Airbus A321NEO London Heathrow🇬🇧 Cockpit Landing 

No. Echo zulu did it better

if you call this long you need to see ams schiphol polderbaan way more longer and amsterdam is just a special airport in my eyes

@@wasmiddelsap3379 wat heeft het ermee te maken dat AMS speciaal is voor jou? Xd

@@nados3258 idk beetje schiphol beschermen toch haha

He is slightly left of the centreline as it’s an RNP approach so he is having to correct for this by moving the aircraft right fairly quickly and deal with the changing wind speeds

At lower speeds (aka during landing), your plane won't react as much to inputs so you have to do more exaggerated inputs. Also factor in wind; this video looks normal to me.

@@_chipchip as a former pilot, not really lol. It takes time for the momentum of the plane to shift and change its direction from the time you input the controls. It's def noticeable lag. You're right, the surface moves with no lag, but the plane takes time to react to the movement

he's reacting to the feeling his eyes and ass deliver

@@IAmNotARobotPinkySwear the guy was over correcting big time. Nothing normal about it. It’s poor airmanship and some pilots do this. I’ve actually recorded first officers who do this to show them afterwards what they are doing.

Unfortunately a lot of airlines SOP's mandate that pilots keep the F/D and AP on until a certain point during landing. I don't agree with it cuz it takes the fun out of flying, but I'm not in charge of multi billion dollar airlines I guess lol

@@IAmNotARobotPinkySwear The pilot switched the F/D off after disconnecting A/P because this is an RNP approach, not ILS. ILS can give you precise guidance until touchdown while RNP only until minimums (even slightly to the left of centerline here). Most probably they would keep F/D on if it was an ILS approach anyway.

@@xentroide Missed that, good to know. Reminded me of when I was younger. I did not much like VOR approaches, but RNAV's were doable (I'm aware they're pretty much the same thing). I really need to get back into aviation, I miss it so much =(

They weren’t over london.

Its a sidestick actually, not a joystick🌚

It can if in selected mode and the pilot tells the autothrust what speed to set instead of managed then it would stop at S speed

@@tomstravels520 he was below s speed and had not selected flaps 2

@@markjackson5333 I know. But the speed triangle is blue meaning selected speed. Selected speed overrides managed speed until you ask the speed to drop below VLS then it won’t if on autothrust

@@tomstravels520 7.20 you can see they are flying below s speed and not have flaps 2 . When you should have flaps 2 out before you fly as this speed

@@markjackson5333 I know that. But you said “didn’t know the plane could do that”. I’m telling you how it is possible. Whether they should be doing it or not I don’t know. The only reason would be that flaps 2 setting increases drag and would cause thrust to increase and increase noise. Heathrow has strict noise abatement rules so it’s likely because ATC told them to fly just below the S speed but they don’t want to unnecessarily increase thrust.

@@cedarkey oh it was an ILS approach was it? So how come at 7:55 he said cleared for RNP09L? How come there are no pink diamonds in the PFD? How come it says RNAV09L on the ND? How come it says FINAL APP on the FMA?

You don't really know what you're talking about lol

Perfectly stabilised approach. They were cleared for a non precision approach to 09L, and they hand flew from minimums.

Define a stabilized approach please

Yet their briefing was cr4p.

@@peteconrad2077 Yet they are not the best for briefing others.

@@HORMOVAS briefing is an essential skill and theirs was absolute rubbish.

Let's suppose that you are correct (you are not).. Still they are the best, either you like it or not.

@@HORMOVAS I am correct. Unlike you, I know what I’m talking about.

i think before you comment about a professional pilots approach, you should know what you’re talking about. there was strong, gusty crosswinds in this video, and the pilot has to counteract those in order to land safely. if he “took his hand off the stick”, he would drift away from the runway in the wind, and believe it or not, you not allowed to land on the taxiway 😜

Are you a pilot?? " if not don't be a stupid pls

@@stephennandi4538 me or the other guy lol

Agreed. Poor handling by the Captain. The surface wind was 070 at 9 knots. A gentle breeze. Over-controlling.

@@perthplanes-ho3lj he did take his hand off the side-stick, while below 200’ agl to select a taxi chart. That’s damn poor piloting and absolutely unnecessary when so low to the ground.