Airbus A330neo - the path to perfection. Description of the new aircraft 

I love this mask around Beluga XL

MD11 WAS A MOST BEAUTIFUL GORGEOUS BIRD WHEN IT FLEW IN PASSENGER VERSION UNTIL 2014 BY KLM .747 ICON LEGEND. ANOTHER BEAUTIFUL GORGEOUS DESIGN, DC10 30_ DC40 BEAUTIFUL GORGEOUS DESIGN, L1011 TRISTAR .

they look more and more like flying buses to me...

Totally agree. It's what I would call the 777 look. However, the 330 NEO has a more sleek tail section. Never liked the Boeing droop tail that much.

you prolly dont care but does any of you know of a trick to get back into an Instagram account? I somehow lost the account password. I would appreciate any assistance you can give me

I hear you, man! :D

This neo has a 3-3-3 config, Airbus released a video this week

@@PatTalisman The a330 neo has a maximum capacity based on a 3-3-3 config (just like the ceo does as well.. check cebu airlines) with a 2-3-2 in the back section. This is just like the a380 can have a 3-5-3 max config but.. does anyone use it? no (or would rarely if low cost). So far the a330 neo has been configured by legacy airlines with the standard 2-4-2 config with 2-3-2 in the back. www.seatguru.com/airlines/AirAsia_X/AirAsia_X_Airbus_A330-300.php

Serge Vivier 3-4-3 is too much 2-4-2 is better

the 767 its more confortable 2-3-2

@@arielsegal7515 A330 has wider width than Boeing 767, so one seat space is supplemented making the A330 a more comfortable aircraft hands down than the old 767.

A330NEO on the paper flys further with the same amount of people on board.

Very true. The a330 may not be as efficient and innovative as the Dreamliner, but it definitely wins in the comfort category

XWB=Extra Wide Body(it is RR engine name btw)

XWB is the A350

@@tuguldurenkhbayar7915 Ironically still narrower than the 777, & the XWB's overhead crew rest compartment still protrudes further into the aft passenger cabin's overhead bin space than either the 777 or 787

@@lzh4950 the name XWB comes because the A350 was originally conceived as an evolution of the A330, using the same frame, Airbus was planning to do the same job they did the time they modernized the A300 into the A330. But most of airlines said that it was a too conservative job and required a more modern aircraft. Thus Airbus came with a second A350 proposal, called XWB to differenciate from the previous one: and this had a wider and bigger frame than the A330. That's why this name.

@@albertogambino2562 Yup I've heard of the story of how the A350 was born

Thanks for watching) I have a plans for this channel)

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IcHTgEfyUZM.html

I guess nobody expected this stupid pandemic crap and the airlines obsession with fuel efficient twin jets. It's a shame as I adore quad jets but you can't hold progress back.....

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IcHTgEfyUZM.html

Only flip side I can think of is that if a trio of travellers wanted to sit together (like my family), then no 1 gets to have a window seat

Damn, I hate 3-3-3 seating. Even worse is 2-5-2. Every damn plane I've been on with that layout, I had the misfortune of getting stuck in the very middle. That is ONLY for those with massive bladders. The first time I was stuck on that was on Singapore Airlines. And the plane hit a massive wake of turbulence causing my lunch to spill all over my lap. And I had to sit and wait in my soaked pants until the captain turned off the seatbelt sign AND for the damn trays on one side to be removed so I could go to the lavatory and at least try to wipe off whatever spilled on me. I wish a lifetime of hell for the shitheads who want this layout on their planes.

@RogerPierre I think the airlines are at blame for the bad seating

largol33t1 Which plane was that? The a380? Must’ve been pretty wide to have 2-5-2

@@jrcadventures2905 Lockheed L-1011 Tristar

Thanks for watching)

Hahaha... Great news!

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0cS1SMptlnQ.html

@@redstone51 that was one time, and they didn't CRASH, unlike with the 737 max, where it happened many more times and happened to kill 300+ people!

@@redstone51 wow thanks for bringing up how a pilot saved so many lives! He deserves more recognition. Wait what was this thread about again?

Why the FUCK would it have mcas in the first place? Only the 737 Max has it.

Cumulonimbus82 obviously you've never seen a 747 or Concorde

He has. Concorde was a different thing. A330 is gracious, gorgeous without trying too harsh (like 787). Regarding that big head old news 747... Geez, I never liked it. I don't even care about it when I see it at airports. But that's the thing: TASTE. He said "for me", you pretentious fuck

Joel Worsley obviously you have no understanding for the concept of an opinion. And as always, yo7 cannot argue about about design. For me the b777 is the most beautiful together with the A340-500. And he thinks the A330 is the most beautiful. And you know what? That is fine.

awesome, cuh. but Nah, I rather stick to the A330 ;)

'if you want my comeback you will have to scrape it off your mums teeth' jeez you are savage!!!! XD

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IcHTgEfyUZM.html

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IcHTgEfyUZM.html

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IcHTgEfyUZM.html

I'm glad you liked it)

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IcHTgEfyUZM.html

I'm glad it was informative) Thanks for watching

Skyships Eng you make great videos. Great information with a nice flow. Great job and thank you!

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IcHTgEfyUZM.html

The challenge makes them both greater and greater!

Same here .This If it aint Boeing I aint going is childish and insular especially as modern Boeings are only assembled in the USA with worldwide partners providing the modules

even with the A380?

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IcHTgEfyUZM.html

Marketing, marketing, marketing

The fuel capacity added by external fuel tanks wouldn’t have the same amount of added range like it would have with military aircraft. Also the range of the aircraft is already long enough for let’s say 95% (probably even more) of all airlines operating it!

Well, the way to get rid of competitors is to make a superior product

Lol, great joke mate

HiiighAsAKite in German eks ve be. Kind of

He means that "XWB" is not so catchy and beautiful as Boeing's "Dreamliner" name.

@@Robostomp Ikr, XWB sounds more like a robot name

@@InForTheLonghaul äks-tuplavee-bee in Finnish

The A330 is nothing more than a Airbus A340 except that it has two engines instead of 4. The wing and fuselage have the same dimensions.