Air Force solves F-22 oxygen supply mystery? 

HAHA! Looks like it.

😂

Hahahaha I was like ayyye a real case from a F22 pilot 😂

why you laughing at the pilot, man?@@3stripeboy Thank you for your service, sir.

Solsist Roblox Its to bad the F22 is having so much problems. Its such a beautiful aircraft. ' hi SR... ussr russia have a big problem with su-50 as pak fat-50... waste waste ussr russia is a big debt currencys and rubles

the f22 looks ok, but it will always be the yf23's plain looking sister.

The biggest problem it ever had was the left wing socialist media's false narrative that gets dragged into everything.

+SquirrelFromGradLife Very hard. It is incredibly expensive to do literally anything on an aircraft. You have to design a system. That takes a team of engineers. It takes time to figure out where you can even cram in this piece of equipment and how to power it. So that's yet another team of engineers. Then you have to test the system to make sure it is flight qualified. That's another team of engineers. Then you have to manufacture this system. That means buying overhead just for building a system that will not be needed after you may or may not find the problem. Then you have to install it that's hundreds of mechanics. Then you have to flight test the aircraft before you can even then run the sensor. Now that's how you would do it if you were a smart organization. How the airforce works is you add a level of bureaucracy at each stage. add a person for each engineer that makes sure each person is doing their job. and another group to make sure that no one is spending too much money. and everytime something is completed it takes a mountain of paper work to explain why each stage was needed and how not too much money was spent. not understanding that they wasted thousands of dollars just trying to save a few hundred dollars. So from the airforces perspective it is 100% easier and cheaper to pay for pilots crashing and writing off an aircraft. Just keep covering up the problem and threatening the pilot's with their careers.

They were using oxygen censors on the fingers of the pilots well before they found out why it was happening. I know a colonel( sounds like kernel) and he said at every stage of the military they want someone who can spend the most and justify the cost. The more they spend the more money they get the next year. It's a racket, but he said it's been going on since he started in the 1970s. The day you start finding less expensive products or procedures is the day you get demoted back to where you were. He also said changing anything was like an act of Congress. Alot of the technology is old because the ones in charge or senior level..it's what they learned and they have no interest in changing it to something that they don't know making them useless.

they have you moron !! the problem is they don't know how its happening !!!

SquirrelFromGradLife as hard as spelling sensor

Terrance Storey well said. respect from china

+Michelle Sullivan The internal bays are not connected to the cockpit or the oxygen line. The cause was a faulty valve and filter system. They replaced both of those and as of April 2015, all F-22s have received the fix. They also added an automatic backup oxygen system when they found out the issue. They left that system in the aircraft instead of paying to take it out, so it's just a background feature for the jet now. So no, they weren't sniffing paint from the bombs or whatever you're trying to say.

CHALK772 the F22 has been around that long? I thought the F22 came out in like 2005.... or was that the, “Story?”

@@josharnold4638 2005 is correct

I flew su27 in Germany

There were some prototypes built number is still unknown Those prototypes were the same as the Raptors just the stealthiness was low and weapons carriage was less

Not correct

F18 have the same issue.

global6674 yeah

Yea in 2020 the F22 oxygen problem is now completely solved

Your comment is at least five years old

Canada, 40-50 %

Efectul Coandă De la Wikipedia, enciclopedia liberă Jump to navigationJump to search Model dinamic al efectului Coandă, denumit uneori efectul Venturi-Coandă sau efectul Coandă-Venturi, deși efectul Venturi se referă la alte proprietăți ale unui fluid. Avionul Coandă-1910 Efectul Coandă sau devierea jeturilor de fluid în apropierea suprafețelor curbe este un efect care poartă numele academicianului, savantului, fizicianului și inventatorului român Henri Coandă.

Blake Mosley Average aircraft enthusiast here - As you say, the F22 is faster and more agile than the last generation of aircraft, of which all the other craft you mention are a part. Not to say the aren't good. They are the reason the F22 exists, in a way. Their existence over the years made it inevitable that parts and designs of parts and systems could be acquired by the enemy, leading to a pairing of capable air power by two sworn enemies. This could not be allowed to stand. Too much at stake. SO, the F22 carries their best traits into battle and adds a few other things of its own. 360 degree radar evasion (stealth) 100% faster and more efficient avionics to include targeting and communications 20% or so higher durability and lower maintenance Plus it's a bargain compared to the F35. Its development costs alone were a fraction of the F35 and per plane cost was as well downright Dollar Store in comparison. The F-18 still takes flight in its most aggressive kit in history. It still lives among its floating nests. Total American dominance of its theaters. The F-15 was, is, and will remain the greatest of its generation I believe most would agree on that. And if it weren't for the perceived threats at the time of contract award, the F15 and current MIG/Tupelov/Sukoi variants ('Dassault Rafale' to the Frenchies, yes literally translated to English it means 'fart') would most likely still be kings of the skies today. The F16 is like the Ford Focus ST/RS to the Mustang GT/Cobra (F15/18). It is ruler of it's domain, just a lower domain than that of the big boys. That's all I got.

Sam Johnson thank you

F-18 have the same hypoxic issues...

@@robhawkins4677 Right, but the media can';t use that to make Americans afraid of keeping the F-18 flying. They are pushing a full-court press against the F-22. Don't you wonder why?

@@bobski8203Doesnt matter anymore cuz they not talking about the USAF.

Nothing in any military force ”just works”😂

not necessarly. The human body resistance to G load doesn't correspond to a simple number. It depends on the duration and direction of the load as well. A human body can withstand 12 G of backward load but barely 7 in a upward load (red veil). This 9 G limits is for around 20 sec in jet turn condition. The aircraft resistance is a mater of structural integrity. Advanced aircraft dont withstand +12 G loads as their structure is complexe. The board computer will limite the load to protect the aircraft. The Raptor is probably not capable of very high loads as it would had a sheer amount of structural conception issues. They are basically rated for an "emergency load" that barely surpasses pilots abilities

@@simonrano8072 -- You clearly never bothered to observe raptors in action. Also, human bodies don't do so well in 12 G loads. 7 Gs is too much for most of the Russian fighters from the 1960s through 1990s. I haven't seen anything to suggest that the new golden geese from Sukhoi can do any better. Meanwhile, F-22s have demonstrated better maneuverability than you suggest, and they are probably capable of far more.

@@bobski8203 you clearly did not bother understanding what i wrote. Maneuvrability is not a single matter of G Load. Angle of attack and stall speed are very important as well. What I say is just that jet fighters and humans have different load survivability depending on direction and duration. On board computer will refuse maneuvers that will damage the aircraft, that is all. People have survived +20 Gs in some conditions.

@@simonrano8072 -- I've observed F-22s flying locally and in airshows. I also know that they reserve their best skills for combat surprises, so clearly the Raptor has no problem at all with high-G maneuvers. If you had watched one, you would know that. I have family members who are or were fighter pilots, so what you are saying is not misunderstood. F-22s have been seen turning at almost zero-airspeed in some pretty radical manners. The only limiting factor of the airframe is the human interface and the safety thereof. The plane is capable of flying itself, as most or all USAF aircraft have been since the 1960s. Also, people who pull more than 8 Gs tend to have internal damage which medical science is only beginning to understand and address. As I said, people don't do so well at the high loads you mentioned. I didn't fail to understand you.

They all can do an extreme 14g with high flexion in the wings for depends how much time until it rips apart,and 12g would be the max safe load. F-22s have pretty bulky and thick wings maybe it could do more without ripping apart who knows

You clicked didn't you ?

They can only say just so much. This is classified equipment in a classified application. You are privileged to know as much about it as you do. I mean . . . who are you, anyway? And you have a problem with this because . . . . . .?!?!?!?!

mrwong11989 however it said that will in return makes your lungs blow up.

But what about the other fighters including the F-18s and F-35s?

BGoldtone unfortunately you wouldn't be brave enough to fight in that war now wouldn't you?

Elisha Ellis oof goteem 5 years later

Michael Azelton hahahah lmao

WW11? World War 11, you say? Wow. Either you guys really fight fast or my nap was a bit longer than I thought. I guess I better go check how long my beard is.

Of course, and so do our older fighters that most everyone assumes work so well. They do work better than they used to, but some of their issues took decades to resolve, and most of the public were never aware of the struggle. Another thing most people don't know about Russian fighters is that they're not designed for nearly as many flight hours as American fighters. That's why they have lighter structures and engines tuned for maximum power instead of long-term durability. This makes for impressive flight performance, but it also means that reliability is a major problem, and their pilots can't get a lot of training time, which is the worst kind of problem to have.

Robincio Geroca I mean their aircraft are no where as advanced or as well built as our aircraft so I am sure they have equally as much issues.

Every aircraft have must primary problem. but they are classified

SamabiTV MiG-29’s are NOT the best fighters, LOL. Watch some videos of original f/a-18’s and F-16’s smoke German MiG-29’s in dogfights, turn that battle to BVR combat and it’s just sad. America has the best long range missile in the business, the amram120

Robincio Geroca I don't think so lol

No you don't, you just see who has the most propaganda going.

what good are airshow tricks when a missile from an f22 15 miles away is coming and you don't even know it

@@adam-od7ow - An F-22 could be *5* miles away and they wouldn't know it.

+drunk mike F16 fighting Falcons do +9gs all day long. Pilots rarely have issues.

+Michelle Sullivan 9g is the common limit imposed for pilot and structural tolerance, but it doesn't mean that all fighters that can pull 9g are the same. For example, no fighter can pull 9g (or even close to that, oftentimes) at all speeds, altitudes, and other conditions, but the F-22 can pull more g under more conditions than other fighters, up to the limit of 9 (imposed by its flight control system). And, perhaps more relevant to this particular discussion, the g-onset rate in the F-22 can be significantly more rapid than in the F-16, so even with the same ultimate limit, pulling 9g in the F-22 can be harder on pilots because the force is applied so quickly. This depends on their control inputs, of course, but the F-22 is more agile than the F-16, so maximum stick force is going to hurt more. Additionally, the F-22 is designed for high performance at higher altitudes, and personally I think its OBOGS (on-board oxygen generation system, which is something new for fighters--the older ones all use LOX bottles) is not always up to the task when it does certain maneuvers at high speeds and altitudes. Fortunately, the OBOGS is now supplemented by a small LOX bottle, which increases the flow of oxygen when the in-ear oxygen sensor determines this is necessary.

+jhon doe How could the structure handle infinite g, though? Build it to withstand super-high g force, and it won't be able to carry much ordnance or fuel, if it can fly at all. It's not just about the pilot's limitations.