An Aether Model of Electricity : The Missing Secret of Magnetism 

Eventually science will accept the existence of the Ether but they will probably have to come up with new names like "quantum vacuum" so they can deal with their own egos.

This is fantastic. We are in desperate need for animators and programmers to explain concepts like this in simple terms.

I've known about Aether and Tartaria for some time. Though I have never seen Aether articulated and modelled and what a wonderful wealth of knowledge you have shared. Thank you so much! Bring the Aether back into our societies and free humanity from the parasites!

BRAVO my hands are clapping when i see this video and her explanations open up my mind. My long questions were answered in this video.

This animation and explanation is absolutely amazing. The circular propagation through the torus reminds me of how a jelly fish propels through the water. This video has answered so many questions for me. I've been following Ken Wheeler for some time, your explanation has really helped me understand and put the pieces together. Thank you.

One of the most important videos ever produced, by anybody! Tesla would be so thrilled and pleased after watching it, I am pretty much sure about it. Way to go, Lori! Warmest greetings from Serbia!!

Thanks! You beautifully demonstrated something so fundamental, and taken for granted that I never realized it, I am super appreciative. I've subscribed. Thank you so very much for this lesson.

LORI - THANK YOU! Very excited to watch this after work today, but I'm just so darn excited I can't contain myself. I'm hoping to see gravity and light also tied in here!!!! You are a wonderful person and so many of us are SO grateful for your hard work in sharing your thoughts and the important insights of others.

Love this! Brilliant animation and explanation of the dynamics of the ether. You rock!

This makes a lot more sense than diving into Einstein's relativity, with mutual length contractions and mutual time dilation. The simplicity is beautiful. Thank you.

Since visualization is one key to comprehension, this has been very helpful. Watching this, a strange memory came to me; a teacher in geometry class, ages ago. He said that there are an infinite number of points on any line. Well, just one more thing for me to keep in mind before I meditate on this. Thank you for this input.

I told you two years ago that electricity was the release of the dielectric pressure this proves me right thank you for your brilliant work

If this theory holds true, it will spell the end for both, relativity and QM

Lori, What an incredible way of explaining the concepts through visualization. Years Worth of study just compressed in 43 mins. Thanks for the effort. Love your videos and your teaching methods. take care.

Great work! 🦾 You are finally the animator that can visualize the mental model I have in mind! The only missing puzzle 🧩 piece to satisfy the Michelson-Morley experiment is the understanding that "the aether“ isn’t a particle, but a quanta of space. Space itself is the fluid. Or in other words: we are made 100% of space. The consequence: our true frame of reference is not Euclidean or inertial! Our true frame of reference is a non-inertial fluid. All constants of nature are an emergent property from mixing our inertial frames of reference with this non-inertial fluid dynamic reality. => "electrons“ are not particles - they’re a rarefaction of space due to fluid dynamic pressure mediation. => "photons“ are cavitation bubbles 🫧 that keep oscillating in a coaxial circuit like a sock that keeps being rotated through itself. A hot wire is vibrating faster than the maximum rate of induction of the aether. This creates the cavitation bubbles 🫧 we call photons. The hotter the light source, the faster and more violent the cavitation bubbles collapse - jet - expansion - implosion - jet - … The jet will move in the direction of lowest pressure which will be straight in the absence of a pressure gradient in the surrounding aether.

This is really fantastic thinking and fantastic work. Thank you.

Your explanation were very helpful for the beginning of my understanding of the aether behavior. I can feel the love you had put into making this video. Thank you for that.

I just love this way of breaking down the waves. I have very little math, or schooling in this subject, but I surf, and play music. Waves break when they hit resistance. The reef is resistance, and forces the energy in a 90 degree,until finally the water collapses from not being able to support itself. There must be two densities for this dynamic to play out. Waves that break in the middle of the ocean are breaking over reef created by water; oneness of vortex is like a solid mass, for water. Nikola Tesla said aether is completely incompressible. Aether is likely to not have any viscosity at all, impossible to “stir”. I doubt it is possible to stir liquid helium. So how does a wave travel if none of those dots can change their distance from one another? That would very much change the nature of the wave across time and space. A newtons cradle can have infinite metal balls touching, and the tapping of one side of the metal ball bearings should travel infinitely “now”, so any where along those metal balls a “signal” is felt now, only amplitude is affected by the distance, so long as they are touching each other. There is a type of ocean where little parts jut up and down, there is no wave moving side to side, but seemingly random pushes up and down of varying areas of water, that is the pressure of up and down being “squeezed” by the water itself. That is longitudinal. Light is like a wave in the ocean, imo. It travels through aether as a longitudinal compression, and hits the resistance of atmosphere, and magnetic field lines, and has a 90 degree manifestation; light. One can never see a shade independent of that which cast the shade, therefore what causes light travels now…..it’s longitudinal, until it hits resistance of differential pressures(atmosphere and magnetic fields). I have other ideas on vortex as well, I believe it all works with what you say here, it’s only adding additional observations. Nikola Tesla had little to do with the magnetic force after 1890, he thought it feeble next to the electrostatic force. He said he could suspend tons with magnetic force, but he never found a limit to the electrostatic force; to him it was infinite. “A spark” is a electrostatic longitudinal wave for tesla, and with aether being incompressible means “that spark” can be felt anywhere in the universe; “now”. That’s what he meant when he said we can speak across the solar system, etc etc… There is more, I will stop…..I can’t get enough of this, my mind creates all sorts of experiments. Very cool.

Some of the best scientific work I have ever seen. Incredible! That longitudinal wave of a medium (such as water in a pipe, or electrons in a wire) also has a transverse wave component outwards to the medium it interfaces (such as air if water pipe also has elastic membrane, or aether for the electrons), and that this transverse wave is perpendicular to the main longitudinal wave (just like the perpendicular electric field component around an electrical conductor carrying current), and that the corresponding wave in the surrounding medium is the inverse of it (therefore has rotation of particles in opposite direction), and that any rotating cylinders, be it on water waves or iron filings around electrical conductors, will align their direction of rotation with the rotation of the surrounding medium, in a way that conforms to the "right hand rule" where the thumb points in the direction of flow, and the fingers curl to show the axis of rotation of the cylinders (and the direction is such that the pole represented by the top of the fingers rotates in a counter-clockwise direction), explains the "right hand rule" perfectly, and I have never seen anything even come close to explaining it. Always found it very arbitrary. It was always something that bothered me a bit, the "right hand rule"... until now!

Love your approach to "one of life's persistent mysteries," (a famous opening line from a film-noir TV series, The Naked City, as I recollect). Your approach, and the elegance of description, reminds me of Euclid's Elements of Geometry: proving such fundamental elements with just a few pages! But they formed the basis of study in geometry for the next thousand years or more. And seriously, I would spend periods of time sitting at the shore, as you did, wondering how waves worked. Never occurred to me that they were circles! Love it!

one day i was pondering why batteries connected in parallel dont add up their voltages, i came across this model of ether, today i realised i was not the only one who reached a realisation of ether model of electricity

Wow, you are such a great communicator. I have no science background, just your average Joe. You help me understand complex things, this also helps me to understand Walter Russells work. Thanks again 👍

Hey, you are a ROCKSTAR!! Thank you. I’m through the roof right now

CIRCULATIONs - Circle-Latent-IONs These Visuals Are Amazing Helping To Articulate To Others, Thankyou So Much For Your Time & Thoughts, 2 G'Heather We Grow 🌱 & Expand 🌿....Thankyou For Sharing. Much Love NOEL 💚

I can tell you that your model bears extreme merit. I have witnessed wires sitting next to each other moving in and out towards one another. This happened in a malfunction election rc boat I have. The electronic speed controller failed. It basically provides a phased pulsed dc signal to a brushless motor. The power source was about 24 plus volts dc. I looked inside the boat to see the motor power supply wires just moving about an inch or so parallel to each other... side to side. I couldn't understand what I was seeing at the time. But your thesis makes sense 🤔

The thing that would be cool to show would be the fact that the surface of the wire is actually the dielectric inertial plane. Around it, is the toroidal magnetic field of force and motion. This is why "skin effect" exists. The wire becomes the attractor of dielectric energy while the magnetic pushes spacial energy down the line. If you think of an AC ckt, where power is generated using a spinning magnet in a coil... the conductors extending and returning are simply an extension of what is already taking place at the source. Hope this helps. Love your analogies. Especially your DC video with like to like, and like to unlike poles explaining why wires jump together, or push apart when current flows. Science has caught on that the nature of electrical conduction takes place primarily between the wires. What they fail to admit, or understand, is that the dielectric component has no spatial value, while the magnetic component does. Together the two run down the line propagating through space via one half cycle losing energy, and returning to a non spatial rest of potential without a spatial value. This is why Eric Dollard was so bent on the idea that if you didn't understand "counter-space", you could never fully understand the nature of electromagnetism. The dielectric field both creates, and destroys space, and it does so with favor towards counter space, as counter space is where space is born. It is pure potential, while space is actualized potential. One requires force and effort, while the other requires negative input. Also why gravity and magnets facing like to unlike pole accelerate at an ever increasing rate of speed. Like pole to like pole requires energy and force. Like to unlike subtracts energy and returns to ever increasing potential. Light and electrical conduction are a attenuating example of this process when viewed from a spatial perspective. The counter spatial (ether) perspective cannot be directly interpreted. Meaning, nothing "moves" in the ether. All physical movement is achieved in space, via potential action. Once actualized, energy is lost, or expended. This loss creates in-balance within space and the ether together as a whole. Too much build up of this in-balance, in all it's various forms and modes creates pressure that eventually must be balanced back to an inertial, or rest state. Everything in nature follows this pattern, wether it's lightning striking, animals falling asleep, or a baseball falling back down to the ground after being thrown. Space and Counter-space are a woven fabric of potential and actualization. One is temporary, the other is infinite.

An unbelievable demonstration that shows that crazy Ken Wheeler is actually on to something.

This is the simplicity of model we need so bad right now.

Ok, the established model of EM is more complete than I realized. Coherent Fractal. Mark, Accidental Scientist.

This is great work Lori and follows Ken Wheeler’s theories very well. Love your 3D visualisations. Using the Right Hand for N and Left Hand for S is a perfect way to conceptualise the spinning dielectric fields. One thing I’d like to suggest you consider is to use continuous overlapping helixes instead of individual overlapping toroids. Think about Phi and how Ken explains a magnet in depth.

I see we still have a thousand different ways of looking at the concept. I'm partual to one in which these waves come to loop upon themselves forming self-perpetuating stable loops with an oscillating core. But as tends to be the case ideas are themselves plentiful and so work goes into distinguishing those that make sense and those that don't. Sometimes down the line, that division might itself differ on certain ideas. Anyway. Good to come back to this with a new lens

Thank you. This has been a fantastic demonstration.

Magnetism is not just attraction or repulsion. Magnetism is a rarefaction of ether. Inside your circulating ether there is nothing. That nothing is space. Outside of space, is ether, trying to fill in the void.

I’d say the spinning cylinders are creating high pressure, the energy is compressing between them forcing them apart, when they spin opposite they are creating a low pressure which wants to be filled hence both are attracted to the low pressure. Spinning magnets create a low pressure that the electricity everywhere races towards on the path of least resistance like a copper wire. Also I was reminded of Viktor Schauberger and the way water moves in a spiral down the river bed. I’d say if the rivers are spiraling in different directions it will cause the same vacuum in the aether between the wires and the wires to be attracted to the low pressure but confined by the magnetic field of the wire. The electricity moves over the wire not through it. You might be able to glean some insight from Suspicious Observers YT channel, he has videos on how the electricity moves into and away from the earth on low and high pressure zones into the ionosphere. I know it’s all related, I’m just trying to piece together how

Great visualizations! Attraction of two cylinders in a fluid is due to the Bernoulli equation. Bernoulli equation basically combines conservation of energy, conservation of momentum and continuity of the medium. Repulsion of the cylinders is due to both cylinders trying to drag in water between the cylinders thereby increasing the pressure between the cylinders. If an analogy is being established between fluid mechanics and aether, analogs of kinetic energy, potential energy, momentum and pressure should also be established.

AWESOME demonstration. But like I said mirror images always compliment one another. Clockwise above, counterclockwise below, left to right compliments right to left, vortex and anti vortex. Hold a piece of round wire in your hand and have the current run clockwise, and now do it in front of a mirror, your antiself sees the current running counterclockwise. And what was left is now right and contrariwise .

Very illustrative! You’re explaining everything just great! ✨

fantastic illustration

Great video Lori!

This is good animation work. It makes a lot of relationships obvious that would have to be slowly pieced together otherwise.

Oh cool topic. I been digging through dan winters work recently so this will help. Thank you.

Clear and helpful video. Thanks for all your insights. 👍

I think you should be excited. You've introduced to magnetism a new paradigm, which I'm going to call the spinning torus, that has helped me visualize a three dimensional space which has no straight lines. You have freed me of being a captive of my ninth-grade two dimensional Euclidean geometry. You've gone the extra mile to make the explanation simple. That is a real compliment. I once had a Nobel prize winning physics professor tell me that he really didn't understand something until he was able to explain it simply. Ken Weber, whom I greatly admire, has had to introduce his followers to a whole new language in order to comprehend his concepts. Keep your videos coming.

Transverse waves create compressive/longitudinal waves at 90 degrees is another interesting observation. A vortex in an incompressible fluid medium will create a toroid.

Will need to watch this over again, very impressive work Lori. Thanks. I am working on an implosion device, which very abruptly implodes the electrogen. both the current and voltage (magnetic and dielectric fields) will be imploded simultaneously.

I started my youtube channel today thanks to videos like yours

It is the best explanation I have ever heard

The surface waves do not require wind to propagate. Drop a stone into a still pond and surface waves form and propagate radially outwards without wind. The theory about ether may be bogus but your software capabilities are marvelous!

Clear explanation. Intuitive. When you started talking about that log I died.

This is amazing, thank you so much for these fantastic breakdowns, Lori! Can you offer any insight into how this differs from the JJ Thompson "tubes of flux" model? This offers consistent results with that model, per Dollard and others. This is fantastic stuff, thanks again!

Very well explained. Learned so much

One important question. The molecules in the diagram move closer and farther apart, but water is not compressible, how can this be?

Wow I have come across your videos and this is excellent work, love the visualizations! I look forwards to seeing more thank you! 😊 I would love to see the breakdown in electronic components like Inductors, capacitors, diodes and transitors. Also animations on the circuit of light, and gravity.

29:00 this torus, around the wire, is what I visualize around the (bifilar) pancake coil. Since I work with 3 stacked bifilar pancake coils (of which one is slightly distanced, for a phase shift), it makes sense to have a Phi ratio center hole.

I'm not convinced you've proven your point. The fact that waves naturally propagate through a substance doesn't necessarily correlate with waves propagating through the Aether. I'm not dismissing the existence of Aether (having read Whittaker's 19th-century physics). However, this experiment doesn't suffice. It simply confirms what we already know: yes, water has waves.

If you look at a magnet under a ferrocell, you can see the dielectric field passing as a horizontal line through the center of the magnet perpendicular to the north and south poles. The dielectric (which is electricity) is what is causing the magnetic field to propagate perpendicular to the dielectric field line. The magnetic field doesn’t attract, as it is a radiative emission of the dielectric. That’s where the water/wave model you have made doesn’t match the magnetic/dielectric field flux. The Aether itself is dielectricity, and magnetism only manifests when dialectricity (i.e. the Aether) is emitted in our “spacetime”. The Aether itself is in “subspace” to use StarTrek terminology. lol The dielectric ‘circuit’ begins in subspace in the Aether and loops into our spacetime, at which point a magnetic radiative field is generated, and then that loop of dialectric Aether terminates back into the subspace Aether. The only part that stays in our spacetime from start to finish is the magnetic field, and is a secondary effect, which is manifested by the dielectric Aether. So when you look at a magnet, and see that linear dialectric field line, what you are really looking at is the boundary zone (or event horizon) between the subspace Aether and our spacetime. So in your model, the dielectric field forms in inverse torus that faces East West along the horizontal axis of a magnet, and is discharging a torus shaped magnetic field perpendicular to it via the North/South poles of the magnet. The magnetic field doesn’t loop through the magnet but loops in towards itself, because magnetism is a radiative secondary effect manifested by the dielectric field. Where your model does partially match the actual magnetic field is in the torus shaped field of magnetism and showing the torsional spin rotations along the cross sections of the torus. However, the magnetic field lines are dialectric nullification points where the magnetic field and the dielectric field are collapsing back in on themselves and the lines that you see (sometimes called lines of force) are actually nullification lines between the dialectric and magnetic fields. The dialectric field absorbs the magnetic radiation back into sub space along those ‘lines of force’ intersections. It’s a little counter intuitive at first, but it makes sense once you get the basic idea that magnetism is a secondary manifestation effect caused by the dielectric field.

Great work!

This shows the predictive power when the Aether hypothesis is applied. I and others are working on what the Aether particles are made of. I think we need invest in software programming like what we see in this RU-vid presentation.

Very interesting! Same torus shape pattern as seen in the michelson-morley experiment!

This was the original hypothesis to explain electromagnetic radiation from Radio Transmitters in the late 1890s and early 1900s. They didn't have things like the ionosphere or any insight into the nuclear forces. Radio evolved into electronics, and electronics made it possible to "see" the subatomic particles. Not the other way around, they always write history as if "invented" means "into mass-production" but for electronics it was the other way around: there was 0 theoretical insight into the forces of electromagnetism, and so pure experimentation dominated the "Spark Era" (named after Spark Transmitters) and this extended into the first long-distance research into the behaviour of electromagnetic radiation. They assumed that there must be a certain chemical element or concoction that allowed these waves to "travel" across the "aether". Yes. That's where the name comes from. Ofcourse, in the 1900s, the backlash from the Theoretical Departement came (as I dubbed them) came: "your theory is nonsense, electromagnetic waves can propagate through a medium in non-straight lines!"... This after they denied that radio could even work using EM-waves, until the 1920s, some of them. Mind you that by this point in time, worldwide communication was a fact. But still, the antenna (which turns the electrons moving into the actual EM-field being "transmitted") is still called the Black Magic of RF-design. And all those that claim it doesn't, never worked on VLF-frequencies, where the "ground wave" (another name for surface wave) effect dominates. So glad you put this online, and boy do I have a lot of literature for you to read! That's assuming I find it again, which might take a while. We've bend and cracked open the Maxwellian Theory to fit the behaviour of low-frequency radio waves in there, and it's incomplete wreck if you ask me. And since the money is in the VHF and UHF (and up) spectrum, not in these long wavelengths anymore, there's very little attention for it either. But I'm not a physicist, let alone a specialist. I just caught a bug a long time ago! 🙂 And since everybody nowadays reads history backwards instead of going forward, as time to my knowledge still propagates, we've got very little good histories out there on this subject. Didn't have time to clean out this text, so it's a rough sketch. Apologies for that one. Got a bit enthusiastic while watching this. Will get back to this, since I've got no time now. Just going to watch the video (which clears up a lot of questions I had, like that experiment with magnets) and will look for this old stuff. Regards, Thomas

Love this topic.

Great video again !

Very cool. Good job!

@fractalwoman. Very nice video, very interesting, as always! I was wondering if some friends of mine could use your video’s on their RU-vid channel? They have a daily show called The Rise and Shiners and already have permission to use al the Electric Universe video’s. Thank you for sharing these amazing models and explanations!

Brilliant, love the animations.

Hi, at 39:16, it appears the model suggests aether doing "work" from left to right between the wires as a biproduct of the forces between the wires. Moving to 42:05, aether produces "no work." Too bad we dont have aether detectors.

simply amazing - tek kelimeyle muhteşem - (I added the original sentence because the English translation could not translate correctly.)

Very interesting ideas am all into it.

You should look at the Lorentz Ether Theory, Einstein's equations were based off of that. Instead of the universal constants being relative to different parts of the universe Einstein modelled it as the scaling of time instead. It hasn't failed any experiment ironically, It was initially thought that the null result from the Michelson Morley experiment disproved Lorentz's Ether. Sagnac designed an experiment to test for a stationary ether, which came up with a positive result and explains away the Michelson-Morley experiments null result as it shows Ether drag. Lorentz's math is still named after him in Einsteins theory. They still explain the results of the Sagnac experiment with relativistic concepts too though as Special Relativity was adopted after the 1st year of World War 1 but it was the accepted model of thinking prior to Einstein and the experiment was explicitly designed to show the ether was real as a result of the Morley experiment. Fibre Optic Gyroscopes and the new LISA satellite system is based off that experiment.

Keep up with this work! Best regards from Serbia! :)

It made it easier to visualize, for sure. Does this extend to something like the wires of an electro magnet?

Amazed! Thank You.

Look up Analysis labs. They make a patented audio cable that may inform what you are working on. I have my own experiments going, but am learning a lot here, as your time and effort to develop software that can help to visualize what is going on is very much appreciated.

Not only Mendeleev predicted two other elements before Hydrogen. They and a few others were also predicted by Walter Russell.

I see the evolutionary development of fish at the 19:49-minute mark when you turn on the yellow color. A fish tail becomes briefly visible.

Excellent

From Vedas: 5 elements make the physical world from gross to subtle, Earth, Water, Air, Fire, Akash. Akash is Aether. Subtle yet physical, like an invisible ocean as the medium for the other four. Water waves, radio waves, sand waves and every kind of oscillation detected is only informing what the Aether is doing. The other side of existence is a black void which is actually the source of all of it. From a neutron, to a magnet, to a black hole and yes, at the core of every living being. Namaskar

fascinating, a true and useful teaching, congratulations

This model is very much worth reviewing. Cause I am a part of one aether community, and one physicist there proved mathematically that magnetism is rotation of aether, but still he somewhat failed to explain the ampere's law. This model both support the magnetism as being the aether rotation, while at the same time elegantly explaining the ampere's law through that.

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

Excellent presentation

This is great!

at 43.50 approx there is a demo of a hand showing the direction of spin - this same diagram is seen on a wall relief depicting the God Ashur (Assur) inside a winged- disc, Nimrud, Iraq. It has two hands ether side of the "winged" disc, which, are not just pointers but demonstrate the direction of rotation of the disc; likely a view of a cyclindrical/toroidal? effect in an EMF. Assur is also Zoroaster etc And if you follow Thunderbolts /Velikovsy models of the great polar conjunction and apply the above model it all makes sense!

💫✨🌟A few errors I should point out. 1] Water is incompressible but the animation around 4 minute time stamp and further on shows stretching and compressing of points which indicates density fluctuations. This does not occur to any significant degree. Any subsequent model based on this fails as the Aether is deemed to be maximally dense with no space between the Aetherons/Plancktons/'particles'. The basis for transverse waves at the surface of a liquid-gas interface is due to the density difference tween the two fluids. 2] The particles in the liquid do not move in >distinct< circular orbits, as the wave animation depicts, with orbits/movement decreasing with increase in depth. The motion is complex, not one of simple circular orbits. Any subsequent model based on this fails as the Aether is deemed to be maximally dense with no space between the Aetherons/Plancktons/'particles'. In an enclosed container filled with 100% of one type of fluid [liquid or gas] waves/energy propagates longitudinally, not circularly. 3] Circular motion is not a vortex nor toroidal motion as assumed here but this is due to the initial faulty modeling. I'm rewriting the electromagnetic theory in formulating the PARALLAX ELECTRIC THEORY [PET], which pulls back the false curtain of all the enduring iconic scientific principles of the past, wherein the magnetic field is but the electric field due to the lack of understanding of the nature of matter and charges when magnetism was 'discovered'/defined. This anachronistic group-think artifact persists today. 🧲⚡My Parallax Electric Theory [PET] dispenses with magnetism of permanent magnets and explains it as positive and negative electric charges that are segregated into regions of unbalanced high-low concentrations [gradients] in matter, called poles/fields, via structured matrix/lattice/crystal/geometric-molecule/alloy units. Positive and negative charges will move with respect to one another. When positive and negative charges are close to one another, but have offset centers of charge, they form a dipole. Another way of saying this is that when nucleus shielding of 'neutral' atoms by electrons becomes imbalanced, the atom or crystalline/matrix/lattice/alloy/molecules [molecular structure] is polar. The sum total of these polarities is called magnetism, a permanent magnet. Electromagnets offer temporary polar/dipole arrangement IMHO, the cause of forces tween 'infinitely' long parallel conductors AND other EM phenomena is the VOLTAGE DIFFERENTIAL/DROP along a conductor due to resistance!!!!!! It can be described as a Bessel function. Precisely why superconductors and Bose condensates should not[DO NOT?] exhibit these behaviors [ZERO RESISTANCE = INFINITE CONDUCTANCE. I must refine this with research. To paraphrase: the Parallax Electric theory holds that B & E fields are the same thing. Magnetism is an anachronistic artifact in language. 'Magnetism' is a second order, dependent interaction, of electricity or electric fields and matter. This results in electric field dis-equilibrium polar effects for each atom. The sum total of all these polar fields is called magnetism, a magnet. 🧲⚡ Seems others are appropriating the idea of energy propagation in conductors. See the video -- 'The Big Misconception About Electricity' [Veritasium channel] Why does a 'compass needle' orient itself tangentially to a conductor? Ask me... after you've exhausted your rationale. ) --- On a related note, my friend discovered new physics in the photonics field which enables a billion fold magnification microscope using ordinary visible spectrum light.. Conventional physics deems this impossible due to the Abbe diffraction limit yet he was able to view atoms with his simple, compact, home built $50,000 microscope. The obverse enables telescopes that can image continents on planets many light years removed.

I love all your videos, thank you so much for making physics more digestible and clarifying so many topics. Question: How would you describe Static Electricity in the aether?

I like the way your mind works. I think the model works well for wire medium with stable lattice angles in solid form, ie. Cu, Ag, Au, etc. are π/2. What I'm curious about is not necessarily the Aether, but how long an induced 'wire' actually retains a field after induction ceases? I guess it would 'snap back' at basically the speed of light if it was perfectly shaped. Kinda like striking a metal and inducing a field for a short time, like all magnets are leeched of energy over time until they can become just a stable metal again. Like all elements have a natural density, and compression changes its magnetic susceptibility? i dunno. My thoughts are skipping around, but i don't want to type an essay. Ok, so our oceans are deep and cold...water doesn't compress as well as alot of other stuff and water can be polarized. So in your video you give a decent example of a polarizable Aether it would seem that continuously is seeking its perfect density. But the wire... if it's crystalline structure is lets say Carbon... so NOW it's lattice is skewed, then the Aether and the torus movements would propagate and potentially overlap. It's a weird dichotomy of things going on and discussions of capacitance and other 'food' for thought. So tx for that, I get the analogies and its a great start for visualization. Like the old if you have a 1 km long stiff rod in space..you strike one end of it, when is it felt on the other end? is it .05 or 3x10^-8 seconds? So, I'm guessing AEther does equate to the temperature inside a box. Next: Ok you chose 12 sides in the slow moving 3d model...what if it was a bunch of interlaced toroidal cones which would match your spinning experiments as the force applied calculated from a golden rectangle function given a distance to center. So an aether 'particle' would travel outward for π, and inward for another π, Like a 3d infinity symbol, just made of the arc segments of intersecting hyperbolic cones. you seem to be modelling propagation with a pressure type confinement, because the air must continuously add energy to propagate the wave - like a perfectly efficient engine. So a convective Navier-Stokes if the AEther does indeed have heat. ok, wierd ... sometimes throwing higher maths at stuff doesn't work, but since we haven't quite figured out how to simplify complex gamma functions in 3d vector matrices imma suggest find a way to throw Phi in there. G/L. z2=MAXZ*arcos(min(1,(Z1+sin(y1+dy)/MAXZ)), dy=Phi/desired steps, y=wire, x2=MAXZ*cos(y1+dy). Sumtin like that, should move aether funky, but wave should be the same.

Fascinating that papers are in mainstream on Aether when it was shunned post 18th century! I'm new to this. Is there an aether model for ferromagnetic interaction with a magnet? In mainstream this depends on relative geometry ratios, black magic on field lines and permeability but doesn't quite cut it IMO. thanks

Hi Lori, Dilip here. I was watching your fascinating animation of the movement of water molecules in a circular motion and I was wondering if this manner of movement of water molecules could account for the speed of a wave being constant.

Brilliant, keep up the great work!!

Ether wave theory of electricity and magnetism, excellent. But some observations. Just because the ether ebb and flow is shown, it doesn't necessarily mean the wire itself is carrying one if the mystery particles between hydrogen and helium. In fact these particles are well known to science as Deuterium and Tritium, and were better explained by the Walter Russell periodic chart in his book "A New Concept Of Universe" where they're all shown ordered in a waveform and octaves of vibration rather than in a clunky table. Also, your wave diagram shows unidirectional pulsed waves of electricity, like pulsed DC. What does a steady flow of electricity look like? DC from a battery also makes magnetism. And since there are no waves in DC, the electricity itself or dielectric distortion, must be a vector of the 3 existing dimensions in which the wire exists. Ether and its distortions and waves are of a higher dimensional order. But these diagrams are excellent representation in 3 dimensions.

When you have longitudinal vibration of ether which you can only achieve electrically (birkeland currents), that's when you get formations of galaxy, stars and planets. Check video "Longitudinal Waves in Space | From OTF2015 Conference". Google "Eric Dollard - How to create Stars, Nebula and Galaxy with Tesla Coils". Also check channel "See the Pattern" on birkeland currents and more.

Very interesting. Have you thought about using a model with two spirals that wrap on the same thread?

How is this different than magnetic and electric fields? It seems like it’s just a different way to model the same phenomena but with more limitations. What different predictions would this make and how would you test it? Also, why the constant null results on aether drag? Is aether just another quantum field? Is it Lorentz invariant?

You don't really have two circulations: one clockwise and the other counterclockwise. What you have is the cross-section of a torus that is spinning in a specific direction. By your convention, the inside of the torus spins in the direction of current flow. This would imply that you would see an attraction between two currents moving the same direction along parallel wires in order for the surfaces of the torii to be moving in the same direction where they interact. Perhaps a better visualization tool would be a stripped torus, with the stripes oriented circumferentially instead of radially. The stripes would move at a constant rate around the torus. This would imply that the stripes towards the center of the torus would be more "dense" than the ones on the outer circumference -- thus mapping the field energy density. This is also the movement seen in smoke rings or air rings under water -- a spinning torus.

I have book of Maxwell's writings. He developed his equations, at least in part, by assuming magnetic force lines were tiny tubes filled with an incompressible fluid. He then used known fluid hydrostatic or dynamic equations to guide his work. These authors should review his papers to make sure they are doing something new.

There is also the "Energy Wave Theory" that also uses the ether. In that model neutrinos are used/predicted as particles of the ether Look it up on YT if you're interested! I think it's fascinating

Thanks for the video again. The concept indeed explains the Amper's law and magnetism. But I have to notice, that the surface wave is somewhat not a totally accurate analogy, since they appear ON the surface of the sea, while the concept here describes the underwater. The reason why i think it's important is that one should make and experiment in the water (aether) with some substance (electrigen) to see if the surface waves appear under the water, not on its surface.

great job on this animation.

Interesant video.

Wow this fits perfectly with reality