All of your problems have something in common 

Couldn’t agree more -Michael

Would this be like Dutch democracy where redistribution occurs? Or like American? Because we are technically a representative democracy which is entirely separate from an individual free marketplace.

@@dailyright The economic system is authoritarian. Capital is held by the few, and they have all the power when it comes to the economy. So a supposedly democratic country where the politicians are bought out and bow down to the authoritarians in the economy. That's what's so weird about the economic system in America, for all the freedom we claim to have, the economy is authoritarian.

@@Alexander_Grant that's why the USA is not considered a democracy at all, but an oligarchy - or plutocracy.

Yes and it would also be fascinating to see what would occur in a capitalist system with no government regulation or interference I’ve often wondered if without government bailouts and subsidies etc would provide higher wages since goods would have to actually cost what they cost to produce, I remember reading the Polland book “Omnivores dilemma” and he outlined how much a bushel of corn actually cost to produce vs what it is sold for due to subsidies

Well, its what is called Absolute poverty, there's also another term called Relative poverty, which is defined as the line below which people do not get access to needs deemed easy to acquire by societal standards

⁠@@shiromusk4236in the EU relative poverty is defined as the half of the mean spending (yes, spending, not salary).

Except it's not even that, because any non-commodified or public good, any informal income that helps makes ends meet is discounted. Yet worse, prices of products that don't at all affect an impoverished person's ability to support themselves are counted. The prices of diamonds and ferraris count towards the poverty line just like food and water.

How would you define it?

@@tlatolcalli682 I don't know what would be useful as a metric for policy decisions. To me, its a lack of security.

Especially when you consider how expensive it is to be poor

Nobody tells poor people to cut costs unless the poor are spending money on buying things they don't need. Like alcohol, drugs, expensive brands etc.

​​@@raccoon_from_heavenneeds go beyond physiology. if you're in a situation where you're taught worth is defined by wealth, and virtually everything, including social interactions, love, belonging, safety, etc. is defined by wealth, then obviously you're going to resort to whatever is emotionally numbing. humans are social creatures. we are not content just to "survive". capitalism deprives us of all of these and attempts to put a material/monetary value on them, which is why drug use is such a huge issue, and designer brands are bought to fulfill desperate consumer culture, because people will do anything to look or feel like they're wealthy, and people will do anything to make their lives feel worth living.

@@raccoon_from_heaventv’s, refrigerators, air conditioning, cell phones, cars, clothes, food, children, childcare and education….

YES!!!!

Guys it's easy, a system has to be predicated on transparency, logical thought, and good faith. . None of these words Like socialism or capitalism mean anything in a non transparent system....... But we all know that already. After this years end the world will know (complete data sets for algorithm that run systems will be exposed) its all of our fault.

Add traditional women’s work nurturing children and running households, unpaid and therefore devalued by capitalistic metrics, so much actual value is exploited while simultaneously being ignored as having none.

Yooo i get it!

I agree that anyone that thinks our current economic system is bad should give subsistence farming a go and see how much they like it.

​@@colinburns8854most people in the world depend on it. in Eastern Europe, especially Bulgaria, if you live outside cities and don't use your land to grow some food like tomatoes you won't make it through the winter.

When rich people are at risk, We're suddenly socialists

@@stevecarter8810 Rich people should be scared of socialism. They work hard for their success. Why should they have to give their hard earned dollars to somebody that hasn't earned it?

​@@devinstucky6948 I think you missed my point. When taxpayer money bails out banks or other companies "too large to fail" then they are suddenly dropping their free market idealism for "the good of all". i.e. the banks are suddenly advocating for a socialist solution to their free market screwup.

​@@devinstucky6948But that's not how socialism works. Profits are privatized and losses are socialized. A huge bureaucratic system keeps the status quo.

​​@@peekaboo1575 I'm sure if you gave a huge bureaucracy the power to socialize and allocate funds that they totally wouldn't abuse that for their own selfish gain... As they totally never did in various actual real world examples... And that said bureaucracy would totally stay efficient... What the US and many other countries are seeing, is the result of failing capitalism because they don't actually follow capitalist doctrine. There is too much lobbying, too much regulation (regulation that prevents small businesses from competing with government-made monopolies.) To say that's the fault of capitalism... Well that's like saying the USSR proves communism doesn't work. They didn't actually follow the doctrine, but they still used it as a power grab and as a rallying point. All it really did is prove that there are plenty that seek to use communism and socialism for selfish means. Could the same not be true for those who claim to be capitalist? Could they perhaps not be following capitalist doctrine just as Stalin and Mao didn't follow the communist manifesto exactly? Whether or not the manifesto is good doesn't matter for this point, because the point is that there are so many factors outside of the manifesto that influenced things that it's dishonest to make a blanket statement about its usefulness. And as such, critiques of it cannot be formulated based off of end results alone, because there needs to be discussion and understanding of the actions that lead to said results, not just "ooh monopoly appeared, capitalism don't work" or "haha people starve socialism no work," you can argue certain intrinsic principles of each system lean towards one effect more than the other, but there needs to be an actual analysis, not a God-of-the-gaps fallacy every time. (Even though technically socialism is worse with monopolies because the state is the monopoly and it is state mandated... In capitalism monopolies are usually state lobbied.) To point at what is happening now and scream "late-stage capitalism!" That completely ignores government corruption and the variety of factors that contribute to all of this, that would just as easily destroy any one of these people's socialist utopias... And has destroyed them in the past. There is a lack of accountability. And I'm sure that the powers that be are thrilled we are sitting here screaming about which economic system is the boogeyman, while completely ignoring the fact NEITHER will ever work under the corrupt leadership that is able to twist either system to their liking. Even if we converted to socialism tomorrow, the oligarchs would not care because they could still game the system in their favor. And guess what? The governments are in on it.

The same reason why socialism doesn’t work… corruption

im 14 and this is deep

​@@PacoCotero1221don't buy into this shit

@@PacoCotero1221 god forbid anyone is sincere on the internet!

So true

Resistance to what?

@@AJRfanboy904 to hopelessness

@@AJRfanboy904late stage capitalism, imperialism, colonialism

that's a really clever mechanism to teach fairness. Do you have any other rules/mechanism that leads to agents optimizing?

Capitalism already has self regulating features in it, you're just used to them that you don't understand how they do not arise naturally and cannot imagine life without them: Capitalism turns greed and envy into productivity. It also gives you a clear path to climb the pyramid of needs. Without it, most societies stagnate. There's plenty of examples. Also, do not fall into the currently-popular trap presented into this video. Gift-giving, hand-holding societies DO NOT SCALE. Sure, tiny village, couple of families, all well. As soon as you don't know the whole neighborhood by first name, the pleasantries end, you can't keep up with everyone and they keep rotating so your standing is never enough.... but money is still good. Another trap presented here is equating capitalism to resources. Countries do not go to war over capitalism. They go to war over resources. These are VERY different things.

"Split a piece of cake between two children fairly. If you do it, they will complain abut you not being fair, regardless of what you do" do they ? Frankly this analogy of yours, regarding entire nations, it's a little simplistic don't you think ?

@@thomasdupont7186 his analogy has nothing to do with entire nations, he was using it to describe self regulating systems.

Where does the cake come from to be split evenly?

Because most are evil and greedy, there you go, not everyone is like you.

That's not necessarily true, the Federalist papers discuss in depth that "men are no angels" and cannot be made to govern themselves without a system if checks and balances that turn their natures against one another for the benefit of the system. Not saying it always works, but the founders definitely were not blind or celebratory about man's natural tendencies for greed and power

​@@DavserbanHard disagree, and you view the world through the lens you craft. Humanity is capable both of unfathomable cruelty and indescribable kindness. All is not lost, even if it sometimes seems that way, and if you feel the world should be different and less cruel it is important to work towards making it that way.

​@@DavserbanIf you are raised in a society that rewards evil and greed, many people will become evil and greedy.

@@pivomanslovensko I think it's worth examining the question of whether we are selectively breeding greed and lack of empathy. Financial Darwinism is the idea that in a capitalist system, only those who can make money will survive. The poor will be less likely to be selected as a partner, less likely to have children, if they have the means to make that choice, less likely to pass on their qualities in general, not only genetically but in the culture as a whole. A similar pressure has arguably always existed, but tribal society meant that everyone would be taken care of if there were enough resources to do so. If wealth was genuinely relational to intelligence I might be okay with that, but it seems more like wealth is correlated to greed, sociopathy, and lack of empathy in general. It's not a good direction for humanity.

You will not reproduce

@@qoph1988buddy we are in a youtube comment section about the consequences of capitalism in decay. Non of us will.

!!!!!

@@qoph1988 and you _should_ not reproduce... yet these arbitrary rules are defied every day

You are not alone not only me, bi I feel like a lot of people feel like that, some are just very good at hiding/ignoring it than others

Sounds like you're discovering nihilism. You're not far, you should make the jump to absurdism. For me, its proved to be a healthier mindset than nihilism.

Some days I feel absurd, other days I feel hopeless. Get plenty of rest and take care of yourself best you can in the system you've been born into. Unfortunately, unless we all band together (which will never happen thanks to the upper end constantly pitting us against each other) then we are powerless to change the world we live in. Circumstances may be bleak, but on an individual level they are not hopeless. We have access to food, water, decent infrastructure, and a mostly safe community depending on where you are located. That's a lot more than majority of the places in the world can say. I understand the hard work of anyone's day to day is numbing to their body and soul, but if you bite the bullet and you truly understand the system you live in then you can game it to put yourself into a better position than you are now. It'll be slow and you will NEVER reach the state of those who used foulplay or were born into money, but you will be comfortable and content with what you've earned as it truly is yours. Take pride in what you have and don't stop dreaming. You have the rest of your life ahead of you and I promise you don't know what it has to offer, you could end up anywhere doing anything and if that thought scares you then living must not be for you. Edit: In the same vein as OP I don't know how people will take this as it's just the way that I've come to view things. Expectations lead to disappointment, and disappointment can often lead to depression. I hope that what you take away from this is that sometimes you have to just accept that life is stupid and ridiculous and way beyond your control. Enjoy what you can and enjoy what you want, otherwise what's the point?

This is pretty much what I think too.

Thanks for all the anwers guys. Yes it's true, that compared to a lot of other people lifes mine is technically great. And often I try to remind myself of exactly that. It definetly helps, but I'm kind of stuck between being motivated to, as you say, biting the bullet and trying to get rest to relieve myself from the stress I've been giving myself recently. It's hard do describe, because of the many factors playing together to form my anxiety-driven mind. At this exact moment I would say that I'm doing quite well, and I hope you guys may feel that way too. In fact, I spoke to some friends of mine about this topic of being "hopeless for the future" (they are between the ages of 20-25) and at some point someone asked "Or is our generation just some kind of whining-generation"? To be honest I think that this statement is not completely wrong, because some of us (even myself) seem pretty spoiled. Yet when a whole generation of people are saying something along the way of our topic, there must be something wrong. And I think we are not to blame, because we were way to young to have any major influence on it (whatever "it" is).

100% this.

"those that provide jobs" Don't fall for their language, they aren't providing the jobs,they are merely exploiting the ones who do the work.

There's an Owner Class, and everyone else.

Bit doomer but yeah

@ReadParenti right if you go over that amount they take your benefits. You're kept in poverty barely scraping by with the amount they give you. With people that can't work it's a harsh life.

you considered paying for premium?! 😂

@@user-qw1xv8sc5d 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 i feel so silly for being so desperate for some peace to even consider, but yes. lmao. haven't given in yet though!

It’s ironic how this guy is thriving due to capitalism. He could have demonetized the video

@@basement_culture something something "we should improve society somewhat" "yet you participate in society, curious!" meme something something. like yes..... but also i'm sure this guy still has to like. eat. we don't really know the state of his life.

@@basement_cultureyou do realize that we still have to participate in this system 🤡

Hence this video making very stupid assertions

He explained why it wasn't accurate. Do you have an issue with what he presented?

Kafka biographic video coming soon 👀

@@HorsesOnYT Love it....can't wait!

The problem are the people that can't be named.

Read Zola

read gogol he was proto absurdism and surrealism

The us is still hegemonic, there is no carving. Yet.

What a comment! The aspects of our society you mention ARE really stuck in the respective decades you say. Spot on.

Our spirit was killed and replaced in Year 33 ad < proof is akin to gravity )

And our sexualities and mental software are still all caveman-mode

@@percivalyracanth1528hey I can read words AND music 😡

look up the acali raft. People of different cultures, believes and backgrounds were put on a raft for a year, completely isolated. They started loving each other despite being completely different. They shared everything, were like a happy family We are good in nature. It's hierachies, authorities, greed that make us go bad

@@juannaym8488 well the truth is juan 2% of people are sociopaths and 1% are psychopaths. When they're are people who are hungry for power and wealth those guys are the ones that try the hardest to get to the top and those people at the top control you. That's the truth

@@noahsanchez5329 then we need a system were there's either no top or where the top's power is controlled by those by the bottom

​@@juannaym8488and that kind of system has no example in our history.

​​@@juannaym8488that is what democracy was supposed to be. A system controlled by the people not by the ones in power.

I, too, feel my own thoughts being fed back to me in these videos. It is truly a reflexive experience.

Everyone is just comfortable and privileged so they complain like spoiled children

​@@adrian15041994indeed

@@adrian15041994agree wholeheartedly!!! I’ve shouted “EXACTLY!!!” & “that is SO true!!!” more times than I can count and I’m only a few minutes into the video. 😂😂😂😂😂

Nike does outsource their work to east asia there was a documentary about it yet the adults that work these jobs are in very poor conditions not to say its any better yet i feel inclined to argue due to the fact that east asia doesnt have workers rights like in the us

​@@xberserker7892the workers rights we've got in the US, like anti-child labor laws, a minimum wage, a 40 hour work week, etc were all won in long and bloody fights between organized labor and the owning class. Not a product of capitalism running unchallenged, but concessions from the factory owner to direct resistance by the factory workers

@@ethicsxcPeople these days have the collective memory of a gnat. People truly believe if capitalism ran unrestricted we’d have an amazing economic system. I’d like to point them to late 1800s/early 1900s América, where we actually had this. Child labor, 100 hour workweeks, deaths at work, company towns. Hell even the food went unregulated - you had people making bread with plaster and bleach to stretch the ingredients and make it look “perfect”. That’s what unfettered capitalism looks like, and it’s fucking horrible for us peons.

​@@mikkelhansen3714how is democracy the worst lol

@@maxwellbarnhart1375 it’s the worst except for all the others

​@@C12341could you expand?

@@C12341 It's called inherited wealth.

​@@C12341nothing dies, it just transitions into a different lifeform.

Thanks for highlighting this. There is a sense of peace in this

@@C12341 I was born in a lower middle class family, but I know. I remember. No matter what reality or the facts presented…people praised “me” or said that I was “going to make it”(think general success). Since birth. Im not particularly good at any academia, business, sports, arts, or anything human really…but everyone saw it (literally even the people who’ve gone legit psychotic). It took time to realise that I was “going to make it” regardless and I didn’t have a choice. Like there was a much elder part of me that my younger mold had yet to comprehend. Though the transgender experience is riddled with much more hate and complexity, I have to say that I relate to extents.

Sir, I IMPLORE YOU to research getting your own land if at all possible. Being self-sufficient and able to grow, hunt, forage and provide for yourself will be extremely important to your survival.

Mfw the icecaps all melted in 2012 😐

Gotta rack our brain to act, not give in

Don't have children, you'll just making new people suffer in a world that'll be even worse than ours.

@@eueumesmoaquelecara4638​"As things stand, I believe that the root of all evils is capitalism" - Albert Einstein, from his essay, "Why Socialism?" published in Monthly Review 1949

Maybe stop being so depressed and it would be less exhausting.

God is not a dead man If you know about Allah, you would know you lost your time with fear of future

To the two others in the replies; HOW ARE THESE SUPPOSED TO SOLVE DEPRESSION

Except when you understand the reason they got to that way is relient on the suffering of other peoples and nations.

Yeah it's nice what supporting American Imperialism and its capital system can buy you.

@@thebat4977I think it's important to point that out, but I disagree with how you frame it. the fact that their place in the world economy places them in a privileged position in comparison to the heavily exploited people of the global south doesn't invalidate their political ideals.

What? Marx is a terrible writer, had terrible ideas, and couldn't explain them for shihh. The communist manifesto is basically sci fi garbage. Pseudo intellectualism is disgusting. Don't attach yourself to figures that loved to wax poetic. Attach yourself to strong ideas. Jeezus!

@@scotiacaper I think there's something to that idea for sure. that doesn't make those ideals wrong, though.

Educate yourself! Horses is citing from the philosophers Mark Fisher and Frederic Jameson among others. Fisher is easily accessible in terms of much of his work being available online but also in terms of his clear and straightforward writing style. Don’t be defeatist, join a socialist org like DSA and fight capitalism. “The tiniest event can tear a hole in the grey curtain of reaction which has marked the horizons of possibility under capitalist realism. From a situation in which nothing can happen, suddenly anything is possible again.”-Mark Fisher

yes, it is like this for most religions, too bad, the capitalist religious institutions love to go against all other forms of systems because they love exploiting people by using religion...

lmfao then how did monarchy came to exist? that's worse than capitalist lib democracy

Yup. I actually came back around to Christianity when I had the epiphany that Jesus was sacrificed for healing and feeding people without demanding profit. I realized that Satan was a real person who monopolized resources and made others bend to his will. Jesus was sacrificed for undermining the monopoly, because Satan propagandizes others to guard his fortune. And God is just what we don't know. We don't know where all this came from, but we know it's wrong to exploit others for selfish gain. The most noble thing you can do is sacrifice your life fighting against exploitation. If Jesus was a based commie, that kinda changes how I feel about Christianity, like it's been corrupted rather than being intrinsically corrupt. But it's corrupted easily because it isn't very scientific. So, yea.

@@MichelleHellexactly how I feel about Christianity as a Christian. I feel like so many people these days believe in a twisted version and are misled by false prophets - I am not exempt either.

@@MichelleHell I guess many people struggle to see that point of view since most socialist countries in the past have been hostile to Christians if not mandating outright atheism.

This is an awful video filled with logical fallacies. If you don't see them, perhaps you are pondering things for so long precisely because you don't know HOW to think, rather than what to think.

@@Scoleciteplease explain further as I thought aligned with the original comment

The creator of this video can hamster is way into thinking capitalism is bad all he wants, and you’re free to latch on to his ideas. But my guess is you haven’t truly studied economic and political systems, you simply did some quick googling. And were exposed to someone else’s anti-capitalism thoughts in the past, essentially mind control (we are all at the mercy of mind control). But the fact remains, look at how past socialist and communist societies ended up. That’s all you need to know

Right thank you! Never had the knowhow to spell it out like he does!

​@@Scolecitesays the bird stuck in its cage

And his doomsday prospects of capitalism progression to late capitalism is ideologically inflated and delusional. He seems to never have noticed how we added human rights, worker rights, children rights to not work, worker unions, work security regulations, payed holidays, 40 hour a week limit etc. during the last 300 years. Creation of monopolies is closely observed and prevented by law. Many decisions were already made to prevent fusions or to split businesses. We have limited/regulated/social capitalism now. Unrestricted unsocial capitalism is a horror story from the past.

Hopefully you do a bit more research on your own videos before making them public, rather than just regurgitating baseless anti-western gibberish as Horses has done here.

@@tomjohnson9833 you seem to be upset, tell us what's wrong?

Well spoken, well spoken.

Yeah. Market economies are phenomenal. Market economies where the largest players monopolize all new market opportunities and suppress wages as low as possible are horrible.

@@TheSpecialJ11 I didn’t mention free market, just the basic concept of capitalism. I agree with you and all of this is facilitated by corruption, lobbyists and a lack of transparency.

nope that's the standard answer they give so you won't question things further but against scientific research none of that stands up What is "corruption"? When a company has an agreement behind closed doors with the government? In the USA that's just called lobbying and they'll lobby and ellect the politicians they want no matter what and there's nothing we can do Protest? They'll use the full might of the police to bash our heads in. They've done it before. There's no fairness. They have all the money, we have nothing. Who's they? It's the rich, the burgeoisie. The owners of the HUGE farms, the factories, the machines, source codes, the data. and so on.

This is why social democracy is good. It retains the benefits of capitalism while also limiting the power of corrupt and self-serving capitalists.

@@binbows2258 well, the problem with social democracy is that it doesn't remove the mechanism that allows the rich to remain rich. Aka. Private property of the means of production. Since they remain rich they have economical power. And economical power is political power. So, they have the incentive and the power to revert all the achievements of the working class in a social democracy. They use all the power to do things like: privatization of healthcare, privatization of transportation, destruction of labour safety regulations, eliminate the minimum wage, paid leave, maternity leave, etc. The only way to maintain the welfare is by having popular power.

wanna debate this video? you’re the only opposition i’ve seen, i’m guessing you’ll go the “economic systems are just a means to execute our nature. there’s no reason to change capitalism there’s gonna exploitation in every system” route? should we start there or do you have an actual point

@@wuizabug2648 No, not really interested in a debate. I think that most of the complaints about economic systems, or at least the ones in this video, are really complaints about choices that governments (or in many circumstances, particularly in the US, corporations) make. Capitalism doesn't require that people behave unethically, although some will claim that it does.

@@joshgoulash4889 oh okay i understand that. i’m an american so i personally haven’t experienced non-american capitalism. i assume that the governments of other countries paint the system is a far better light than we do.

​@joshgoulash4889 Capitalism may not "require" anybody to behave unethically to function on paper, but it sure does encourage the most unethical behavior possible, and funnels all the most unethical people to the top of society.

@@ElectricAlien577 Any system that allows individuals to accrue power should expect to have some that game the system. The longer a system persists, the more obvious the exploits become, and the worse it can get. I think you're being hyperbolic, though.

Even if it isn't everybody's gotta eat

Look behind the curtain of socialism this clown professes - there isn't anyone there because they are all dead.

Wish we could try capitalism, Keynesian is capitalism, it's socialism.

I’m sick of trying capitalism after every crash we try it again. I wanna give communism a shot like capitalism got

@blazzuris7219 You don't know what you're talking about.

Yea, people can put up with a ton and the ones who can't are world changers since most are introverts and off themselves, I've been getting "signs" is it really up to me?

Is 'what' up to you?

@@SOLIDSNAKE. at the end of the day I think the only person responsible for the happenings and reactions is ourselves

@@crystalwebster2005 reactions sure but is it really not us at the hands of the unpredictable ocean that is life

i need source for research

You are the best God is not a dead man Future is bright Even with crazy men in white house

I hope you are right. My fear is that in America the current global hegemony and enforcer of capitalism. The middle class can be continually bought off with commodities or propagandized to accept any cost to ensure their lifestyle remains the same. Anyone under the middle class will be too burned out and tired to even care. I could be just as wrong as I could right though.

Agreed. Will be better the sooner it happens though - but no generation wants to bear that toll so the buck keeps getting passed down the line

I think the global shift will happen first and we will be determined to create something different so we don't repeat the same mistakes. Not positive a better system will be created though. As we can see with nuclear weapons, the fundamental problem isn't the economic system but human nature. Competition and self-preservation is in our DNA and those instincts will always drive us to secure more resources and try to dominate others for our own security. Looking for a "perfect" system is illusory imo We are smart but also deeply flawed and will thus always find ways to circumvent it

It is the time of the Kali Yuga, so might as well give it a shot. Things are going to change, just how. Are we going to be assimilated into the capitalist system to the point that it is physically in our brains, or are we going to make a system that fits our bodies and the needs of the planet? Like getting a new car, you don’t rebuild the old one, you ditch it and get a different one. We start planning and building the new system now, so when the old one breaks down we can abandon it with glee and ride along in a system the meets our needs much better. Just can’t wait too long to start building the new one. Then the people with power have control over you.

@@xsdeafroxit may be the job of millennials and zoomers. We’re pretty fucked already so we don’t have much to lose.

@@xsdeafroxI think it keeps getting passed down the line because not enough people are revolutionaries, not because people don’t want to bear the toll. I think people are in fact very willing to pay the price for a better world. I think it’s just that, currently, society as a whole would view some sort of revolution as radical and extremist. That opinion will gradually shift as more people suffer and the ones who have been suffering suffer worse. That’s how it usually goes at least looking at revolutions of the past.

👏💯

Cringe comment detected

There’s a retarded kid in my moms town who started his own business fixing bikes He’s got 2 things going for him: strong work ethic, he isn’t poisoned by leftism

@@Cringe_department_15 It's on the other end of the "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" spectrum of determinism/free will. It's just as disingenuous and moronic, honestly.

That's basically what Marx criticized. Pretty ironic. 😅

How about this for a strong idea: build a system to replace capitalism as a wiki MMORPG sort of like The Sims meets GitHub, and when enough folks are on board, and enough kinks ironed out, we can say, screw you guys, we're going over here. We can't escape it unless we have somewhere to escape TO.

These videos seem most appealing to cynical, misanthropic Leftists who own cats. Do you own a cat? If you want to strengthen your ideas, start by researching his 'figures' on British India. Even Indian nationalists don't make such idiotic claims.

@@tomjohnson9833 , nope, don't own cats. Been thinking of adopting one recently though & a dog. Also, what's wrong with cats? Are you allergic? Did you have a run in with a feline who ruined a part of your childhood? Some traumatic experience with a kitty that's rocked your world? Most creatures are cool, some are a**holes though - like people, like you. You're a strange guy with outlandish interpretations of complete strangers on the net, fella. Check yourself ✓

@@tomjohnson9833 if a person start anything they have to say by "every problem has one cause/one solution and it's this", just get ready to read/listen to a bunch of bs lol

​@@tomjohnson9833your mindset seems the most appealing to self righteous shut-ins who love to deny factual truths and own guns. Do you own a gun? I'm Indian and was raised on Indian history, and since growing up I've done a short amount of reading into what kife in colonial India was like, and this video is absolutely on point with it. The figures line up roughly with other sources, in addition, the Brits stole upwards of a trillion dollars worth of natural resources from India to benefit themselves. You've got no close what you're talking about, and are only doing it to preserve your smooth little brain from having to think critically for a moment.

Well, it's exactly that: a feeling. There's barely any real facts in this video.

@@raybrandt bootlicker spotted

Willful participation in you own ignorance is crazy. Ray Brandt

We are all trapped just on different levels.

Cuz this is late stage cronyism. Companies are now "too big to fail" so they never do regardless of their actions. Capitalism without competition is just late stage communism with extra steps. Without checks and balances both systems just become oligopolies. It just happens faster with communism cuz of the immediate unlimited power of the state rather than the gradual erosion of competition that capitalism requires to become cronyism.

Bombs and bailouts don't buy themselves.

Agreed, and financial “gurus” try to get people to invest, but all that is is throwing money at companies that use immoral means to increase profit as much as possible.

A lot of those "parts" are basic freedoms though which could only be stopped through a tyrannical government.

You are starting to edge close to the historical materialism understanding of history. At one time, capitalism was a progressive force. So too was feudalism over slave societies, and slave societies over “primitive” communities. However, just as slave societies and feudalism became reactionary over time, producing the elements that led to their own destruction, so too has capitalism become similarly reactionary. With dialectal thinking, we can begin to see the truth of the world, utilizing concrete analysis of concrete conditions to shape our strategy and policy. If we want to advance humanity, we must accept that our mode of production must change, as it has in the past. What happens when the contradiction at the core of capitalist society, that being that one class owns the means of production, and another class can only sell their labor to those owners, is resolved? Either the owners remain in power, and we embrace barbarism in a ruined world, or the laborers break up and reshape the means of production, marrying the social labor organization that we experience today with social ownership of the means of production, and reshape society along with it. We cannot say exactly what that society will look like, nor will it be a total end to human misery, but just as capitalism launched us to great heights, so too can what comes next.

@@wizardunionizer I think that’s a decent way to put it. I just can’t shake the thought that people only tend to deal in absolutes when it comes to how societies should function. If every aspect of capitalism is upended, the progress brought by the new system would be completely outweighed by the shattering social effects that a lack of familiar structure would bring. I’m not saying anything about you implying this, however. I’m just saying that slow and steady wins the race. As much as social change is an integral part to healthy societies, it’s a fine balance between too much change and not enough. Not everyone is going to benefit from these changes, neither. It’s only a matter of time before anyone’s current economic views become obsolete and harmful to future generations.

@@wizardunionizerthis comment just changed my mind to how I perceive historical materialism. It comes across as a kind of Hegel phenomenology of the spirit idea but in terms of economics. Great comment.

Yeah that's a reasonable idea until you realize that if class had never existed and thus feudalism never existed human beings would be far, far, far more advanced now than we are today. History is not an independent factor, it is a narrative, a result of actual causes. It is not a cause in itself, there is no teleology to the development of societies. Capitalism is just a profoundly evil, harmful thing that unfortunately happened to humanity and there is nothing good about it and nothing about it we should keep.

We can't wait for the revolution, we need to make it. Good luck comrade.

Will come

Lmao

I feel like this too, and so do many of my colleagues. Absurd to think we should be grateful both for being comfortable AND better than many and yet we fail.

Let me ask you a question, do you believe in security? In regards to a person or a job?

Says it doesnt exist cause horses is kinda dumb

Also, he claims capitalism did not exist before that, and then attributes many horrors to capitalism that happened well before when he claims capitalism started.

Yeah i don't understand this point of view. People were on the brink of starvation, dirty and poor for almost ALL of human history up until the industrial revolution, and even though things are better we're still not out of it. Another way i think of it is that the scientists at CERN don't work for free. Thousands of people dedicating lifetimes to one project and we seriously think that if they had every one of their needs met outside of work that they would continue scientific pursuit? In my experience, brains are lazy. They need a tangible reason to push on and to work.

Agreed

That's precisely how evangelical christians delude themselves into believing they are correct. It's also why people point out what you are doing is a religion. As a former member myself, good luck out there.

@@willytodd2750 Well evangelical Christians believe in questionable set of events that were fainltly recorded via second hand sources that turned into a an absolute fan-fiction mess. This is more of a "Generally speaking regardless of wtf happens, systems rise and fall, empires crumble under the weight of time like night and day, so it's hard to imagine this will last forever, as even our civilization probably won't to begin with...maybe in the future it will be changed..." Basically it's just a thought that isn't even believed that strongly but a likely theory. That's hardly a religion that's just a bloody hypothesis and a intense thought experiment.

It's called human nature and it won't ever change

Oh definitely! People will invent a hundred new ways to oppress each other, but I’m still waiting on the downfall of capitalism.

Not to be pessimistic, but most revolutions and systemic changes occur because of elite in fighting. The oppressed are just a convenient tool that can tip the balance in one elites favour, before being quietly shelved again.

@@erichooligan9329What is human nature? People can only describe it in the most dire and negative possible terms. greed, fear, anger, hate, etc. Is it not human nature to Love? To nurture, care, create, hope, survive and strive eternally for new horizons? Human nature is shaped by your conditions. It is a cop out to end the argument at “human nature” as it ultimately doesn’t mean anything beyond a justification to continue to do evil.

“New oppressors” is an interesting term. Oppressors of whom? The revolution you speak of would be started and finished by the workers, the 99%. This revolution would strive to completely destroy capitalism entirely. Uproot its very existence. The workers would be responsible for rebuilding and shaping whatever world would come after. Who would be oppressed other than the capitalists?

By the end of the video some options were mentioned

@@abelabel3664no there werent…. Only vintages of a fall past were mentioned… thats not how progress works

Ty… we will see.

You said more with 4 words then this guy did the entire video. Thank you

Remove "Deregulated" from the sentence

any form of capitalism needs desperate, violent authority to survive

@@SirCommoner maybe, but vs. what seems to be our age old question

​@@ivoted-5489 .....🤡

"I don't think anyone can make a difference outside of their own lives" is obviously untrue. Billionares make decisions that impact our lives every day. Peasants in midaeval Germany, 20th century Catalonia, present day Syria and Chiapas have radically altered the structure of their societies for the better. You and I might not do anything out of fear, but meaningful change is not a physical impossibility. Edit: and it's fine and dandy for you and me to sit here and say "well life just sucks", but we can hardly tell that to people in the third world working in hellish conditions to keep us in our seat. Just a thought.

Agreed. It's more about human nature than capitalism itself being flawed and evil. Those at the top will always structure things in favor of the elites, regardless of the systems in place. At least with capitalism, I feel slightly more free to make my own financial decisions, rather than the government making those decisions for me. I can't confidently say that any currently existing economic system is without major issues. Yes, it sucks, but so do the alternatives

i feel like he debunked this toward the beginning of the video?

step 1: acknowledge greed is a trait that exists. step 2: build an entire economic system around that trait for some reason . step 3: say that since that trait is in our nature the system is only logical and if we try any other system (prioritizing other inherent traits), it will not work because greed is inherent. - did you know that we have more inherent traits other than greed?

@@dub2shoe step 1: acknowledge greed is a trait that exists. step 2: build an entire economic system around that trait for some reason . step 3: say that since that trait is in our nature the system is only logical and if we try any other system (prioritizing other inherent traits), it will not work because greed is inherent. - did you know that we have more inherent traits other than greed?

My favorite part was when he claimed capitalism immiserated feudal workers lol Communists really are incredibly dumb

Thank you!

They thought leprosy would too.

They got that one right

​@@courtjester8055leprosy still is with us though.

The darkness is only going to get darker friend. John 14:2 King James Version 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. "Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."

@@OTG1776 To be completely honest, I have no idea what that is supposed to mean.

he is saying give your life to christ and then youll be happy not saying you should do it or not do it just explaining @@doublesoul862

you can work on something that's not a job, you are choosing to do bad things like play video games

@doublesoul862 you've hit the nail on the head, it all feels so pointless and unchangeable without something massive changing things :/ message me if you wanna build our own country and fuck the rest of instead

Who said/wrote this?