Amazing Interview With Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson 

Yes, just listen to Neil say his garbage. Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God: Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?" Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know." from the beginning of this video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-v-qU4F0lNfU.html What we KNOW and have NO doubts about... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God. Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-X7h2HWcTwa4.html He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.

@@2fast2block where's the proof of a god.

@@pablomuzzobar8940 well, I gave one right above your comment. Maybe you shoved it up your behind hole and lost it.

@@2fast2block where's the proof. All I see is an opinion and opinion isn't proof of a god

@@pablomuzzobar8940 I had the laws I gave were just opinions. Do tell how they are just opinions. You keep skipping that part because you're so stu-pid.

I love how he "dumbs down" the very difficult things of the universe so a simple fellow like myself can understand so easily

I listen to this man for hours.

​@@ramseydaugherty5515 A lot of his stuff is wrong. You don't notice? It's questionable he's giving you understanding.

A lot of his stuff is wrong. You don't notice? It's questionable he's giving you understanding.

​@@HopDavid i wouldn't say that alot of his talking is wrong information I think he's great but sometimes he over simplify concept Or doesn't answer the main point of the question and go off topic His mistakes aren't much and are justifiable.

"than many" not then.

I don't think it's humanly possible to prevent him from completing his thoughts

Fantastic! Mr Tyson should have a 2 hour science class beamed across America for all schools..

htsfrtjykkykyd

Gotcha Catherine!...I'm 73yrs old and have exactly the reverence/admiration/ happiness for this Gentleman (Dr Neil DeGrasse Tyson) ...He is not only absolutely brilliant but possibly more importantly he can communicate his knowledge and understanding to folks like me! (I can't get enough of of him!).He is possibly the most important human on earth!

😅

He's married 😊

He's become an egomaniac. He's a dick.

@@spridle how so

@@spridle yes....how so???

When we talk about the left and the right, we're suppose to talk like they're both equal but different veiwpoints. While neither the left nor the right are perfect, one of our political parties does seem to specialize in ignorance!

@@johnwoelfel7326 They both specialize in ignorance. In different capacities. -- Though I'm not sure what that has to do with the original post, above.

@@johnwoelfel7326 how

@@Tar-Von When you're trying to bring and mix God and religion with the governance of a nation, the outcome is but total ignorance and chaos for its, citizens. Such ignorance is plainly aboundant within the right wingers of this country, the USA, period.

@@PARABOLA1966 Right wing, left wing.. Irrelevant concepts when both are essentially bought and influenced by the same monetary agenda. I don't disagree with your comment but it doesn't negate the first sentence of my post. *_(I'm aware that your comment was removed. Unsure if that was intentional or RU-vid. If the former, disregard this.)_*

What evidence are you speaking of, exactly?

I know right!! I listen to Neil ALL THE TIME. I hope he never stops.

@@SWAMPJUNIOR Multiple experiments that check out with one another

If you like Neil you need to check out Brian Cox, if you haven't already. He's Britain's version of Neil. And he literally use to be a rock star lol. Brian Greene has also replaced Neil for me as well. But please check out Brian Cox.

@@SWAMPJUNIOR keep crying all over these comments its fun

Whats wrong with kitten videos?

Kardashian....wouldn't let the carrier of her BABY go to her baby shower......because she hadn't told her kids yet. Now that's something about her worth knowing.

But we'd still be killing eachother

Ed19601 just more effeiciently.......

@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 yes, that's called civilization ;-)

Standard Havok he is a pork chop chasing clown

Except you are very, very wrong.

You don't care that a "scientist" lies all the time? strange..this religion is.

Pat Gee - Apparently you are not bright enough to discern a lie from truth. If you are that bright, then that makes you a liar. So I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are stupid rather than dishonest. Those are your only two choices.

Please elaborate what lies

Andreas Møller I doubt firstly that Pat knows what elaborate means...secondly, they couldn't even if they wanted to because the tin foil hat has perforated their brain to the point of idiocy.

reaper0004 Lmyq

Neil's great; i like science but also social aspects. try Jacque Fresco, lawrence krauss, stephen schneider, noam chomsky, james gilligan, gabor mate & potholer54 on youtube

Try watching Joe Rogan's 3-hour interview of physicist Brian Greene or CIA staff Edward Snowden.

@@jaanc8047 And he's had neil Tyson on like 3 times now

eric weinstein as well

Honestly had to rewind quite a bit to grasp the whole of what he was saying, so much past 2 hours, worth every second.

I checked out your playlists. Thank you for posting them, Sir! 💜👍🏾

being religious or faithful has nothing to do with the church's desire to impede with science. One can be both a scientist and religious and the two do not have to interfere with each other. I love how people can bash religion and then have a priest bless and accept their wedding

+II Nomad II. Or go to a doctor...?

II Nomad II it is idiotic..no irony.

they are "calculating" what atoms do. They really have no idea what they are talking about. They get an idea and then invent the math to try to make you believe its a fact. He's saying the universe was this big. they "know" what happens to matter, so they know what happened then. It gives them confidence. the only problem is they have no idea what happens with matter now and it shouldn't be giving them confidence to say anything about it. I can't listen to this crap anymore.

what???do you know anything about science?for example being able to read your comment is a direct result of the science you treat as crap.read the book "On the Day You Were Born" by Debra Frasier ,im sure you'll like it

Murat Sarsenov my thoughts exactly when I found this video! Gimme more!

These 2 videos are worth watching. One is his recounting of every time he'd met Carl Sagan, and the other is a Public Talk/Q&A at the Hayden Planetarium (Starting at 10:00 on the Planetarium video is one of my favorite NDT moments, it's the first audience question which starts off humorously but with a good inquiry as the answer that he gives regarding Sir Isaac Newton and his discoveries in science was great. Have you seen either of these videos? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4KRZQQ_eICo.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oRYVtVFadX.html

@@JuicyLeek It feeds scoffing...

Only comparable to Art Tatum, Johnny Costa, and Oscar Peterson

3 hours of neil? ONE of the best things on youtube, i think the fact he has his own show and channel that comes out every week is better than a few year old interview!

QPDS THANK YOUR QP! A STATEMENT MORE REVELANT TODAY!!!

inertiaforce p

zzyivif

There's a ton of fun science stuff out there now. Best use of special effects, I think.

i wouln't say that because enlightenment it is not a scientific term -

imagendes That depends on what you define as a scientific term.

prpmpt? Neil???? Come on he he

Well so that this doesn’t be a monologue!

Your right. Neil does invoke great interest and intrigue with what he is explaining. Great interview

I have watched many of Neil's interviews. He really does not need prompting. I would love the opportunity to spend a day with Neil. Just think how many thoughts he has that are relevant but are not a part of any interview.

I’ve noticed Neil tends to interview himself because he goes in depth when he speaks.

oscar as in peterson? interesting choice. not arguing that he wasn't a great jazz musician, just often overlooked.

Yes, start at 34:35 to grasp the concept, for those that don't know how many planets are in our solar system. (35:28 is right before the moment)

@@producerk8247 the look was for the people that want to continue to call Pluto a planet.

Memorise it and quote it to friends randomly. They will think you are a genius.

@@lewisner Or far better, understand it.

i heard he is from the bronx in new york. imagine if we educated the world with science & tech

Do you watch Star Talk? He's still relevant and brilliant ☺️

This guy is soooooooo a r r o g a n t , and of course sooooooo S T U P I D .

"A generation is going, and a generation is coming, But the earth remains forever." Ecclesiastes 1:4 NWT

A lot of Neil deGrasse Tyson's stuff is wrong. He is making 'Murica even dumber.

I thought it was and then they started talking about Trump so I had to check haha

It's called pixel resolution.

When you burn a video onto your computer the rendering process between downloading onto your computer to uploading it online is going to force distortion.

+StonagePwnage. lol good joke...

A E S T H E T I C S

That's what I told he idiot who thought he could stop a train by standing on the tracks. LOL

@@SMgirlsarah I hope that was original...

First of all Edison was a dick he killed animals to prove his point and he didn’t invent the light bulb but yeah failure is learning because you weren’t born with all the knowledge of the universe predisposed in your mind.

@Make Me Believe i believe his-tory says he waited until tesla was flat broke or dead and yanked them from under his feet. Your point still remains valid!!

jemal999 that’s because he has so much knowledge to share.

The thing is... even though he goes off on tangents, even the tangents are interesting and informative AND they always lead back to the original subject/question.

hence his phrase from some of his lectures: "Uhhmm... where was I before I interrupted myself?" but his "Stupid aliens" rant and his "Steal the ashtray" rant never get old

And I love every minute 😆

He can be the next voice for Darth Vader, he's a POS, If so SMART why does he work at a planetarium????? Why don't he work for NASA, IBM??? he's a Phoney, He's a good bull shiter that's it.

So you endorse forcing people to do a job they don't want to do? Not only that, but the most important job? Silly statement

Sorry my brother that's how life goes nothing in it really is permanent. But as it takes it always gives that's how God made it no sorrow is permanent. have a nice day.

Somaya Alharbi B.,),?

Why don’t you start listening to near death experiences.

I totally agree 🌹

I salute you and congratulate you. People like you restore my faith in humanity.

I was thinking the same thing. Why not!? It could happen! It would be like something out of a good, old Disney movie. 🎥

He's way to smart to fall for that trap

ThePigvincent - Somewhat better than Sagan, but not in Feynman’s league.

Mediamatix What the hell are you trying to say ? Just spit it out man!!!!!

Mediamatix just did, Jackie you did not try

Ernst Haeckel What ?

Ernst Haeckel I didn't see any clear thought !!

@@jackiebinns6205 because you did not try.

Literally. Including me. *shuts up*

Well, that is usually how it goes. Thankfully his voice is super-silky and he's really insightful. Imagine if Fran Fine (from The Nanny) talked that much and in public.

There is always time to learn and find joy in discovering new ideas.

Michael McDaniel - Gamow and Asimov?

@@GH-oi2jf Asimov definitely... I didn't know Gamow popularized science (I thought he just came up with outstanding theories that were usually proved correct - decades later)...

I know this is 10 months later, but Neil deGrasse Tyson has been on the JRE show at least 3 times (2-3 hr long show each episode on RU-vid). Just 3 examples is 2.1mil views from 5 years ago, 7.5mil views from 1 year ago, and already up to 3.3mil views from only two weeks ago. The trend is looking good for science. Have hope! :)

This is how it always goes, if we had to depend on the masses we are screwed.

taisgdl almost blacked out twice 😂😂😂

taisgdl I wouldn't be able to walk !!!

Pat Gee, you have won the award for the trolliest and stupidest comment I've ever read. I piss on your life with great esteem for winning this prestigious and abysmal award.

down

taisgdl LOL 😂😂😂

Cecilia hoppenjans

Mostffascinating

He's a proven liar and Charlton....who will purposely mislead and lie when it suits his political agenda and he knows the cult members like you will never question him , because hes your Jesus....but hes a egomaniacal scumbag...another day another fabrication by sean davis....great stuff...lol

Oh Bullcrap.

citation?

Much silliness. Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God: Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?" Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know." from the beginning of this video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-v-qU4F0lNfU.html What we KNOW and have NO doubts about... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God. Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-X7h2HWcTwa4.html He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.

whats your number