Amber Heard Trial: Rottenborn and Elaine's Closing Arguments (Highlights) 

Elaine is a joke🤡

Those were some good muffins

and how much people make and how they only want fame

“Amica Cream”

Those muffins are worth 6 million,,

100 percent agree! What man wants the whole world to know a women ( including his own mother) abused him! He’s always stayed humble and true! Amber says everyone comes out of the “ woodwork” for him.. other women could have jumped in to say they were too abused by him but where were they? Oh yeah Kate Moss and she had nothing but good things to say! The truth always come out in the end!! #justiceforjohnny

Did she really say amber spent 6 MILLION on her attorneys 😂

He also has worked his ass off entertaining us.

It is true and still denying it. No redemption for JD.

He is a good parents..no way a drug addict and alcoholic could EVER BE A GOOD PARENT LOL.. I am a fan of jd fyi but I am no way gullible and naive

I just read the op ed and I do think it's going to be a difficult one to prove, I don't know if it's designed to be defamatory. Amber opening her big mouth and saying it was for him could have an impact.

@@rowannandlall5060 if she kept her mouth shut it would have been difficult to prove . But, she repeatedly admitted she wrote it and at the very last day she admitted she wrote it AND explained why she wrote it ... " because JD is a powerful man" She is a complete narcissist and just evil.

@@shel_311 I don't disagree with you. I just don't know which direction this case will sway.

@@rowannandlall5060 you are right. Even after she admitted that she has never ever considered herself a victim or wanted to be seen as one ..... I would think that would be powerful. If she is not a victim and never said she was then why is she an ambassador for domestic violence with ACLU

@@shel_311 yeah look, she permanently contradicts herself. She doesn't know how to leak information and in the same breath she could've done much worse if she really wanted to. The big thing about the op ed is that she doesn't explicitly even mention Jonny, she talks about being a survivor of domestic abuse and focuses on coming out of it and being in a position of power. So it could be argued that intent of the article wasn't to tarnish his name, but rather to empower other women.

Imagine being in court having to bring suit against a psychopath as Amber Heard. It all comes down to good lawyers, and the jury.

Yes

"Stop being poor"

At the risk of sounding like a big honking socialist, at some point our system needs to do a better job when it comes to financing legal access for those of us who aren't movie stars.

Brutal

She’s 👏🏻doing👏🏻 her 👏🏻job 👏🏻

Elaine is essentially an extension of Amber (as the client and the narcissist) so there you go lol.

@@namastewellness She's not. She's a lawyer just doing her job. She really doesn't deserve the hate that she's getting.

Tough material she has to work with

@@namastewellness in the end, someone has to do it.

Amber how dare you lying about the donation?! Shame on you Amber!!!

I am so concerned whether these lawyers get paid by amber or pledged. 🤣🤣

@@jpgar6066 u deserve a million likes haha.

Oh come on! I pledged my tax payment to the IRS last year and they had no problems with it.

@@jpgar6066 🤣🤣

She sounds a little schizophrenic. Lol

Yeah Elaine has less class than Rottenborn. Which part you couldn’t follow anymore ?

@@gabrielmichael3701 I kinda get what she's going for and I think I would have had liked it better if it contained less voices (definitely makes it a lot more entertaining) and took it a little slower to give a little space for the jury to think (though I totally get that she needed to be fast because Rottenborn's closing argument is so long that they'll ran out of time for rebuttal if she took it any slower). Also the amount of times she misinterpret the malice stuffs (I think its the malice stuffs, maybe I'm wrong) and the statements didn't really helped her for me either.

Elaine’s closing statement was the worst. It was more like a boring fast talking lecture mixed with some comedy. Get your bitch in here, Amber get the f.ck up, Amber get the f.ck up, Amber get the f.ck up, Amber get the f.ck up 😂

OMG, LOL, My friend said the same thing, she said Elaine reminded her of her aunt and mother chattering like lunatics about family gossip after they had a few glasses of wine.

And no matter how this turns out, it's a huge victory for the victims of false rape accusations and other bogus claims of abuse. Tens of millions of people are finding out that, yes, false accusations happen and are incredibly harmful.

Yes we saw how revolting he is. Well done Drippy ice cream

In other words this trial is about him defaming Amber in the media... Most people are not going to follow this story the way a juror would. They are not isolated only looking at evidence. They are not jumping into a mob. Johnny has already been convicted of abuse by a high UK court. It's not illegal to talk about being abused if your spouse was literally convicted of abuse. It's pure harassment.

@@nekomime3282 In other words implies that's what I'm saying, but it isn't. If there's anyone who was willing to put Johnny Depp on blast but is doubling down to support Amber Heard when it's become evident that she was the abuser....that person is sexist. It has nothing to do with supporting a victim of domestic violence, and everything to do with blind, angry mysandry.

@@kipo1456 incredibly harmful not just to the accused but to the trust and understanding lent to the victims that come forward that we fully intend to believe and support them. I think it's important that we still do, but the more people betray that trust with lies, the more likely it is people are going to be apprehensive about believing a victim and it could happen at a time when a victim needs to be blindly believed as once they would have been. There are a lot of lies an ex can tell, particularly an abusive ex, but perhaps the most damaging of all time is the false allegation of domestic violence. May Amber Heard turn her heart and soul around before it's too late.

He abused her period

The purpose of the first amendment is to allow people to be able to speak out about our government without fear of punishment. Meaning, we are free to voice our opinions about our President without having to worry we'll be thrown in prison or face a firing squad. (Think N. Korea, The Soviet Union, Putin's Russia, Henry VIII, Alice in Wonderland, etc.) Also, free speech is meant to protect government employees from being fired by their government employers for talking trash about their government businesses. If you work at Burger King and loudly criticize your boss's shady business dealings, free speech will not apply. You still have the freedom to say whatever you want, but you won't be protected under the first amendment for saying it. You can be fired. What I'm trying to say is, Mr. Depp isn't the government, so Miss Heard can absolutely face repercussions for what she wrote. I think this case has turned out to be an amazing example of what can qualify as libel. I'm sure precedence has previously been set, but wouldn't it be hilarious if future generations, in future libel/defamation litigations, would need to study the case notes and history from this lawsuit as a point of reference before proceeding with their own lawsuits. Either Rottenborn thinks the jury is a bunch of idiots or he himself is one. (I guess both of those assumptions prove that he actually is the idiot.)

First amendment actually only applies to government stuff, not anything that is published online or in print.

Spot on. Freedom of Speech, which is protected by law, not just in the United States with their First Amendment but in all constitutional democracies means that you can express a verbal opinion or write an article, make comments in the inter web..but that right doesn’t mean that there won’t be consequences for those words if those words are untrue or inflammatory. Freedom of speech doesn’t cancel out other protections for individuals that exist within the law, namely libel, slander or any other redress for any other harm that has been inflicted. People tend to forget that when they say they have the right to say anything and it’s protected under the First Amendment ( or whatever your country’s laws state), because that’s not entirely true.

But it’s odd to say she did not wrong because of the first admendment. But to try to justify her suing the Waldmans statements according to them would also fall under first admendment. So very flawed logic.

Johnny has already been found guilty of abuse. This court case will not take away his battery charges.

YES. I think calling johnny an abuser for slamming cabinets is victim blaming

Correct. She tied the op-ed directly to Johnny, which was a huge mistake. Another potential mistake, which I haven't seen anybody else notice: she mentioned that she has been to see a gynecologist since the so-called abuse. If so, why didn't he/she/it testify in regards to her alleged injuries from the supposed liquor bottle rape?

When did she mention the that? I totally missed that. And good catch

He hasn’t been hired due to the allegations from Amber ..he’s been sober for some time now and still can’t make movies due to those allegations 🤷🏽‍♂️ but he will prolly get a comeback movie since there’s a lot of support outside and on the web

From my understanding he's been sober from opiates, he definitely drinks still, I can only speculate he still does the occasional line or two possibly more. But those have been known traits since the 90's. Soooo many of his exes have come out and openly stated for no personal benefit that he was never violent towards them. So saying he's a violent man without personally witnessing said violence, which he has many people outside of his employees who say he's the opposite.

I meant to finish that thought, lol. To say he's violent would be a little far fetched

I was surprised she brought up the divorce settlement and used it as an example for how Amber is NOT a gold digger because she pledged the entire amount. It must have been hard for Amber's team to come up with closing arguments since every fact in the trial has been against Amber but damn, Elaine especially said some strange things.

I was thinking the same thing hahaha

I know. The accountsnt clearly said she made JD pay the taxes as part if the divorce settlement. Right?

Why because it’s captain jack sparrow ?? 😂😂

sorry but that’s so wrong. Winona had to go to rehab after dating Johnny depp and if you think Kate moss is “just fine” then you’re sadly mistaken, she is insanely anorexic and was completely codependent on him.

Because these people don't stand for truth. They stand for money.

Be kind. EB has, of course, also been lied to by AH. That is what she does to people. EB is worthy of our compassion.

She is a piece of shit omg how unbearable for JD and team to have to endure that scandalous closing 😳

She’s terrible. Rottenborn as much as I cannot stand him is actually an okay Attorney but Elaine is absolutely horrible at her job.

Since the beginning of this trial i felt compasioned towards ambers lawyers. They are trying without having things going their way. They are allowed as a lawyer to twist the info in favour of their cliënt but the client cannot commit perjury. Its good that this exist because even guilty humans have right to defend themselves. I feel sorry for Elaine, to have Amber as a client, and cannot image even having to defend such a case. I think she did well in respect to how stressful this must have been. And hope people see this as well. Greets from Belgium.

Lol pledging 7 mil to charity.

Well now it’s come out that her insurance policy is actually paying for her attorneys so… 🤷🏼‍♀️

Yes, that was a bit odd, I agree.

@@heatherb8594 Homeowner Insurance does not recompense an arsonist who burns his home down for fraudulent financial gain, nor a torched 🏠 converted into a Meth Lab that blows up during the cooking process, nor a Grow Op house that becomes unsellable due to moisture and mould or catches fire from faulty wiring to scarf electricity off the main box, otherwise extraordinary high use shown on the homeowner's issued bill for a single residence would record and disclose to the utility server and police an illegal cannabis business was hiding, cloaked in the community. Insurance fraud is not tolerated. The "fine print" stipulates no payout to policy holders will be made for defamation legal challenges. Undertaking this tort is such a self-destructing pursuit, like the folly of burning down your own house. As citizens in a 21st century 'CIVILization', we have an expectation our fellow humans will keep a CIVIL tongue in their heads. Surely 2000 years was sufficient time passage for Earthlings to learn that lesson of abusing Words referenced in Proverbs 6:16-19, 10:19, Matthew 15:11, Revelation 9-12 for a small sampling of moral guides. Insurance firms not only resist being suckered, scammed, conned but also have a cap on legitimate court costs. Were these contractual arrangements not written in the policies, requiring ethical and moral standards, the aggregate pool of funds for honest people hit by storm, flood, fallen trees etc. would evaporate very quickly, then the insurance industry go belly up, kaput, fini, destroyed by corruption. Like you, Heather, this rumoured possibility concerned me, deeply, since any vengeful jilted lover, male or female, presumably could download cost onto premium payers which would be grating, unfair and a further injustice. We can be assured that will not happen, as confirmed by an insurance industry insider. Good news, right?

I hope the tax man is listening. Lol

I'm not sure about that since we can't blame them. It's their job as a lawyer. They have to defend their client whether they are innocent or not. Amber's lawyers probably have no choice anyways, but have to go through it because money.

@@kpopislejindary11 Still they should be required to back up claims with evidence or they shouldn't be allowed to make those claims at all.

@@RRL110 For Amber Heard's lawyers, they don't really have that much evidence and so they have no choice but make up lies using what they have. Again, they're just doing their job lol

Women's word are evidence in these silly courts so they lawyer also don't need evidence why they need if they need it's unfair womens word should also not be evidence

So, they talk like such because it’s not to be taken as evidence

Truth

Exactly. He got back his good name in eyes of milions people's over the world. I was one of the people that belived in her claims and pictures. But now ... after seeing full trial it's obvious she lied and was exposed. Johnny showed the true. This is what he wanted. He got back support billions of people. He won no matter of outcome !

That's what he wanted anyway.

@@AmitKumar-yl6bz of course, Its about redemption and clearing his name.

I think so too, but it would be nice to get a favorable jury verdict also. If he doesn't, what will stop her from continuing to make allegations?

🤣🤣

She got them from WISH 😂

It sounds like you don't even know what the trial is about. It's about Amber Heard writing an op ed that she was a DV victim and how it impacted Johnny's career. This is not a criminal case. This a civil case about money. As much as I think AH is a liar, the lawyer has a point. She only needs to prove ONE instance of abuse for the op-ed to be factual and therefore not defamatory. Stop attacking AH's lawyers. They are doing their best with what they got based on what's allowed in the law. You shouldn't speak if you know nothing.

@@Udontknowmi Oh i most definitely know what the trial is about but im sure you me and the whole world have seen how stupid they are they at first said the op ed wasnt even about johnny and then they make an attempt to prove that johnny did beat her so they just want a quick way out of the mess legally.

Yeah Amber and Elaine destroyed Rottenborns defense strategy. I would wonder if Rottenborn continues working for Amber.

Amber is a lying malignant narcissistic sociopath

😭😂😂😂

It was an amber alert for her LIES! Totally a sign.

😂

That was a funny moment, like the gods were saying, don't you do it, don't let her win

Quick... check all the beds!

It was a weather alert but still

He abused her period

I’m surprised that wasn’t suggested in the trial cause I thought the same thing. She DEF wasn’t bruised from being hit.I know what a black eye bruising does. So what about Botox….

It’s literally his job to argue that. Heards argument is that it isn’t defamation, so they’ll have to argue exactly that.

In a way, Johnny is a victim of the me too movement, just that the power his abuser used was being female.

So true.. She's trying to relate to the actual victims of #metoo movement so they will give their full on support towards her. Absolutely disgusted how a person can take advantage of other people's trauma to pretend to be a DV victim.

I agree with you. It still confuses me that someone can pay a legal team to lie and manipulate and twist things on their behalf. I love our democratic society BUT (there it is... the big BUT) legal teams are never sworn in. A.H's legal people (apparently human) were never disposed to tell the truth.

@@lindarussell4735 very good point!!

@@theharbingerofconflation exactly men can be victims too!

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Laugh It Off 🤡🤡

ROTTENBORN KILLED IT DEAL WITH IT TOXIC DEPP FANBASE

@Loosey are you talking about Heard's attorneys? You are right, they did.... Okay. If I were paying an attorney and expert witnesses that amount of money I would want more than okay.

@Laugh It Off having been a female that was not on the arrested but later on in an abusive relationship I always side with the victim of abuse. It was proven that Johnny Depp was the abused by Amber Heard. Her own tapes convicted her and if the attorneys had been smart they would not have used them.

Amber is a Monster, and this has nothing to do with Johnny being a good or bad guy. Just watch her expressions and responses in court. She is the Poster Child for Sociopath.

I don't recall camille's argument taking about defamation. Regardless I think Johnny's team had winning the case as a secondary goal. Primary was to get Amber to say all this on tv

CAMILLE GOT DESTROYED DEAL WITH IT TOXIC DEPP FANBASE

You are gullible. It is a pity

DELUDED DEPP FANBASE

I don't think we watched the same trial. 👎 those statements don't describe either of those imbeciles.

@@jimmyjones3884 you must not have watched any of the testimony. And I was never a big fan - have probably only seen 3 or 4 of his movies. Saw the first POTC and never watched any sequels. I had no opinion until watching a lot of the testimony.

@@jimmyjones3884 I am not a fan of Depp, i´m a fan of JUSTICE. If you still believe AH after 6 weeks of evidence against her, then i feel bad for you. Poor soul

EXACTLY COLIN

Not to forget that Amber is the one who has been accused of being an abuser before!

I dont want her to be able to let go,...she deserves everything she gets from here on in for what she has done,the whole world has seen the kind of woman she is,she created the clouds now she can stand in the rain

🤣 so true

Rottenborn's argument was wayy stronger, maybe strong enough to win. But their evidence and experts were not really about that arguement. It's strange

Exactly. She was not scared at all

This is the best example of her not being afraid of him at all.

That's not true. A victim will do and try everything to ingratiate themselves with their aggressor. So many comments from people who don't understand the abused person mentality in the comments.

@@yvettetorres7829 so when i was being beaten to death by my ex i guess i should've given him a knife so he could stab me as well.. makes a lot of sense

@@yvettetorres7829 buying a knife for her abuser?…rampantly texting her abuser when he of his own accord leaves the premisis, telling him to come back…when she can finally get some peace and quiet from the abuse?…manages to capture audio and video of everything..but the physical abuse itself?…not one clip of the abuser apologising for any physical abuse or further threatening more abuse of the same kind?…. Ive seen things, heard things, experienced things…aim is to try to have a more balanced view after gathering the facts right?..such as being able to differentiate between physically identical photos submitted that have been edited and presented as taken on different days? Cmon

They posted a video of Johnny’s closing arguments before this one.

Because Johnny’s side is literally everywhere? I had to specifically search for this video.

The news is so 1 sided

@@spirituallyyoung5295 yes, the news is one sided. Many people have said that for ages.

This channel posts several segments of both sides. The plaintiff’s arguments is in another video. Check it out.

@@gabrielmichael3701 But the plaintiff argues that because she retweeted the article and made no attempt to distance herself from the title, she owns it. And clearly, everyone on earth knew at this point that Amber had called Johnny a rapist.

Rotten to the bones....

Born to be rotten

That's what I was wondering he said ANY abuse be it verbal or anything, one time, means Ambers wins, HOW?, when it's about the deformation of Johnny depps entire reputation as a wife beater, not just one act of reactioning to Ambers taunts, that's unfair, how did he get away with that even?

@@gabrielmichael3701I think he's talking more about huge disparity of the over all claims and damage from the article being nullified by Johnny saying one thing in Jest

Here here! Same happened to me! In fact, his apology to her was what proved to me that he is the abused person here. An abuser convinces you that you deserved the beatings. And even when the victim knows they are innocent, they apologize to avoid further beatings. And it is much worse when you are a man cuz you know no one will believe you. My ex used used to threaten me and say that if I told anyone she was abusing me that she would make up a lie and I would go to prison. As a man you are fucked if a women chooses to abuse you. My ex used to say, go ahead, tell people what I am doing, I’m a woman and a minority, you are a white male. No one will believe you. If my neighbors had not witnessed her saying that, I’m not sure I would be here today to make this comment.

Oh my god....

Amber has power over johnny? Seriuously

@@MsPinkCrusader Yes she does. How does she not?

Heck yeah brother, glad you smoked her in the end. You probably shouldn't admit this online though. Sorry you dealt with this. Anyway take care.

he clearly traumatized his children for the rest of their lives by his own actions. now potentially putting their entire family into financial ruins. Too late to save Johnny Depp. He brains are cooked due to alcohol and drugs

True. It's called "venting".

Amber is a Monster, and this has nothing to do with Johnny being a good or bad guy. Just watch her expressions and responses in court. She is the Poster Child for Sociopath.

@@juliam1099 venting in 2013 when their relationship was perfect, according to depp's own testimony? Yall dont fucking know the facts and wanna speak

Still reflects on what type of person he might be.

He abused her period

Yeah I wasn't a fan but following the case I got to see lies from amber and stories that just don't line up. I got a brain and I use it, plus I have a heart which for some reason won't connect with her. There is something just off about her.

They're claiming she didn't write it specifically about JD, not that she didn't write it at all and in the closing arguments they were trying to show that she didn't republish it.

@@party4keeps28 oh ok. Thanks

@@jazaractus No problem at all.

@@party4keeps28 Didn't she admit that she did write the op ed and the reason she wrote it is because " johnny depp is a powerful man" which basically proves the article is about JD?

@@shel_311 She never denied writing the op-ed. She denied writing it about Johnny. She then denied to re-publishing the article and a debate on what technically constitutes republication ensued. But yes, during her last cross-examination with Camille she basically admitted to writing it about Johnny. She didn't 100% admit that it was about him but she said enough so that the jury will probably realize that she actually did write it about him.

Omgg

No , she didn’t write the title/headline

because of all her lies and she didn't stick to "the story" now they had to change it. fk being her attorney. i actually feel sorry for Rottenborn Elaine and the others... Rottenborn should have lead the team. TURD sould have been more forthcoming with all her bullshit they had 4yrs to sort their shit... i ain't a fan of TURD though... here for Johnny!

@@ekingston1694 she said she didn't have ANYTHING to do with ANYTHING....The Opt head the TMZ video, the TURD, his finger, ... I mean i could go on But for her Attorneys to give that Confusing HYPOCRITICAL Closing statement confirming but also Denying her LIES are ridiculous. An they should be charging their FEES in Magic Beans because that BS was Magical BS! Ijs

She did not write the headline. She stated she wrote the op-Ed because of powerful men getting away with DV or murder per say. The Op-Ed is well written. Check it out for yourself. She makes a generalization with ONE sentence to “powerful men” from her “experience”. That’s it.

Yeah, and she said she never leaves the house without makeup. Uh?

In one hand she is so amazing with her make up skills and OF COURSE would NOT LEAVE THE HOUSE WITHOUT... But then again you guys saw her without make up 🤣

I know! That was just useless blathering. Heard's lawyers are as stupid as she is!

She wore makeup everyday but guess men couldn't tell that lol like they are stupid and no Nothing about makeup

Will see🤭😅👏

It was more like a gossip

Agree

I applaud your lack of judgment. You have compassion others do not lol.

narcs target empaths...

Facts

No, they are saying that the article is not about depp and his abuse. It's about how institutions protect powerful men with several different legislation reform focused in it. However, even if the article was about the abuse she experienced, she was speaking truthfully about her life and is therefore protected.

@@ChocolatexCherries3 Yesterday she admitted it was about him.

Your guess is as good as ours. 😆

@@ChocolatexCherries3 I didn’t think she wrote the article - they said the ACLU did… She didn’t talk about SA from Johnny but she mentioned it happened once in college? Oh yeah, she didn’t make up the SA until after the UK trial and the island manager told the court that Amber freaked out on Johnny. So fuckin nasty. Thinking about all the women and men who end up killing themselves over actual fucking SA and DV, makes me want to puke all over the Heard sisters. It’s like they can’t come up with enough real shit. Even her parents didn’t believe her. Sad and crazy

@@BM-qz4rs no she fucking didn't. She said that she wrote the article because she knew how powerful men get away with abuse and how many people are willing to protect them. Yall need public speaking classes expeditiously.

😆 good one

Why you feel sorry for people who try to save a lying snakes butt? They know shes lying and still took the case or they are super dumb. No pity from me. People who defend evil, are evil.

I honestly think that a lawyer should not take a client's case if they don't believe the client. It's consciously supporting and defending a lie, ... for money.

Yo, "pledged"? I'm dead 🤣☠️☠️☠️

Lol on the pledge to pay her lawyers!

Hopefully he realizes that now.

Our boy Elton John has been looking out for Depp and has made massive strides in helping him get away from drugs. I know he's on the road to recovery now, he has more support now and people loving him than ever before!

And stop smoking so he can enjoy his grandchildren 😃

I highly doubt the jury appreciated the way Rottenborne was speaking to them.

He's really reaching.

Amber is a Monster, and this has nothing to do with Johnny being a good or bad guy. Just watch her expressions and responses in court. She is the Poster Child for Sociopath.

All the claims are not convincing… bottom line is your client AH is a liar, narcissist, and manipulative. She is pure evil 👺

Right. As if calling out someone who's guilty of making up horrific lies and defaming another is at all the same as infringing on their right to free speech. I mean, shit, the article was written and then posted; where were her rights infringed upon?! Just another sad and pathetic attempt on her side, grasping at straws by inflating and exaggerating the facts of reality.

because that’s what lawyers do. They defend clients wether they are bad or good.

Perfect projections. This level of evil is like a black whole, cannot create but only absorb. That’s why she keeps stealing other victims stories in order to make them her own.

These lawyers are the same with their liar Amber client lol What goes around goes around and I pray God will do his judgement on you Amber and your lawyers for not doing the right thing 😂

It’s all an opportunistic gimmick to further her career and make millions of this case alone

@@BRBallin1 just imagine if she won, how much further she would spread these lies

Its the court of law man, someone's gotta represent both parties, their duty as a lawyer and they really gonna have to find anything they can to protect their client, just so happened they had the worst client to work with

I mean they didn't have to do much. Johnny had to prove he didn't abuse her.

Well, everyone saw her whole demeanor the entire trial. Smirking, smiling, laughing just as she denied.

Yes completely...last week when they played a recording of jd arguing with her when he raised his voice she pretended to jump..it was so cringe

And yet she couldn't summon up so much as a single tear, even toward the end.

Unfortunately he is right in terms of the trial. But she will never win in the public eye.

@@lukehale5381 that's what johnny wanted with this trial.

That proof seems outside the bounds of reason, it's impossible to prove a negative

In other words she can abuse the shit out of him and if he ever says one negative word he loses. Bullshit.

@@RRL110 that's essentially what rotten-born is saying and he's full of crap. A real abuser would've pummeled AH upon her first narc rage. I've known someone like Amber before, whew, unbelievably heartless!

Oh man I didn’t know they could say they’d f**k the corpse too to make sure she’s dead! I didn’t know Monty Python was that disgusting!!

HOW CAN HER LAWYERS GET AWAY WITH PERJURY JUST LIKE TURD?

Self-defense or ?

I’m wondering if they know Amber is full of sh!t but they’re stuck with her for now….

Jury was already instructed that the closing statements are the lawyers interpretation of things and they are free to disregard anything they want to.

@@7brutusbuckeye their lies have been documented love

@@jodieisnotokay He made the article about himself Love. 🥴

@@hhholly she said she wrote about Johnny love. Keep defending her tho babes x

@@7brutusbuckeye Rottenborn lied a lot in closing.

Gee kinda sounds like a lot of arguments you hear from people on that side that if you don’t like what they like that makes you racist sexist etc lol. Very telling about the message they trying to send, “either you side with us because we said so or you’re a terrible person and possibly a N@zi”

Amber's teams closing arguments did not compare to the excellence and power of Johnny's team.

In my opinion, Elaine is just a shitty lawyer. Just look at what a poor job Amber's team did when it comes to time management. This is largely Elaine's fault. She even had trouble remembering to turn her microphone on.

@@dianebannister4591 It's funny how in the final argument she mentions her make up and how of course she would not leave the house as a star without make up. Then mentioning that she didn't wear eye make up at one point. Then making a point about how skilled she is with covering things. For someone so skilled it's odd to show up in court looking super worn out when she was on the stand and looking like she had a bruise on the cheek just like in the pics where she was "beaten up" 😂 And going on about the pledges OMG I can't

@@ninoslanguagejourney6002 I believe that it was part of Amber's "act" when she was on the stand to look like an innocent "victim" during the times she looked to be with little or no make up. And she wore very conservative clothing and old fashioned hair styles. Did you notice that after she didn't have to be on the stand that she glammed herself up? All with make up and more modern hairstyle. I missed her cross examination somehow. I need to look it up.