Alternate History of the World - Season 3 - Episode 10 - Amongst the Shadows 

Happy New year to you too! And take your time. We can wait.

Happy new year

just mean to tell you some eps of s3 are not on the reproduction list,i hope you can fix this

The link is unfortunately invalid

@@CodyMapping discord.gg/JpeApY

Hes a mad lad

Lol, this comment hasn't aged well...

@@mattr.8470 Ugh...

@@mattr.8470 _Errare humanum est._

it is here, just in case you didn't know

what is wrong with Tsyganov?

@@ilyasmusin8993 I see

@@ilyasmusin8993 I think he did that on purpose tho.

@@kiankier7330 I like the Ottomans.

And that's another reason why radical totalitarian regimes are bad. Because their actions cause other peoples to resort to equally destructive solutions. And the more this battle between these people continues the less likely it is for both to calm down, move on and prosper together.

@@asparagussyndrome9430 'You know when you are from a country that had lost 70% of its territory and 50% of its population in the last 100 years' He mentioned the treaty of Trianon. You know, it's nearly impossible, if all your neighbours hate you and have a portion of your lands... Or tell this 'move on' story to the humiliated farmers in the video. :3

🦀impressive

안호성 there’s a reason everyone was called a hypocrite at least once in the episode

weird germany never left the occupation of any italian land since half of them were temporary

FasoOoLi Shami True. Although, they didn’t lift the occupation of northern Italy and I believe Germany said that they couldn’t risk a revolution, a betrayal or something like that. It’s in episode 3 I think? I can’t remember. It would probably explain the occupations elsewhere not being lifted.

yes

no, britian are the good guys.

“In real life, the hardest aspect of the battle between good and evil is determining which is which.” -George R R Martin (writer of “A Song of Ice and Fire”, better known for its TV series “A Game of Thrones”

Wow, impressive Grey and Black Morality there.

The problem is that due to the vienna accords no foreign power(outside of europe)can interfere in european affairs (just like what was the monroe doctrine)and this Germany is not the USA it would not allow other powers to threaten his position in europe (like the USA "allowed"it in south america. What you say about Hungary and Bulgaria is right to some extent but not fully.I think they will have to part ways with their puppets but they will not give up lands to them or other minorities.Also what you said about Hungary is also true in some ways but not wholly.Yes hungarian are probably around 40--45%around in the country but the rest is divided into 10 different ethnicities therefore they are noting compared to the hungarian "block".This is the reason why in the past we hungarians could rule because(you might take this offensive)the minorities on thier own have no chance to fight against us(Even whit foreign help you would have trouble).And to also point out our minorities might not like us but they certanly don't like eachother either(just some example:Serbs-Croats,Croats-Bosnians,Bosnians,Serbs,Romanians and serbs also have territorial disputes,etc...)So a compromise among them is possible but it's not bound to last long.(Just like what happened to the minorities who rose up against Russia after the collapse of Slavia) Well that's about my home country,I am not an expert on Bulgaria but he would be the easier nut to crack.(Much less population,much less national population,much weaker economy) An Aliance with Brazil seems logical and i wonder why the USA didn't try it earlier.And i wonder how Brazil feel that the Communist Spanish had killed his "father". Well I can certanly agree that the Vienna Pact has to go but its core idea is not a bad thing.I mean a european aliance with ONLY european powers for the europeans is not bad idea.

@@duckling3615 Thank you for your reply to this topic. Of course the minorities on their on have no chance to overthrow the rulership of these two countries the reason behind is because they don't have the numbers or the resources/economy for a long conflict. The only possible way i can imagine them fighting against Bulgaria and Hungary is Guerilla warfare(the geography of the balkans is suitable for it). I learned that the bulgarian army was much more powerful than what from a country with that size and population you expect, so respect :D. But there is a potential scenario on how the rule of the two lord of the balkans could be broken, its if the germans support the rebels and even engage in conventional warfare with them then they might secure their independence from them.(Altough their status of being "free" would be quickly over as the germans will likely subjugate them after they remove the two countries whom had a slight fighting chance.) Im interested in how will europe look like after the fall of Germany (If it falls at al)

he's always known for his big contents

Short answer. Militarily more advanced. Civilian technology is more contrasted, there are serious backwaters, even worse than say Africa today, but most Great Powers are similar to OTL technical advancement.

????

coderHUN I sort of agree. Though the path the Russians have set down only leads to 3 options, submission (not bloody likely though), burning out after expending themselves against the Germans, or becoming the superpower of Eastern Europe/Asia

An imperial federation between Canada, Australia and New Zealand will probably happen. The snack waits the best moment to strike !

But probably not India, since at their pace they should be hitting a population of 1 billion by the end of the millennium (the UBSR is probably force-marching them through industrialization 10x times faster than they were in our timeline, so their population should be booming like it is now) also they hold Pakistan and bangladesh, so even more people.

@@diepie5144 but you know how it is with communist regumes and forced industrialization if they followed the same polecies our ussr did then there should have been lots of famines in india killing millions.

@@danieltsiprun8080 But the increased population growth that usually comes along with Industrialization should overcome that quickly. Look at the USSR for example, with Stalin leading they killed millions, yet the population kept growing because of the insane population growth rates in industrializing countries. Along with that, the UBSR seems a lot more humanitarian than the USSR or PRC of our timeline, actively trying to uplift African and Indian territories to European standards of living, simply because they are downtrodden. So I don't think that there would be mass-starvation o the scale of the PRC or USSR anyways.

It will

@@thealternatezeitgeist5950 any prediction for how long it will take you to drop the next ep ?

ALPHA GAMER December 31- Rain of Wrath

more like everyone vs germany

I would play it or even a dlc based of this

What do you mean?

@@Wm7forthewin Like,how would the UBSR compare to the Soviet Union?

+The Thunder Chieftain britian is weaker. ok bye.

Not really

Even if that is the case, damn his storytelling is top-notch He's the God of Mapping

Judging by how the first timeline ended, Germany will fire the nukes and people will be forced to live in bunkers until present day. And what happens after that will never be shown and we'll get a season where both Germany and France get cucked and someone else becomes the big boy bad guy in Europe. Maybe Italy or UBSR.

@@asparagussyndrome9430 No that would be silly and unoriginal. I am not doing an ending twice. And this will be the last season of this universe.

@@asparagussyndrome9430 I doubt he would be the type that would make kind of the same ending twice. Plus, the build up is leading more towards like how the Cold War ended in a way and not like how the last series ended.