Airbus A380 SIMULATOR - Bird Strike/ Engine fire on Takeoff (ENG sub) 

LOL

Sparryax Best reply ever!

Lolllllll

lmao

Not pilot gods.Just real pilots.Just ask me where all my classmates are.They couldn't fly for shit.

Let's see if the pilot remains calm if he had 3 engine failures!

@@justicewarrior9187 Even 3 engines are OK if you manage to climb enough.

yeah right

The a380 can fly with just 1 engine? Didn’t know that , I thought with 2

I love this comment

RundiF1 just realised where that was from and im glad

Captain?

I'm not questioning the pilots, they're good pilots but they've clearly been instructed to head for the airport immediately after the bird strike.

by keeping the visual references straight on the horizon while making a climb or descent motion, they manage too fool your internal ear references and give you a realistic feel of accel or deccel ! It's pretty impressive the first time !

I wish there was a home version haha

@@ezragreiner5773 it goes from 2000€ to 4000€ for 2 persons for a 2x2h session. If you want one at home in your backyard, you can consider renting it! 😉

oh lol

A380 does not do cargo.

TechThatLasts No fuel dump either. ... maybe it was a ferry flight! (unlikely for Lufthansa from JFK). Maybe they don't spook the passengers. Just say the Captain left his phone behind.

Gavin Ward as this is just a simulator and they’re dressed causal I’m pretty sure they knew what was going to happen and it would involve going back so didn’t need much fuel

Ich bin kein Pilot, aber ich kann zumindest logisch denken! Wenn ich ein so schweres Flugzeug auf Höhe bringen muss und mir beim Start 1/4 meiner Leistung flöten geht, werde ich alles tun um die Maschine in der Luft und Balance zu halten, aber bestimmt nicht die Leistung meiner restlichen 3 Turbinen senken.

@@Hansi689 Nur die Leistung einer Turbine Zurücknehmen. Und Den Ansteigwinkel gleizeitig Vermindern. Es kommt immer darauf an in welcher Fluglage sich das Gerät befindet und Welche Flug Manöver man Ausführen könnte um Ein Stabiles Flug verhalten zu bekommen. Wenn 1 Motor aus fällt ist Auf der Anderen Seite Des 50% Mehr Leistung vorhanden. Das bringt das Flugzeug in eine Kurven Lage. Diese Kann man Durch die Ruder Steuerung oder Durch Verteilung der Motor Leistung kompensieren. Wenn das Flugzeug eine Bestimmte Höhe erreicht hat kann es Auch bestimmt nur mit Zwei von Vier Motoren Sicher Fliegen. Die Zusätzlichen Motoren sind nur für Schnellere Geschwindigkeiten und Größere Flug Höhen von Nöten. Umd Natürlich Verkürzten diese auch den Brems Weg durch die Schuppumker Steuerung der Motoren. Also wird das Flugzeug Versuchen Lange zeit zu Kreisen um Leichter zu werden. Kürzere Landung Zeit wird dann erreicht. Flugzeuge sind Eine Technische Meisterleistung vom Besten Nur das Beste verbaut. Und Alles ist Doppelt bis Dreifach Gesichert. Ausfälle von Geräten gibt es immer wieder und das ist normalerweise auch kein Problem wenn die Piloten und die Mechanik Richtig zusammen Arbeiten. MfG Michael aus Hamburg. ✈

@@hieristderkanalvomyoutuber5387 Danke für die Ausführliche Erklärung. Es beruhigt mich zu wissen, dass die, die von der Materie Ahnung haben im richtigen Moment wissen was zutun ist. Das ist auch der Grund warum ich überhaupt in ein Flugzeug steige. Ich sage mir immer, die Jungs und Mädels haben ein strenges Auswahlverfahren durchlaufen (hoffentlich) und die Ausbildung war Schweine teuer.

They transfer fuel to "emergency tank". Guess you cant discharge at low altitude thou.

@@victor360modena The weight is the same no matter which tanks you transfer the fuel to.

Probably little fuel as they knew what was going to happen and it would involve a very short flight

I want a pteranadon

@@malachinewland6550 I'll be honest, I had to google that one. It's an extinct flying reptile though not a bird?

@@fjs1111 I meant one flying into the plane

I think they're just being assholes...

LMAO

Totally true

THis comment is so underrated

You need no strike at all, they blow up all by themselves ;)

@@Mike25654 u must be a Boeing lover..?

HAHAHAHAHA

Dude, I thought I was the only one who thought of that once they turned the APU on. XD

If Sully didn't start apu, we were going to die

Sully didn't have to start the APU right away, but he did out of instinct. It was a masterstroke.

Unable!

Anything to the left in New Jersey ?

@@MrTruth111 we ending up in the Hudson

"Add a 30 second response time"

@@camwest4477 yeah you got Tetobourgh of to your left hand side you wanna go to Tetoborough? Unable

@Carpet Hooligan boomer

@Carpet Hooligan Unless you're in an anatomy class, saying that in class is going to make people giggle, so it's appropriate

Carpet Hooligan Ahahahahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Carpet Hooligan ok boomer

@SilentGamer yeah how dare the flightdeck dude call cpt. Raps a retard like have some respect

On Windows computer this usually helps! xD

I went to the simulator in the video 2 years ago, it was really good, I was with my dad on internship.

You can also rent the Lufthansa Aviation Training Simulators for private use. In Frankfurt you can fly the Simulator shown in the Video for 400€/h As well as Boeing 747, 777F, 787 (not sure about the 787) Airbus A320,A340 and in Munich you can go for the Airbus A350 and the CRJ1000.

But with microphones on :)

falconeaterf15 that really made me laugh omg

falconeaterf15 It happens. I know someone who got a jump-seat on a busy flight and on landing the brakes or thrust reversers failed and the co-pilot freaked-out as he thought they were going off the end of the runway. They stopped with about 150m to spare (might actually have been on the over-run) but I think they had to evacuate the aircraft. Even pilots are mortal.

@falconeaterf15 The pilots know how to deal with everything; they know that if something happens, such as a bird strike or an engine failure, no one is going to die. They know what to do. I understand you're just being funny, but if you were a pilot and someone said that to your face, then how would you feel?

Can a380 fly with one engine ?

@@henrychan0222 It's designed to be able to.

@@kaseykilsby1645 it can fly with 1, but can't take off or climb with 1

Niels Mallant I know, but they make it flyable with 1 engine

Lol.

Not even close.

A380 costs about 440 million US dollars while A380 flight simulator costs about 13 million US dollars. So...

@@MarianKeller Hey, Marian? I think that was sarcasm.... And it went right over your head.

@@Mr.Oblivian Maybe.

@@edgarslacis3865 Jesus 13 million??

Amazing Insanity there’s special programmes were an airline trains you, and you the pay of the cost when you start working :)

Moo Chini for example? For poor people like us :d

If you really wanted to be a pilot you’d do the research and know lmao. Some countries offer student loans that you can pay off with minimal interest after a few years which is good

de fan exactly, but I’ll tell you british airways do it for example, a lot of airlines do loans that you can pay of later

@@mehmetfatihbozkurt1363 Yanlış hatırlamıyorsam 4 yıllık sayısal mezunların girebildiği fakat son yıllarda talebin artmasi sebebiyle sözel ve açıköğretim mezunlarına da hak tanındığı Türk Hava Yolları Akademisine katılabiliyorsun. Eğitimini tamamlayıp THY'de pilot olursan maaşından 10 yıl boyunca 140.000 €'luk eğitim masrafı kesilerek karşılanmış oluyor.

Jipp leider schon in Rente. Habe beide Pilotseye Videos von ihm A340-600 von EDDM-KSFO und sein letzter Flug mit dem A380 von EDDF-KSFO 👍

Ja ich auch

Rappps, mit 3 "p"!

Who the fck is Jürgen- Bekomme ich eine Autogrammkarte ? (drei wären noch besser)

Dachte mir ich kenne ihn schon

Not even an overweight landing.

@Komrade Of course there has to be someone who doesn't get the joke. Get a life you ignorant scumbag lol

@Komrade r/woooosh

@Komrade It's obviously a joke, don't be a fucking 3 year old about it.

@@danqu933 Ahhh I See! You are a man of culture as well! :)

Accompanied from Jeremy Irons.

JEFFREY PHILLIPS “Jürgen, wir haben den Passagieren nichts gesagt.” - “Verdammt noch mal.” XD

Adel Haiba Maybe not full loaded fuel

I was about to ask the same question. A plane like that has to have a lot of fuel inside for an intercontinental flight.

Just before takeoff : "T/O 13L, left turn around landing 13L". So no fuel dumping

These planes has always alot of fuel onboard so very strange they did not dump fuel. A Quantas 380 had an engine failure and had to land with to much fuel, that did almost end in a disaster.

usually when it comes to engine fire you want to land as soon as possible, confirmed at 2:10 by the ECAM action "land asap"

Chief Pilot. He is also on the Board of Lufthansa, executive vice president of Operations (or was before retiring).

The simulator is more like $16-20 million dollars! You wish it only would cost 1 mill

I thought that was Captain Raps

@@leerobinson590 yes he is it! The "JR" are his initials of his first and last name;)

You have to pay the ransomin bitcoins

No. Thrust lever must be verified by both pilots and actioned by the PF, engine master switch requires dual confirmation (actioned by PM) if in flight.

I've seen that one, you land upside on a mountain I'm pretty sure

Hydraulics failure doesn’t matter on this plane. It has Electro-Hydrostatic Actuators on some of the flight controls so even with loss of hydraulics in the main lines it would still be controllable. The RAT would take over some of the electrical power, the landing gear would be released by gravity drop and its daytime and there a standby back up instruments too

There is an electrically driven backup pump for the hydraulic system, partly powered by the RAT (a turbine that automatically deploys in case of engine failure) so yeah it can be controlled in case of a dual engine failure. But it won’t be as responsive.

If it lost all engines then the APU would restore electrical power with the batteries and the RAT filling in the gap whilst the APU started. Even if the APU failed the ram air turbine would restore one hydraulic system and provide enough electrical power. In worst case scenario the horizontal stabiliser is mechanically connected to the trim wheel and the rudder to the pedals so they can still pitch and turn. The A380 and A350 work slightly differently but that requires a pilot to explain as they don’t have trim wheels

Suly

No QRH be use they’re using ECAM.

About $10 Million at least

AviationHub i think I'll get 2 then 😁

@@AviationHubOfficial for $10m I can lease a320 or a319

AviationHub more than 16 million

My dude you can buy a buggati, lafarrari, a mansion and a limozine with that

I was looking for this comment. Had the same question.

it doesn't matter which side you are turning to.

Once AP is off the aircraft won’t trim rudder itself so has to be done pilot. If you know when the thrust changes are coming you can adjust rudder accordingly. If autothrust is on you only react to the changes after thrust has adjusted.

No airliner can safely land fully loaded mate. But the fuel tank was damaged so maybe the jettisons were too. It would be able to land but it would be dangerous.

airbus cant dump fuel i dont know how it is on the a380 but i think it also can not dump

@@benni6901 Depends on which Airbus. The A320 families indeed can't dump fuel, so does its competitor, Boeing 737. However Airbus A340, A350 and A380 do have fuel dumping capabilities. Some A330 (depending on the order) also have jettison to dump fuel but it's optional to the customer.

AviationHub 2 months ago They cheated. Pause at 4:23 , look at the right (or left) ND, the landing weight is that of the A380 MLW (391,000KG). So this theoretical flight wouldn't have made it across the atlantic anyway!

Too low for fuel dumping. Especially over a highly populated area like Manhattan. It’s highly unlikely you will see any fuel dumping under FL100. Better to slightly damage the Airplane.

You're not going to dump (flammable) fuel after an engine fire. You land overweight and risk the damage to the plane. Early on, you hear them read out "LAND ASAP (RED)"; according to some people I've talked to, the red color of the text basically means you're in deep shit, and should be considering landing at military bases, abandoned airfields,, on highways, bodies of water, etc if you need to.

That's a really good question mate. And I don't know, but I'll give it a reasonable guess: I'd assume all fuel flow is cut-off to idle level on an engine failure/fire warning automatically, and it does seem to be the case: Pre-bird strike, pause@ 1:15 - look at the lower middle MFD/ECAM, the third green row is Fuel Flow (FF - KG/H), the number is illegible but visually identical to the other three on that row, as it should be. Engine failure registered at 1:26 , you can see immediately the FF has gone down to three digits already, consistent with idle power as if the levers were pulled instantaneously. So it makes no real difference what they do to the ENG1 lever at this point. Whether thats some automatic operation, or just because the engines have stopped! I don't know, but there has to be a logical explanation for the SOP. So the question should be, should the engine 1 MASTER be switched off immediately? Or manually disable the fuel pumps? and would that make a difference? We need an Airbus engineer in here. Also check the FF on ENG failure here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jzjyr0UZKRw.html I have over-thought this. Look what you made me do @Daddy Kush!

You are probably right! This is what I thought, too. Maybe the FADEC reacts to the compressor stall/surge with an immediate fuel cut off automatically. I believe aircraft manufacturers are forward enough to implement such a system ;). Thanks for your detailed answer, @AviationHub!

No worries man, thanks for an insightful question that got me thinking about something I'd never considered before. Most of my inbox is a variation of "they just stick on autopilot and a computer does the rest" or "at 3 minutes the captain didn't... " *insert a procedure contained in no SOP/FCOM ever* ".... so it's refreshing ha :)

Shutting down the wrong engine is a major danger so engine shutdown procedures have quite a few steps. If you reduce the wrong engine to idle you should notice the loss of additional thrust or notice the mistake on the engine status page. Even more critical with twins. So no immediate actions because it increases the danger of this mistake.

Fuel cut off would be no fuel. Automatic engine shutdown via FADEC is reserved for overspeed conditions only. This is to avoid losing thrust in critical situations (double birdstrike for example). What i would suspect is in this case that the engine slowed down due to the engine damage and the fuel injected depends on RPM even before FADEC. So the engine turning slower means less fuel is injected. This video is an example of a quite serious bird strike, as soon as the bird hits the EPR gauge goes down to 0 within a second or so.

Captain realised he left his phone in the terminal after V1

AviationHub lol

if you rush things you can make mistakes like shutting off the wrong engine. And then you have 2 engines out

How do you know how much fuel they had on board? if it was just a training flight they may not bother otherwise they'd have to circle for ages waiting for the fuel to be dumped. They already planned to land back on 13L

1. It's shut down, not shoot down. These are two different things in aviation. 2. What do you expect them to do? Act right when they see birds? Their action time was on point and they obeyed procedures by calling out the ECAM warnings, which you must do before taking any actions. You can't do anything on your own mind, you need to tell the other pilot what you're doing first.

You can have a real one for circa $20 million.