Use code EmilyBaker599 at www.GreenChef.com/EmilyBaker599 to get $5.99 per meal on your first box-and your first box ships free! Head to policygenius.com/LAWNERD to get your free life insurance quotes and see how much you could save. Visit thrivecausemetics.com/LAWNERD for 15% off your first order.
@Emily, I love Thrive! I've been using their products over a year, and I cannot sing their praises enough. If anyone has any doubts, just check it out. Their mascara and lipliner is fantabulous, and I'm picky. Just wanted to add my experience. Love, love, love! So happy you're partnered with them.💜
But would the jurisdiction not be questionable and Amber fail to show proof of valicity because the house was sold due to the outcome of the Defanation Case? Basically, Amber argument will be denied based upon her selling her hime afterwards during representation?,..or what??
Every single thing that has come out of Amber's cock holster is a blatant LIE. That has literally been the case from the day she walked into that courtroom with a zit on her face and her Amish schoolgirl dress on and claimed that Depp beat her.
@@normasolache2420 Elaine did knowingly lie in court a surprising amount of times, did she not? She single-handedly destroyed my faith in the justice system.
If she is stateless how is she traveling around without a passport? If she is using a passport and has money to travel then she should be held accountable because she’s not broke!
She is in a completely different country. They might be better off finding out if they can enforce anything before they waste time and money fighting over it all.
That's what I've been saying. You can't be stateless and hold a passport. You have to declare where you live on your passport application. Even if you're homeless you have to declare what state you reside in. If she's "stateless" then her passport is wrong and should be confiscated and she should be charged with fraud. I know she has lawyers telling her to do this but it seems like a bad idea to me.
Given the timing of when she was shopping for this insurance & acquired it, when she wrote the OpEd for WaPo & the outcome of the court that she did this with malice, she should be thankful that Traveler's isn't also suing her. I'm in Illinois you pull a stunt like that on State Farm & they'll make sure you get charges for fraud AND have to pay back every single penny they paid out. That's exactly what she did. She intentionally sought out insurance to cover defamation, intentionally made the defamatory statements under the belief that the insurance would cover it. Then filed the claims. It's fraud. New York General & Travelers should be pressing fraud charges against her, not suing each other.
After the absolutely heinous crap State Farm pulled on the survivors of the October 2017 Sonoma County Complex fires (namely the Tubbs fire, of which I was a victim), they deserve an Amber. I wish all the worst clients and all the most inconvenient happenings on them.
@@aliioana8586 State Farm has all kinds of clauses they would've used to get out of it. 🤔 I think it was the late 80's early 90's they managed to get out of paying customers for hurricane damage. I guess that's part of why I find it weird that Traveler's essentially gave her a blank check. Then just looking at the timing of when the extra insurance was purchased & stuff, that looks like a clear case of fraud
If AH is saying she cannot be sued because she is stateless, then I would assume the opposite should apply. She cannot collect on her policy because she isn't a resident. It should work both ways IMO. Plus it seems like her status when she originally had the policy should come into play.
Seems like she fled, is not planning to come back. It also appears like she won’t be paying anyone… not her attorneys, not JD and not anyone else she owes. When does this become a criminal case? She’s left the country to avoid lawsuits and avoid paying her pledged money and to avoid paying attorneys.
She sold her house, made a few hundred thousand $$$$ & closed the day before she filed intention to appeal. Says it all. She planned in advance to get some money & get out of dodge so she could claim she has no home. Surely she can’t stay in Europe longer than 3months as visa policy is as strict there as it is in U.K. UNLESS she secretly married her gf & got a spouse visa (that takes about 6months to get minimum). Then again, her gf isn’t European (since U.K. left Europe) so she would be subject to same 3month visa. So weird. Only way she could keep moving round Europe after 3months would be as wife if spouse has work visa or is European. Or has she returned to USA? I haven’t read much news about her recently so I have no idea where Amber currently is. Got Covid for 1st time 4wks ago & have been really sick & in hospital as well as still struggling (have disability so have very low immune system). Sadly have been too sick to watch my usual RU-vid favs.
If I’m understanding … she’s saying the whole trial and verdict and judgement is incorrect - as conveniently now she’s stateless. They want that judgement vacated - as they say the court didn’t have jurisdiction.
@@JDAfrica but wouldn't that be pointless as she accepted their jurisdiction during the trial and can't do a u-turn on that now? Surely it should only affect her ability to appeal as she's stateless after the trial and not during?
That is exactly how the USA legal system seems to work. Not sure there are many countries where she could be extradited to answer for a case where she was sued. Serious criminal charges with no time limitations might be different but apparently USA has no interest in putting criminal charges on her and as an Australian I have no interest in my government pursuing her. She ever comes back here she can answer for her shit but just happy to keep her away. We got better things to spend money on than something like that.
She's been in Europe. Schengen (EU + a few other countries) do not easily grant residence visas to people from outside Schengen, she was on a tourist visa, good for 3 months in a 12 month period for the entire Schengen area. Schengen operates as one country when it comes to visas from people outside the area. Residence visas can be granted for work or marriage, Amber has not been working, or gotten married in Schengen, also, her visa is now up since it's been over 3 months. She can be asked to leave
The USA doesn’t want or need her back. The insurance companies were stupid for insuring her in the first place. Johnny has moved on so he could care less what she is doing. Let her pull her manipulative bullshit somewhere else.
As an expat in an EU country. There is no way she is a permanent resident anywhere in the EU yet. It takes multiple years to become a ‘permanent resident’ as that is a very different status than a long-term working visa (I’m came on a 6 month initial working visa, am currently on a 2-year visa, then could get a 5-year visa and at some point apply for actual permanent residency at some point after the 5 year total mark. While individual EU countries may vary there are none im aware of that would grant permanent residency without at least several years of living there under a proper visa that contributes time to someone’s residency status. Also, if she’s ‘stateless’ (aka not a citizen of any country) then any visa she is living under would be fraudulent as it likely was issued on the basis of her being a US citizen….
Most people with tons of money, and I mean buy several apartment houses and businesses rich, and still have money to live comfortably and pay taxes, could get a special visa, but it still wouldn't be a permanent residency.
She could definitely use her wealth (though she also says she can’t pay depp or her legal fees 🙄) and celebrity to get a Visa to live and work somewhere. Definitely. But there is a difference between being allowed to live and work in a country under a visa arrangement and being a ‘permanent resident’. The country I live in is my only home. It’s the only place I work and only place I live. Plus, I have no doubt I could get the necessary visas to stay in the EU country I am in ‘permanently’. But I am not a ‘permanent resident’. That is a separate legal thing, and to apply requires you to have lived in a country for a specific period of time - often 5 years (applying for refugee status would be different). It’s a much more involved process than other Visa processes and is like declaring you want to permanently (aka forever) live in that country (though of course you aren’t required to, but you typically wouldn’t apply for permanent residency over another visa without at least that consideration). It’s also the step you take before obtaining citizenship (though I’m sure not all permanent residents become citizens). But usually ‘permanent residency’ gives you most of the all the same benefits and rights as a citizen. That is likely what the woman in the other case had as she had lived in the other country for 8 years. Most celebrities would go to countries under work or other Visa’s, but most wouldn’t have actual ‘permanent residency’ anywhere unless they intended to move to that country permanently.
not only that (i have full french citizenship now due to BREXIT after living here for 20 years i applied just after) it took 2 years a language exam several interviews and police visits (and i’m married to a French citizen & have my own property!) Anyoutstanding legal issues ~ even an unpaid parking ticket in either UK or France could have resulted in refusal.
How long can a person be Stateless in the US without being caught up by the System? Healthcare, various insurance, renewal of passport etc? Here in Europe You can hardly buy a cellphone or get a SIM-card if You don't have a personal ID/adress. Well, there are ways around, and I am pretty sure AH is in the works exploiting every little quirk she can find.
One of the biggest issues here is that being unhomed/a person experiencing homelessness kills your job opportunities because you HAVE to have an address. You have to prove legal residence for a lot of things depending on the state. Her "statelessness" is pretty much bunk.
It occurs to me that the Travellers insurance company not only believed AH’s story, but felt that the climate against dv on women made this a ‘slam dunk’ case, as you Americans say. As a women, I am deeply peed off that AH has now put back real DV victims chances of being believed. At the same time, I am thankful that JD has highlighted the fact that men can be victims of DV too.
I just need to say, I love how all of LawTube has a collective thesaurus that everyone just knows. Thruple, lawful law, mega-pint, objection hearsay, etc. It makes my heart warm.
Shouldn't matter if she is "stateless", if a foreigner commits a crime in USA, it shouldn't matter if they have an address anywhere in the world. Even if she is homeless, she still should have to pay what the court ruled against her.
AH's legal team have no scruples. I believe the court will cite Federal and Case law citing she was a citizen of CA when the lawsuit against her was filed. She acknowledged said fact through her attorneys prior to trial. After her loss, she allegedly moved out of CA. Claiming now to be stateless, the court will see this as malfeasance on AH's part. The court will defer to AH's prior domicile in CA.
Amber was in Israel and now staying in Spain. Apparently, according to a quick search: "You need a total of 5 years in order to get permanent residency in Spain. The thing is that many times, depending on the type of permit you have, more than 5 will be required to actually get 5 years of legal and continuous residence in the country."
Most countries, you have to leave for a certain time, then come back … likely, she went to Isreal, and re-entered Spain to renew her travel or work visa.
“Spain is a party to the Schengen Agreement. This means that U.S. citizens may enter Spain for up to 90 days for tourism or business without a visa. “ I suspect she traveled to the UK (when she was sighted) to re-enter the Schengen area after 90 days. Schengen agreement is for 26 countries in Europe - the UK is not included (after Brexit).
not only that (i have full french citizenship now due to BREXIT after living here for 20 years i applied just after) it took 2 years a language exam several interviews and police visits (and i’m married to a French citizen & have my own property!) Anyoutstanding legal issues ~ even an unpaid parking ticket in either UK or France could have resulted in refusal.
@@vicleomant8519 Yes, I doubt she has got residence status anywhere yet. There are articles on this on google. Most countries require investment in real estate and most require 5 years presence, one island nation fast tracks (1 year). I doubt that the insurance companies want to be taken for a ride by that Aquaman starlet 😉 The verdict said “With actual malice”.
2 years minimum residency in Spain before you can apply for citizenship. You also have to take a language and culture test (whole process takes approx an extra year). She's been there around 5months, so she's still a US citizen. 🤷
2 years if you are from one from a former colony or from Portugal (most central and south America and Filipinas too, people of sefardi descedant, etc -a few other exceptions to the general rule of 10 years-), 1 if married to an Spanish citizen, 10 years of residence required if you´re not in any of those cases (as far as I know, she is not).
Depp had to pay her 14 million dept, they weren't even married 2 years & she owed 14 million! 🤯. So she goes through money like water. The 7 million is gone
She has been on British soil recently ... she has friends here called "Sun" paper etc etc. Brits don't want her anymore than US does. But she is bouncing around avoiding US and Aus though because both have dirt against her. I wish the Sun appeal would be re-opened. So that we can be rid of her here too.
@@Ulvetann her finding a company that would touch her with a 10 foot pole is probably more to the point right? Especially if/when she gets caught trying this residence schtick.
I might be over simplifying but if the original policy was opened with the understanding that the insurance company chose the lawyers, gave leeway for Amber to bring in Elaine as codefense but then Elaine in essence pushing out thr insurance company lawyers - would that nullify the original policy making Amber solely responsible for legal fees and verdict? Then if her stance is I'm broke and stateless, how is she retaining appellate lawyers and traveling the world? Would she not need a visa or passport originating from her country of birth?
@@877swissmiss she could renounce her U.S citizenship but does she have the ability to? With all these cases and what not would any other country take her?
@@FantasyFinalFiend Don‘t think any state would like to give her citizenship but who knows… But that would mean she really is stateless if she renounce US citizenship, right?
Just announcing you re?inquiry your citizenship as far as I know isn't acceptable to the US as it could be a forced statement, so therefore there are steps to doing so, thankfully. This is also to protect US citizens who can not fend for themselves such as children and others, from being denied their rightful citizenship by others like a non citizen parent or guardian.
Hello! If Amber is in Spain, she may have processed "permiso de residencia" (visa) that allows her to stay for more than 90 days in our country. But we must not confuse this with a" permiso de residencia permanente"(similar to a green card), for this you would have to demonstrate at least 5 years of residence in our country, although there are exceptions to this rule. I have read here something that she might travel from the UK and that would make it easier for her to obtain residency? This doesn't work like that, the UK is not a member of the Shengen area, what exists is an agreement with the EU, but the permanence is 90 days and you must also travel with a passport (it's a border )Therefore, it only applies to the passports of EU citizens, not the USA( that mean you have a different border, similar for us when we go to the USA with a ESTA form or regular visa). In addition, we would also have to take into consideration international law, agreements signed between the USA and SPAIN on this matter. at least from the point of view of Spanish law.
You can barely gain permanent residency in another state let alone another country. When I lived in Germany, I had to take and pass language and government law exams before even being eligible.
Yeah I’m very curious to see how this turns out, cause it feels like she feels she can just live elsewhere when she feels like it, but the places she’s going to have pretty strict immigration laws. The places she could get away with would probably be more in Latin America unfortunately (also because she speaks the language somewhat), but even there people know who she is and what she did , I’m from Mexico and everyone knows about the bed shitting lol
not only that (i have full french citizenship now due to BREXIT after living here for 20 years i applied just after) it took 2 years a language exam several interviews and police visits (and i’m married to a French citizen & have my own property!) Anyoutstanding legal issues ~ even an unpaid parking ticket in either UK or France could have resulted in refusal.
@@LianaHappens Gruñón/a, cascarrabias (but it would be kinda weird to use cascarrabias in my country, at least, we usually say "enojón") or enojado could work, depending on the context
I just can't wait to hear your take on this. People's opinions are all over he place bout this, whether it's brilliant or stupid, but I trust you know how to break this down so I can understand
In a legal sense, the term infirmity is used to mean any imperfection that renders a particular transaction void or incomplete. For example, if a deed drawn up to transfer ownership of land contains an erroneous description of it, an infirmity exists in the transaction.
Quote>>>>In a legal sense, the term infirmity is used to mean any imperfection that renders a particular transaction void or incomplete. For example, if a deed drawn up to transfer ownership of land contains an erroneous description of it, an infirmity exists in the transaction. West's Encyclopedia of American Law
right there proves Amber is not living abroad to "raise her baby" she is just trying to run from her responsibilities. She continues to act entitled. She will never pay for her consequences she will continue to act like a victim and her poor child is doomed,, either the child will be just like her when she grows up or completely resent Amber,, sadly i am betting on the first.
Yeah. Worst part is she’ll get away with it all, too, just watch. And you KNOW that everyone else wouldn’t get away with this AT ALL. That’s what makes it the most unfair. She isn’t anymore special than the rest of us. It’s the “look” and “big picture” that will protect her, and it will. And we’ll have to eat it
I wouldn’t worry to much about “her” baby. She’s been caught on vid taking photos with a baby, handing a baby to a woman, paying the woman and leaving while woman stays, Pushing an empty stroller with no child in sight, and there are no pregnancy records or photos. I think it may be a all an act.
@@kristamun8614 if I remember right, there wouldn't be any pregnancy notice about her daughter because Amber got a surrogate. I could totally be wrong though lol
If Amber is 'stateless/homeless' does this also not apply yo her daughter and is this then not a child welfare issue in US ... I'm not American & do not live there so am not knowledgeable with your laws regarding child welfare but it seems any homeless/stateless child would become a minor under US protection
Not a lawyer just a mom with a question. Doesn't she need to have a home for her daughter? Just seems like if she was just a ' regular ' person with an infant someone would step in and be worried about the safety of the child being homeless. Am I missing something? Thanks Emily, you are amazing!
@cloiebuggeater but it would place you under the scrutiny of cps surely? They should make sure child still attending school/doctors appointments/thriving?
@@evanescentlili No, being homeless does not make you an unsafe parent or entitle anyone to investigate you. Medical neglect or truancy are separate issues that might lead to an investigation.
I wonder if the insurance companies and her chosen lawyers just failed to do normal due diligence here as they all just assumed it would be a win. They all just figured by her playing the media’s victim role she would never have to show evidence or be accountable as most of the media and public had already cancelled Johnny without evidence. This may be a great case study in future.
Allegations of defamation could potentially be covered in a policy. The duty to defend is greater than the duty to indemnify. Meaning at times you have to wait until it’s determined if the acts were intentional or not. If deemed intentional then the insurance does not owe any obligation to pay for that. An insurance company will provide a defense to their insured under a Reservation of Rights. Meaning that most likely AH was told up front that she wouldn’t have coverage for any acts that were excluded. However a defense would be provided until this was determined. Since CA has laws regarding cumis counsel if there is a conflict between the policyholder and the insurance carrier: ie: exclusion for intentional defamation-AH would most likely have been advised in the ROR ( sent shortly after the carrier was notified of the suit) that if the alleged allegations were excluded she would have to pay back her defense costs to the carrier & no judgment would be paid. But, the insurance companies contract makes them responsible for defense costs if there are potentially covered allegations pled in a lawsuit. NY most likely sent a disclaimer for failing to abide by policy terms/conditions & that’s why they are saying they don’t owe anything further to AH or Travelers.
Looking forward to Amber Heard deciding to represent herself as a "sovereign citizen" next. What I'd really like to find out is who in Traveller's decided to let Elaine bill them infinity moneys.
The woman who kept going to AH and her team at the star of trail but later never to be seen again cause she was fired? She represented the insurance company
@@aleccampbell7707 I kinda feel like an AH stan was behind the Traveler's blank check. What they spent is way out of line for any insurance company. Hope somebody looks into that.
No way can the court afford to go with AH's "stateless" defense, because it encourages people to flee the country the second they are, or think they might get sued. I can't imagine a level-headed judge that will want that much of a future headache to deal with if it becomes precedent.
So AH says she is stateless when being sued and the court lacks jurisdiction. Yet when she wants to use the courts for an appeal then suddenly everything is fine and that court is good to go.
I feel the "stateless" argument should be resolved by asking AH: "To what state/country did you pay taxes during the filing of the lawsuit?", but I fear that'd spark motions and filings with regards to "pledged" versus "paid". Bless her heart. 🙃 I really hope that this "stateless" BS (which is exactly what it is because she's clearly trying to run away from responsibility and accountability) is squashed and doesn't quell these lawsuits, as well as the ongoing Australia investigation. All I can say is: "FFS! 😐"
Nope. Your policy pays based on the coverage you had at the time of the occurrence (so the date of the defamatory act). Changes to the policy or moving after the fact does not impact the policy coverage or duty to defend.
I read earlier that a Dane wrote to you that we do not have Jury in Denmark. But we have Jury in Denmark. Jury cases are cases where the prosecutor demands a prison sentence of four years or more, or where the defendant may be sentenced to detention or other placement. These are typically serious criminal cases that are decided as jury trials. In criminal cases, evidence is presented to the jury, rather than the judge, which means that all evidence must be presented in a way ordinary citizens understand. Once you have been approved, you are a civil representative to be a judge or juror in the criminal court cases the president of the Western High Court appoints one to. This means that you have to show up and therefore cannot say no. You typically participate in approx. four trials annually.
At what point can we say AH is fleeing from the law and on the run? There's got to be a law, somewhere, against escaping to another country when the courts say you owe someone millions of dollars.
AH knew the insurance companies were planning on trying to get out of paying her legal fees before she flew the coop. She sold her house, played around in upper New York for a few weeks then flew out of the USA. It appears to me that she decided to put herself outside the insurance companies ability to collect any money from her. Just another example of her duplicity.
I don’t understand, I thought attorneys couldn’t lie to the jury , Elaine told the jury that AH could pay JD due to her paying 6 million for the legal fees . That was a known lie . There is no Consequences for lying under oath for an attorney?
She's on an extended vacation since she didn't legally make herself a Citizen of any other Country and what's she's doing to her daughter ( if there is one but she claims there is) is just awful. I remember having to move every three months as a child in just one state due to my Parents getting evicted all the time and it was one of the main things that ruined my childhood
Damn, that sounds awful. And yeah, it is weird if she's just traveling around with a young child, but in an airplane too? That poor kid. And claiming to be homeless seems like something authorities would care about if she has a kid with her.
All I can say is, she really is a piece of work! She’s got so many people wrapped up in her chaotic & toxic world! Thank you for breaking this down for us that don’t understand all of this! 💜💜💜
Yes. And all I can say is, that if I were in her position, and on the brink of losing everything (which she is), I would probably try to do the same. When you are desperate you try everything. This is not the play though.
@@bissek3567 We’ll just agree to disagree lol and she needs to put her big girl panties on and face the problems she’s caused or she’ll be running from here to there all her life.
@@rosiealvarez1065 I don’t really disagree with you. I just try to think of everything from each perspective. Not trying to argue, just getting a discussion going. Xo
She’s not homeless she’s staying with Eve Barlow, to get residency don’t you have to prove you work and have money to be able to live there and have lived there for so long before asking for residency. She’s just sofa surfing, that poor kid if is being moved all over if it is hers, be interesting when kid old enough for pre school
Idk if anyone has said it, but your voice is so nice. Engaging, smooth, beautiful tone. I honestly haven’t watched as much of your stuff as I intended to, but I plan to change that ASAP. You could read me my eulogy and I’d come back to life 🖤
EMMMMMMily I almost spit out my water!!! At 10:42 “let’s see if that’s become lawful law somewhere” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 I love you so goddamn much 😂😂😂😂😂💜💜💜💜💜🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼
I'm only at 29 minutes in,but I'm definitely intrigued. Only an actor would attempt a defense that sounds like a script to an unlikely movie plot. It works in the movie but not in real life.😂
NYM vs Heard didn't sue AH's personal corporation (not LLC) at all. Since it is a CA corp (and who they issued the policy too), could they add it in order to get personal jurisdiction? SCOTUS has already ruled that jurisdiction is proper where a corporation is incorporated.
I've been a resident of 3 foreign countries and depending on the visa you can establish residency immediately after first entry to the foreign country, same day you get your residency card and all that jazz and you are free to exit the country as much as you like, some countries in Europe, however, stipulate that you need to be in the country for 6 months and a day or more than 50% in order to renew the residency. The more expensive option is buying property, some countries you can get residency if a family member is a national. So I wouldn't be surprised if she established residency before the trial began based on how shady and calculating she has proven to be.
Let me understand…so she lost in a trial and was found responsible for 10 mil dollars. So she sold her assets and left the country to go abroad, living a millionaire lifestyle and evading responsibility. Now saying she can’t be sued because she’s no longer resident in the US. That’s ridiculous! How is that allowed? Why was she allowed to sell up and leave the country?
Hello there. Could she possibly be sued wherever she’s living now? I’m thinking of when Johnny Depp, as a US citizen, sued the publishing company in England.
You work so hard and I love seeing so many sponsorships for your channel. Thank you for breaking down this information and wishing you even more success!
She is not stateless - She is domicile in California - California equates citizenship with domicile if she has any formal ties - you can not get out of it that easily - California does not let it's taxpayers go. She is CEO of three companies, including the one she took her NYM insurance through Her Lawyers are based in California - if she has bank accounts, a drivers licence, insurance, anything that still ties her to California she is still Domicile - she would have to have set up shop completely in Europe before she could cut ties with California - You can check out anytime you like but you can never leave
So what if NYM goes, "Okay. So then we drop our attempts to have the court officially declare we don't have to pay for you and just decide we don't pay you"... "Hey Travelers, I know you're suing us, but as we mentioned the only implied rights are on Amber's behalf; she's the client we owe rights, not you. She would be the one who needs to sue us here, but she's stateless, so...." ?
Since she's living somewhere in Spain right now (heard something about Palma de Mayorca) she must be aware that Spain as part of the EU has extensive legal agreements between them and the US, right? If she wanted to flee jurisdiction, she would've had to go to Iran, Russia or North Korea - none of which would I recommend for obvious reasons, but who knows, her wit seems to have no bounds.
So, in the UK we refer to the legal status AH is trying to claim as a (NON - DOM). I'm aware of this status because when I lost my father suddenly in 2020 & he had no will, I sorted out the estate with my Mum meaning she didn't have to use expensive Probate lawyers. I'm not a Solicitor, but having an extensive Engineering background I'm disciplined in dealing with Red tape / Bureaucracy & excessive paperwork. Incidentally this is also the status that our current Prime minister's wife was, in order to pay less taxes. But she had to revoke this in order for Rishi to become PM. This all blew up in the British Press recently as a result. This I'm sure is not a quick & easy legal process, but many rich people may undertake it. I know of this tactic that the extremely wealthy use. They never live in any 1 country for more than a few months of the year in order to reduce the taxes they pay to the respective government, & AH kind of fits into this category. However, wouldn't AH have to have been Domiciled somewhere in the U.S. in order for the Insurance policies to have been even valid in the 1st place. Surely, she can't just turn round now & try to claim (NON - DOM) status because it suits her. It's standard protocol for most Insurers to exploit loopholes & avoid having to pay out unless they really have to. This is all out of AH's playbook in trying to avoid any responsibility. But I recently heard Johnny tell her in 1 of the Audio's Recordings, she is spiralling out of control. This is one legal wormhole she doesn't really want to be going down. It seems to me that this could potentially open her up to all kinds of Fraud Investigation's & intense scrutiny, but that's nothing new to AH. I just have a feeling this could all backfire & end up doing more damage than good, but that's what we want for her anyway. LOL Final point which I thought of afterwards & have edited in. What if she actually does manage to claim Non-Domiciliary status, couldn't the insurer that did back her initially, turn round & then demand their money back too. Just seems like a can of worms to me.
So how did all this play out, I see she's still suing her insurance companies in the US. How can she sue them but claim she can't be sued back because she's stateless?
I was in the military, stationed overseas, and desperately wanted to not be a resident of my state. The only way to change my state residency was to establish residency in another state, which I was able to do when I was subsequently stationed in another IS state.
I am Canadian living in Mexico. When i got home for Christmas I am going to apply at the Mexican consulate for my residency. It's really easy if you meet the financial requirements, and then I have 30 days from when I reenter the country to get it certified here. So it is possible in Mexico at least.
At the start of her testimony in Virginia AH testified that she lived in California. She was either domiciled in California or guilty of perjury. I bet the IRS knows what state she was domiciled in. If AH is saying she cannot be sued because she is stateless, then wouldn't the opposite also apply? So she could not collect on her policy because she wasn't a resident as was required for the policy. Besides it seems like her residential status when she originally had the policy should be what matters. A gypsy lifestyle should not cause one to become exempt from lawsuits.
I don't know how it is in the US, but given that she has to pay Johnny for damages even selling her house would be questionable conduct. It would be fair to say that it looks like she is attempting to save her belongings from getting collected. And while defamation was not a criminal charge maybe insurance fraud and fleeing from judgement could be.
so were these not part of home owners insurance policies .... one would think that she held a policy on the home in Cali up until it closed which would be well past when it sold ...... which had the companies on the hook, and so locked her into a domicile IMHO
The residence permit is usually issued for a period of 2 years, renewable, provided that you still meet the economic requirements and you have lived at least 183 days in Spain each year. After 5 years of holding
